正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Holly: "Vaccine Schedule being changed,there aren't studies showing anything different" Makary: "Show me any scientific study HEP B shot given at birth's better than at ten/twelve. Doesn't exist" "example, covid booster shot in young healthy..little transient protection for covid shot & covid virus's like the common cold, doesn't make...

80,091 次观看 • 9 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

I asked Dr. Marty Makary MD, MPH about the FDA's recent approval of Moderna's Spikevax COVID-19 vaccine for the elderly and high-risk kids. Here's what he told me: "We have a situation whereby we would love these companies to run a proper randomized control trial…If you [fully] reject the COVID vaccines as they come to you for approval, then you have no leverage to be able to ask the company to do that. And those studies may never be done. We don't commission studies at the FDA. These are gigantic and expensive studies that, in my opinion, desperately need to be done…And I would like the data to come out to tell us what the truth is. …So we basically said we're not going to approve COVID vaccines in low-risk and healthy Americans without a randomized control clinical study first. …Now, in the situations where you've got a kid with immuno suppression from HIV and a cancer therapy with chemotherapy, where they have an incredible immune susceptibility, and their doctor feels like they would benefit from a COVID shot, we're sticking to the promise of Secretary Kennedy that we're not going to take anyone's vaccines away from them. And if you want a vaccine, you can get a vaccine. …For people who think that we approved a COVID vaccine for say, healthy children, that's incorrect. That's not true. It's for those high-risk exceptions where a doctor feels strongly. And as a matter of fact, ACIP has already echoed the views of others in in saying that we're no longer going to push these COVID vaccines in healthy subjects."

Jan Jekielek

33,972 次观看 • 1 年前

MRNA MYOCARDITIS DETAILS NZ IMMUNOLOGIST COULD NOT BRING HIMSELF TO DISCUSS WITH ROYAL COMMISSIONERS.... A few days ago NZ Immunologist and former head of the NZ Biotech research centre, The Malaghan Institute (and still sitting on the board), Prof Le Gros testified to the NZ Royal Commission of Inquiry. This video is a compilation of comments made pertaining to the issues of "adverse events" following the Pfizer mRNA Covid injectable. In his testimony he said he "didn't want to go into that" when questioned about mRNA induced Myocarditis. I DO want to go into it....so here are some important details that New Zealanders should have been updated on. *FDA issued an updated safety warning for mRNA induced Myocarditis on June 25 2025 *Based on 2023 - 24 FDA safety system data they found an incidence of 27 Myocarditis per 1 million doses for mRNA products in males aged 12 - 24 (1 case per 37,000 doses) *2024 FDA study - at 5 months post onset, 60% of Myocarditis cases that had been hospitalised had PERSISTANT CARDIAC ABNORMALITIES ON IMAGINE (a consistent finding across multiple studies) *THIS IS A POOR PROGNOSTIC FACTOR increased with increased risk of future cardiac events and increased mortality *LONG TERM IMPLICATIONS FOR mRNA MYOCARDITIS NOT UNDERSTOOD *Studies from 2021 showed rate of mRNA Myocarditis as high as 1/5,000 (200 cases per million mrna doses) for males age 16/17 *Hong Kong study 2021 - 1/3,000 doses resulted in myocarditis boys aged 13 - 18 *Using FDA Vaccine Safety Link data in 2021 - 1/2,000 doses resulted in Myocarditis (2nd dose males aged 18 - 24) SEVERITY *CDC data 2022 age 12 - 29 years, 90 days post Myocarditis onset. 25% had ICU at onset. 90 days later 25% still on medication. 30% on exercise restriction. OVER 50% HAD ABNORMAL CARDIAC IMAGING (LGE) Updated FDA warnings: *FDA concludes the 2023 - 24 unadjusted crude myocarditis rate post mRNA is 27 cases per million doses *mRNA induced Myocarditis (when resulting in hospitalisation) was associated with ABNORMAL CARDIAC IMAGING (LGE) in majority LGE IS A MARKER FOR A POOR PROGNOSIS. FULL IMPLICATIONS OF THIS ARE NOT YET KNOWN

NZ and the MRNA

11,356 次观看 • 1 年前

🔥"[T]he mRNA technology came out of the Pentagon. The Pentagon were the people who financed these Nazi COVID Franken-shots, and they were involved in the development of them." Professor of international law Dr. Francis Boyle describes for Pelle Neroth Taylor (@PelleNTaylor), a host on TNT Radio (@tntradiolive), how he refers to the COVID-19 "vaccines" as "Nazi COVID Franken-shots." He notes "there's no other word for them" and says that the mRNA technology used in them was developed by the Pentagon. "[W]hat is being done in Florida is [they're] trying to ban and get withdrawn these Nazi COVID Franken-shots," Boyle says, presumably referencing Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo's call to withdraw the injections over DNA contamination concerns. Boyle adds, "I am not a part of any anti-vaccine movement or anything like that, but they...don't dignify the word 'vaccine.' I just call them 'Franken-shots.'" "[T]he technology here, the mRNA technology, came out of the Pentagon. The Pentagon were the people who financed these Nazi COVID Franken-shots, and they were involved in the development of them," Boyle says. He notes "my belief and the belief of the people in Florida that they have to be withdrawn from the market, prohibited, and destroyed. They're just too dangerous for people." Boyle goes on to say: "[Y]ou can see all of the adverse reactions among people, and deaths, that are occurring all the time. In fact, right at the very beginning of the pandemic, based on my experience dealing with biological warfare weapons and their so-called 'vaccines'—Franken-shots—I said quite clearly that anything that Big Pharma came up with...that they said would be a vaccine...would be more dangerous than useless...I predicted right from the get-go that these...Nazi COVID Franken-shots would produce a humanitarian catastrophe, and that is what we are seeing today."

Sense Receptor

52,718 次观看 • 2 年前

REMINDER: A 2022 study from the Cleveland Clinic—ranked as *one of the top hospitals in the world*—showed that the more mRNA COVID injections you get, the more likely you are to get COVID. (1/3) "The proof is massive that the vaccines do more harm than good to everybody." Dr. Chris Shoemaker (@CShoemakerMD), a comprehensive physician in Canada, describes for Jason Lavigne (Jason Lavigne) how the mRNA COVID injections **increase** one's risk of getting COVID. Shoemaker highlights a seminal study performed by the Cleveland Clinic—often rated as one of the top hospitals in the world—which looked at the effectiveness of the injections in its own employees. The cohort size was just shy of 52,000 people. "The proof is massive that the vaccines do more harm than good to everybody," Shoemaker tells Lavigne. "The Cleveland Clinic hospital system...wanted to check who was doing the best of their staff. Some of their staff were totally unvaccinated. Some had had one or two jabs already after a year-and-a-half of the COVID program, and some had...five. So they checked everybody from 0 vax to five vaxs, and they wanted to see how they were in terms of time off work, illness, actually getting COVID, transmitting COVID to their own family, or bad effects of COVID, like death or severe illness. And they checked for all the indices, and they found that whatever number of shots you had, each additional shot made you another 20% more likely to get the bad result." Shoemaker adds: "By the time [you'd] gotten five jabs, you were five times more likely to have bad consequences going on for you. You're pretty well off the staff at the Cleveland Clinic at that point because your health has deteriorated so badly from five jabs. [On the contrary,] the zero vaxxed staff were still working steadily without interruption [and] weren't having any troubles. So that's point number one in terms of actual effectiveness of this crap that they wanted to put into us. Completely ineffective. In fact, negatively effective. Harmfully effective is what they are, and the Cleveland Clinic proved it in a five-month study in 2022."

Sense Receptor

41,713 次观看 • 1 年前

The Swiss study showed that 1/35 people who received an mRNA covid booster had "Vaccine associated myocardial injury" aka "heart damage" So I asked GROK, how many people would have heart damage if 2.56 Billion people had Boosters? ◻️73.1 Million People According to the WHO, 32% of the World has had at least 1 x "Booster" dose (3 x doses). That's "around" 2.56 Billion people. We know that most had Moderna or Pfizer mRNA technology, but not all of them. So how close to 73.1 Million people do you think we are? (GROK AI) "based on this study, approximately 73.1 million people worldwide might have experienced heart damage after receiving a third dose of the mRNA vaccine." Context by GROK with fact check included: "If the Swiss study indicated that 1 out of every 35 people who received a third dose of the mRNA COVID vaccine experienced heart damage, and if 2.56 billion people have received a third dose, then we can estimate the number of people with heart damage as follows: Fraction with heart damage: 1/35 Total number of people with third dose: 2.56 billion Therefore, based on this study, approximately 73.1 million people worldwide might have experienced heart damage after receiving a third dose of the mRNA vaccine. Important Notes: This calculation assumes the rate of heart damage found in the Swiss study applies universally across all demographics and conditions, which might not be accurate due to various factors like population differences, health conditions, etc. The study's findings should be interpreted with caution. Several sources mentioned in the context indicate that the heart damage detected was often mild, transient, and not necessarily indicative of long-term damage or myocarditis. The significance of these findings has been debated, with some suggesting the actual clinical impact might be less severe or significant than the raw numbers suggest." End quote

Humanspective

249,813 次观看 • 1 年前

The TGA finally admit myocarditis is an autoimmune response which means the vaccine causes autoimmune issues. Given biodistribution studies showed vaccine lipids entered all body organs this means all organs are at risk of autoimmune responses. No wonder Pfizer didn’t test for autoimmune responses in their trials! Is it just me or do others struggle to remember any mention of Covid causing myocarditis before the vaccine rollout. I seem to recall the initial hysteria was around Covid causing cytokine storms and respiratory problems with lots of pictures of people (young people at that) lying in bed with a ventilator struggling to breathe. Not pictures of people clutching hearts. Furthermore and I’m annoyed I didn’t ask this question how do health authorities know that people who had Covid didn’t actually get myocarditis from the vaccine given most of the adult population was vaccinated. It’s all to convenient to blame myocarditis on Covid, yet the authorities never tested the distribution and degradation of the vaccine spike protein so how can they rule out the vaccine having caused myocarditis for those who caught Covid. Let’s not forget the vaccine was codon optimised to increase the expression of spike protein, and the lipids were designed to enter all cells not just those with an ACE receptor. Given these enhancements increased the potency of the vaccine, I fail to see how the vaccine isn’t more toxic and dangerous than the virus. Finally, the TGA claim only 2 in 100,000 doses cause myocarditis from the vaccine. This is rubbish . That would mean only 1,200 people in Australia have myocarditis. I myself have spoken to hundreds of people who got it after the vaccine. #auspol TGA Australia #pfizer #moderna

Gerard Rennick

507,710 次观看 • 3 年前