Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

👀How H1B Visas affect UT’s student enrollment.👀 Here are some enrollment stats for the University of Texas at Austin. Enrollment in the last 9 years: - white females 🔻21% - white males 🔻30% - Asian females 🔺50% - Asian males 🔺25% - There are more Asian females than both...

71,146 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Yale Medical School caught by the Justice Department discriminating against White Student admissions The Civil Rights Division found Yale's leadership intentionally selected applicants based on their race, excluding white students Black students were 29x more likely to be admitted “The DOJ says the school discriminated based on race in its admissions process. It's claiming admissions data shows that Black and Hispanic applicants were admitted with consistently lower academic qualifications than white and Asian applicants” Here’s what I found A year long investigation into Yale School of Medicine’s admissions by the DOJ concluded that Yale intentionally discriminated on the basis of race in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Yale’s leadership used a “holistic review” process (and racial proxies) to continue favoring Black and Hispanic applicants while disadvantaging White and Asian applicants with stronger qualifications Black and Hispanic applicants were admitted with consistently lower GPAs and MCAT scores than White and Asian applicants - Black students had a median GPA of ~3.88 and MCAT in the 95th percentile - Asian students had 3.98 GPA and 100th percentile MCAT; White students similar to Asians - But the black students were admitted Black applicants had up to 29 times higher odds of getting an interview than an equally qualified Asian applicant with similar credentials Keep in mind, this is for medical school. The last profession on earth you want DEI standards. You only want the very best

Wall Street Apes

52,415 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Recently, on Chris Williamson's podcast, said it's "not true" that "there are only two sexes" in humans. He also claimed that "there are people with male brains in female bodies, and conversely." I'd like to address both claims directly to help clear up some confusion. THE SEX BINARY First, Eric used the terms “sex” and “gender” interchangeably, and when prompted to clarify he explicitly claimed sex (as well as gender) was not binary. He brought up people with intersex conditions as the reason why he believes this. But the existence of people with rare intersex conditions does not in any way negate the reality of the sex binary. That’s because the sex binary simply means “there are only two sexes,” and this is true because there are only two types of gametes. Males and females are universally defined by the gametes they have the function to produce, with males producing small gametes (sperm) and females producing large ones (ova). The sex binary does not mean “everyone is either male or female.” This may seem overly pedantic, bit it’s an important distinction. It may be possible that a person can be so sexually ambiguous as to defy categorization as either male or female, but sex ambiguity is not a third sex. The existence and prevalence of complex DSDs or so-called “intersex” conditions is irrelevant to the question of how many sexes there are. So, on this point, Eric is simply confused about what sexes are at a fundamental level. There are only two sexes because there are only two types of gametes—sperm and ova. I agree with Eric that we need to be compassionate and accommodating of people who might be sexually ambiguous. But claiming it’s “no true” that “there are only two sexes’ is definitely not the way to go about this. Apart from being incorrect, it carries a tremendous amount of baggage that I believe Eric and I would both agree must be avoided. BRAIN SEX Lastly, Eric said he believed it’s true that "there are people with male brains in female bodies, and conversely." Again, I believe this is rooted in a fundamental misunderstanding about what sexes are. Simply put, brains do not and cannot have their own sex that differs from the body. Whole organisms have a sex, individual organs do not. However, it is true that various body parts and organs can differ in the degree of how masculinized or feminized they are or appear. Hands are a great example of this, as their morphology is sensitive to in utero testosterone levels. As a result, some females have very masculine looking hands, and some males have very feminine looking hands. But no matter how masculine a female’s hands may be, it would never be correct to say that she has “male hands on a female body.” The same goes for brains and any other organ or appendage. While the brains of males and females can vary in the degree to which they are masculinized or feminized, it is never the case that a person can possess the brain of the opposite sex, even if they deeply feel that way. Eric, I’m a fan of yours and believe you possess tremendous insight on many topics, but I think you need to give this specific topic some more thought. I would be more than happy to chat with you about this if you’re ever interested. I think it's extremely important. Watch the whole podcast at the link below. 🔗

Colin Wright

1,059,715 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Check out this recent Resolving Reality podcast with the brilliant Youtuber and commentator Christine Grace Smith Christine Grace Smith We discuss the impacts of feminism on the modern female, on men, and society as a whole, and some of the crazy behaviour we've been seeing in recent times. And perhaps most importantly - Sydney Sweeney's boobs get a mention. What an excellent and sometimes hilarious discussion🔥 Reposts appreciated 👍 Youtube version is down below 👇 00:00 - Start 01:13 - Intro 02:00 - Christine joins us 02:33 - How she got started on Youtube 04:59 - A mostly male audience 05:52 - Why she didn't become feminist herself 09:12 - Did her opinions create conflicts 11:29 - The 'sisterhood' problem 15:10 - How widespread the lunacy is 18:55 - The affects of all this on society 21:25 - Relations have become more miserable 21:45 - Emmet is a misogynist 22:45 - Can women survive without men? 26:45 - Females becoming more masculine 32:40 - Double-standards in behaviour 35:45 - The "provider' thing and cherry-picking 39:40 - Females making excuses for bad behaviour 43:51 - Emmet's struggles 44:30 - Spoiled for choice and commodification 47:20 - Bonnie Blue's compassion 49:30 - Objectification 53:55 - Sydney "Massive Jugs" Sweeney 55:15 - Using attractiveness for positive reasons 57:20 - How entitled behaviour stunts personal evolution 58:55 - Struggle leading to fulfilment 1:02:35 - Feminism leading women astray 1:04:40 - Should men stop treating women well? 1:09:30 - Males shunning problematic females 1:12:00 - Men challenging this behaviour more 1:13:40 - The system is biased against males 1:16:05 - Discouraging young females away from feminism 1:19:30 - Christine's new channel and future plans 1:20:40 - Outro 1:21:15 - Closing spiel

Emmet Connor

86,007 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce