Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

High intensity cardio protocol for improving VO2 max: "The Sugar Kane involves selecting some form of exercise that you can do at high intensity safely — for some of you it will be a stationary bike, for others running, for others rowing." Round 1: Go the maximum distance you... show more

Huberman Lab Clips

26,952 subscribers

36,928 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Gesundheit & Wellness Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

16 Kommentare

Profilbild von liminally chris ⬡

liminally chris ⬡vor 5 Monaten

"going the maximum distance you can in two minutes" is the same as "going that same distance as fast as you can" the maximum distance in two minutes means the maximum (distance / time) which is speed

Profilbild von Ron Manuel🇨🇦🇺🇸

Ron Manuel🇨🇦🇺🇸vor 5 Monaten

Rest between rounds total rest? Or active rest at 70% like i understand the Norwegian 4x4 to be?

Profilbild von T. H. Reynolds

T. H. Reynoldsvor 5 Monaten

And let’s not forget about establishing a solid aerobic base with months of LSD training

Profilbild von Cloude

Cloudevor 5 Monaten

@DrAndyGalpin errmmm…??

Profilbild von Agent ORANGE

Agent ORANGEvor 5 Monaten

I'm practicing what you taught me.

Profilbild von Waistless

Waistlessvor 5 Monaten

Sounds brutal but effective, will test on the bike

Profilbild von Thiccolas Cage (Josh Allen enjoyer)

Thiccolas Cage (Josh Allen enjoyer)vor 5 Monaten

what exactly is the difference between 1 & 2

Profilbild von Rob de Vries

Rob de Vriesvor 5 Monaten

@DrAndyGalpin How long should I rest between the rounds?

Profilbild von Stop the FOMO

Stop the FOMOvor 5 Monaten

Pacing is critical and requires some practice because you have to start out at 80% and hit 100 near the end but you cannot start at 100% and last 2 minutes

Profilbild von Greenlandshark

Greenlandsharkvor 5 Monaten

Norwegian, 4 x 4’s are the bomb

Profilbild von Agent ORANGE

Agent ORANGEvor 5 Monaten

We've got a poser vs. Imposter syndrome A.I. type of problem going on in America 🇺🇸 🙄 who's real and who's fake.

Profilbild von Chill with Mei 🌥️

Chill with Mei 🌥️vor 5 Monaten

this sugar kane looks brutal, im trying it on bike

Profilbild von Brilliant_minds

Brilliant_mindsvor 5 Monaten

@DrAndyGalpin Round 4...!! resting for 15 minutes... ready for round 5?

Profilbild von BIoHacksForYourHealth

BIoHacksForYourHealthvor 5 Monaten

Always the best most informative information from him 👌👌

Profilbild von Agent ORANGE

Agent ORANGEvor 5 Monaten

Sometimes you've gotta feel it for yourself to truly know it. 💯

Profilbild von Dale Fink, Jr. NP, EP

Dale Fink, Jr. NP, EPvor 5 Monaten

What

Ähnliche Videos

VO2 max is one of the strongest predictors of how long you’ll live And you can measure yours in just 12 minutes This is how: 1) Find a flat track or road 2) Run as fast as you can for 12 minutes 3) Measure the distance VO2 max = (35.97 x distance in miles) - 11.29 or VO2 max = (22.351 x distance in kilometers) - 11.288

VO2 max is one of the strongest predictors of how long you’ll live And you can measure yours in just 12 minutes This is how: 1) Find a flat track or road 2) Run as fast as you can for 12 minutes 3) Measure the distance VO2 max = (35.97 x distance in miles) - 11.29 or VO2 max = (22.351 x distance in kilometers) - 11.288

FoundMyFitness Clips

207,233 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

"Every time you dedicate a round, does that dilute some of the other rounds that we've got as well?" "Some of the games that are owned by clubs, rather than the AFL, are done really well ... I think Spud's Game can be [like King's Birthday] for St Kilda." Nick Riewoldt on the push for a Mental Health Round 👉

"Every time you dedicate a round, does that dilute some of the other rounds that we've got as well?" "Some of the games that are owned by clubs, rather than the AFL, are done really well ... I think Spud's Game can be [like King's Birthday] for St Kilda." Nick Riewoldt on the push for a Mental Health Round 👉

7AFL

76,549 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

When you can get this guy for a third round pick you give up the third round pick

When you can get this guy for a third round pick you give up the third round pick

evin

815,099 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Nearly 40% of people who follow standard physical activity guidelines (~150 minutes/week) still fail to improve their VO2 max Why? Because moderate-intensity exercise alone often isn’t enough to drive meaningful cardiovascular gains To break through this plateau, incorporating high-intensity interval training (HIIT) is key One of the most effective, research-backed methods is the Norwegian 4x4 protocol—a proven approach that boosts VO2 max through structured high-intensity intervals Here's how it works: • 4 minutes at the maximum intensity you can sustain (for a given pace, usually around 85-95% HRmax) • 3 minutes at a lower intensity (~70% HRmax) • Repeat 4x

Nearly 40% of people who follow standard physical activity guidelines (~150 minutes/week) still fail to improve their VO2 max Why? Because moderate-intensity exercise alone often isn’t enough to drive meaningful cardiovascular gains To break through this plateau, incorporating high-intensity interval training (HIIT) is key One of the most effective, research-backed methods is the Norwegian 4x4 protocol—a proven approach that boosts VO2 max through structured high-intensity intervals Here's how it works: • 4 minutes at the maximum intensity you can sustain (for a given pace, usually around 85-95% HRmax) • 3 minutes at a lower intensity (~70% HRmax) • Repeat 4x

FoundMyFitness Clips

252,179 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Damnnn, another round of high voltage action ⚡️ And we got the Top 10 Plays for you all 🛫 Top Plays of the Round I Etihad Airways

Damnnn, another round of high voltage action ⚡️ And we got the Top 10 Plays for you all 🛫 Top Plays of the Round I Etihad Airways

EuroLeague

25,643 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Just how I like them. Quick and efficient communicators , and back for round two of this throat in the same day. Short video of round two with him.

Sensitive content

Just how I like them. Quick and efficient communicators , and back for round two of this throat in the same day. Short video of round two with him.

THEE throat goat

21,366 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

You can identify as whatever you want in the year 2025 and shane cottle says Justin Grant 🇺🇸 identifies as “a little bitch”. What do you think Justin? Do you think you can go a full round?

You can identify as whatever you want in the year 2025 and shane cottle says Justin Grant 🇺🇸 identifies as “a little bitch”. What do you think Justin? Do you think you can go a full round?

Johnny Wingo

27,731 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚀 Guilherme Siqueira's wonder strike for Sheffield Wednesday vs Bolton Wanderers has been voted as Round One's Goal of the Round! 👏 #EFL | #CarabaoCup

🚀 Guilherme Siqueira's wonder strike for Sheffield Wednesday vs Bolton Wanderers has been voted as Round One's Goal of the Round! 👏 #EFL | #CarabaoCup

Carabao Cup

67,828 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Q: Should startups always raise as much money as possible? In the clip below, Marc Andreessen shares a framework that Benchmark co-founder Andy Rachleff taught him called "The Onion Theory of Risk". You can think of a day 1 startup as having every conceivable kind of risk: founding team risk, product risk, technical risk, market acceptance risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk, viral growth risk, etc. A startup is basically just a long list of risks, and as Marc explains: "The way I think about running a startup is the way I think about raising money. It's a process of peeling away layers of risk as you go." You raise seed money to peel away the first two or three risks (e.g. founding team risk, product risk, initial launch risk). You raise the Series A round to peel away the next layer of risks (e.g. recruiting risk, customer risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk) And so on. Basically, you're peeling away risk as you're achieving milestones. And as you achieve milestones, you're both: making progress on your business and justifying raising more capital. So in terms of fundraising, you should be calibrating the amount of money you're raising to the risks you need to pull out of your business for you to raise your next round. For example, if you're raising your Series A round, the best way to do that is to say to investors: "I raised a seed round then achieved ____ milestones and eliminated ____ risks. Now I'm going to raise $X for the Series A to achieve ____ milestones and eliminate ____ risks. This will get the company to ____ state for the Series B round. " This seems fairly obvious, but as Marc points out, it's a much more systematic way of going about things versus just raising as much money as possible, renting fancy offices, and hiring as many people as you can to grow as fast as you can. The more money you raise, the more you dilute your ownership stake in your business so it pays to be thoughtful. Raise the capital you will need to achieve the milestones and eliminate the risks required for your next financing round. It also probably makes sense to give yourself some margin as safety because things never go exactly as planned in startup land. Follow Startup Archive for more tactical startup advice!

Q: Should startups always raise as much money as possible? In the clip below, Marc Andreessen shares a framework that Benchmark co-founder Andy Rachleff taught him called "The Onion Theory of Risk". You can think of a day 1 startup as having every conceivable kind of risk: founding team risk, product risk, technical risk, market acceptance risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk, viral growth risk, etc. A startup is basically just a long list of risks, and as Marc explains: "The way I think about running a startup is the way I think about raising money. It's a process of peeling away layers of risk as you go." You raise seed money to peel away the first two or three risks (e.g. founding team risk, product risk, initial launch risk). You raise the Series A round to peel away the next layer of risks (e.g. recruiting risk, customer risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk) And so on. Basically, you're peeling away risk as you're achieving milestones. And as you achieve milestones, you're both: making progress on your business and justifying raising more capital. So in terms of fundraising, you should be calibrating the amount of money you're raising to the risks you need to pull out of your business for you to raise your next round. For example, if you're raising your Series A round, the best way to do that is to say to investors: "I raised a seed round then achieved milestones and eliminated risks. Now I'm going to raise $X for the Series A to achieve milestones and eliminate risks. This will get the company to state for the Series B round. " This seems fairly obvious, but as Marc points out, it's a much more systematic way of going about things versus just raising as much money as possible, renting fancy offices, and hiring as many people as you can to grow as fast as you can. The more money you raise, the more you dilute your ownership stake in your business so it pays to be thoughtful. Raise the capital you will need to achieve the milestones and eliminate the risks required for your next financing round. It also probably makes sense to give yourself some margin as safety because things never go exactly as planned in startup land. Follow Startup Archive for more tactical startup advice!

Startup Archive

178,597 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

⚽️ The winner of the Goal of the Round vote for Round Two is Blackburn Rovers' Dapo Afolayan! 💥 #EFL | #CarabaoCup

⚽️ The winner of the Goal of the Round vote for Round Two is Blackburn Rovers' Dapo Afolayan! 💥 #EFL | #CarabaoCup

Carabao Cup

108,234 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

For the final time, we go into the Edwards corner before a HUGE Round 5. Can 🏆 @Leon_EdwardsMMA do it again? #UFC286

For the final time, we go into the Edwards corner before a HUGE Round 5. Can 🏆 @Leon_EdwardsMMA do it again? #UFC286

UFC Europe

359,836 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

Back again for another Hoyofair :DD Thank you to Kieru for bringing me back as always and thank you to the entire audio team for making everything go smooth as always! Here are the cuts that I did this time round!!

Back again for another Hoyofair :DD Thank you to Kieru for bringing me back as always and thank you to the entire audio team for making everything go smooth as always! Here are the cuts that I did this time round!!

Skelktons (is actually a skeleton)

44,935 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

"No round two seriously"... Is 3 minutes enough for you?

"No round two seriously"... Is 3 minutes enough for you?

Joy is coming

614,345 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Bears keep Eberflus. More of the same and round and round we go

Bears keep Eberflus. More of the same and round and round we go

Eddie

347,055 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

“The NFL guys can’t do what some of the wrestlers can any 7th round pick tonight can go off the top rope” “Were talking about a real sport” “You’re nervous because it’s night 1 of the draft & you know next year you will only be night 1 at Mania” (GMF)

“The NFL guys can’t do what some of the wrestlers can any 7th round pick tonight can go off the top rope” “Were talking about a real sport” “You’re nervous because it’s night 1 of the draft & you know next year you will only be night 1 at Mania” (GMF)

FADE

366,624 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Q: Should startups always raise as much money as possible? In the clip below, Marc Andreessen shares a framework that Benchmark co-founder Andy Rachleff taught him called "The Onion Theory of Risk". You can think of a day 1 startup as having every conceivable kind of risk: founding team risk, product risk, technical risk, market acceptance risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk, viral growth risk, etc. A startup is basically just a long list of risks, and as Marc explains: "The way I think about running a startup is the way I think about raising money. It's a process of peeling away layers of risk as you go." You raise seed money to peel away the first two or three risks (e.g. founding team risk, product risk, initial launch risk). You raise the Series A round to peel away the next layer of risks (e.g. recruiting risk, customer risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk) And so on. Basically, you're peeling away risk as you're achieving milestones. And as you achieve milestones, you're both: making progress on your business and justifying raising more capital. So in terms of fundraising, you should be calibrating the amount money you're raising to the risks you need to pull out of your business for you to raise your next round. For example, if you're raising your Series A round, the best way to do that is to say to investors: "I raised a seed round then achieved ____ milestones and eliminated ____ risks. Now I'm going to raise $X for the Series A to achieve ____ milestones and eliminate ____ risks. This will get the company to ____ state for the Series B round. " This seems fairly obvious, but as Marc points out, it's a much more systematic way of going about things versus just raising as much money as possible, renting fancy offices, and hiring as many people as you can to grow as fast as you can. The more money you raise, the more you dilute your ownership stake in your business so it pays to be thoughtful. Raise the capital you will need to achieve the milestones and eliminate the risks required for your next financing round. It also probably makes sense to give yourself some margin as safety because things never go exactly as planned in startup land.

Q: Should startups always raise as much money as possible? In the clip below, Marc Andreessen shares a framework that Benchmark co-founder Andy Rachleff taught him called "The Onion Theory of Risk". You can think of a day 1 startup as having every conceivable kind of risk: founding team risk, product risk, technical risk, market acceptance risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk, viral growth risk, etc. A startup is basically just a long list of risks, and as Marc explains: "The way I think about running a startup is the way I think about raising money. It's a process of peeling away layers of risk as you go." You raise seed money to peel away the first two or three risks (e.g. founding team risk, product risk, initial launch risk). You raise the Series A round to peel away the next layer of risks (e.g. recruiting risk, customer risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk) And so on. Basically, you're peeling away risk as you're achieving milestones. And as you achieve milestones, you're both: making progress on your business and justifying raising more capital. So in terms of fundraising, you should be calibrating the amount money you're raising to the risks you need to pull out of your business for you to raise your next round. For example, if you're raising your Series A round, the best way to do that is to say to investors: "I raised a seed round then achieved milestones and eliminated risks. Now I'm going to raise $X for the Series A to achieve milestones and eliminate risks. This will get the company to state for the Series B round. " This seems fairly obvious, but as Marc points out, it's a much more systematic way of going about things versus just raising as much money as possible, renting fancy offices, and hiring as many people as you can to grow as fast as you can. The more money you raise, the more you dilute your ownership stake in your business so it pays to be thoughtful. Raise the capital you will need to achieve the milestones and eliminate the risks required for your next financing round. It also probably makes sense to give yourself some margin as safety because things never go exactly as planned in startup land.

Michael McGuiness

735,728 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren