Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🇱🇧 Hezbollah's tunnels run too deep to bomb, and that single fact may be why this war has no clean ending Matthew Hoh kept circling one idea: the things driving this conflict can't be shaken loose. Iran won't surrender Hezbollah, Hezbollah won't disarm while Israel sits in Lebanon, and...

188,499 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Question: What about Lebanon? Is Lebanon going to be part of a deal? U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio: "Well, Lebanon we’re working on separately. With Lebanon we are engaged now. We have a 45-day ceasefire. We’ve had weekly meetings now and ongoing daily engagements between the government of Lebanon and Israel. The problem is not Lebanon and Israel. The problem is Hezbollah. Just last night Hezbollah put out a statement calling for the overthrow of the Lebanese government. And it just reminds you who you’re dealing with here - by the way, an Iranian proxy, 100% Iranian proxy. And as long as an armed Hezbollah exists, it’s going to be hard to achieve peace in Lebanon because they’re victimizing the people of Lebanon. They’re not just attacking Israel. But we’re working that track with the Lebanese government and the Israeli government. And we’ve made some good progress there - an extended ceasefire, a path forward. We’re going to continue to work on that. Hezbollah is a terrorist group.” Question: "Would it be an understanding that Israel wouldn’t strike Lebanon as part of the deal?” U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio: "Well, Israel always has a right to protect itself. Every country in the world does. So if Hezbollah is going to launch missiles at them, Israel has every right to respond to that or to prevent that from happening. That’s always been understood during the ceasefire, and it will be understood beyond that."

Open Source Intel

59,882 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Military Analyst Elijah Magnier thinks the Iran war didn't end, it just moved. Most people are still watching Tehran, waiting to see whether America or Israel strikes Iran again. Elijah thinks they're watching the wrong battlefield. His argument is that the next phase of this conflict won't be fought primarily inside Iran. It will be fought across Iraq, Lebanon, Syria, and Yemen, where the real objective isn't to attack Iran directly, but to slowly dismantle the network of allies that has protected it for decades. That made a lot of the recent headlines suddenly look very different. The anti-corruption drive in Iraq, the push to disarm Iraqi militias, the renewed mobilization of Saudi and UAE-backed forces inside Yemen, and the talk about Syria confronting Hezbollah. Elijah believes these aren't isolated events; they're all pieces of the same long-term strategy: to isolate Iran step by step until it stands alone. Then he explained why he thinks the Strait of Hormuz has become so important. Washington sees Hormuz as an economic problem, but Iran sees it as leverage. As long as Israel remains in Lebanon, Iranian assets remain frozen, and the wider agreement remains unfulfilled, Elijah says Tehran has no reason to surrender the strongest bargaining chip it still holds. That's why he believes the current ceasefire changes very little. In his view, the war never really stopped; it simply shifted into a different phase. The direct confrontation became too costly for everyone, so now the pressure moves onto Iran's partners instead. By the end of the interview, I wasn't thinking about one war anymore. I was thinking about four separate conflicts that may actually be the same war playing out on different fronts. And if Elijah is right, what we're watching is the opening chapter of a much longer regional campaign. Elijah J. Magnier 🇪🇺

Mario Nawfal

222,988 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat