Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Hi TRIGGERnometry. I find it incredibly bizarre that you're platforming a failed comedian to talk about Iran and Iranian history. This statement by Dave Smith about Iran is 100% factually incorrect. Just because he's a self-hating American with Islamist friends doesn’t mean his opinions on Iran or Iranian history...

gghamari's profile picture

Goldie Ghamari | گلسا قمری 🇮🇷

255,813 subscribers

362,603 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

In case you missed it, here's my interview with Glenn Beck on the ongoing Iranian Revolution and why Iranians are fighting to overthrow the terrorist Islamic Republic and want the Shah of Iran to transition Iran from a totalitarian Islamic Dictatorship to a democracy:
15:58

In case you missed it, here's my interview with Glenn Beck on the ongoing Iranian Revolution and why Iranians are fighting to overthrow the terrorist Islamic Republic and want the Shah of Iran to transition Iran from a totalitarian Islamic Dictatorship to a democracy:

Goldie Ghamari | گلسا قمری 🇮🇷

79,525 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

“The Shah did not massacre Iranians. If he wanted to, he would still be in power.” Sadegh Zibakalam, an academic inside Iran and a regime insider, admits that the Shah could have easily stayed in power and ruled Iran if he had used his armed forces to suppress the people. Unfortunately, the Shah cared about Iran and did not want to see mass deaths, while this Islamic Republic regime will kill every single Iranian to stay in power, as they showed in the January protests where over 45,000 Iranians died. He also dispelled lies about Iran being a puppet state of the United States and said the Shah distrusted Americans and was independent.
1:16

“The Shah did not massacre Iranians. If he wanted to, he would still be in power.” Sadegh Zibakalam, an academic inside Iran and a regime insider, admits that the Shah could have easily stayed in power and ruled Iran if he had used his armed forces to suppress the people. Unfortunately, the Shah cared about Iran and did not want to see mass deaths, while this Islamic Republic regime will kill every single Iranian to stay in power, as they showed in the January protests where over 45,000 Iranians died. He also dispelled lies about Iran being a puppet state of the United States and said the Shah distrusted Americans and was independent.

The Iran Watcher 🇮🇷

17,467 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

The terrorist Islamic Republic occupying Iran doesn’t need a reason to torture and murder Iranians. Listen to the harrowing story of an Iranian who was arrested just because the IRGC didn't like his haircut. This is the brutal reality Iranians face on a daily basis in Iran.
6:59

The terrorist Islamic Republic occupying Iran doesn’t need a reason to torture and murder Iranians. Listen to the harrowing story of an Iranian who was arrested just because the IRGC didn't like his haircut. This is the brutal reality Iranians face on a daily basis in Iran.

Goldie Ghamari | گلسا قمری

12,975 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Iranian woman shuts down those who are calling for an end to the Iran War: "If you are not Iranian, STFU. You don't even know where exactly Iran is on the map. You don't know the difference between Iranians and Arabs. You don't know Iran is one of the oldest civilisations with 5,000 years of history while the Islamic Republic has been in power for only 47 years and most Iranians are not even Muslim.... Anyone who is upset about what's happening in Iran isn't Iranian. We Iranians are grateful to the US and Israel for k!ll!ng that dictator and helping us take our country back from that bstrd regime...."
1:54

Iranian woman shuts down those who are calling for an end to the Iran War: "If you are not Iranian, STFU. You don't even know where exactly Iran is on the map. You don't know the difference between Iranians and Arabs. You don't know Iran is one of the oldest civilisations with 5,000 years of history while the Islamic Republic has been in power for only 47 years and most Iranians are not even Muslim.... Anyone who is upset about what's happening in Iran isn't Iranian. We Iranians are grateful to the US and Israel for k!ll!ng that dictator and helping us take our country back from that bstrd regime...."

Rakesh Krishnan Simha

338,899 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Religious expert on Saudi TV: 🔸 Iran is the center of civilization. And all the scientists, rhymers, poets, and hadiths that appeared in Islam were Iranians. Ibn Khaldun said: It is not possible to find a scholar in the Islamic world who is not Iranian, and if you find a non-Iranian scholar, his teacher is Iranian
1:20

Religious expert on Saudi TV: 🔸 Iran is the center of civilization. And all the scientists, rhymers, poets, and hadiths that appeared in Islam were Iranians. Ibn Khaldun said: It is not possible to find a scholar in the Islamic world who is not Iranian, and if you find a non-Iranian scholar, his teacher is Iranian

Reza Zainab

67,857 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

B. General (retired) Iteshek Segev, Israel's military attaché in Iran, was in Iran during the 1979 Islamic Coup D'état. Pay attention to what he says about President Jimmy Carter. This is why Iranians despise Carter. The Islamic Republic in Iran is not a legitimate government. 1979 was not a revolution, it was a Coup D'état. It was Carter's pet project that failed massively. This is why Iranians want their rightful Shah, HRH King Reza Pahlavi, to return to Iran. This is why the radical Islamists are trying so hard to keep us silent by accusing us of Islamophobia for speaking out against the Islamofascist dictatorship occupying Iran. Watch and learn: #KingRezaPahlavi
2:47

B. General (retired) Iteshek Segev, Israel's military attaché in Iran, was in Iran during the 1979 Islamic Coup D'état. Pay attention to what he says about President Jimmy Carter. This is why Iranians despise Carter. The Islamic Republic in Iran is not a legitimate government. 1979 was not a revolution, it was a Coup D'état. It was Carter's pet project that failed massively. This is why Iranians want their rightful Shah, HRH King Reza Pahlavi, to return to Iran. This is why the radical Islamists are trying so hard to keep us silent by accusing us of Islamophobia for speaking out against the Islamofascist dictatorship occupying Iran. Watch and learn: #KingRezaPahlavi

Goldie Ghamari | گلسا قمری 🇮🇷

124,687 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Religious expert on Saudi television: "Iran is the center of civilization. All scholars, poets, rhymesters, and hadith narrators that appeared in Islam were Iranians. Ibn Khaldun said: it is impossible to find a scholar in the Islamic world who was not Iranian. And if a non-Iranian scholar is encountered, his teacher was in any case Iranian."
1:20

Religious expert on Saudi television: "Iran is the center of civilization. All scholars, poets, rhymesters, and hadith narrators that appeared in Islam were Iranians. Ibn Khaldun said: it is impossible to find a scholar in the Islamic world who was not Iranian. And if a non-Iranian scholar is encountered, his teacher was in any case Iranian."

Sprinter Press News

19,510 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Charlie Kirk spoke about how better days could come for Iran “What do you actually know about Iran? Persia was a great power, and then Iran took a turn for the worst. Interestingly enough, there was the Shah of Iran, and then the Shah was displaced by Mossadegh. Mossadegh was democratically elected. Now, to be very fair, the United States and Britain got rid of Mossadegh. And then we reinstalled the Shah, bad decision. Which then led to the Iranian revolution where radical Islam took over Iran. Look at some of these pictures of what Iran used to be. (Shown in video) It was wealthy, it was proud, it was strong. The Persians are wonderful people. Some of my closest friends are Persians, and I love the Persian people, and we should have a heart for the Persian people to try and have a better future. Regime change is very difficult to talk about. I actually don't like talking about regime change. It's very complicated. But understand that there can be brighter days ahead for the Iranian people and just look at some of these pictures of how beautiful Iran used to be, how beautiful Tehran used to be. And it's, it's very easy to kind of sit in your Western armchair and be like, oh, Israel's terrible. Well, you are able to enjoy free speech rights and a lot of rights here in the West that Iran used to have. And if you are serious about actually protecting human rights, you should wanna make Iran Western again.”
1:17

Charlie Kirk spoke about how better days could come for Iran “What do you actually know about Iran? Persia was a great power, and then Iran took a turn for the worst. Interestingly enough, there was the Shah of Iran, and then the Shah was displaced by Mossadegh. Mossadegh was democratically elected. Now, to be very fair, the United States and Britain got rid of Mossadegh. And then we reinstalled the Shah, bad decision. Which then led to the Iranian revolution where radical Islam took over Iran. Look at some of these pictures of what Iran used to be. (Shown in video) It was wealthy, it was proud, it was strong. The Persians are wonderful people. Some of my closest friends are Persians, and I love the Persian people, and we should have a heart for the Persian people to try and have a better future. Regime change is very difficult to talk about. I actually don't like talking about regime change. It's very complicated. But understand that there can be brighter days ahead for the Iranian people and just look at some of these pictures of how beautiful Iran used to be, how beautiful Tehran used to be. And it's, it's very easy to kind of sit in your Western armchair and be like, oh, Israel's terrible. Well, you are able to enjoy free speech rights and a lot of rights here in the West that Iran used to have. And if you are serious about actually protecting human rights, you should wanna make Iran Western again.”

Wall Street Apes

56,122 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Johnny Harris, Johnny Harris I'm getting absolutely sick and tired of your factually incorrect, recycled talking points that you repeat over and over to spread false narratives about Iran and the Shah. I've been watching your videos for many years. Every time, I hope that because you clearly spend a lot of time researching, you'll eventually realize where you've been wrong and correct those mistakes in future videos. Instead, the same false narratives keep getting repeated. If you didn't have such a large platform, I wouldn't even care. Your video starts off reasonably well when discussing Reza Shah, but once you move on to Mohammad Reza Shah, your historical accuracy completely falls apart. To start, you claim: "The British are taking Iran's oil, and the Shah is okay with it, because remember, the British installed the Shah." I don't know if you understand how a hereditary monarchy works, but the crown passes from father to son. When Britain and the Soviet Union invaded Iran in 1941, Reza Shah's newly built military had no realistic chance of resisting two global superpowers. He was forced to abdicate and was sent into exile. His son then succeeded him, exactly as he would have under the normal line of succession. There were discussions between Britain and the Soviets about restoring a Qajar prince instead. They ultimately abandoned that idea because the Qajars had little support in Iran, whereas the Pahlavis did. If Britain had bypassed the line of succession and placed a Qajar or another political figure on the throne, that would have been installing a ruler. That is not what happened. Then you claim that "the Iranian people didn't like the Shah, they liked Mohammad Mossadegh." Who forced Soviet troops out of Iran after World War II? The Shah. Who reasserted Iranian control over the Soviet-backed separatist governments in Azerbaijan and Mahabad? The Shah. Following those events, Mohammad Reza Shah enjoyed enormous popularity. Now let's talk about Mossadegh. Who was most enthusiastic about Mossadegh's rise? The Soviet-backed Tudeh Party. The Tudeh Party, financially and politically aligned with Moscow, strongly supported him. Mossadegh certainly gained popularity among parts of the Iranian public because of his campaign to nationalize Iran's oil. What many people didn't realize was that the original D'Arcy concession—the agreement that handed Britain a 60-year oil concession—was signed under the Qajar dynasty, the dynasty to which Mossadegh himself belonged. So yes, it was the Qajar state that granted Britain that concession. Reza Shah later renegotiated it into a more favorable agreement for Iran. Yet somehow people continue repeating the myth that it was the Pahlavis who "gave away Iran's oil." Of course the Shah did not want Britain controlling Iran's oil indefinitely. What constrained him was reality. Iran had just emerged from World War II. It lacked the military strength to openly confront Britain, and unlike Mossadegh, the Shah had no interest in relying on Soviet support to challenge British influence. He also understood something Mossadegh failed to appreciate until it was too late. Nationalizing oil is easy on paper. Extracting it, transporting it, insuring it, refining it, finding buyers, and exporting it are entirely different matters. Iran lacked that infrastructure. When Mossadegh nationalized the oil industry before Iran was capable of operating it independently, Britain organized an international boycott. Oil exports collapsed, government revenues dried up, and the country was pushed into a severe financial crisis because oil was Iran's primary source of national income. The Shah's strategy was different. He wanted to continue receiving oil revenues, use that income to industrialize and modernize Iran, build the expertise and infrastructure necessary for an independent oil industry, and nationalize from a position of strength rather than symbolism. You are free to disagree with that strategy. You are not free to rewrite history. If you want to actually learn about this part of Iranian history, read this article.
3:05

Johnny Harris, Johnny Harris I'm getting absolutely sick and tired of your factually incorrect, recycled talking points that you repeat over and over to spread false narratives about Iran and the Shah. I've been watching your videos for many years. Every time, I hope that because you clearly spend a lot of time researching, you'll eventually realize where you've been wrong and correct those mistakes in future videos. Instead, the same false narratives keep getting repeated. If you didn't have such a large platform, I wouldn't even care. Your video starts off reasonably well when discussing Reza Shah, but once you move on to Mohammad Reza Shah, your historical accuracy completely falls apart. To start, you claim: "The British are taking Iran's oil, and the Shah is okay with it, because remember, the British installed the Shah." I don't know if you understand how a hereditary monarchy works, but the crown passes from father to son. When Britain and the Soviet Union invaded Iran in 1941, Reza Shah's newly built military had no realistic chance of resisting two global superpowers. He was forced to abdicate and was sent into exile. His son then succeeded him, exactly as he would have under the normal line of succession. There were discussions between Britain and the Soviets about restoring a Qajar prince instead. They ultimately abandoned that idea because the Qajars had little support in Iran, whereas the Pahlavis did. If Britain had bypassed the line of succession and placed a Qajar or another political figure on the throne, that would have been installing a ruler. That is not what happened. Then you claim that "the Iranian people didn't like the Shah, they liked Mohammad Mossadegh." Who forced Soviet troops out of Iran after World War II? The Shah. Who reasserted Iranian control over the Soviet-backed separatist governments in Azerbaijan and Mahabad? The Shah. Following those events, Mohammad Reza Shah enjoyed enormous popularity. Now let's talk about Mossadegh. Who was most enthusiastic about Mossadegh's rise? The Soviet-backed Tudeh Party. The Tudeh Party, financially and politically aligned with Moscow, strongly supported him. Mossadegh certainly gained popularity among parts of the Iranian public because of his campaign to nationalize Iran's oil. What many people didn't realize was that the original D'Arcy concession—the agreement that handed Britain a 60-year oil concession—was signed under the Qajar dynasty, the dynasty to which Mossadegh himself belonged. So yes, it was the Qajar state that granted Britain that concession. Reza Shah later renegotiated it into a more favorable agreement for Iran. Yet somehow people continue repeating the myth that it was the Pahlavis who "gave away Iran's oil." Of course the Shah did not want Britain controlling Iran's oil indefinitely. What constrained him was reality. Iran had just emerged from World War II. It lacked the military strength to openly confront Britain, and unlike Mossadegh, the Shah had no interest in relying on Soviet support to challenge British influence. He also understood something Mossadegh failed to appreciate until it was too late. Nationalizing oil is easy on paper. Extracting it, transporting it, insuring it, refining it, finding buyers, and exporting it are entirely different matters. Iran lacked that infrastructure. When Mossadegh nationalized the oil industry before Iran was capable of operating it independently, Britain organized an international boycott. Oil exports collapsed, government revenues dried up, and the country was pushed into a severe financial crisis because oil was Iran's primary source of national income. The Shah's strategy was different. He wanted to continue receiving oil revenues, use that income to industrialize and modernize Iran, build the expertise and infrastructure necessary for an independent oil industry, and nationalize from a position of strength rather than symbolism. You are free to disagree with that strategy. You are not free to rewrite history. If you want to actually learn about this part of Iranian history, read this article.

Arsalan Naamdar

15,486 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen

Exposing the hypocrisy, racism and colonialist mindset of the woke left. The audacity for a German politician to say that Iranians are not ready for democracy. But guess what? Iran was a democracy 12 years before Germany. And during WWII thousands of Jews escaped Europe and Nazi Germany and sought refuge in IRAN. Don't judge Iran or Iranians based on the actions of a foreign 7th century Islamic occupation. This is why we Iranians are fighting to free ourselves from this backwards, foreign ideology. Here's a brief lesson on the history of democracy in Iran.
16:14

Exposing the hypocrisy, racism and colonialist mindset of the woke left. The audacity for a German politician to say that Iranians are not ready for democracy. But guess what? Iran was a democracy 12 years before Germany. And during WWII thousands of Jews escaped Europe and Nazi Germany and sought refuge in IRAN. Don't judge Iran or Iranians based on the actions of a foreign 7th century Islamic occupation. This is why we Iranians are fighting to free ourselves from this backwards, foreign ideology. Here's a brief lesson on the history of democracy in Iran.

Goldie Ghamari | گلسا قمری 🇮🇷

101,102 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Iranian here. I have a message from Iranians in Iran to all the "anti-war" people, pundits and journalists who are so blinded by their hatred for Israel and the United States that they are siding with the evil Islamic Clerics: You're on the wrong side of history. Shame on you.
6:52

Iranian here. I have a message from Iranians in Iran to all the "anti-war" people, pundits and journalists who are so blinded by their hatred for Israel and the United States that they are siding with the evil Islamic Clerics: You're on the wrong side of history. Shame on you.

Goldie Ghamari | گلسا قمری 🇮🇷

341,173 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Here is Yasmin Vossoughian Reports talking to someone inside Iran. This is journalism, not what CNN is doing by sending Frederik Pleitgen to Iran as journalist who is controlled by the regime and only reports regime propaganda narratives. Also, this is for the “Pahlavi has no support in Iran” & “no one knows who Pahlavi is in Iran” crowd. And for those who have been attacking the diaspora/Iranians inside Iran, calling them “vatan foroush” aka “one who sells out their own country” People need to stop pretending they speak for Iranians inside Iran while ignoring what many inside Iran are actually saying. Even in this clip, our brother inside Iran clearly says people support Reza Pahlavi and need someone like him. You do not have to “want war” to understand why many Iranians believe the regime cannot be defeated by bare hands against Basij, and the IRGC. No sane Iranian wants to see their homeland bombed, but the blame for where we are belongs first and foremost to the Islamic Republic, not to Iranians in the diaspora and not to Iranians inside Iran who believe outside help is necessary. We heard the same arguments during the June 2025 war, and I told y’all, if the regime survives more Iranians will be killed than you can imagine. Less than a year later, 32k+ Iranians were killed in the regime’s own crackdown as I called it. Compare that to the numbers during these two wars, which include high rate of IRGC & regime officials. So I genuinely want to understand the logic of attacking the very people who are standing with Iranians inside Iran. I personally have always echoed the voices of people inside Iran and what they tell me. If your position is always “I hate the regime, but…” and that “but” always ends with protecting the conditions that keep it alive, then what exactly are you offering the Iranian people besides more death and more time under this regime? So before you jump to attack, please just listen to what people are saying in Iran. I’m not attacking anyone, I’m just trying to have a fair dialogue, to get an understanding on where my misunderstanding might be. Long Live Iran 🇮🇷
3:59

Here is Yasmin Vossoughian Reports talking to someone inside Iran. This is journalism, not what CNN is doing by sending Frederik Pleitgen to Iran as journalist who is controlled by the regime and only reports regime propaganda narratives. Also, this is for the “Pahlavi has no support in Iran” & “no one knows who Pahlavi is in Iran” crowd. And for those who have been attacking the diaspora/Iranians inside Iran, calling them “vatan foroush” aka “one who sells out their own country” People need to stop pretending they speak for Iranians inside Iran while ignoring what many inside Iran are actually saying. Even in this clip, our brother inside Iran clearly says people support Reza Pahlavi and need someone like him. You do not have to “want war” to understand why many Iranians believe the regime cannot be defeated by bare hands against Basij, and the IRGC. No sane Iranian wants to see their homeland bombed, but the blame for where we are belongs first and foremost to the Islamic Republic, not to Iranians in the diaspora and not to Iranians inside Iran who believe outside help is necessary. We heard the same arguments during the June 2025 war, and I told y’all, if the regime survives more Iranians will be killed than you can imagine. Less than a year later, 32k+ Iranians were killed in the regime’s own crackdown as I called it. Compare that to the numbers during these two wars, which include high rate of IRGC & regime officials. So I genuinely want to understand the logic of attacking the very people who are standing with Iranians inside Iran. I personally have always echoed the voices of people inside Iran and what they tell me. If your position is always “I hate the regime, but…” and that “but” always ends with protecting the conditions that keep it alive, then what exactly are you offering the Iranian people besides more death and more time under this regime? So before you jump to attack, please just listen to what people are saying in Iran. I’m not attacking anyone, I’m just trying to have a fair dialogue, to get an understanding on where my misunderstanding might be. Long Live Iran 🇮🇷

🇺🇸🇮🇷پیام-Payam

60,372 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

With Persian subtitles! 💚🤍❤️ “Iran is occupied by the Islamic regime, and the Iranian people are being held hostage by the ayatollahs!” 📽 “The regime of #Iran is, in essence, the Shiite version of Islamic State. It is a murderous jihadist sharia regime: jihadist towards us, a sharia regime towards the Iranian people. Iran is occupied. It is occupied by the Islamic regime, and the Iranian people are being held hostage by the ayatollahs. The ayatollah regime should never have existed — thanks in part to the West — and should long ago have been banished to the dustbin of history. The Belgian 🇧🇪 government is tough on Israel and soft on Iran. It is therefore tough on the Allies and soft on Islamo-Nazism.” 👇🏻
0:44

With Persian subtitles! 💚🤍❤️ “Iran is occupied by the Islamic regime, and the Iranian people are being held hostage by the ayatollahs!” 📽 “The regime of #Iran is, in essence, the Shiite version of Islamic State. It is a murderous jihadist sharia regime: jihadist towards us, a sharia regime towards the Iranian people. Iran is occupied. It is occupied by the Islamic regime, and the Iranian people are being held hostage by the ayatollahs. The ayatollah regime should never have existed — thanks in part to the West — and should long ago have been banished to the dustbin of history. The Belgian 🇧🇪 government is tough on Israel and soft on Iran. It is therefore tough on the Allies and soft on Islamo-Nazism.” 👇🏻

Sam van Rooy MP

20,722 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

STOP SPEAKING OVER IRANIANS ‼️‼️‼️ This Iranian man has a message for all of those who are not happy for the people of Iran. “You were silent when the regime in Iran was slaughtering Iranians in the streets. Now you're outraged? Iranians risk prison, torture, and death for the freedoms you exercise casually online. You don't get to ignore their suffering for years and then speak over them the moment it fits your politics. Listen to Iranians... Or step aside.”
1:16

STOP SPEAKING OVER IRANIANS ‼️‼️‼️ This Iranian man has a message for all of those who are not happy for the people of Iran. “You were silent when the regime in Iran was slaughtering Iranians in the streets. Now you're outraged? Iranians risk prison, torture, and death for the freedoms you exercise casually online. You don't get to ignore their suffering for years and then speak over them the moment it fits your politics. Listen to Iranians... Or step aside.”

𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕷𝖎𝖔𝖓𝖊𝖘𝖘™️

26,981 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Her Majesty Farah Pahlavi, Empress of Iran ( FARAH PAHLAVI 🇮🇷 فرح پهلوی ) on #JimmyCarter : "If Mr. Carter truly was pursuing human rights for Iranians, what happened that as soon as the Shah left Iran, it was as if Iranians no longer had any human rights? Not even once we hear him speak about Iranian human rights. And all those foreigners who used to write harsh articles about the political rights of Iranians, university professors, and actors...where are they today? After all the tragedies that have befallen the Iranian nation? All of this raises a big question mark, which isn't really that much of a question mark. All these events have benefited certain foreign countries. If Iran and the Shah were still there, neither would the Soviet Union have dared to invade Afghanistan, nor would the Iran-Iraq War have happened, nor the Gulf War between Iraq and Kuwait. Who benefited from these wars? Neither Iraq, nor Kuwait, nor Iran, nor Afghanistan benefited."
2:28

Her Majesty Farah Pahlavi, Empress of Iran ( FARAH PAHLAVI 🇮🇷 فرح پهلوی ) on #JimmyCarter : "If Mr. Carter truly was pursuing human rights for Iranians, what happened that as soon as the Shah left Iran, it was as if Iranians no longer had any human rights? Not even once we hear him speak about Iranian human rights. And all those foreigners who used to write harsh articles about the political rights of Iranians, university professors, and actors...where are they today? After all the tragedies that have befallen the Iranian nation? All of this raises a big question mark, which isn't really that much of a question mark. All these events have benefited certain foreign countries. If Iran and the Shah were still there, neither would the Soviet Union have dared to invade Afghanistan, nor would the Iran-Iraq War have happened, nor the Gulf War between Iraq and Kuwait. Who benefited from these wars? Neither Iraq, nor Kuwait, nor Iran, nor Afghanistan benefited."

Ari 🇮🇷

125,249 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Abbas Milani “Seeing the war in Iran, I feel a profound sense of sadness for the deaths of innocent Iranians. But I hold the Iranian regime responsible for it, because I think they have put the country on a warpath for 47 years. They have pursued policies that make conflict almost inevitable, and they seem willing to pay the price for those policies with the lives of ordinary Iranians.” — Abbas Milani Hearing this is incredibly painful. Abbas Milani is one of the most respected historians and scholars of modern Iran. He directs the Iranian Studies program at Stanford and has written some of the most important books on Iran’s modern political history, including The Shah, Eminent Persians, The Myth of the Great Satan, and The Persian Sphinx. What makes this moment even harder to hear is that Milani himself once supported the 1979 revolution as a young intellectual, believing it might bring justice and reform to Iran. Like many in his generation, he later watched those hopes collapse into authoritarian rule. Iranians are not naïve. They understand the risks and consequences of what they are asking for. We need the war to end and turn the page to transitional leadership. Iran is occupied by the Islamic Republic. Whether Democrats Republicans or the Western left want to acknowledge that or not, these are the facts.
1:35

Abbas Milani “Seeing the war in Iran, I feel a profound sense of sadness for the deaths of innocent Iranians. But I hold the Iranian regime responsible for it, because I think they have put the country on a warpath for 47 years. They have pursued policies that make conflict almost inevitable, and they seem willing to pay the price for those policies with the lives of ordinary Iranians.” — Abbas Milani Hearing this is incredibly painful. Abbas Milani is one of the most respected historians and scholars of modern Iran. He directs the Iranian Studies program at Stanford and has written some of the most important books on Iran’s modern political history, including The Shah, Eminent Persians, The Myth of the Great Satan, and The Persian Sphinx. What makes this moment even harder to hear is that Milani himself once supported the 1979 revolution as a young intellectual, believing it might bring justice and reform to Iran. Like many in his generation, he later watched those hopes collapse into authoritarian rule. Iranians are not naïve. They understand the risks and consequences of what they are asking for. We need the war to end and turn the page to transitional leadership. Iran is occupied by the Islamic Republic. Whether Democrats Republicans or the Western left want to acknowledge that or not, these are the facts.

Moj

40,109 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

NEW: 🇺🇸🇬🇧🇮🇷 The US was supposed to stop Iran with a blockade, but the result was the opposite Alastair Crooke, former British MI6 officer: “Pressure on Iran has no effect; the Iranians are clever and have strengthened alternative routes and their ability to continue. The narrative (of blockading Iran) is not true and is complete nonsense. It is other countries that are trapped, and American ships are afraid to approach because they will be guided to the depths of the sea by Iranian missiles.”
2:57

NEW: 🇺🇸🇬🇧🇮🇷 The US was supposed to stop Iran with a blockade, but the result was the opposite Alastair Crooke, former British MI6 officer: “Pressure on Iran has no effect; the Iranians are clever and have strengthened alternative routes and their ability to continue. The narrative (of blockading Iran) is not true and is complete nonsense. It is other countries that are trapped, and American ships are afraid to approach because they will be guided to the depths of the sea by Iranian missiles.”

Megatron

107,225 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Two disgraced former CNN "journalists" Jim Acosta and Alex Marquardt get together to decry the strikes on Iran. Acosta claims Secretary Hegseth is lying about Iran killing thousands of Americans over the last few decades: "And and oh, by the way, Hegseth was saying this morning that there were thousands of Americans who were killed by the Iranians over the years. I don't understand where he's pulling that from."
1:32

Two disgraced former CNN "journalists" Jim Acosta and Alex Marquardt get together to decry the strikes on Iran. Acosta claims Secretary Hegseth is lying about Iran killing thousands of Americans over the last few decades: "And and oh, by the way, Hegseth was saying this morning that there were thousands of Americans who were killed by the Iranians over the years. I don't understand where he's pulling that from."

Nicholas Fondacaro

17,001 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

JUST IN: LINDSEY GRAHAM SAYS TRUMP IS NEGOTIATING WITH IRAN HIMSELF AND LOST IT: “Trump is directly talking to the Iranians. He is negotiating himself. He was on the phone with the Iranians a couple of days ago, and it got rather sporty to the point that Trump loudly told Iran what would happen if they keep playing games. He actually lost his voice. I’d hate to be the Iranian on the receiving end of that”
0:36

JUST IN: LINDSEY GRAHAM SAYS TRUMP IS NEGOTIATING WITH IRAN HIMSELF AND LOST IT: “Trump is directly talking to the Iranians. He is negotiating himself. He was on the phone with the Iranians a couple of days ago, and it got rather sporty to the point that Trump loudly told Iran what would happen if they keep playing games. He actually lost his voice. I’d hate to be the Iranian on the receiving end of that”

Sulaiman Ahmed

795,307 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten