Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

History shows us that if Iran has nukes it would actually be stabilizing for the region.

KimIversenShow's profile picture

Kim Iversen 🇺🇸

302,856 subscribers

227,817 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & TechnologieNachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Kim Iversen 🇺🇸
Kim Iversen 🇺🇸vor 1 Jahr

Catch the full show!

Profilbild von OSINTdefender
OSINTdefendervor 1 Jahr

You can’t actually be this Stupid, can you?

Profilbild von Open Source Intel
Open Source Intelvor 1 Jahr

You’re aware Iran openly threatens to wipe Israel off the map, right? You know they fired 180 ballistic missiles at Israel just days ago, correct? You realize they are a terror regime, don’t you? You are fucking ignorant, and it’s a good thing I’ve never even heard of you.

Profilbild von Anna Gechtman
Anna Gechtmanvor 1 Jahr

Are you actually assisting Iran in spreading this misinformation?..

Profilbild von Kosher🎗🧡
Kosher🎗🧡vor 1 Jahr

You’re a fucking idiot.

Profilbild von Coal Mine Canary
Coal Mine Canaryvor 1 Jahr

How much is Iran paying you?

Profilbild von Anna Gechtman
Anna Gechtmanvor 1 Jahr

Unlike other countries with nuclear weapons, Iran has explicitly threatened and continues to threaten Israel and has launched missile attacks (probably you ignored that fact as well, not surprising at all 🙄 #antisemitic #propaganda) By minimizing these Iranian threats, you're emphasizing antisemitic views that dismiss the very real dangers Israel faces. Shame on you. Am Israel Chai 🇮🇱 ❤️

Profilbild von I Have Questions 🇺🇲🎗
I Have Questions 🇺🇲🎗vor 1 Jahr

Hey, Kim. If what you're saying is true, shouldn't Isreal have nuked Iran already? The Islamic regime in Iran will use a nuke on Isreal the moment they develop one. They already have the ballistic missile technology to deliver it.

Profilbild von Pantea Peyvandi 🇮🇱 💚🦁☀️ ❤️
Pantea Peyvandi 🇮🇱 💚🦁☀️ ❤️vor 1 Jahr

Go and live under the Ayatollahs and then lecture us about how they are nice and let’s give them nukes. Millions of people are suffering because of idiots like you and millions will be killed if irresponsible stupid people like you won’t stop giving such dangerous and nonsense comments.

Profilbild von The Real Truther
The Real Truthervor 1 Jahr

Are you off your meds?

Ähnliche Videos

IF IRAN HAD NUKES THIS WOULD NOT BE HAPPENING!!! No one would ever attack North Korea… BECAUSE THEY HAVE NUKES FOR PROTECTION. George Galloway
0:46

IF IRAN HAD NUKES THIS WOULD NOT BE HAPPENING!!! No one would ever attack North Korea… BECAUSE THEY HAVE NUKES FOR PROTECTION. George Galloway

Earth Hippy 🌎🕊️💚

523,193 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The US attacked Iran because it was supposedly “weeks away” from getting nukes — but America is the one giving Iran the biggest reason to actually build them. You don’t see North Korea getting bullied like that… Is today’s reality that if you don’t have nukes, eventually someone stronger may decide your future for you? Watch FULL here:
0:53

The US attacked Iran because it was supposedly “weeks away” from getting nukes — but America is the one giving Iran the biggest reason to actually build them. You don’t see North Korea getting bullied like that… Is today’s reality that if you don’t have nukes, eventually someone stronger may decide your future for you? Watch FULL here:

Rick Sanchez

30,533 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Fox: I think the market would actually be quite happy if the Supreme Court rejected Trump's current tariff strategy. It would be a positive for the market. That would mean less uncertainty. That would be better for the US economy.
1:23

Fox: I think the market would actually be quite happy if the Supreme Court rejected Trump's current tariff strategy. It would be a positive for the market. That would mean less uncertainty. That would be better for the US economy.

FactPost

177,685 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

HASAN PIKER: Middle East would be MORE STABLE if IRAN HAD NUCLEAR WEAPONS! Then adds: 'NOT ADVOCATING for Iran to get NUKES!'
0:57

HASAN PIKER: Middle East would be MORE STABLE if IRAN HAD NUCLEAR WEAPONS! Then adds: 'NOT ADVOCATING for Iran to get NUKES!'

RT

34,390 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

"I thought it would be worse" -- Trump's new line on his Iran "excursion" is that he actually thought it would hurt the economy more than it has
1:27

"I thought it would be worse" -- Trump's new line on his Iran "excursion" is that he actually thought it would hurt the economy more than it has

Aaron Rupar

40,327 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

WELKER: Iran just attacked US allies in the region. Is the US at war with Iran? TRIUMP: I call it a military exercise because people would rather have it called that. It's not a big war for us.
1:11

WELKER: Iran just attacked US allies in the region. Is the US at war with Iran? TRIUMP: I call it a military exercise because people would rather have it called that. It's not a big war for us.

Aaron Rupar

132,768 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Noam Chomsky explains why the US🇺🇸 government, Israel, and the media never acknowledge Israel’s nukes: If the US were to recognise Israel as a state with nuclear weapons, US aid to Israel would be ILLEGAL since they were developed outside of international legal frameworks. The absurd assumption behind the US’ negotiating position is that Iran would somehow just willingly give up its nuclear program and missile program… Meaning it would have no deterrent against an Israel that is armed with nuclear weapons, that launched two wars against it in a single year. While the US demands Iran has no deterrent, according to Washington, Israel is allowed to keep its nuclear Sword of Damocles hanging over Iran and the entire region.
3:06

Noam Chomsky explains why the US🇺🇸 government, Israel, and the media never acknowledge Israel’s nukes: If the US were to recognise Israel as a state with nuclear weapons, US aid to Israel would be ILLEGAL since they were developed outside of international legal frameworks. The absurd assumption behind the US’ negotiating position is that Iran would somehow just willingly give up its nuclear program and missile program… Meaning it would have no deterrent against an Israel that is armed with nuclear weapons, that launched two wars against it in a single year. While the US demands Iran has no deterrent, according to Washington, Israel is allowed to keep its nuclear Sword of Damocles hanging over Iran and the entire region.

Afshin Rattansi

18,421 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Trump ADMITS He Would BOW TO IRAN if They Had NUKES Trump on Iran: If Iran had a nuclear weapon, I would be calling the Supreme Leader. I would be saying, "Mr. Supreme Leader, how are you, sir? Is there anything we can do for you?"
0:22

Trump ADMITS He Would BOW TO IRAN if They Had NUKES Trump on Iran: If Iran had a nuclear weapon, I would be calling the Supreme Leader. I would be saying, "Mr. Supreme Leader, how are you, sir? Is there anything we can do for you?"

Ryan Rozbiani

1,490,792 Aufrufe • vor 21 Tagen

None of this would be happening if Iran had nukes. Also look up Samson Option while you’re at it. 🧐
1:07

None of this would be happening if Iran had nukes. Also look up Samson Option while you’re at it. 🧐

James Li

65,995 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

REPORTER: Is killing US troops your red line for ending the ceasefire? TRUMP: If they killed? REPORTER: US troops TRUMP: What does that mean? REPORTER: That you would restart the war with Iran if they killed US troops TRUMP: Well, it would be a good reason
0:24

REPORTER: Is killing US troops your red line for ending the ceasefire? TRUMP: If they killed? REPORTER: US troops TRUMP: What does that mean? REPORTER: That you would restart the war with Iran if they killed US troops TRUMP: Well, it would be a good reason

Breaking911

428,885 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

If Iran got NUKES… ‘they’d be NORTH KOREA but worse’ — Rubio They would ‘ultimately DESTROY ISRAEL’
0:49

If Iran got NUKES… ‘they’d be NORTH KOREA but worse’ — Rubio They would ‘ultimately DESTROY ISRAEL’

RT

34,820 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

"America knows that it does not have the defensive capabilities to even protect their own assets in that region, because that region is in striking distance." Hasan stating that the US underestimated Iran, and underestimating China would be even more detrimental.
1:00

Sensitive content

"America knows that it does not have the defensive capabilities to even protect their own assets in that region, because that region is in striking distance." Hasan stating that the US underestimated Iran, and underestimating China would be even more detrimental.

adri ♡

630,818 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

☢️💥 GLENN: “If Iran had a nuclear weapon, I do think the world would be SAFER, because the Israelis would then be actually constrained and deterred.” “THE MOST DANGEROUS SITUATION is for the Israelis—and them alone in that region—to have a nuclear weapon!” Glenn Greenwald says:
2:01

☢️💥 GLENN: “If Iran had a nuclear weapon, I do think the world would be SAFER, because the Israelis would then be actually constrained and deterred.” “THE MOST DANGEROUS SITUATION is for the Israelis—and them alone in that region—to have a nuclear weapon!” Glenn Greenwald says:

System Update

104,256 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Trump: I prevented Iran from nuking us by ripping up the agreement that prevented nukes, & allowed us to inspect for nukes. You literally have to be 40 IQ to believe anything this fkn Moron says.
1:27

Trump: I prevented Iran from nuking us by ripping up the agreement that prevented nukes, & allowed us to inspect for nukes. You literally have to be 40 IQ to believe anything this fkn Moron says.

Cuckturd

687,575 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Jeffrey Sachs: "The solution? The US just goes home. Iran has been attacked by the US and Israel. It has every reason to believe that if it makes major concessions, it will be attacked again. So Iran will keep up its deterrence. It won't give up what the US is demanding." They've seen Libya give up its weapons and get destroyed. They've watched Ukraine give up nukes in exchange for "security guarantees" that evaporated. They have every reason to believe that concessions won't bring peace-they'll invite more aggression
0:44

Jeffrey Sachs: "The solution? The US just goes home. Iran has been attacked by the US and Israel. It has every reason to believe that if it makes major concessions, it will be attacked again. So Iran will keep up its deterrence. It won't give up what the US is demanding." They've seen Libya give up its weapons and get destroyed. They've watched Ukraine give up nukes in exchange for "security guarantees" that evaporated. They have every reason to believe that concessions won't bring peace-they'll invite more aggression

Ounka

90,297 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Iran FM Spox in response to claim that Saudi Arabia is preventing the US from attacking Iran: It is a positive thing that all countries in the region recognize that they will be affected by the future situation in the region. The war of the United States against Iran is a war against the entire region. Over the past 5 months, we have witnessed that the presence of the United States in the region has increased insecurity and instability. It is natural for countries to try to prevent the escalation of insecurity, but experience has shown that nothing deters the enemy except the power and deterrent capability of Iran.
1:37

Iran FM Spox in response to claim that Saudi Arabia is preventing the US from attacking Iran: It is a positive thing that all countries in the region recognize that they will be affected by the future situation in the region. The war of the United States against Iran is a war against the entire region. Over the past 5 months, we have witnessed that the presence of the United States in the region has increased insecurity and instability. It is natural for countries to try to prevent the escalation of insecurity, but experience has shown that nothing deters the enemy except the power and deterrent capability of Iran.

Iran's Today

11,612 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat