Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

🚨 HMS DRAGON DOCKYARD WORKERS CLOCKING OFF AT 5PM Fresh reports claim work to repair HMS Dragon is only proceeding during standard 9–5 dockyard hours, as the Royal Navy destroyer remains out of action. The Type 45 air-defence destroyer was expected to return to readiness sooner, but the timeline... show more

Kiera Diss

65,006 subscribers

519,636 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика Наука и технологии

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

HMS DRAGON STILL NOT READY The Royal Navy’s Type 45 destroyer HMS Dragon will not be ready for operations for at least another week, according to the latest reports. Britain once ruled the waves. Now even getting a destroyer back to sea is a struggle. Shambolic.

HMS DRAGON STILL NOT READY The Royal Navy’s Type 45 destroyer HMS Dragon will not be ready for operations for at least another week, according to the latest reports. Britain once ruled the waves. Now even getting a destroyer back to sea is a struggle. Shambolic.

Kiera Diss

614,759 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

‼️🇬🇧 HMS Dragon: The Sky and Sea Killer, Hunts Missiles Before They Hit. The UK just sent HMS Dragon straight into the tension zone near Iran. This Type 45 destroyer isn’t just a ship, it’s a floating missile-eating machine. • Sea Viper missiles ready to shred drones, jets, and cruise missiles • Can track dozens of targets at once and fire in seconds • SAMPSON radar can track multiple threats from around 400 km away • Guns, CIWS & helicopters ready for anything in the air or on the sea • Acts as a shield for the Royal Navy and allies HMS Dragon is now in the Eastern Mediterranean. One wrong move, one missile, and it won’t make it past this beast.

‼️🇬🇧 HMS Dragon: The Sky and Sea Killer, Hunts Missiles Before They Hit. The UK just sent HMS Dragon straight into the tension zone near Iran. This Type 45 destroyer isn’t just a ship, it’s a floating missile-eating machine. • Sea Viper missiles ready to shred drones, jets, and cruise missiles • Can track dozens of targets at once and fire in seconds • SAMPSON radar can track multiple threats from around 400 km away • Guns, CIWS & helicopters ready for anything in the air or on the sea • Acts as a shield for the Royal Navy and allies HMS Dragon is now in the Eastern Mediterranean. One wrong move, one missile, and it won’t make it past this beast.

Defense Intelligence

282,620 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

The Royal Navy Daring Class (Type 45) destroyer HMS Dauntless is seen here inbound to HMNB Devonport Plymouth at the end of last week. HMS Dauntless recently emerged from a maintenance period at Portsmouth after a busy time as an escort with the UK Carrier Strike Group (UK CSG) for much of 2025, and in early 2026 spent several days working with the French Carrier Strike Group. Video courtesy of Stephen Jagger

The Royal Navy Daring Class (Type 45) destroyer HMS Dauntless is seen here inbound to HMNB Devonport Plymouth at the end of last week. HMS Dauntless recently emerged from a maintenance period at Portsmouth after a busy time as an escort with the UK Carrier Strike Group (UK CSG) for much of 2025, and in early 2026 spent several days working with the French Carrier Strike Group. Video courtesy of Stephen Jagger

Warships IFR

24,434 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

“The UK will deploy our Carrier Strike Group to the North Atlantic and the High North this year, led by HMS Prince of Wales.” But can we even sustain a Carrier Strike Group in the High North, given the proportion of the Royal Navy and Royal Air Force the Indo-Pacific deployment took? HMS Queen Elizabeth has been in dry dock for most of last year and we need a new icebreaker to support/replace HMS Protector. This is a significant commitment and one that indicates, alongside the expanded Commando deployment in the Arctic, that the strategic focus has now shifted. Whilst our security to the north is vital, this is also a helpful respite for Keir Starmer to look strong on NATO. It would not be a surprise if the much delayed Defence Investment Plan now sees the Royal Navy come out as the big winner with regards to investment in capability.

“The UK will deploy our Carrier Strike Group to the North Atlantic and the High North this year, led by HMS Prince of Wales.” But can we even sustain a Carrier Strike Group in the High North, given the proportion of the Royal Navy and Royal Air Force the Indo-Pacific deployment took? HMS Queen Elizabeth has been in dry dock for most of last year and we need a new icebreaker to support/replace HMS Protector. This is a significant commitment and one that indicates, alongside the expanded Commando deployment in the Arctic, that the strategic focus has now shifted. Whilst our security to the north is vital, this is also a helpful respite for Keir Starmer to look strong on NATO. It would not be a surprise if the much delayed Defence Investment Plan now sees the Royal Navy come out as the big winner with regards to investment in capability.

Ben Obese-Jecty MP

35,414 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

The Defence Secretary mislead the House. On 9th March the Secretary of State for Defence, John Healey, was asked directly by me if he could guarantee that following the deployment of HMS Dragon to the Eastern Mediterranean, and therefore removing it from our Standing NATO Maritime Group One commitment, we would be able to fulfil our commitment to NATO in providing the flagship role. He was also asked whether he could guarantee that the role would be conducted by a British ship? He replied that “…we will always fulfil our NATO commitments”. We have not. Today NATO replaced HMS Dragon with the German frigate Sachsen. This decision wasn’t made yesterday. The question is when John Healey knew that HMS Dragon would be replaced. He should correct the record.

The Defence Secretary mislead the House. On 9th March the Secretary of State for Defence, John Healey, was asked directly by me if he could guarantee that following the deployment of HMS Dragon to the Eastern Mediterranean, and therefore removing it from our Standing NATO Maritime Group One commitment, we would be able to fulfil our commitment to NATO in providing the flagship role. He was also asked whether he could guarantee that the role would be conducted by a British ship? He replied that “…we will always fulfil our NATO commitments”. We have not. Today NATO replaced HMS Dragon with the German frigate Sachsen. This decision wasn’t made yesterday. The question is when John Healey knew that HMS Dragon would be replaced. He should correct the record.

Ben Obese-Jecty MP

50,174 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

“The UK is preparing an aircraft carrier for possible deployment to the Middle East” This is pure posturing by Keir Starmer. Other than saving political face what is the benefit of deploying the HMS Prince of Wales Carrier Strike Group? And where would we deploy it to? I’ve repeatedly warned of the overstretch our armed forces face as this Government overcommits them, just as the previous Labour Government did. HMS Prince of Wales is supposed to be deploying to the High North on Operation Firecrest later this year, and was cited as the reason HMS Duncan couldn’t be the T45 deployed to Cyprus. Reducing its notice-to-move from 10 days to 5 sounds good but why would we deploy it, given the resources required to move it to the Arabian Gulf - a near whole force effort for the RAF and Royal Navy? Not to mention the risk of losing it. Last week we weren’t even prepared to strike Hezbollah. We could just move two squadrons of F-35B to RAF Akrotiri. That’s why it’s there. But that doesn’t have the same “strong leader” optics. We have just enough escort ships but no Astute class submarine; HMS Anson is undergoing AUKUS maintenance in Australia. HMS Dragon is still in Portsmouth, preparing to head to the Eastern Mediterranean and HMS Dauntless is in FTSP. If we were to deploy, how would we cover Operation Firecrest and how would we fulfil our NATO Standing Maritime Group One flagship commitment? Additionally, what effect will this have on the ship’s company(s) who only returned from an 8-month deployment late last year. Meanwhile the USS George H.W. Bush Carrier Strike Group yesterday completed COMPTUEX and is about to be tasked to the Eastern Mediterranean as the US’s third CSG in the region, replacing the USS Gerald Ford which is now in the Red Sea. The Defence Secretary will need to explain what the intention is here, and what deconfliction has taken place with our allies already in the Eastern Mediterranean.

“The UK is preparing an aircraft carrier for possible deployment to the Middle East” This is pure posturing by Keir Starmer. Other than saving political face what is the benefit of deploying the HMS Prince of Wales Carrier Strike Group? And where would we deploy it to? I’ve repeatedly warned of the overstretch our armed forces face as this Government overcommits them, just as the previous Labour Government did. HMS Prince of Wales is supposed to be deploying to the High North on Operation Firecrest later this year, and was cited as the reason HMS Duncan couldn’t be the T45 deployed to Cyprus. Reducing its notice-to-move from 10 days to 5 sounds good but why would we deploy it, given the resources required to move it to the Arabian Gulf - a near whole force effort for the RAF and Royal Navy? Not to mention the risk of losing it. Last week we weren’t even prepared to strike Hezbollah. We could just move two squadrons of F-35B to RAF Akrotiri. That’s why it’s there. But that doesn’t have the same “strong leader” optics. We have just enough escort ships but no Astute class submarine; HMS Anson is undergoing AUKUS maintenance in Australia. HMS Dragon is still in Portsmouth, preparing to head to the Eastern Mediterranean and HMS Dauntless is in FTSP. If we were to deploy, how would we cover Operation Firecrest and how would we fulfil our NATO Standing Maritime Group One flagship commitment? Additionally, what effect will this have on the ship’s company(s) who only returned from an 8-month deployment late last year. Meanwhile the USS George H.W. Bush Carrier Strike Group yesterday completed COMPTUEX and is about to be tasked to the Eastern Mediterranean as the US’s third CSG in the region, replacing the USS Gerald Ford which is now in the Red Sea. The Defence Secretary will need to explain what the intention is here, and what deconfliction has taken place with our allies already in the Eastern Mediterranean.

Ben Obese-Jecty MP

30,396 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Breaking News🇬🇧⚡️🇺🇸: "The first concern of a British PM is to make decisions in the UK's national interest, not in the interest in any other country, that is what Sir Keir Starmer has done". Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper thinks that it is in the UK's national interest to risk the lives of American airmen, British troops in RAF Akrotiri in Cyprus and British expats living throughout friendly states in the Middle East. Since the beginning of the Ukrainian/EU/NATO proxy war with Russia, the UK has placed Zelensky's bank accounts as a PRIORITY over and above that of British Armed Forces. Both the Conservatives and The Labour Party Ireland have gifted over £22 billion to Ukraine, when their own Navy fleet is at least 8 S45 type destroyers short of stock. The S-type destroyers costs around £1 billion a pop and this money would have gone to the Royal Navy rather than unknown Zelensky officials, two of which have already been arrested for fraud. The quicker Labour as ousted from 10 Downing Street the UK the better.

Breaking News🇬🇧⚡️🇺🇸: "The first concern of a British PM is to make decisions in the UK's national interest, not in the interest in any other country, that is what Sir Keir Starmer has done". Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper thinks that it is in the UK's national interest to risk the lives of American airmen, British troops in RAF Akrotiri in Cyprus and British expats living throughout friendly states in the Middle East. Since the beginning of the Ukrainian/EU/NATO proxy war with Russia, the UK has placed Zelensky's bank accounts as a PRIORITY over and above that of British Armed Forces. Both the Conservatives and The Labour Party Ireland have gifted over £22 billion to Ukraine, when their own Navy fleet is at least 8 S45 type destroyers short of stock. The S-type destroyers costs around £1 billion a pop and this money would have gone to the Royal Navy rather than unknown Zelensky officials, two of which have already been arrested for fraud. The quicker Labour as ousted from 10 Downing Street the UK the better.

HIN News🇬🇧🇺🇸

39,099 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🇬🇧 Once upon a time, the Sun never set on the British Empire. Today, it’s a different story. Even just going back to 1975, the Royal Navy operated 166 vessels. That number has plummeted to 66. Just 13 destroyers and frigates. For context, a single U.S. carrier strike group is larger than the entire deployable Royal Navy. When Iran struck RAF Akrotiri in Cyprus in March, the UK had no warships in the Gulf or the Mediterranean. It took weeks to get HMS Dragon into position. And yet, Britain still publicly commits to NATO leadership, an Indo-Pacific presence, carrier group deployments, nuclear deterrence, and Gulf security, simultaneously. The Iran crisis didn't create this problem. But it’s opened a lot of eyes to how significantly this once-great military power has fallen. Source: Business Basics

🇬🇧 Once upon a time, the Sun never set on the British Empire. Today, it’s a different story. Even just going back to 1975, the Royal Navy operated 166 vessels. That number has plummeted to 66. Just 13 destroyers and frigates. For context, a single U.S. carrier strike group is larger than the entire deployable Royal Navy. When Iran struck RAF Akrotiri in Cyprus in March, the UK had no warships in the Gulf or the Mediterranean. It took weeks to get HMS Dragon into position. And yet, Britain still publicly commits to NATO leadership, an Indo-Pacific presence, carrier group deployments, nuclear deterrence, and Gulf security, simultaneously. The Iran crisis didn't create this problem. But it’s opened a lot of eyes to how significantly this once-great military power has fallen. Source: Business Basics

Mario Nawfal

29,012 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Here's HMS St Albans outbound from HMNB Devonport Plymouth yesterday morning. One of the few remaining Royal Navy Duke Class (Type 23) frigates in service, she was deploying allegedly on Towed Array Patrol Ship (TAPS) duty. That means using a sonar reeled out at distance behind the ship, to get away from the frigate's own noise, in order to listen out for submarines (or undersea nefarious activity) off the UK and in NATO waters generally. The prime target: intruding Russian submarines, though other tasks will be on the frigate's itinerary. Video courtesy of Stephen Jagger Meanwhile, sister vessel HMS Somerset returned home at the end of last week, after her own busy period on patrol that included monitoring the activities of the Russian naval vessel Yantar. The lattter is one of Moscow's key assets for gathering intelligence and also potentially conducting sabotage of seabed cables (including internet) and energy pipelines. In the pic here we see Yantar (nearest) being monitored by HMS Somerset. Photo: Royal Navy.

Here's HMS St Albans outbound from HMNB Devonport Plymouth yesterday morning. One of the few remaining Royal Navy Duke Class (Type 23) frigates in service, she was deploying allegedly on Towed Array Patrol Ship (TAPS) duty. That means using a sonar reeled out at distance behind the ship, to get away from the frigate's own noise, in order to listen out for submarines (or undersea nefarious activity) off the UK and in NATO waters generally. The prime target: intruding Russian submarines, though other tasks will be on the frigate's itinerary. Video courtesy of Stephen Jagger Meanwhile, sister vessel HMS Somerset returned home at the end of last week, after her own busy period on patrol that included monitoring the activities of the Russian naval vessel Yantar. The lattter is one of Moscow's key assets for gathering intelligence and also potentially conducting sabotage of seabed cables (including internet) and energy pipelines. In the pic here we see Yantar (nearest) being monitored by HMS Somerset. Photo: Royal Navy.

Warships IFR

42,957 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Russian tanker diverts course amid US naval presence A sanctioned Russian oil tanker has made three failed attempts to reach Venezuela after a US Navy destroyer blocked its route. According to #MarineTraffic data, the Seahorse departed from the Port of Matanzas in Cuba on November 9 at 8:54 a.m. local time. While sailing toward Venezuela, the vessel made a U-turn on November 14 after altering its course to 160 degrees. According to media reports, the vessel was intercepted by the U.S. Navy destroyer USS Stockdale. The laden tanker made another U-turn on November 16, rejoining its initial route, before being intercepted again in the early hours of November 17, after which it made yet another attempt to continue its voyage. The vessel is currently sailing in the Caribbean at 10 knots with an unknown destination. Watch the playback of the tanker's movements:

Russian tanker diverts course amid US naval presence A sanctioned Russian oil tanker has made three failed attempts to reach Venezuela after a US Navy destroyer blocked its route. According to #MarineTraffic data, the Seahorse departed from the Port of Matanzas in Cuba on November 9 at 8:54 a.m. local time. While sailing toward Venezuela, the vessel made a U-turn on November 14 after altering its course to 160 degrees. According to media reports, the vessel was intercepted by the U.S. Navy destroyer USS Stockdale. The laden tanker made another U-turn on November 16, rejoining its initial route, before being intercepted again in the early hours of November 17, after which it made yet another attempt to continue its voyage. The vessel is currently sailing in the Caribbean at 10 knots with an unknown destination. Watch the playback of the tanker's movements:

MarineTraffic

187,859 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

🔥 50 YEARS OF DESTROYER 🔥 By the time KISS stepped into the studio to record Destroyer, the band had already ignited a movement on stages around the world with the success of Alive!. Now expectations were higher, the spotlight brighter, and the band knew the next record had to push everything further. With producer Bob Ezrin, KISS did exactly that. Destroyer was bold, dramatic, and unexpected. At first, the reaction was uncertain. The album surprised people, and some didn’t quite know what to make of it. But real rock 'n' roll has a way of proving itself over time. Song by song, Destroyer caught fire. “Detroit Rock City.” “God of Thunder.” “Shout It Out Loud.” “Beth.” Ultimately, the album exploded — becoming one of the defining records of the KISS legacy and a cornerstone of rock history. Fifty years later, Destroyer still stands as a testament to a band that never played it safe, and to the power of rock & roll that only grows louder with time ⚡️ Listen here:

🔥 50 YEARS OF DESTROYER 🔥 By the time KISS stepped into the studio to record Destroyer, the band had already ignited a movement on stages around the world with the success of Alive!. Now expectations were higher, the spotlight brighter, and the band knew the next record had to push everything further. With producer Bob Ezrin, KISS did exactly that. Destroyer was bold, dramatic, and unexpected. At first, the reaction was uncertain. The album surprised people, and some didn’t quite know what to make of it. But real rock 'n' roll has a way of proving itself over time. Song by song, Destroyer caught fire. “Detroit Rock City.” “God of Thunder.” “Shout It Out Loud.” “Beth.” Ultimately, the album exploded — becoming one of the defining records of the KISS legacy and a cornerstone of rock history. Fifty years later, Destroyer still stands as a testament to a band that never played it safe, and to the power of rock & roll that only grows louder with time ⚡️ Listen here:

KISS

22,464 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

‼️🇬🇧🇺🇸🇮🇷 The United Kingdom has declared that it is fully prepared to defend itself after Iran warned of "consequences" if British military facilities are used to support U.S. operations against Iran. The warning specifically referenced RAF Fairford, a key Royal Air Force base that Iranian officials claim was used to support a U.S. B-1 bomber strike on targets inside Iran earlier this week. In response, the UK Ministry of Defence said Britain's armed forces remain on constant alert and are prepared to respond to any threat. "Our armed forces are ready to protect the security of the UK from any form of attack, whether on our soil or beyond. The UK is ready to defend itself 24/7," the ministry said. The exchange marks another escalation in tensions, raising concerns that countries providing logistical or military support to U.S. operations could increasingly become part of Iran's deterrence strategy as the regional crisis deepens. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

‼️🇬🇧🇺🇸🇮🇷 The United Kingdom has declared that it is fully prepared to defend itself after Iran warned of "consequences" if British military facilities are used to support U.S. operations against Iran. The warning specifically referenced RAF Fairford, a key Royal Air Force base that Iranian officials claim was used to support a U.S. B-1 bomber strike on targets inside Iran earlier this week. In response, the UK Ministry of Defence said Britain's armed forces remain on constant alert and are prepared to respond to any threat. "Our armed forces are ready to protect the security of the UK from any form of attack, whether on our soil or beyond. The UK is ready to defend itself 24/7," the ministry said. The exchange marks another escalation in tensions, raising concerns that countries providing logistical or military support to U.S. operations could increasingly become part of Iran's deterrence strategy as the regional crisis deepens. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

81,142 просмотров • 26 дней назад

Steve Reed is lying his way through another media round. “We have systems and defences in place that keep the United Kingdom safe” HMS Duncan is the only asset we currently have capable of intercepting a ballistic missile. It’s already committed to deploying with the HMS Prince of Wales Carrier Strike Group on Operation Firecrest. We currently don’t have enough seaworthy Type 45s to fulfil our existing commitments, which includes the flagship role for the Standing NATO Maritime Group One, let alone defence of the UK mainland against hypothetical ballistic missile attack. “We will take necessary defensive action to protect British interests, British people or our allies across the region” No, we haven’t. We deployed HMS Dragon which has only just arrived in the Eastern Mediterranean. We haven’t intercepted a single missile and have intercepted a handful of the thousands of drone fired. Bahrain is one of our closest allies in the region. It has been repeatedly struck by missiles and drones for three weeks. There is no account of us having played any role in intercepting any of them, despite the C-SIPA agreement between us and the presence of the UK Naval Support Facility. “The UK has been taking down drones and missiles that have been fired around” We haven’t intercepted any missiles. The only capability that could is HMS Dragon, and that has been in transit. “Our assessment is that there was a missile launched at Diego Garcia, two I think….one failed and the other was intercepted, so that shows that our defensive capabilities are correct” An Iranian IRBM failing doesn’t show our defensive capabilities are correct; we got lucky. The other was intercepted, by a US-Navy SM-3 ballistic missile interceptor. Reed implies that this was by UK forces. Once again we were reliant upon the US. We appear entirely unwilling to hold Iran to account for attacking us. The Government is fudging its way through this conflict one indecisive step at a time, but gaslighting us into believing they’re in control of the situation is laughable.

Steve Reed is lying his way through another media round. “We have systems and defences in place that keep the United Kingdom safe” HMS Duncan is the only asset we currently have capable of intercepting a ballistic missile. It’s already committed to deploying with the HMS Prince of Wales Carrier Strike Group on Operation Firecrest. We currently don’t have enough seaworthy Type 45s to fulfil our existing commitments, which includes the flagship role for the Standing NATO Maritime Group One, let alone defence of the UK mainland against hypothetical ballistic missile attack. “We will take necessary defensive action to protect British interests, British people or our allies across the region” No, we haven’t. We deployed HMS Dragon which has only just arrived in the Eastern Mediterranean. We haven’t intercepted a single missile and have intercepted a handful of the thousands of drone fired. Bahrain is one of our closest allies in the region. It has been repeatedly struck by missiles and drones for three weeks. There is no account of us having played any role in intercepting any of them, despite the C-SIPA agreement between us and the presence of the UK Naval Support Facility. “The UK has been taking down drones and missiles that have been fired around” We haven’t intercepted any missiles. The only capability that could is HMS Dragon, and that has been in transit. “Our assessment is that there was a missile launched at Diego Garcia, two I think….one failed and the other was intercepted, so that shows that our defensive capabilities are correct” An Iranian IRBM failing doesn’t show our defensive capabilities are correct; we got lucky. The other was intercepted, by a US-Navy SM-3 ballistic missile interceptor. Reed implies that this was by UK forces. Once again we were reliant upon the US. We appear entirely unwilling to hold Iran to account for attacking us. The Government is fudging its way through this conflict one indecisive step at a time, but gaslighting us into believing they’re in control of the situation is laughable.

Ben Obese-Jecty MP

61,575 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

MAJOR INCIDENT AS MINIBUS OVERTURNS CLOSING A1M AMID REPORTS OF 15+ CASUALTIES A MINIBUS has overturned, closing the #A1M motorway in both directions this evening. The Yorkshire Air Ambulance helicopter has landed at the scene. Reports suggest there are ‘multiple casualties’, with at least one person airlifted to Pinderfields Hospital before the air ambulance returned to the scene to continue providing specialist medical aid to further patients. A spokesperson for National Highways has said: “The A1(M) in West Yorkshire is closed northbound between J40 (near #Darrington) and J41 (for the #M62) due to a serious collision involving an overturned vehicle. “All emergency services including West Yorkshire Police and the Yorkshire Air Ambulance are in attendance. “National Highways Traffic Officers are also on scene providing assistance with traffic management. Due to the nature of the incident, the road is expected to be closed for some time. “Traffic is also still held on the southbound carriageway at this time.” Diversion routes are in place, and drivers are advised to avoid the area. This is a live incident, follow YappApp for all the latest updates as they happen.

MAJOR INCIDENT AS MINIBUS OVERTURNS CLOSING A1M AMID REPORTS OF 15+ CASUALTIES A MINIBUS has overturned, closing the #A1M motorway in both directions this evening. The Yorkshire Air Ambulance helicopter has landed at the scene. Reports suggest there are ‘multiple casualties’, with at least one person airlifted to Pinderfields Hospital before the air ambulance returned to the scene to continue providing specialist medical aid to further patients. A spokesperson for National Highways has said: “The A1(M) in West Yorkshire is closed northbound between J40 (near #Darrington) and J41 (for the #M62) due to a serious collision involving an overturned vehicle. “All emergency services including West Yorkshire Police and the Yorkshire Air Ambulance are in attendance. “National Highways Traffic Officers are also on scene providing assistance with traffic management. Due to the nature of the incident, the road is expected to be closed for some time. “Traffic is also still held on the southbound carriageway at this time.” Diversion routes are in place, and drivers are advised to avoid the area. This is a live incident, follow YappApp for all the latest updates as they happen.

Yapp

626,606 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🚨Tragedy in Dadyal: One Killed, 14 Injured in Firing by Pakistani Rangers DADYAL, Pakistan-administered Kashmir – Tensions escalated sharply in the Dadyal area of Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) on 5th July 2026 as Pakistani Rangers opened fire on protesters, resulting in at least one fatality and leaving 14 others injured. According to local sources, the security forces, including personnel from the Punjab Rangers, used AK-47 rifles and tear gas shells to disperse the crowd. The incident occurred during what witnesses describe as a protest in the region. The deceased has been identified as Mohammad Yaqub. The condition of the injured individuals remains unconfirmed at this time, and authorities have yet to issue an official statement regarding the circumstances that led to the use of live ammunition. The situation in Dadyal remains tense as residents react to the violence. Further details are awaited.

🚨Tragedy in Dadyal: One Killed, 14 Injured in Firing by Pakistani Rangers DADYAL, Pakistan-administered Kashmir – Tensions escalated sharply in the Dadyal area of Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) on 5th July 2026 as Pakistani Rangers opened fire on protesters, resulting in at least one fatality and leaving 14 others injured. According to local sources, the security forces, including personnel from the Punjab Rangers, used AK-47 rifles and tear gas shells to disperse the crowd. The incident occurred during what witnesses describe as a protest in the region. The deceased has been identified as Mohammad Yaqub. The condition of the injured individuals remains unconfirmed at this time, and authorities have yet to issue an official statement regarding the circumstances that led to the use of live ammunition. The situation in Dadyal remains tense as residents react to the violence. Further details are awaited.

Adil Raja

60,388 просмотров • 1 месяц назад