How did they pack enough oxygen for a day on the moon landing?

Google is literally free

Fuck people are stupid.... How do submarines do the same? Oh yeah, they produce their own oxygen on board, use Co2 scrubbers, and carry condensed food.

Are you too stupid to understand pressure? The LEM used O@ at ~3.7 psi instead of normal sea level pressure of ~14.7 psi. This reduces oxygen requirement by almost 1/4. Then they had scrubbers to remove CO2. It's simple if you understand a little 7th grade science.

I don't have enough time or crayons to explain it to you in a way you'd understand

Please answer me Where is the toilet? Where did they go pee and poo One week in space Three crew members Give me a fucking break would you? Same bullshit as 911

You can easily find this information online. Thought you guys were all about "research" ?

They liquefied it and the air you breathe is only 23% oxygen and most of the air you breathe you exhale very little of the oxygen links with blood cells.

"No manned spacecraft now exists that can withstand the radiation from the Van Allen belts, through which a craft must traverse to make it to the Moon." -SpaceCast News Service, March 9, 1998

Elon said it would take him 9 refueling stops to get to the moon.

Really wasn't much trouble. Want to know how? Or just post more bullshit hoping that people fall further down the stupid hole.

As usual @MckeeganDave has a video that fully explains this. Did you not check for the answer or is this just engagement farming?

@haveaconcern How do they pack enough oxygen to be under water for three months on a submarine?

The landing sites, equipment, tracks etc all there still on the Moon for thousands of years and Japanese craft that took high definition images from the US LEM landing sites. Why waste so much time on silly conspiracies?

🤣🤣studios in closed system earth under the firmament doesnt require it

All explained here.

LoL. It's so fkg silly... How did the jeep sized Rover fold up into a little suitcase under the side of the Lander? Btw the driver is a doll... Bwahahaha

NASA has a great explanation for all that. As for oxygen, astronauts held their breaths for the whole trip. They did the same for food and washroom. So, all the problems were solved so easily 😎😎😎.

The people who believe this video are the ones that Abraham Lincoln referred to when he said, "You can fool some of the people all of the time."

How did they scrub the CO2? It needs to go somewhere. Why didn't the film get overexposed going thru the Van Allen Belts? Why wasn't it overexposed on the Moon where there was no protection from radiation?

The older I get, the more I realize how much everything they ever told us, is a got damn lie. It actually quite infuriating. Makes you wonder what else these pieces of shit lied to us about.

Great question. Yeah, we know the moon is a hologram. There is no outer space.

Anyone who has been to Washington D.C. and actually looked at it in the Air and Space Museum at the Smithsonian sees what I saw, people gathered around it, looking up at it, and all saying, “Ain’t No Way” while shaking their head.

The liquid fuel [aerozine] for the Ascent Craft leaving the surface of the Moon, would take up the volume of 12 - 55 gal drums. I did the math last week. They said the fuel was in 2 - 1 cubic meter Ti spheres attached to the outer frame. But that's not enough fuel.

being a moon landing denier requires one to not understand anything ever. All your talking points were created by commies or browns to discount the White man.

"I don't understand how something works so it must be impossible"

And don't forget the 12v lead acid car batteries And they want you to please forget Richard Nixon calling the moon on his land-line phone

Liquid oxygen takes much less volume

I’m surprised you guys aren’t denying the existence of rocket anymore.

Come on it’s such a simple answer. “They NEVER WENT”

It won't all fit in there I actually had it out with someone capable of using a calculator and admitting the actual results. When we got to the Fuel he saw it all 💡 I heard from him 4 or 5 days later "I wasn't even thinking about their power supply" Mission Accomplished 😬

It was higher oxygen concentration than air, the cabins and suits were at lower pressure than 14.7 psi, they had CO2 scrubbers.

they recycle the air the same way a submarine does it

How did they pack enough? Well, they put what was needed into containers and then moved those containers onto the ship. Is that beyond your understanding?

Hey Grok, did Nasa use liquid oxygen on the Apollo missions to the moon? Grok: “Yes, the Apollo missions to the Moon used liquid oxygen (LOX) for crew breathing over the roughly week-to-two-week duration of each mission —though with an important technical nuance in how it was stored. The primary oxygen supply for the crew (metabolic oxygen for breathing via the Environmental Control System, or ECS) came from the Service Module's cryogenic storage system. This stored oxygen in supercritical cryogenic tanks (not traditional subcritical liquid oxygen with a clear liquid-gas interface). - Supercritical oxygen is maintained above its critical point (around -118°C / 154.6 K and 50.43 bar / ~731 psi for O₂), behaving as a dense fluid without distinct liquid/gas phases. In Apollo, the tanks operated at about 900 psi and cryogenic temperatures (around -297°F or colder to stay dense/liquid-like). - This was often described as a "slush" or semi-liquid/semi-gaseous state in historical accounts, and it was effectively **cryogenic liquid oxygen** in function—providing the high-density storage needed for long missions without venting losses or complex two-phase gauging in zero-g. - Each oxygen tank held about 320–326 pounds (145–148 kg) usable, with two tanks initially (total ~640–650 pounds), later three after Apollo 13 for added redundancy. A significant portion (~450 pounds total across tanks) went to fuel cells for power (reacting with hydrogen), while the rest supported crew breathing, cabin leaks, and contingencies. - Crew consumption was roughly 1.8 pounds per man-day (about 5.4 pounds/day for three astronauts), plus small amounts for other uses—easily covered for typical mission lengths of 8–12+ days (e.g., Apollo 11: ~8 days total; Apollo 17: ~12.5 days). This system was chosen over gaseous high-pressure storage or subcritical LOX because supercritical storage eliminated the need for complex venting and quantity-gauging in low gravity, while providing reliable, high-density supply without boil-off losses. The Lunar Module had its own separate oxygen supply (also cryogenic/supercritical in primary tanks for the descent/ascent phases and PLSS backpacks for EVAs), but the Command/Service Module handled the main transit and return oxygen for the crew. In short: Yes—cryogenic (supercritical) liquid oxygen was the key source that kept the astronauts breathing for the full duration of their lunar trips. The famous Apollo 13 oxygen tank explosion involved one of these very cryogenic oxygen tanks in the Service Module.”

... welp there's also this...