Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

'How can the BBC claim to be impartial if it doesn't sack Gary Lineker?' Patrick Christys

354,994 views • 3 years ago •via X (Twitter)

9 Comments

Marina Purkiss's profile picture
Marina Purkiss3 years ago

@PatrickChristys …the same reason it can claim to be impartial if they don’t sack Robbie Gibb, Tim Davie and Richard Sharp.

Edwin Hayward's profile picture
Edwin Hayward3 years ago

@PatrickChristys Ahem. Perhaps look at your own broadcasting ranks stuffed with Tory MPs first?

Shoaib M Khan's profile picture
Shoaib M Khan3 years ago

@PatrickChristys This impartial BBC?

Solly0 #FBPE's profile picture
Solly0 #FBPE3 years ago

@PatrickChristys GBNews the snowflake channel, always trying to get people cancelled, they hate freedom of speech unless it’s in line with what they’re saying, do you think they are far right, do you think they are fascist? Of course they are!

Richard Bentall #FBPE @richardbentall.bsky.social's profile picture
Richard Bentall #FBPE @richardbentall.bsky.social3 years ago

@PatrickChristys Says the least impartial news programme on the planet.

Tobi's profile picture
Tobi3 years ago

@PatrickChristys The BBC of all places has the answer...

Shoaib M Khan's profile picture
Shoaib M Khan3 years ago

@PatrickChristys Don't think anyone believes the BBC is impartial.

steve burrows 🇺🇦✈️'s profile picture
steve burrows 🇺🇦✈️3 years ago

@PatrickChristys Lol. How can GBNews claim to tell the truth if it doesnt sack Rees Mogg who is paid with taxpayers money.

Robin Murray's profile picture
Robin Murray3 years ago

@PatrickChristys Should they also sack David Attenborough, Prue Leith and Lord Sugar. Anyone else who’s views you wish to suppress from the viewpoint of your totally impartial, unbiased news program, worthy of Dr Goebbels

Related Videos