Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Holding a massive grudge after Jan previously humiliated him, the malicious food critic Nichido Otani schemes to get Jan completely thrown out of the Gobancho restaurant. Otani sets up a high-stakes challenge: if Jan loses the match, he gets instantly fired from the kitchen. The entire showdown comes down...

272,903 views • 28 days ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Marc Andreessen explains the "Elon Method" of leadership, and it completely contradicts how most CEOs operate today. Most leaders get bogged down trying to manage every single moving part of their business. But according to Andreessen, Elon's approach is actually the exact opposite: he delegates almost everything. He isn't involved in 99% of what his companies are doing on a daily basis. Instead, his entire focus is hunting for one specific thing: The Bottleneck. In any manufacturing chain, there is always a bottleneck keeping the line from running the way it's supposed to. It could be a lack of raw materials at the beginning, or a shortage of warehouse space at the end. Whatever it is, that bottleneck is holding everything up. Job number one is to remove it and get things flowing again. Elon has universalized this concept. He looks at every company like it's a conceptual assembly line—sometimes a literal one making cars and rockets. He knows that on any given week, there is guaranteed to be one main bottleneck holding his people back. So, what’s the secret to his management paradox? He relentlessly micromanages the solution to that one specific problem. He doesn't need to manage everything else because, by definition, the rest of the company is running better than the bottleneck. Once it's fixed, he moves on to the next biggest problem. But here is the part where most non-technical CEOs would completely fail trying to replicate this method: When Elon identifies the bottleneck, he has zero patience for bureaucracy. He doesn't ask the VP of Engineering to ask the Director to ask the Manager to ask the individual contributor to write a report to be reviewed in three weeks. He would throw that entire chain of command out the window. Instead, he bypasses the middleman completely. He goes straight to the manufacturing line or the software group, personally finds the exact line engineer who actually understands the technical nature of the bottleneck, sits in a room with them, and fixes the problem together.

Ian Miles Cheong

71,502 views • 4 months ago

Here it is: What was the CIA doing on Jan 6? Who occupied the high central place and did every single thing the CIA manual told them to do? Well, it was the number one suspect of the FBI-paid sedition hunters. Here it is. It’s right here—directing the entire crowd to overthrow the United States government: Ray Epps. This is the CIA’s guide—Democrats use for starting protests, riots, BLM, and Antifa. Mike Benz: They have “highly trained mass agitators” to get riots going. “Outside commando element. This element stays out of all activity, located so that they can observe from where they are the development of the planned events. So these are highly trained mass agitators to get innocent persons to bring about an apparent spontaneous demonstration. This outside commando element stays out of the thick of it—not in the crowd like Ray Epps—they are above the crowd. They should look for the tower of a church, a high building, a high tree, the highest level of the stadium, or any other high place. This is from the CIA’s own manual in 1983. Who occupied the high central place and did every single thing the CIA manual told them to do? Well, it was the number one suspect of the FBI-paid sedition hunters. Here it is. It’s right here—directing the entire crowd so much so that people in their own defense pleadings after getting arrested said, ‘I was just following this guy’s orders.’ And the FBI never even looks for them. And this FBI has not, to my knowledge, even looked into that.”

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

115,023 views • 2 months ago

Hon'ble Justice M. Nagaprasanna is a judge who never minces words when public interest is at stake. Blunt, fearless, and unapologetic his courtroom leaves no space for political vendetta or doublespeak. Read/Listen to what he said 👇 "If you are not extending Jan Aushadhi Kendras of 120 sq ft, the state government is not acting in public interest. The state is not interested in the welfare of the public. You are only dislodging somebody who is doing well, sir, for the public, because it is Pradhan Mantri's part of the Government of India. Now that medicines are available there, you are having a headache. Politics even there. If Jan Aushadhi is a problem, the people will ask. Nobody asked you to give free. Who asked you, sir? Who asked for free bus? Was there a demand? It wasn't there. Today other government departments have not paid the salary. Should they not survive? Because all money has gone into this (free schemes)." Orders 👇 "We will not allow one wing of the government to tinker with medicines for the poor, whether free or at nominal price. The order (congress order to shut down Jan Aushadi kendra) is quashed. Public welfare cannot be sabotaged by vendetta." -Justice M. Nagaprasanna, Dharwad Bench, Karnataka High Court When a High Court Judge himself calls it “vendetta”, you know how low Congress has sunk. PM schemes serve poor. Congress schemes serve politics. Congress is anti poor. Anti welfare. Pure vendetta politics.

Kiran Aradhya

40,942 views • 8 months ago

Back in 2015, in Zutter, he wrote an incredibly brutal line: “나는 어릴 적에 살쪄봐서 돈(豚) 맛을 알아” (“I used to be fat as a kid, so I know the taste of money/pig”) The lyric plays on the Korean word “돈” (don), which can mean both “money” and “pig”. And the way “맛을 알아” flows in pronunciation subtly hints at the English word “slaughter”. In the MV, he holds a kitchen knife, and the blood spraying out is green ~ the color of U.S. dollars. Back then, he thought success meant cutting off the weak, clumsy, not-good-enough version of himself. Killing that kid so “T.O.P” could sit on the throne. He really believed that killing was the only way. Eleven years later, in Desperado, he writes something completely different: “Your angle and mine” Now he’s no longer holding a knife. Instead, he wants to face the other version of himself, talk to him, reach the same angle as him. That “you” is Tempo, the person he was before debut. He doesn’t want to kill him anymore. He wants to fully absorb him back into himself, to love him “like crazy, like it’s the last time”. After going in circles for more than a decade, he finally understood something: real wholeness doesn’t come from killing your past self. It comes from letting him return and learning to coexist with him. The two “burials” mean completely different things. In Zutter (2015), he buried the “not good enough” version of himself so he could become a god in other people’s eyes. In Desperado (2026), he buries the version of himself that was once “T.O.P” so he can become a human being again in his own eyes. It took him eleven years to go from attacking himself to finally being able to calmly hold a ceremony for the person he used to be. He’s no longer trying to kill the overweight, insecure, not-shiny-enough Choi Seunghyun. Instead, he lets that person live on in his music, as Tempo. That’s the real meaning of T.O.P stepping down from the throne and returning to being human. #탑 #TOP #최승현 #CHOISEUNGHYUN #TTTOP #ANOTHER_DIMENSION

ashlms⁵💗

22,097 views • 3 months ago