正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Honestly, DirectQuery is for the rich! Set your expectations right. You cannot optimize DirectQuery to perform like Import mode. #Honestly #powerbi #directquery

12,921 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

Ed Hansberry - MVP 的头像
Ed Hansberry - MVP1 年前

Everyone that talks to their Snowflake sales rep will be told DQ is the best when working with Snowflake data. Yea, it can perform decently, but still pales in comparison to import. The main reason is money flies from your bank account to Snowflakes with each visual query processed. 💸💸💸💸

Micah Dail 的头像
Micah Dail1 年前

I do prefer avoiding DQ, but just about every model we have has DQ with aggregates. I can't get away!

Marco Russo 的头像
Marco Russo1 年前

You are certainly aware of pros/cons. Many people don’t, so I tried to simplify the message. 😎

Daniel Dickler 的头像
Daniel Dickler1 年前

Honestly, with live connections to SSAS multi-dimensional model cubes you do not have all these performance headaches.

Marco Russo 的头像
Marco Russo1 年前

Long live to Multidimensional!

Thomas Ivarsson 的头像
Thomas Ivarsson1 年前

When you cannot import data into Power BI with an acceptable time window then DQ can be interesting. I have not met that scenario so far.

Mathew Westwood 的头像
Mathew Westwood1 年前

You always talk sense Marco and always appreciated 👏

NYCGuy1463 的头像
NYCGuy14631 年前

What if you get a fresh set of information every month across multiple tables ? DQ allows the new data to just flow in.

Marco Russo 的头像
Marco Russo1 年前

I don't get the point. You refresh every month. Unless you want to spend more for each query, of course. Your choice.

dinesh 的头像
dinesh1 年前

Please share your opinion on direct lake by comparing with import mode from performance point of view.

相关视频