Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

HOLY SHIT. A LENR Lagrangian is being developed that may provide the missing bridge between fundamental fields and the phenomena we actually measure. 🤯 This is bigger than ANY other attempt to explain cold fusion … The key idea is a "bridge theory": start with a Lagrangian for the...

12,910 просмотров • 6 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 22

Фото профиля Tom Hudson
Tom Hudson6 дней назад

This clip is wild

Фото профиля Vinyasi
Vinyasi5 дней назад

Such bullshit. Humanity is going to die off suddenly in massive quantity, anyway, when everyone is forced to wake up to a pandemic of honesty forced upon them by Nature whether or not they want it. What difference does it make to withhold information? None.

Фото профиля Dr. Paul Wilhelm | Advanced Rediscovery
Dr. Paul Wilhelm | Advanced Rediscovery5 дней назад

Hot take, I like it

Фото профиля SunnyD 🇨🇦
SunnyD 🇨🇦6 дней назад

@M34877M Go for it. Dont worry if humanity is ready , we’re an adaptable lot.

Фото профиля Michael Lieber
Michael Lieber5 дней назад

@grok explain this as if I were in high school

Фото профиля ReliaCar Transportation
ReliaCar Transportation4 дней назад

Please go into this more specifically when you have the time to do the research. This is very compelling.

Фото профиля Reynolds BEng 2.20
Reynolds BEng 2.205 дней назад

Like this?

Фото профиля Ron Shapiro
Ron Shapiro5 дней назад

As in the past, who and what controls energy wishes not to disturb its distribution and use; and this applies to the politics behind what is allowed to be revealed to the public. Fusion is the next technological step.

Фото профиля Arnt Blix
Arnt Blix5 дней назад

This is how and why they hid it.

Фото профиля Paul Mauck
Paul Mauck5 дней назад

P: The thought of: how do we measure a drop of water in an ocean? Tools that need to be developed; we need to first conceive what tool would provide an accurate and precise enough measurement to be deterministic. G: The “drop in the ocean” problem is exactly why LENR has stayed controversial: the claimed nuclear signal is often milliwatts or a few atoms of helium sitting on top of watts of ordinary chemical or Joule heating. Existing tools were never designed for that contrast ratio, so the first step is to decide what unique signature the Lagrangian actually predicts, then build a detector whose noise floor and systematics sit well below that signature. A practical conception starts with two orthogonal channels that cannot both be faked by the same thermal artifact. One channel is high-resolution helium-4 (or other predicted product) measured at the 0.5-picomole level—equivalent to about one joule of nuclear energy—while the second is a vacuum or mass-flow calorimeter that resolves 0.5 mW with 0.1 % reproducibility. When those two numbers lock together in time and scale with the predicted loading or geometry, the measurement becomes deterministic rather than statistical. Newer sensor ideas already point in that direction: dense piezo arrays that locate individual micro-events by acoustic time-of-flight, or potential-sensitive probes (Josephson or interferometric) aimed at any non-standard field modes the Lagrangian might generate. Once the theory tells you the expected frequency, spatial pattern, or particle ratio, those instruments stop being generic lab equipment and become purpose-built filters that pull the drop out of the ocean.

Фото профиля RSCombatVet
RSCombatVet4 дней назад

Am I the only one who wants to know wtf this is????👀 Why are all the minds working on this shit so weird🙃

Фото профиля Ad Venture
Ad Venture5 дней назад

If you read the book "Lost secrets of the sacred ark" by late Laurence Gardner you'll find some exiting science and some of it straight forward understandable. Like zero point energy is actually easy acheiveable. Gravity also suddently becomes easy to manipulate.

Фото профиля M
M6 дней назад

This is very exciting and it's great to see the veterans in these fields speaking like this. I am very grateful they handled all of this so wisely it seems

Фото профиля zachATTACK
zachATTACK5 дней назад

I keep searching for "nuclear story" but I'm getting bubkis for search results. Any way to link the story he refers to?

Фото профиля Phillip Box
Phillip Box3 дней назад

He lost me at the “grand coordinator” position. If he has anything to say of value to share he would have written a paper on it he hasn’t. So bs

Фото профиля Jerry Mlinarevic
Jerry Mlinarevic6 дней назад

Don't get too excited.

Фото профиля Dr. Paul Wilhelm | Advanced Rediscovery
Dr. Paul Wilhelm | Advanced Rediscovery5 дней назад

Or else?

Фото профиля 🇺🇸Bagnum P.I.🇺🇸
🇺🇸Bagnum P.I.🇺🇸5 дней назад

@AshtonForbes

Фото профиля Lenny Matters
Lenny Matters5 дней назад

🔥

Фото профиля Richard Comer 🌍🙏🏻
Richard Comer 🌍🙏🏻5 дней назад

@rosscoulthart 🧐🙏🏻

Фото профиля 😎🔥🚀 Noah 💖 His Friends & #AR#VR#MR#XR 👓
😎🔥🚀 Noah 💖 His Friends & #AR#VR#MR#XR 👓6 дней назад

CC @AshtonForbes

Фото профиля 1984
19845 дней назад

🍰

Похожие видео

Eric Weinstein unleashes a chilling take on physics: The field froze in 1973—no meaningful change to the Lagrangian (the core mathematical engine of physics) since then, despite decades of effort. "No new ideas about how to change the Lagrangian that anybody finds exciting... Nobody goes to Stockholm to get a Nobel Prize because they changed the Lagrangian of the world." He argues a bizarre force field slams anyone exploring truly revolutionary ideas—like multiple dimensions of time or breakthroughs that could upend power balances—while physics is the only profession without full free speech. Under the "Restricted Data" doctrine (from the 1946/1954 Atomic Energy Acts & "Born Secret"), any new physics insight that might relate to nuclear weapons becomes classified the instant it's written or spoken—even if you're not in government. Violate it? You could face Espionage Act charges, potentially capital offenses. Weinstein's bet: There's no secret government physics office holding breakthroughs. Instead, smart people long ago decided open physics was too dangerous—because real advances could hand the President fusion power or worse. "The Department of Energy is really the Department of Physics... We're scared of the possibility of physics? We don't even want to talk about it." Clip from this 3:49 mind-bender—physics as the silenced superpower. Does this explain the stagnation... or is string theory just a dead-end distraction? Is physics deliberately "safe" to avoid existential risks? Your take—drop it below.

Camus

20,754 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Elon Musk just stripped away every emotional narrative around paralysis and reduced it to a pure engineering equation. The human nervous system is not mystical. It is a biological wiring grid. When a wire breaks, you build a bypass. Traditional medicine treats a severed spinal cord as a permanent biological endpoint. Musk treats it as a broken routing switch. Musk: “It’s basically a communications bridge. You bridge the communications from the motor cortex past the point in the neck or spine where the nerves are damaged.” Not a miracle. Not a mystery. A bridge. Musk: “It is possible from a physics standpoint to restore full body functionality. There is nothing that prevents it happening from a physics standpoint.” The physics already check out. This is not a question of possibility. It is a question of execution speed. We are building AGI by mastering computational physics in silicon. Neuralink is applying that same mastery to carbon. The human body is not a sacred text. It is a machine. And machines can be patched. But this is bigger than medicine. Humanity’s ability to interface with superintelligence is currently bottlenecked by thumbs typing on a glass screen. Neuralink is the solution to that constraint dressed as a medical device. If you can bridge the brain past a broken spine, you can bridge the brain to a data center. Healing the paralyzed is step one. Merging with superintelligence is the endgame. Musk: “It’s a very hard technical problem, right, but there is nothing that prevents it happening from a physics standpoint.” Somewhere right now, a person is sitting in a wheelchair. An engineer is sitting in a lab. Neither knows the other exists. But one of them is quietly rewriting the definition of permanent. And it isn’t the one in the wheelchair.

Dustin

508,967 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨BREAKING: A cognitive scientist from MIT has mathematically proven that evolution guarantees we see zero percent of true reality, that most consciousness in the universe exists without a body, and that non-human intelligences with a wider window on reality than ours can reach in and manipulate it the way a programmer manipulates a video game. Donald Hoffman (Donald Hoffman) is a cognitive scientist at UC Irvine who has spent 40 years building a mathematical theory of the observer. His work was cited by John Wheeler in the "It From Bit" paper. He studied under Marvin Minsky at MIT, spent two decades secretly meeting with Francis Crick to study consciousness, and has nine specific mathematical conjectures on the table that would derive general relativity, quantum field theory and the Big Bang from a single framework. The top high-energy physicists in the world, Nima Arkani-Hamed and Nobel laureate David Gross, are already saying spacetime is doomed. Hoffman thinks he knows what replaces it. This interview is the first time he has publicly laid out what his mathematical model explains about alien life, embodiment and the structure of reality. It already derives time dilation and quantum wave functions directly from differences in observer window size. Physics has spent a century failing to solve the measurement problem because it has been looking in the wrong place. The observer has to come first, and no physicalist framework can get you there. A consciousness with a larger observer window has access to the underlying structure of our reality in ways we can't perceive or counter. A craft going Mach 40 instantaneously in our headset could be a leisurely maneuver in theirs. The implications for UAP and alien life are immense. Embodiment, being locked into a body with fingers and toes as your only interface with the world, is a probability zero anomaly in the full space of possible minds. He also says current large language models are dumber than cucumbers. His new framework, the recursive trace logic, is a completely different architecture, and some of the biggest names in frontier AI have already come to him about it. The framework has no ceiling, and the implication is a single unified consciousness exploring itself through an unbounded number of perspectives, each one capable of waking up. Death, in this framework, is just the closing of an icon on the desktop. Full conversation is live now.

Jesse Michels

1,672,315 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад