Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Historically Avian flu is not easily transmitted between humans and Dr Kelly Victory is certain the only way that changes is if it has been manipulated in a lab. She is appalled by the unnecessary culling of millions of birds/cattle for a problem that can be solved by allowing... show more

Kat A 🌸

86,433 subscribers

209,323 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

9 Comments

David Hockley2 years ago

$cientists and expert$ are “baffled” how avian bird flu jumped species for the first time. What on earth could have caused this??? It’s almost impossible unless someone intentionally made this happen in a lab to put humanity at further risk…. Oh, wait a minute:

Veritas Vox2 years ago

There is no Avian Flu. It's another Hoax 😂

Cosi..2 years ago

The biggest threat to our health is the misinformation spread by the WHO and the voice of the MSM that supports it.

Melchizedek 🐭2 years ago

@P_McCulloughMD Fauci straight up admitted funding it..

Me&G0d2 years ago

but we all know (I hope) that that isn't why they are doing it!

ablindeye2 years ago

'Of course the globalists would love to cull millions of birds/cattle to create a problem that might otherwise be solved by allowing for the natural process of herd immunity. Such a program the globalists would obstruct'. #Satire.

wendy hone2 years ago

What about the wild birds?? Or does it only affect chickens???? And cattle?? Wonder why?? 🤔

Jillian Dawn Clarkson2 years ago

This is all being pushed nefariously they know there is no real threat. I am not convinced at all that all these diseases are jumping from animal to human unless of course they are being manipulated to do so

MCphoto2 years ago

Think they have learned and it is more about putting farmers out of business, controlling food supply and people, instilling fear and pushing another mRNA type shot on the masses. They are cheaper and faster to make, will pull in billions of $ and create repeat customers.

Related Videos

We Are Way Ahead of the Government Bird Flu Narrative at the Moment Dr. McCullough with historian John Leake. We subsequently have found that farmers will get payment for mass PCR testing of animals and for culling or intentional killing of poultry and disposal. This will engage farmers financially and greatly overstate the extent of the current outbreak with massive numbers of false positive PCR tests. Government strategy will never give a chance for natural bird immunity to the current strain which most likely has its proximal origins at the Dept. of Agriculture Southeast Poultry Research Laboratory in Athens, GA. US FDA and CSL poised for human vaccination for avian influenza with the antigen based vaccine for starters. Self-replicating mRNA products from CSL BARDA and Gates Foundation CEPI Essentially the current avian influenza "crisis" is a ploy for mass vaccination of animals and humans.

We Are Way Ahead of the Government Bird Flu Narrative at the Moment Dr. McCullough with historian John Leake. We subsequently have found that farmers will get payment for mass PCR testing of animals and for culling or intentional killing of poultry and disposal. This will engage farmers financially and greatly overstate the extent of the current outbreak with massive numbers of false positive PCR tests. Government strategy will never give a chance for natural bird immunity to the current strain which most likely has its proximal origins at the Dept. of Agriculture Southeast Poultry Research Laboratory in Athens, GA. US FDA and CSL poised for human vaccination for avian influenza with the antigen based vaccine for starters. Self-replicating mRNA products from CSL BARDA and Gates Foundation CEPI Essentially the current avian influenza "crisis" is a ploy for mass vaccination of animals and humans.

Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®

652,791 views • 2 years ago

This is such a vital point by Chris Whitty. The only rational strategy for achieving herd immunity is by vaccination. NOT infection. When I caught wind of the herd-immunity-by-infection strategy, early in 2020, it sent shivers down my spine. Because it meant people would be sacrificed - and unknowingly.

This is such a vital point by Chris Whitty. The only rational strategy for achieving herd immunity is by vaccination. NOT infection. When I caught wind of the herd-immunity-by-infection strategy, early in 2020, it sent shivers down my spine. Because it meant people would be sacrificed - and unknowingly.

Prof Alice Roberts💙

917,103 views • 2 years ago

Following the martyrdom of Reda Al-Hussein Abu Jihad in Quneitra last December, the new commander of the Islamic Resistance Front in Syria, Oli al-Bass Abu Mujahid, delivered his first speech, in which he announced the start of the phase of “total attrition” against Israel, emphasizing that: - This attack is not a mere act, but a declaration of sovereignty through gunpowder and a message that the trembling minds of the occupation’s leaders understand. - We tell the Zionist enemy that its expansion on our land is nothing but suicide and that its incursion will meet only with corpses and destruction - At a time when many offer their weapons for sale, we were the first to raise the banner of defiance and we will be the last to raise the banner of victory - To the decision-makers in Damascus: Your desperate attempts to stifle the resistance movement and continue persecuting its cadres, arresting the free people of this country, and confiscating weapons that will only be used to repel the enemies, are nothing more than an embrace of the Zionist project. The resistance is a divine cause that cannot be annihilated by arrests nor confined by prison bars. - We clearly warn you not to test Oli al-Bass’s patience. We do not wish to turn our weapons against those who are not our enemies, but if a confrontation is forced upon us, we will wage it in a great battle that will leave nothing standing.

Following the martyrdom of Reda Al-Hussein Abu Jihad in Quneitra last December, the new commander of the Islamic Resistance Front in Syria, Oli al-Bass Abu Mujahid, delivered his first speech, in which he announced the start of the phase of “total attrition” against Israel, emphasizing that: - This attack is not a mere act, but a declaration of sovereignty through gunpowder and a message that the trembling minds of the occupation’s leaders understand. - We tell the Zionist enemy that its expansion on our land is nothing but suicide and that its incursion will meet only with corpses and destruction - At a time when many offer their weapons for sale, we were the first to raise the banner of defiance and we will be the last to raise the banner of victory - To the decision-makers in Damascus: Your desperate attempts to stifle the resistance movement and continue persecuting its cadres, arresting the free people of this country, and confiscating weapons that will only be used to repel the enemies, are nothing more than an embrace of the Zionist project. The resistance is a divine cause that cannot be annihilated by arrests nor confined by prison bars. - We clearly warn you not to test Oli al-Bass’s patience. We do not wish to turn our weapons against those who are not our enemies, but if a confrontation is forced upon us, we will wage it in a great battle that will leave nothing standing.

@Suriyak

16,189 views • 3 months ago

MASS KILLING IS NOT THE SOLUTION - SO WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF MASS SLAUGHTER? CFIA CATCHING WILD GEESE. Breaking wings? Terrified birds scrambling to escape. Theresa Joy FB Wild birds rarely die from avian flu. That’s why we are not seeing fields of dead geese and ducks. They have lived with this virus for generations. Through natural exposure, some get sick, some don’t, but as a population they have developed resilience and immunity. That is how nature works. So why are we doing the exact opposite in farming? Instead of allowing natural selection and immunity to occur, we: • kill 100,000+ birds at once • destroy entire flocks even when many are healthy • and call it “biosecurity” If weak animals are the ones most vulnerable, why not let the weak die and repopulate with the strong? That is how every natural system on Earth builds resilience. We also have to talk about the conditions these animals are kept in: • no sunlight • artificial lighting • extreme crowding • constant stress • genetically uniform breeding No immune system can thrive in that environment. Of course outbreaks become catastrophic. The system itself creates the crisis. You cannot eliminate a naturally occurring virus by killing wildlife. You cannot build health by destroying every living being in the path of fear. This is nuanced. It is complex. But one thing is clear Mass killing will never be the solution. Changing how animals are raised, restoring resilience, and respecting biological reality is the only sustainable path forward. Otherwise, this starts to look less like “protection” and more like control of the food supply under the language of safety. Dee Cameron thank you so much for this footage. Friends, if you see it film it and post it. This is all pieces of the puzzle that will help us to fix this system. @CFIAPresACIA

MASS KILLING IS NOT THE SOLUTION - SO WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF MASS SLAUGHTER? CFIA CATCHING WILD GEESE. Breaking wings? Terrified birds scrambling to escape. Theresa Joy FB Wild birds rarely die from avian flu. That’s why we are not seeing fields of dead geese and ducks. They have lived with this virus for generations. Through natural exposure, some get sick, some don’t, but as a population they have developed resilience and immunity. That is how nature works. So why are we doing the exact opposite in farming? Instead of allowing natural selection and immunity to occur, we: • kill 100,000+ birds at once • destroy entire flocks even when many are healthy • and call it “biosecurity” If weak animals are the ones most vulnerable, why not let the weak die and repopulate with the strong? That is how every natural system on Earth builds resilience. We also have to talk about the conditions these animals are kept in: • no sunlight • artificial lighting • extreme crowding • constant stress • genetically uniform breeding No immune system can thrive in that environment. Of course outbreaks become catastrophic. The system itself creates the crisis. You cannot eliminate a naturally occurring virus by killing wildlife. You cannot build health by destroying every living being in the path of fear. This is nuanced. It is complex. But one thing is clear Mass killing will never be the solution. Changing how animals are raised, restoring resilience, and respecting biological reality is the only sustainable path forward. Otherwise, this starts to look less like “protection” and more like control of the food supply under the language of safety. Dee Cameron thank you so much for this footage. Friends, if you see it film it and post it. This is all pieces of the puzzle that will help us to fix this system. @CFIAPresACIA

Shareaware Canada

12,819 views • 7 months ago

The avian flu infected ostrich farm in BC says they will not comply to the CFIA order to cull their birds by Feb 1, and CFIA will have to come do it. Katie the ostrich farmer believes the world is watching & the way Canada should solve the crisis is by NOT culling birds. #birdflu

The avian flu infected ostrich farm in BC says they will not comply to the CFIA order to cull their birds by Feb 1, and CFIA will have to come do it. Katie the ostrich farmer believes the world is watching & the way Canada should solve the crisis is by NOT culling birds. #birdflu

Sisu van Hellberta

63,206 views • 1 year ago

"We're not in a crisis. There is no climate emergency." Geologist, Professor Ian Plimer: "It has never been proven that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming." "Only 3% of emissions are from humans, the rest is natural... So if you're to prove that humans, and their emissions of the the gas of life, change climate, then you also have to prove that the natural emissions—97% of all emissions—don't change climate. That has never been addressed."

"We're not in a crisis. There is no climate emergency." Geologist, Professor Ian Plimer: "It has never been proven that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming." "Only 3% of emissions are from humans, the rest is natural... So if you're to prove that humans, and their emissions of the the gas of life, change climate, then you also have to prove that the natural emissions—97% of all emissions—don't change climate. That has never been addressed."

Wide Awake Media

234,182 views • 2 years ago

Charles Kanjama on whether the DP can run for office or not: The court was not clear on it; it could have been clear by making a declaration that the outcome of the impeachment will not have any consequence. My interpretation is that because the court has found that there has been a violation of the right to a fair hearing, of necessity, the fruits of the impeachment cannot all be sustained. The finality in terms of bringing in a new DP has been sustained, but the other fruits of impeachment, which is to stop the DP from running again, cannot be sustained. The outcome is fairly confusing #CitizenMondayReport

Charles Kanjama on whether the DP can run for office or not: The court was not clear on it; it could have been clear by making a declaration that the outcome of the impeachment will not have any consequence. My interpretation is that because the court has found that there has been a violation of the right to a fair hearing, of necessity, the fruits of the impeachment cannot all be sustained. The finality in terms of bringing in a new DP has been sustained, but the other fruits of impeachment, which is to stop the DP from running again, cannot be sustained. The outcome is fairly confusing #CitizenMondayReport

Citizen TV Kenya

35,563 views • 2 months ago

.Naval: You have a beautiful definition of knowledge, which most people don’t even try to tackle, about how knowledge perpetuates itself in the environment. You gave some really good examples. One was around genes. Successful, highly adapted genes contain a lot of knowledge and can cause themselves to be replicated because they’re survivors. In the same way, knowledge itself is a survivor, in that if you transmit to me the knowledge of how to build a computer, it’s an incredibly useful thing. I’m going to build more and more computers and that knowledge will be passed on. Your underlying point that you repeated here was if you want to understand the physical universe you have to understand knowledge, because it is the thing that over time takes over and changes more and more the universe—more than almost anything else. You have to understand all the explanations behind it. You can’t just say “particle collisions” because that explains everything, so it explains nothing. It’s not a useful level to operate at. Therefore, the things that create knowledge are uniquely influential in the universe. And as far as we know, there are only two systems that create knowledge. There’s evolution and there are humans. But is there a difference even between these two forms of knowledge creation, between evolution and between humans? David Deutsch: Yes. I have argued that the human way of creating knowledge is the ultimate one, that there aren’t any more powerful ones than that. This is the argument against the supernatural. Assuming that there is a form of knowledge creation that’s more powerful than ours is equivalent to invoking the supernatural, which is therefore a bad explanation—as invoking the supernatural always is. The difference between biological evolution and human creative thought is that biological evolution is inherently limited in its range. That’s because biological evolution has no foresight. It can’t see a problem and conjecture a solution. Whenever biological evolution produces a solution to something, it’s always before natural selection has even begun. This is Charles Darwin’s insight. This is the difference between Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution and the other theories of evolution that had been around for a century or more before that, including Charles Darwin’s grandfather and Lamarck. The thing they didn’t get is that the creation of knowledge in evolution begins before. That means that biological evolution can’t reach places that are not reachable by successive improvements, each of which allows a viable organism to exist. Creationists say that biological evolution has, in fact, reached things that are not reachable by incremental steps, each of which is a viable organism. They’re factually mistaken. The thing which they have in mind is the idea of a creator who can imagine things that don’t exist and who can create an idea that is not the culmination of a whole load of viable things. A thinking being can create something that’s a culmination of a whole load of non-viable things. Explanatory creativity makes humans unique Out of all the billions and billions of species that have ever existed, none of them has ever made a campfire, even though many of them would’ve been helped by having the genetic capacity to make campfires. The reason it didn’t happen in the biosphere is that there is no such thing as making a partially functional campfire; whereas there is, for example, with making hot water. The bombardier beetles squirt boiling water at their enemies. You can easily see that just squirting cold water at your enemies is not totally unhelpful. Then making it a bit hotter and a bit hotter. Squirting boiling water no doubt required many adaptations to make sure the beetle didn’t boil itself while it was making this boiling water. That happened because there was a sequence of steps in between, all of which were useful. But with campfires, it’s very hard to see how that could happen. Humans have explanatory creativity. Once you have that, you can get to the moon. You can cause asteroids which are heading towards the earth to turn around and go away. Perhaps no other planet in the universe has that power, and it has it only because of the presence of explanatory creativity on it.

.Naval: You have a beautiful definition of knowledge, which most people don’t even try to tackle, about how knowledge perpetuates itself in the environment. You gave some really good examples. One was around genes. Successful, highly adapted genes contain a lot of knowledge and can cause themselves to be replicated because they’re survivors. In the same way, knowledge itself is a survivor, in that if you transmit to me the knowledge of how to build a computer, it’s an incredibly useful thing. I’m going to build more and more computers and that knowledge will be passed on. Your underlying point that you repeated here was if you want to understand the physical universe you have to understand knowledge, because it is the thing that over time takes over and changes more and more the universe—more than almost anything else. You have to understand all the explanations behind it. You can’t just say “particle collisions” because that explains everything, so it explains nothing. It’s not a useful level to operate at. Therefore, the things that create knowledge are uniquely influential in the universe. And as far as we know, there are only two systems that create knowledge. There’s evolution and there are humans. But is there a difference even between these two forms of knowledge creation, between evolution and between humans? David Deutsch: Yes. I have argued that the human way of creating knowledge is the ultimate one, that there aren’t any more powerful ones than that. This is the argument against the supernatural. Assuming that there is a form of knowledge creation that’s more powerful than ours is equivalent to invoking the supernatural, which is therefore a bad explanation—as invoking the supernatural always is. The difference between biological evolution and human creative thought is that biological evolution is inherently limited in its range. That’s because biological evolution has no foresight. It can’t see a problem and conjecture a solution. Whenever biological evolution produces a solution to something, it’s always before natural selection has even begun. This is Charles Darwin’s insight. This is the difference between Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution and the other theories of evolution that had been around for a century or more before that, including Charles Darwin’s grandfather and Lamarck. The thing they didn’t get is that the creation of knowledge in evolution begins before. That means that biological evolution can’t reach places that are not reachable by successive improvements, each of which allows a viable organism to exist. Creationists say that biological evolution has, in fact, reached things that are not reachable by incremental steps, each of which is a viable organism. They’re factually mistaken. The thing which they have in mind is the idea of a creator who can imagine things that don’t exist and who can create an idea that is not the culmination of a whole load of viable things. A thinking being can create something that’s a culmination of a whole load of non-viable things. Explanatory creativity makes humans unique Out of all the billions and billions of species that have ever existed, none of them has ever made a campfire, even though many of them would’ve been helped by having the genetic capacity to make campfires. The reason it didn’t happen in the biosphere is that there is no such thing as making a partially functional campfire; whereas there is, for example, with making hot water. The bombardier beetles squirt boiling water at their enemies. You can easily see that just squirting cold water at your enemies is not totally unhelpful. Then making it a bit hotter and a bit hotter. Squirting boiling water no doubt required many adaptations to make sure the beetle didn’t boil itself while it was making this boiling water. That happened because there was a sequence of steps in between, all of which were useful. But with campfires, it’s very hard to see how that could happen. Humans have explanatory creativity. Once you have that, you can get to the moon. You can cause asteroids which are heading towards the earth to turn around and go away. Perhaps no other planet in the universe has that power, and it has it only because of the presence of explanatory creativity on it.

Deutsch Explains

186,329 views • 1 year ago

Vance: The only thing that is truly served as an anchor of the United States of America is that we have been -- and by the grace of god we always will be -- a Christian nation.

Vance: The only thing that is truly served as an anchor of the United States of America is that we have been -- and by the grace of god we always will be -- a Christian nation.

Acyn

474,690 views • 8 months ago

VIDEO: Vice president Vance in a message to to Israeli cabinet members: “If I was in the cabinet of the Israeli government, I might not be attacking the only powerful ally that I have left 2/3 of the defensive weapons that have protected your homeland have been built by American hands and paid for by American tax dollars. The problem for Israel is not Donald J. Trump, and anybody in Israel who thinks their biggest problem is the President of the United States needs to wake up and smell the reality of the situation that country is in”

VIDEO: Vice president Vance in a message to to Israeli cabinet members: “If I was in the cabinet of the Israeli government, I might not be attacking the only powerful ally that I have left 2/3 of the defensive weapons that have protected your homeland have been built by American hands and paid for by American tax dollars. The problem for Israel is not Donald J. Trump, and anybody in Israel who thinks their biggest problem is the President of the United States needs to wake up and smell the reality of the situation that country is in”

Open Source Intel

5,695,287 views • 2 months ago

Iran’s Foreign Ministry Spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei: We have reached a conclusion on a large part of the issues under discussion. The focus of the negotiations is on ending the war, and at this stage, we are not discussing nuclear details. Regarding the Strait of Hormuz, we have not entered into the details of this agreement. How the Strait of Hormuz will be managed is a matter that concerns the coastal states of the strait. We are not collecting tolls in the Strait. Iran and Oman are drafting a protocol for the safe passage of ships. It is natural that in this process, the services provided and the protection of the area requires the collection of fees. It is possible for the Pakistani delegation to visit Tehran again or vice versa; if necessary, this will be done. But in the current situation, we have not planned anything for a trip to Pakistan or a trip by the Pakistani delegation to Iran. Regarding Qatar’s role in the talks, the official mediator between Iran and the U.S. is Pakistan. Some countries have also played a positive role in this process to help resolve some issues. The Emir of Qatar has not visited Tehran. The Deputy Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council of Qatar visited within the framework of Qatar’s efforts to help advance the understanding that is being brokered by Pakistan.

Iran’s Foreign Ministry Spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei: We have reached a conclusion on a large part of the issues under discussion. The focus of the negotiations is on ending the war, and at this stage, we are not discussing nuclear details. Regarding the Strait of Hormuz, we have not entered into the details of this agreement. How the Strait of Hormuz will be managed is a matter that concerns the coastal states of the strait. We are not collecting tolls in the Strait. Iran and Oman are drafting a protocol for the safe passage of ships. It is natural that in this process, the services provided and the protection of the area requires the collection of fees. It is possible for the Pakistani delegation to visit Tehran again or vice versa; if necessary, this will be done. But in the current situation, we have not planned anything for a trip to Pakistan or a trip by the Pakistani delegation to Iran. Regarding Qatar’s role in the talks, the official mediator between Iran and the U.S. is Pakistan. Some countries have also played a positive role in this process to help resolve some issues. The Emir of Qatar has not visited Tehran. The Deputy Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council of Qatar visited within the framework of Qatar’s efforts to help advance the understanding that is being brokered by Pakistan.

Ariel Oseran أريئل أوسيران

20,240 views • 2 months ago