Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Hosting Group masturbation/frottage session Saturday April 4 in Hampton, Virginia. You must be masculine and clean. Average to Inshape. No anal allowed. DM or telegram: Beat_Broo (No Group Chat) #757Freaks #B8 #Masc #Frot #Frottage #Hampton #Bators #JO

29,068 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Dear Virginians, Tuesday is Election Day. And what happens on Tuesday, April 21, will shape your family, your freedom, and your prosperity—not just for a moment, but for the rest of this decade… and far beyond. If you stay home, and don’t VOTE NO, understand what you’re choosing. Right now, Virginia has the most balanced representation in the country —11 districts, with a mix of voices across the Commonwealth— 6 Democrats and 5 Republicans. This referendum—that you will vote on on Tuesday— changes that. You must VOTE NO! Why? Because if you don’t vote NO Virginia will have the most gerrymandered maps in the entire country and millions of Virginians will be disenfranchised. The proposed map shifts you to a reality where 10 Democrats and 1 Republican represent you. Even worse—7 of those 11 representatives would come from Fairfax and Richmond, living hours away, disconnected from your community, your values, and your daily life. Under these new lines, Fairfax-based politicians would represent citizens in: ➡️Williamsburg and Colonial Beach. ➡️Fredericksburg and Bowling Green. ➡️Culpeper and Stanardsville. ➡️Hampton Roads. ➡️Even into the Shenandoah County. Think about that. That is not “fair.” That is not “temporary.” That is not representation. The Democrats are lying to you. If they get what they want, you will be silenced. You must VOTE NO! This referendum overrides the bipartisan redistricting system that YOU voted for in 2020—replacing it with a last-minute political maneuver designed to lock in power before the next elections. If you don’t vote, you are not opting out. You are consenting! And those who only show up for presidential elections need to hear this clearly: This vote matters more. Because it determines who speaks for you—or whether anyone truly does. It determines if your vote will even matter at all. One more thing: If you have a 17-year-old who will be 18 by November 3—they CAN vote NO tomorrow too. They can register at their precinct and vote the same day. So no excuses. Get up. Get out. Vote NO. And make sure everyone you know does the same. VOTE NO. If you sit this out, don’t be surprised when your voice disappears and things get so much worse. WE NEED YOU TO VOTE?

Loudoun County Republican Committee

24,690 views • 3 months ago

Yesterday morning I hosted a group of my constituents whose lives have been directly impacted by the squatter crisis, for a segment with Marcia Kramer of CBS. The new talking point from the progressive Democrats is that the squatter crisis is overblown or even non-existent, as they push to further empower squatters and strip property rights in the state budget currently being negotiated, but this problem is all too real, and it's devastating. I was able to pull this group of constituents together for a live interview with less than 12 hours notice. That's how bad it's gotten. With more notice I could have brought in least a dozen more cases from my office alone. This problem is rampant, it's getting worse, and it's destroying people's faith in the city. These laws MUST be changed, but Republicans cannot do it alone. Democrats MUST begin to take this seriously at both the city and state level. The timeframe to establish residency must be made longer. I'm proposing a change from 30 days to 180 days in NYC. Documentation to establish residency must be limited to official utility bills or notarized leases and nothing more. In one case in Jamaica, a squatter used an Uber Eats receipt to establish residency, and the court allowed it. In no sane world should this be acceptable. Homeowners MUST be empowered to rapidly remove squatters from their property when they are first discovered. And squatters MUST be taken out of civil court and brought into criminal court, to be charged with criminal trespass, forgery, and ID theft if appropriate. There must be serious consequences to these scams. The people have had enough. Laws must change. And if Democrats aren't interested in fixing these problems, homeowners are going to be left with no other option but to take matters into their own hands to protect their rights. We're playing with fire here.

Councilwoman Vickie Paladino

18,192 views • 2 years ago

🏳️‍🌈🇺🇸 It is truly unbelievable what's happening in the west atm. Today in San Francisco, grown men were allowed to walk around with their penis' out in front of CHILDREN. There's video footage of this everywhere but I will not be sharing it. Here you have a cop saying it's fine for a man to have his penis out in front of a kid as long as he's not masturbating. But you know what, a couple years from now, masturbating in front of children will probably be legalized. Why? Because it would follow the pattern of how we reached this point. First society said: “We only accept relationships between a man and a woman, anything else is unacceptable.” Then a fringe group said: “We want you to accept same-sex relationships!” Initially society said no, but after a while society allowed it. Then society said: “Marriage is only between a man and a woman, anything else is unacceptable.” Then a fringe group said: “We want you to accept same-sex marriages!” Initially society said no, but after a while society allowed it. Then society said: “You're either born a man or a woman, this cannot be changed.” Then a fringe group said: “We want to change sex!” Initially society said no, but after a while society allowed it. Then society said: “There's only 2 genders, male and female, this cannot be changed.” Then a fringe group said: “We want you to accept unlimited genders! People should be able to identify as whatever they want and use whatever pronouns they want! Throw biology out the window!” Initially society said no, but after a while society allowed it. Then society said: “Adults can't be naked with their genitalia out in front of minors.” Then a fringe group said: “There's nothing wrong with having our penis' out in front of children! It's a way of expressing ourselves!” Initially society said no, but after a while society allowed it. Now, if you showed the society that allowed homosexual relationships where we are now, they'd be horrified! So how did we reach this stage? The line was moved once. And as soon as the line moved once, it made it so if could be moved an infinite amount of times. Every time it was moved, everyone said "oh this is it now, this is our set of morals that we'll follow." But it never was. And following this trajectory, things like pedophila may also become normalized. We're already hearing terms like MAPs (Minor Attracted People) because some feel the term pedophile is too offensive! Western governments fear religion becoming mainstream again, because God's law means that line is set in stone, and cannot be moved. CR: Tayler Hansen
0:47

Sensitive content

🏳️‍🌈🇺🇸 It is truly unbelievable what's happening in the west atm. Today in San Francisco, grown men were allowed to walk around with their penis' out in front of CHILDREN. There's video footage of this everywhere but I will not be sharing it. Here you have a cop saying it's fine for a man to have his penis out in front of a kid as long as he's not masturbating. But you know what, a couple years from now, masturbating in front of children will probably be legalized. Why? Because it would follow the pattern of how we reached this point. First society said: “We only accept relationships between a man and a woman, anything else is unacceptable.” Then a fringe group said: “We want you to accept same-sex relationships!” Initially society said no, but after a while society allowed it. Then society said: “Marriage is only between a man and a woman, anything else is unacceptable.” Then a fringe group said: “We want you to accept same-sex marriages!” Initially society said no, but after a while society allowed it. Then society said: “You're either born a man or a woman, this cannot be changed.” Then a fringe group said: “We want to change sex!” Initially society said no, but after a while society allowed it. Then society said: “There's only 2 genders, male and female, this cannot be changed.” Then a fringe group said: “We want you to accept unlimited genders! People should be able to identify as whatever they want and use whatever pronouns they want! Throw biology out the window!” Initially society said no, but after a while society allowed it. Then society said: “Adults can't be naked with their genitalia out in front of minors.” Then a fringe group said: “There's nothing wrong with having our penis' out in front of children! It's a way of expressing ourselves!” Initially society said no, but after a while society allowed it. Now, if you showed the society that allowed homosexual relationships where we are now, they'd be horrified! So how did we reach this stage? The line was moved once. And as soon as the line moved once, it made it so if could be moved an infinite amount of times. Every time it was moved, everyone said "oh this is it now, this is our set of morals that we'll follow." But it never was. And following this trajectory, things like pedophila may also become normalized. We're already hearing terms like MAPs (Minor Attracted People) because some feel the term pedophile is too offensive! Western governments fear religion becoming mainstream again, because God's law means that line is set in stone, and cannot be moved. CR: Tayler Hansen

Censored Men

1,781,455 views • 2 years ago

Possibly the biggest change in Microsoft Teams history? Teams without the Teams? Public preview in November to desktop, mobile, iOS, and Android. Here is what you need to know: 🟣 Microsoft is introducing a new combined chat and channels experience. Meaning chat and teams/channels will show up under the "Chat" sidebar icon. No more dedicated Teams sidebar button. 🟣 Teams and Channels will have their own section in chat. 🟣 Group your chats and/or channels however best works for you with favourites and custom sections (up to 50 sections and 50 items per section) 🟣 “Unread,” “Chat,” “Channels,” “Meetings,” and “Muted” Filters 🟣 New message can initiate a new chat or new channel post 🟣 New Mention view gathers all your mentions into a single interactive list. 🟣 At launch, a self-service, guided onboarding will help users discover the new experience and configure it to their preferences (on or off) 🟣 Users who prefer to keep chat and channels separate can easily do so during the onboarding process or at any time later. So far, it looks like there are no IT/tenant-level override controls. This experience change is targeted at getting more users using teams/channels. Most Teams users live in "chats", not teams/channels. There will undoubtedly be some pushback from users who use teams/channels well and like having the mental separation of teams/channels vs chats. I've been fortunate to be using it for a while, and I'm personally a big fan; my use of the correct channels has gone way up, and now I can find them all in one place in the app, particularly on mobile. I'm now much more likely to see channel conversations I need to see. What do you think? #MicrosoftTeams #Microsoft365

Tom Arbuthnot

64,526 views • 1 year ago