Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨HIGHLY DISTURBING: Kenneth Copeland FAKE Exorcism Caught on Camera ⚠️ Unhinged, eyes bulging, voice growling as he “exorcises” demons on stage. Pure theater, a manipulative stunt to hype his crowds and rake in donations, with no real spiritual substance behind the spectacle. Claiming to be a “rich Jew backed...

69,723 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfĂźgbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Asked Nuggets coach David Adelman about the season that Jaylen Brown has had, and he gushed about Brown as both a player and a person. "The the elite shooting from mid range is such a big deal in our game, it's the late-clock ability, his overall size, his ability to play in the middle of the floor, which is really hard to come double people and not give up the three point line to a team like they have, I would just say his continued evolution in his game. "He's an elite, All-Star player, two-way player. I just watched him grow over the years, not just the championship year, but with Jayson Tatum, obviously out, more responsibility falls into his hands, and I thought they did a great job building around him for this particular season, with all the shooting that surrounds him." "He's a problem. He's not fun to watch on tape when you have to play against him. I'm a fan of his, just as a pure basketball person, not just as a coach. Actually got to spend some time in Africa, he was such an impressive person. He's good for the NBA. He's going to be a probelm for us tonight." "There was an Africa game that I coach in, that he played in. They used to do that yearly in South Africa. It's an amazing event. He came down there for that. And some of the events that we had to do -- humanitarian stuff, you go out and you see these communities, and just to see his investment in it was really impressive. And he was at a much younger age then. And I remember him in the bubble, speaking up at meetings and things like that." "Some people are born to lead. He definitely stands out as one of those people."

Noa Dalzell 🏀

98,397 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

When Mick Ryan lost his son through sucide his world fell apart. Six years ago he decided that he would try to save even one life. He believes his son told him to do what he could, and he did. It started with just one teddy bear. A symbol he believes takes us all back to our childhoods. He placed it on a bridge with a note saying, "Your friends and family love you". He also left his own name and phone number, and the number of a su!c!de support line. He got a call one night and was able to help a young person who saw the Teddy and that’s when it took off. Mick drove around the country with his daughter placing Teddy bears and notes and solar lights on bridges, train tracks and on riversides, all in the hope that he could save eleven one life. But it’s done more than that. Not only has he saved a life, he has started a nationwide campaign, where people from all over of Ireland are now asking Mick for his signs and putting up their own bears. He’s even had messages from people in the U.K. and the US thanking him and lwttimg him know that they have taken on his idea..... and it’s working ❤️ Mick is 74. He’s recovering from a serious illness and he’s on a walker, but he said he won’t stop what he’s doing until he’s not around anymore to do it. We need more Micks in this world. Please suport this lovely short film showing the power of not just a village, but a little island. Producer- Yvonne Kinsella - That’s A Wrap TV Director - Martin Daneels. Camera - Joe Edwards. We need this film to be made, and im saying that as someone with absolutely zero to do with the production. We need more stories about the heros like Mick who are out there giving their lives to save strangers. What beautiful Human Being. That Go fund me link is in the comments as X doesnt like them.

Martin (Beanz) Warde

33,506 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

There are so many subtle, but deliberate, animation choices with Alastor’s expressions during this scene that shift it from just a brutal, cruel rejection into something more complex. On the surface, the rejection is theatrical, performative. It’s too over-the-top with its mockery, so much so that Vox is taken aback by Alastor’s reaction, even tries to laugh along with him at first because it’s so seemingly misplaced. His body language is a contradiction: he hides his face initially, hiding that initial reaction from Vox and the viewer — almost as if he’s recalibrating, trying to reposition the hurt of thinking Vox was also just attempting to use him for his power. It’s a quick withdrawal from a character usually so present and visible. When he turns back to Vox, his eyes read wounded and confused at the suggestion. Canonically, Alastor is fixated on autonomy and control, both in life and in Hell. The partnership Vox poses, to Alastor, is interpreted as a transaction, one where he is reduced to a tool, an asset, a resource. His laugher is more defensive than genuine here — it’s the sound of Alastor refusing the premise before Vox can further define the relationship for him. He grabs at his hair, something we’ve only seen when he’s stressed and seemingly losing that control. It’s one of those rare moments where Alastor’s invulnerability shatters, where something has truly gotten under his skin, and where he’s felt it all. Alastor’s perpetual smile means that every small, physical shift is amplified as a more emotional tell. Especially here.

⊹ ࣪ ˖ ၊၊||၊ ⋆˙alastor fm 𐂂 (🎙)

23,041 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Nick Wright says everything about Wemby feels tenuous and a little scary, it’s why he’s so special: “The flip side of the coin of we’ve never seen a guy be able to tip dunk his own missed three, we’ve never seen a guy be able to protect the paint while guarding the three point line. Is what goes along with having a body that size is just more times your going to say I’ve never seen it. Normally it’s amazing and then the other night it was, I’ve never seen a NBA player fall quite like that and this sounds like a ridiculous thing to say, I don’t know the actual math on this, but just visual because I’ve seen guys fall like that and I’ve seen guys fall like that and hit their face on the ground it felt to me because of the extra length of torso almost that by the time his head hit the ground it was just going a little bit faster it gained more velocity. And it wasn’t lost on me that the highlight of game one, the on where they showed Duncan and Robinson going like “ Oh my God” was when Wemby took the ball at half court did the spin move in the paint and then dunked. That was almost exact same thing he was trying to do on this play. And like when, it’s the size plus the style. He’s not just planting himself in the paint, like he’s out there moving. And it is the elephant in the room on any of the, how many MVPs? How many championships? It’s like, man. How nervous are you going to be every time this giant of a man falls.” (Via What’s Wright? with Nick Wright)

NBA Courtside

13,651 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Andrei Tarkovsky on Ingmar Bergman's Shame (1968): "Let us look at Bergman's Shame. The film doesn't contain a single 'actor's piece' for the performer to 'give away' the director's purpose, to play the conception of the persona, his attitude to it, to assess it in relation to the overall idea; and the latter is entirely hidden within the dynamic of the characters' lives, at one with it. The people in the film are crushed by circumstances; they act only in accordance with their situation, to which they themselves are subordinate; they make no attempt to proffer us any idea, any perspective on what is happening, or to draw any conclusion. All of that is left to the film as a whole, to the director's vision. And how superbly it is accomplished! You cannot say in simple terms who amongst them is good or bad. I could never say that von Sydow is a bad man. They are all partly good and partly bad, each in his own way. No judgements are passed, because there is no hint of tendentiousness in any of the actors, and the circumstances of the film are used by the director to explore the human possibilities which they test, and not for a moment in order to illustrate a thesis. Max von Sydow's character is developed with masterly power. He is a very good man; a musician; kind and sensitive. It turns out that he is a coward. But by no means every bold man is a good human being, and cowards are not always scoundrels. Of course, he is weak and irresolute. His wife is far stronger than he, so much so that she can overcome her fear. The hero lacks that strength. He is tormented by his own weakness, vulnerability, lack of resilience; he tries to hide, to cower in a corner, not to see and not to hear; and he does this like a child, naively and with complete sincerity. But when circumstances nevertheless force him to defend himself, he instantly turns into a scoundrel. He loses all that was best in him; but the drama and absurdity of his situation is that as he is now he becomes necessary to his wife, who, in her turn, looks to him for protection and succour instead of despising him as she always had. When he beats her about the face and says 'Get out!' she goes crawling after him. There is something here of the age-old idea of passive good and active evil; but its expression is immensely complex. At the beginning of the film the hero cannot even kill a chicken, but as soon as he has found a way of defending himself he becomes a cruel cynic. He has something of Hamlet: my view is that the Prince of Denmark perishes not as a result of the duel, when he dies physically, but immediately after the 'rat' scene, when he understands how irreversible are those laws of life which have forced him, a man of humanity and intellect, to act like the inferior people who inhabit Elsinore. Von Sydow is now a sinister character, afraid of nothing: he kills; will not raise a finger to save his fellows; pursues only his own interests. The point is that you have to be a person of great integrity to feel fear in the face of the foul necessity to kill and humiliate. And by shedding that fear and apparently acquiring courage, a person in fact loses his spiritual strength and intellectual honesty and parts from his innocence. War is the obvious catalyst for the cruel, anti-human elements in people. Bergman uses the war in this film exactly as he uses the heroine's illness in Through a Glass Darkly: to explore his view of man." — "Sculpting in Time" by Andrei Tarkovsky (translated by Kitty Hunter-Blair, 1987)

RadiantFilm

27,723 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten