正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

How does exclusive homosexuality persist, despite evolution? An evolutionary biology professor of mine during undergrad suggested that a hint might be found in the cultural trope of the "rich gay uncle." It's true that gay men tend to have somewhat more financial success than straight men, and it's also... true that gay men tend to have more brothers (i.e., gay men are actually more likely to become rich uncles). Further, since the 1970s, evolutionary biologists have hypothesized that maybe homosexuality could persist via kin selection: instead of investing in a child with 50% of your genes, you invest more in your siblings' children, who have 25% of your genes. So, perhaps, in some cases, men might benefit from forgoing their own reproduction and obtaining resources to maximize investment in nieces and nephews. An unusual strategy sure, but, in principle, feasible...show more

Macken

24,373 subscribers

344,660 次观看 • 5 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Mothers and maternal aunts of gay men tend to have significantly more children than those of straight men, suggesting a genetic link where the same factors promoting female promiscuity may increase the likelihood of gay sons. Theo Von: “The first gay dude must have been like ‘what’s going on?’” Rogan referenced studies by evolutionary biologist Andrea Camperio Ciani at the University of Padova. A wild, funny chat about evolution, genes, and balance. What do you think, is being gay more nature, nurture, or both?

Mothers and maternal aunts of gay men tend to have significantly more children than those of straight men, suggesting a genetic link where the same factors promoting female promiscuity may increase the likelihood of gay sons. Theo Von: “The first gay dude must have been like ‘what’s going on?’” Rogan referenced studies by evolutionary biologist Andrea Camperio Ciani at the University of Padova. A wild, funny chat about evolution, genes, and balance. What do you think, is being gay more nature, nurture, or both?

Camus

210,764 次观看 • 18 天前

Being gay takes fortitude and true grit, and in order to have these superpowers, you have to embrace the marvel that you are. GAY LIKE ME is a celebration of gay identity, and a powerful warning for gay men and the world.

Being gay takes fortitude and true grit, and in order to have these superpowers, you have to embrace the marvel that you are. GAY LIKE ME is a celebration of gay identity, and a powerful warning for gay men and the world.

Richie Jackson

2,952,358 次观看 • 1 年前

Gay male couples—two men in a relationship—have the lowest breakup rates, which is striking given that gay men also have the highest rates of what evolutionary psychologists call extra-dyadic mating, a technical term for sex outside the primary relationship: infidelity, or cheating. In other words, they have the lowest breakup rates despite the highest levels of non-monogamous behavior. After gay male couples, heterosexual couples—one man and one woman—have the next lowest breakup rates. Interestingly, the highest breakup rates are found among female–female couples. Lesbian couples, on average, dissolve relationships more frequently than either gay male or heterosexual couples. One likely reason is that, across relationship types, women are more likely than men to initiate breakups. In heterosexual marriages, women initiate 60 to 70 percent of divorces. When you have two women in a relationship, you effectively double the likelihood that at least one partner will initiate a breakup, which raises the overall probability of relationship dissolution.

Gay male couples—two men in a relationship—have the lowest breakup rates, which is striking given that gay men also have the highest rates of what evolutionary psychologists call extra-dyadic mating, a technical term for sex outside the primary relationship: infidelity, or cheating. In other words, they have the lowest breakup rates despite the highest levels of non-monogamous behavior. After gay male couples, heterosexual couples—one man and one woman—have the next lowest breakup rates. Interestingly, the highest breakup rates are found among female–female couples. Lesbian couples, on average, dissolve relationships more frequently than either gay male or heterosexual couples. One likely reason is that, across relationship types, women are more likely than men to initiate breakups. In heterosexual marriages, women initiate 60 to 70 percent of divorces. When you have two women in a relationship, you effectively double the likelihood that at least one partner will initiate a breakup, which raises the overall probability of relationship dissolution.

Rob Henderson

590,512 次观看 • 7 个月前

If animals live longer, they can have more kids, and pass on more of their genes. So why hasn't evolution solved aging? Jacob Kimmel explained the three evolutionary reasons why we still grow old: (1) Longevity doesn't actually help that much. Most of our primate ancestors didn't die of natural causes: if you are probably going to be eaten by a tiger, a naturally long lifespan is pointless. (2) Some genes might benefit from aging! If an older animal dies, often the resources they would have consumed are instead consumed by younger kin, who are genetically similar to them but more likely to reproduce. (3) Even if the two other arguments are wrong and there's selection against aging, there might be even stronger selection on other traits. Evolution just might not prioritise longevity.

If animals live longer, they can have more kids, and pass on more of their genes. So why hasn't evolution solved aging? Jacob Kimmel explained the three evolutionary reasons why we still grow old: (1) Longevity doesn't actually help that much. Most of our primate ancestors didn't die of natural causes: if you are probably going to be eaten by a tiger, a naturally long lifespan is pointless. (2) Some genes might benefit from aging! If an older animal dies, often the resources they would have consumed are instead consumed by younger kin, who are genetically similar to them but more likely to reproduce. (3) Even if the two other arguments are wrong and there's selection against aging, there might be even stronger selection on other traits. Evolution just might not prioritise longevity.

Dwarkesh Patel

124,850 次观看 • 1 个月前

Why are so many young people single these days? Pooja Arora (Pooja Arora): So my last question: I wanted to talk about why people are single nowadays. I would have asked about human nature, but that’s for another day. I sent you an article—how do you think common knowledge fits into that area? Why do you think so many youngsters are single? Me: Yes, it’s a good question. I’m not sure that common knowledge is an important part of the answer, but some of it is that women no longer depend on the economic contributions of men for their livelihood, as was true, say, in my mother’s era, when women were not professionally trained. To pay the rent, they had to be married. Now, not only are women better educated, but the economy has shifted to favor the kinds of skills that women, as opposed to men, have. And just as women have been rising, men have been sinking because of the decline in blue-collar work. There have also been cultural trends that favor women’s temperaments. Men have been distracted by internet gaming, gambling, and pornography and are less desirable as marriage partners. Women with more economic power are more likely to raise their standards for what they want in a man. In my parents’ generation, it was not uncommon for a woman to marry a man with much less education and, sometimes, less intelligence. This was not unusual among my parents’ friends. The men often had a high school degree and then went immediately into a small business—sometimes a family business, sometimes one he started himself. The criterion was: does he make a living? No one cared about education. That has changed, with the result that there are fewer men who satisfy the criteria women now have. This was mentioned in the article you shared with me. Also, with more sexual freedom, people don’t have to get married simply to have sex, which was again true in my parents’ generation. There’s a process that has been in place since the baby boomers and has accelerated among millennials and Generation Z. For other reasons, I think a generation of men may also be incapable of socially skilled interaction, partly because they’ve grown up with screens instead of face-to-face contact. There is some fear that a sexual encounter could result in an accusation of rape or sexual harassment. There is so much pornography that, for an increasing number of men, it serves as an outlet for what in the past would have required actual human contact. There are many factors. The article from The Economist lists them, I think, quite skillfully. It’s not clear how to reverse the trend. Increasing the economic prospects of men and creating an educational system that is less feminized and more encouraging of male achievement might help. Another could be changing norms—and here common knowledge comes in. Among women, is it a sign of low status to be with a man who has less education than you? Men, from time immemorial, have been happy to marry women with less education than themselves. Women don't. That immediately reduces the marriage pool. Maybe that’s a norm that could change. Go back to the norm in my parents’ generation? Pooja Arora: No, let’s not do that. Me: Okay, let's not do that. Pooja Arora: We’re happy to marry men who are not as educated as us. It’s fine. They just have to be nice and kind at this point in time. Me: Well, yes—exactly. Nice and kind.

Why are so many young people single these days? Pooja Arora (Pooja Arora): So my last question: I wanted to talk about why people are single nowadays. I would have asked about human nature, but that’s for another day. I sent you an article—how do you think common knowledge fits into that area? Why do you think so many youngsters are single? Me: Yes, it’s a good question. I’m not sure that common knowledge is an important part of the answer, but some of it is that women no longer depend on the economic contributions of men for their livelihood, as was true, say, in my mother’s era, when women were not professionally trained. To pay the rent, they had to be married. Now, not only are women better educated, but the economy has shifted to favor the kinds of skills that women, as opposed to men, have. And just as women have been rising, men have been sinking because of the decline in blue-collar work. There have also been cultural trends that favor women’s temperaments. Men have been distracted by internet gaming, gambling, and pornography and are less desirable as marriage partners. Women with more economic power are more likely to raise their standards for what they want in a man. In my parents’ generation, it was not uncommon for a woman to marry a man with much less education and, sometimes, less intelligence. This was not unusual among my parents’ friends. The men often had a high school degree and then went immediately into a small business—sometimes a family business, sometimes one he started himself. The criterion was: does he make a living? No one cared about education. That has changed, with the result that there are fewer men who satisfy the criteria women now have. This was mentioned in the article you shared with me. Also, with more sexual freedom, people don’t have to get married simply to have sex, which was again true in my parents’ generation. There’s a process that has been in place since the baby boomers and has accelerated among millennials and Generation Z. For other reasons, I think a generation of men may also be incapable of socially skilled interaction, partly because they’ve grown up with screens instead of face-to-face contact. There is some fear that a sexual encounter could result in an accusation of rape or sexual harassment. There is so much pornography that, for an increasing number of men, it serves as an outlet for what in the past would have required actual human contact. There are many factors. The article from The Economist lists them, I think, quite skillfully. It’s not clear how to reverse the trend. Increasing the economic prospects of men and creating an educational system that is less feminized and more encouraging of male achievement might help. Another could be changing norms—and here common knowledge comes in. Among women, is it a sign of low status to be with a man who has less education than you? Men, from time immemorial, have been happy to marry women with less education than themselves. Women don't. That immediately reduces the marriage pool. Maybe that’s a norm that could change. Go back to the norm in my parents’ generation? Pooja Arora: No, let’s not do that. Me: Okay, let's not do that. Pooja Arora: We’re happy to marry men who are not as educated as us. It’s fine. They just have to be nice and kind at this point in time. Me: Well, yes—exactly. Nice and kind.

Steven Pinker

89,160 次观看 • 5 个月前

We are living in a time where more men are being more vocal about their feelings which many women have said they have wanted for a long time. However, some women are struggling with accepting what men have to say when it comes to them having to accept that all relationship problems are not caused by men. This is not meant to be an attack on women but many women take it as an attack and are way more interested in defending women than actually understanding what men are trying to say. It tends to be more challenging for women to emotionally regulate and to accept accountability, not because they are flawed, but because of the conditioning and training that has taught women that men are less intelligent and more than often the problem. Quality men, which there are plenty of but are often overlooked and not talked about, are tired of being blamed for everything and are no longer willing to tolerate it. They want to make it clear that most men are not like the stereotypical bs that our society teaches about men. It has been challenging because it's difficult for many women to accept because of their personal experiences from choosing and dealing with lesser quality men.

We are living in a time where more men are being more vocal about their feelings which many women have said they have wanted for a long time. However, some women are struggling with accepting what men have to say when it comes to them having to accept that all relationship problems are not caused by men. This is not meant to be an attack on women but many women take it as an attack and are way more interested in defending women than actually understanding what men are trying to say. It tends to be more challenging for women to emotionally regulate and to accept accountability, not because they are flawed, but because of the conditioning and training that has taught women that men are less intelligent and more than often the problem. Quality men, which there are plenty of but are often overlooked and not talked about, are tired of being blamed for everything and are no longer willing to tolerate it. They want to make it clear that most men are not like the stereotypical bs that our society teaches about men. It has been challenging because it's difficult for many women to accept because of their personal experiences from choosing and dealing with lesser quality men.

Tamorah Shareef Muhammad

12,429,491 次观看 • 2 年前

In response to a question about why a wife should be thanked after sex, Rev. Eastwood Anaba stated that most married women have never experienced an orgasm due to their husbands’ lack of knowledge about the basics of sex. He further highlighted that men tend to enjoy the relationship more than women and, on average, are the ones who pay for sex.

In response to a question about why a wife should be thanked after sex, Rev. Eastwood Anaba stated that most married women have never experienced an orgasm due to their husbands’ lack of knowledge about the basics of sex. He further highlighted that men tend to enjoy the relationship more than women and, on average, are the ones who pay for sex.

SIKAOFFICIAL🦍

131,649 次观看 • 1 年前

Every few months, Leonardo DiCaprio is the topic of interest online for dating yet another young woman. Like clockwork, men defend him while women roll their eyes. But both reactions make evolutionary sense. It’s in men’s interest to date younger women, and it’s in women’s interest to shame men for doing so. The same pattern plays out across different controversies, whether it’s West Elm Caleb, Andrew Huberman, or now Harry Sisson. Predictably, reactions to these stories split along gender lines. A lot of men defend guys like Sisson with evolutionary logic—”men are wired to sleep around with young women” or some variation thereof. But these guys conveniently ignore that evolution also favors women shaming men for it. Just as you can apply evolutionary logic to say that men have an interest in sleeping around, you can also apply evolutionary logic to say that women have an interest in shaming men (especially high-status men) into not doing so. This tension between the sexes isn’t a bug in the system. It’s the system.

Every few months, Leonardo DiCaprio is the topic of interest online for dating yet another young woman. Like clockwork, men defend him while women roll their eyes. But both reactions make evolutionary sense. It’s in men’s interest to date younger women, and it’s in women’s interest to shame men for doing so. The same pattern plays out across different controversies, whether it’s West Elm Caleb, Andrew Huberman, or now Harry Sisson. Predictably, reactions to these stories split along gender lines. A lot of men defend guys like Sisson with evolutionary logic—”men are wired to sleep around with young women” or some variation thereof. But these guys conveniently ignore that evolution also favors women shaming men for it. Just as you can apply evolutionary logic to say that men have an interest in sleeping around, you can also apply evolutionary logic to say that women have an interest in shaming men (especially high-status men) into not doing so. This tension between the sexes isn’t a bug in the system. It’s the system.

Rob Henderson

35,003 次观看 • 1 年前

Gay men often have a more “hyper male” finger ratio. Andrew Huberman explained the science: pointer vs ring finger length is linked to testosterone exposure in the womb. Lesbians tend to show a pattern similar to heterosexual men. The more older brothers a guy has, the higher the chance he’ll be gay, due to increased testosterone in utero. These differences appear at birth, showing strong biological roots. What do you think about the role of biology in sexual orientation?

Gay men often have a more “hyper male” finger ratio. Andrew Huberman explained the science: pointer vs ring finger length is linked to testosterone exposure in the womb. Lesbians tend to show a pattern similar to heterosexual men. The more older brothers a guy has, the higher the chance he’ll be gay, due to increased testosterone in utero. These differences appear at birth, showing strong biological roots. What do you think about the role of biology in sexual orientation?

Camus

1,661,041 次观看 • 25 天前

Despite fifty years of “gay pride”, and an increasingly protracted, and contentious alphabet soup of ‘LGBT+’; there is one group, in a vast ocean of awareness, that rarely gets discussed. Gay men. The stats are clear – Gay men are, by far, America’s number one victim of sexuality based hate crimes, outnumbering all other victims combined. They face more hate crime, they feel less safe in public, they are less accepted in every country in the world; they were, and still are, uniquely persecuted, throughout history, across the globe, and deep within theological text. And yet, the story of the lowly gay male is one I so rarely see. In fact, from my almighty gay following, I only hear the opposite: that the gay male, has become the “white man” of LGBT. An unwelcome figure, so often cast out and “decentred” in the incessant purity contest, that so-called “progressives” desperately flagellate themselves over. And it’s not right. I’ve seen deeply illuminating conversation at the intersection of being a ‘gay woman’, with so many important points of view, a straight man like me would otherwise have no hope of seeing. And now it’s time to have a specific conversation about “gay men”, to understand their unique experiences – both current day and historic – that are so frequently glossed over. So why do gay men experience homophobia so differently to lesbian women? What do you think? New podcast: Ask us Anything with Lisa Britton in 4K here!

Despite fifty years of “gay pride”, and an increasingly protracted, and contentious alphabet soup of ‘LGBT+’; there is one group, in a vast ocean of awareness, that rarely gets discussed. Gay men. The stats are clear – Gay men are, by far, America’s number one victim of sexuality based hate crimes, outnumbering all other victims combined. They face more hate crime, they feel less safe in public, they are less accepted in every country in the world; they were, and still are, uniquely persecuted, throughout history, across the globe, and deep within theological text. And yet, the story of the lowly gay male is one I so rarely see. In fact, from my almighty gay following, I only hear the opposite: that the gay male, has become the “white man” of LGBT. An unwelcome figure, so often cast out and “decentred” in the incessant purity contest, that so-called “progressives” desperately flagellate themselves over. And it’s not right. I’ve seen deeply illuminating conversation at the intersection of being a ‘gay woman’, with so many important points of view, a straight man like me would otherwise have no hope of seeing. And now it’s time to have a specific conversation about “gay men”, to understand their unique experiences – both current day and historic – that are so frequently glossed over. So why do gay men experience homophobia so differently to lesbian women? What do you think? New podcast: Ask us Anything with Lisa Britton in 4K here!

TheTinMen

20,599 次观看 • 7 个月前

Females generally have stronger immune responses than males, particularly in cases of sepsis, trauma, and shock. One contributing factor is genetic: the X chromosome carries more immune-related genes than the Y chromosome, and women have two X chromosomes, while men have only one. This genetic advantage is one reason—among others—why women tend to recover more quickly from illness and are more resistant to infections overall. During the COVID-19 pandemic, for example, studies from 2021 reported that approximately twice as many men died from the virus as women. While most of these deaths occurred among the elderly, the disparity remained: twice as many older men died compared to older women. This contrast is striking given our cultural assumptions. When a man gets sick, there’s often this expectation that he’ll be tough, stoic, that he’ll endure it. But biologically, it’s the opposite in many ways—men are actually frailer. Our immune systems are weaker than women’s.

Females generally have stronger immune responses than males, particularly in cases of sepsis, trauma, and shock. One contributing factor is genetic: the X chromosome carries more immune-related genes than the Y chromosome, and women have two X chromosomes, while men have only one. This genetic advantage is one reason—among others—why women tend to recover more quickly from illness and are more resistant to infections overall. During the COVID-19 pandemic, for example, studies from 2021 reported that approximately twice as many men died from the virus as women. While most of these deaths occurred among the elderly, the disparity remained: twice as many older men died compared to older women. This contrast is striking given our cultural assumptions. When a man gets sick, there’s often this expectation that he’ll be tough, stoic, that he’ll endure it. But biologically, it’s the opposite in many ways—men are actually frailer. Our immune systems are weaker than women’s.

Rob Henderson

53,049 次观看 • 1 年前

The world hates men. Never in the history of humanity have men been more villainized. Nothing terrifies this social order more than men banding together to create tribes dedicated to tearing down that order. This is why they isolate and ridicule anything conventionally masculine. Moreover, they are terrified that Red Pill fathers, uncles, coaches, etc., might embolden a new generation of young men to resist the self-loathing taught to them by a Gynocentric social order.

The world hates men. Never in the history of humanity have men been more villainized. Nothing terrifies this social order more than men banding together to create tribes dedicated to tearing down that order. This is why they isolate and ridicule anything conventionally masculine. Moreover, they are terrified that Red Pill fathers, uncles, coaches, etc., might embolden a new generation of young men to resist the self-loathing taught to them by a Gynocentric social order.

Rollo Tomassi

41,684 次观看 • 1 年前

This is why empowering more women than men does nothing but kills the progress of every society. Women are hypergamous in nature. They take and hardly give and most often when they give (their) men, it's usually the men doing better than them already. On the other hand, men have no problem picking women from any kind of background and giving them the best of life. If you check the list of richest women in the world today, it's mostly through divorce. You hardly see any of them create anything from the scratch. And then you'll also realise that they're single. Why? Because they hate sharing their resources with men, despite getting the said resources from men. Most modern women don't even believe they're broke, they believe they're with the wrong men—what a mentality. EMPOWER MORE MEN.

Sensitive content

This is why empowering more women than men does nothing but kills the progress of every society. Women are hypergamous in nature. They take and hardly give and most often when they give (their) men, it's usually the men doing better than them already. On the other hand, men have no problem picking women from any kind of background and giving them the best of life. If you check the list of richest women in the world today, it's mostly through divorce. You hardly see any of them create anything from the scratch. And then you'll also realise that they're single. Why? Because they hate sharing their resources with men, despite getting the said resources from men. Most modern women don't even believe they're broke, they believe they're with the wrong men—what a mentality. EMPOWER MORE MEN.

Plato's Cousin

24,640 次观看 • 7 个月前

JUST IN: The names of at least 6 men were redacted in the Epstein files, according to Reps Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna. Massie said with a smile that one of the men is "pretty high up" in a foreign government. "They need to do a little more homework. There are six men. We went in there for two hours. There are millions of files." "And in a couple of hours, we found six men whose names have been redacted, who are implicated in the way that the files are presented."

JUST IN: The names of at least 6 men were redacted in the Epstein files, according to Reps Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna. Massie said with a smile that one of the men is "pretty high up" in a foreign government. "They need to do a little more homework. There are six men. We went in there for two hours. There are millions of files." "And in a couple of hours, we found six men whose names have been redacted, who are implicated in the way that the files are presented."

Collin Rugg

1,433,879 次观看 • 5 个月前

This is France. This is how the state-sponsored NGOs spend their energy. Dora was found guilty for saying that women have to be wary of men, and that's why we need single-sex spaces. Meanwhile, gay men are being murdered in the streets by teenage boys whose religion tells them homosexuality is an unforgivable sin. Not a peep about those guys.

This is France. This is how the state-sponsored NGOs spend their energy. Dora was found guilty for saying that women have to be wary of men, and that's why we need single-sex spaces. Meanwhile, gay men are being murdered in the streets by teenage boys whose religion tells them homosexuality is an unforgivable sin. Not a peep about those guys.

Róisín Michaux

36,137 次观看 • 25 天前

Merkley: "What we have seen around the world is that democracies no longer die because men with guns go in and take it over. Instead, it's electeds who erode the separation of power, checks and balances. If you have a rubber-stamp Congress, if you have a court that delivers more power to the executive, suddenly you have lost your democracy and you have an authoritarian state structure. It's here now."

Merkley: "What we have seen around the world is that democracies no longer die because men with guns go in and take it over. Instead, it's electeds who erode the separation of power, checks and balances. If you have a rubber-stamp Congress, if you have a court that delivers more power to the executive, suddenly you have lost your democracy and you have an authoritarian state structure. It's here now."

Aaron Rupar

87,628 次观看 • 9 个月前

NEW: Tucker Carlson accuses the media of hiding Obama’s alleged history of gay sex and crack smoking before his 2008 presidential run. “In 2008 it became really clear that Barack Obama had been having sex with men and smoking crack.” According to Obama’s former girlfriend, the former president told her in letters that he made love to men daily” in his imagination. “In regard to homosexuality, I must say that I believe this is an attempt to remove oneself from the present, a refusal perhaps to perpetuate the endless farce of earthly life. You see, I make love to men daily, but in the imagination,” a 21 year old Obama said. “My mind is androgynous to a great extent and I hope to make it more so until I can think in terms of people, not women as opposed to men. But, in returning to the body, I see that I have been made a man, and physically in life, I choose to accept that contingency,” he added. Obama should sit down with Tucker to clear this all up 😂

Sensitive content

NEW: Tucker Carlson accuses the media of hiding Obama’s alleged history of gay sex and crack smoking before his 2008 presidential run. “In 2008 it became really clear that Barack Obama had been having sex with men and smoking crack.” According to Obama’s former girlfriend, the former president told her in letters that he made love to men daily” in his imagination. “In regard to homosexuality, I must say that I believe this is an attempt to remove oneself from the present, a refusal perhaps to perpetuate the endless farce of earthly life. You see, I make love to men daily, but in the imagination,” a 21 year old Obama said. “My mind is androgynous to a great extent and I hope to make it more so until I can think in terms of people, not women as opposed to men. But, in returning to the body, I see that I have been made a man, and physically in life, I choose to accept that contingency,” he added. Obama should sit down with Tucker to clear this all up 😂

Collin Rugg

4,375,457 次观看 • 2 年前

People with high conscientiousness tend to get better grades in school and earn more money—even when you control for IQ. So if you have two people with the same score on an intelligence test, the person with higher conscientiousness will likely go on to get better grades and have higher earnings. There's also a very small but significant inverse correlation between intelligence and conscientiousness. In other words, the higher you go in intelligence, the lower your conscientiousness score tends to be. It's a very small effect, but it seems to be driven largely by the orderliness aspect of conscientiousness. Some psychologists have suggested there's a compensatory mechanism at work here. Very intelligent people can afford to be less organized because they're able to use their intelligence to compensate for their lack of diligence and focus. Meanwhile, people who are relatively less intelligent are forced to be more orderly to compensate for their lack of intellectual aptitude. Relatedly, men with spouses who score higher on conscientiousness tend to earn more money, even when their own level of conscientiousness is controlled for.

People with high conscientiousness tend to get better grades in school and earn more money—even when you control for IQ. So if you have two people with the same score on an intelligence test, the person with higher conscientiousness will likely go on to get better grades and have higher earnings. There's also a very small but significant inverse correlation between intelligence and conscientiousness. In other words, the higher you go in intelligence, the lower your conscientiousness score tends to be. It's a very small effect, but it seems to be driven largely by the orderliness aspect of conscientiousness. Some psychologists have suggested there's a compensatory mechanism at work here. Very intelligent people can afford to be less organized because they're able to use their intelligence to compensate for their lack of diligence and focus. Meanwhile, people who are relatively less intelligent are forced to be more orderly to compensate for their lack of intellectual aptitude. Relatedly, men with spouses who score higher on conscientiousness tend to earn more money, even when their own level of conscientiousness is controlled for.

Rob Henderson

39,860 次观看 • 7 个月前

So exciting to see the results of Anktiva in bladder cancer in women who tend to have higher-grade and more advanced tumors, resulting in a higher risk of recurrence and lower survival rates compared to men. Grateful for Deborah allowing us to tell her story of papillary disease that then recurs to CIS with BCG alone... and now in complete remission after Anktiva + BCG. Further evidence that papillary and CIS disease are clonally the same.

So exciting to see the results of Anktiva in bladder cancer in women who tend to have higher-grade and more advanced tumors, resulting in a higher risk of recurrence and lower survival rates compared to men. Grateful for Deborah allowing us to tell her story of papillary disease that then recurs to CIS with BCG alone... and now in complete remission after Anktiva + BCG. Further evidence that papillary and CIS disease are clonally the same.

Dr. Pat Soon-Shiong

223,235 次观看 • 5 个月前