How 0.004% sparked a trillion dollar debate 😳

I studied Environmental Education, and only just realized it's a left-wing scam

Environmental bs has been forced down our throats for decades now, Framing the whole human species as the villain. It's very important that humans rise up to see the scam we are being force fed to not only keep us distracted from the baby slurping monsters controlling the society but also to guilt trip us into submission.

Conservatives are all retards

CO2 rose from 280 ppm (before industrialization) to 480 pmm. You guys call it a conspiracy as if anyone would benefit from it being real. The one's who are benefiting from dumb people thinking it's fake are the rich oil barons. Keep it up guys.

this man is an idiot

When people say its a small amount ask them how rare Ozone is in the Ozone layer. Spoiler 8-15ppm and that stops 97-99% of UV. Small amounts does not mean insignificant.

It’s all lies,to fool the people a money making scheme.

Dumb fucker

You got one zero too many in your heading, but yeah, even o.o4%, or 400 ppm, is a very low number. And crazy to think that all trees 🌳 and other plants, live off that really small amount

Just more proof of lies. Noting to see here. SO WHAT DO WE DO ABOUT IT. ALL WE DO IS TALK TALK TALK. I am ok, I just want to see some people do something righteous for a change. Don't you?

11 procent of 0.04 is 0.0044. And CO2 is not polution, it's the gas of life. Plant needs it. Under 200 ppm most plants die.

They say half knowledge is dangerous for a reason. Especially when politicians talk with it.

damn

Here’s the science. CO₂ is a greenhouse gas. Even in small concentrations, it absorbs and re-radiates infrared heat that would otherwise escape to space. This is not controversial — it’s basic physics, first quantified by Eunice Foote and John Tyndall in the 1850s and confirmed by satellites measuring Earth’s energy balance today. The key number isn’t the absolute percentage. It’s the change: Pre-industrial: ~280 ppm CO₂ Today: ~420 ppm (a ~50% increase) That extra 140 ppm has added significant radiative forcing — the equivalent of adding ~2 watts per square meter of extra heat to the entire planet. Climate models and observations (NASA, NOAA, IPCC) attribute most of the ~1.1°C warming since 1880 to this human-caused rise. Why small numbers matter in climate Think of it like a fever. A 1–2°C rise in body temperature doesn’t sound like much — until it is. The climate system is the same. Small changes in energy balance get amplified by feedbacks (melting ice reduces reflectivity, warmer air holds more water vapor, permafrost releases more greenhouse gases). The “0.004%” argument misses this entirely. It’s like saying “a little poison can’t hurt you” without measuring the dose or the body’s response. The trillion-dollar debate Yes, climate policy involves enormous sums. Reasonable people disagree on the best response — how fast to decarbonize, the role of nuclear, adaptation vs. mitigation, and the reliability of long-term models. Those are legitimate debates. But the core physics — that human CO₂ emissions are warming the planet — is settled science, not “black magic.” Dismissing it because “the number is small” is like ignoring rising blood pressure because “it’s only a few points.” The atmosphere doesn’t care about percentages. It responds to energy. If you enjoy these science-backed explanations of climate, energy, and the real debates behind the headlines, follow for more. 🌍 #TheQuietObserver

They aren’t there for answers. They are there to get paid and preach their propaganda for political influence and monies spent.

@grok please explain the context of these video

Facts matter. All the climate alarmists have are incomplete computer models.

@elonmusk @VP @PressSec @WhiteHouse @UnderSecPD @SecRubio @BuschEbba @lizamaria80 @nikeorbrink @LouiseHammargr1 @kdriks @Sverigesriksdag @alexstubb

What a moron!

This proves that tjese politicians know nothing about anything!

@grok verify? and which movie is this?

Meanwhile the geomagnetic field is down 30% over the past 150 years. But it cannot really be used as a way to force more taxes now isn't it ?

it's the concrete jungle, change in geology, topography fine v by humans, so climate change is accelerated by humans 💯

its absolutely heartbreaking knowing that morons like there run the country

0.11 × 0.004 = 0.00044

Yes. CO2 has increased, but even that is irrelevant. Temperatures don't seem to follow atmospheric CO2 consistency. The latest warming phase of Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation, AMO, was used to frighten us about CO2. In reality CO2 and temperature are not connected.

👍