Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

“How is Autograph different from Cavalry?” 👇

18,314 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 7

Фото профиля Alex ‘4D’ Gollner ⧜
Alex ‘4D’ Gollner ⧜6 месяцев назад

Just because AE does motion graphics and compositing doesn’t mean its competitors should. Scene Group were right to make Cavalry be better at motion graphics than After Effects (layers and Apple Motion behaviors) and not worry about the Combustion/Fusion/nodes side of things.

Фото профиля Joe Walker
Joe Walker6 месяцев назад

I think all of it is good for the industry. Competition breeds innovation. Even if they’re only similar in certain ways. I e been using AE since the 90s and it feels good to rewire my brain in Cavalry and Autograph.

Фото профиля Alex ‘4D’ Gollner ⧜
Alex ‘4D’ Gollner ⧜6 месяцев назад

I started using AE in 1996. Apple Motion launched in 2004. Took me a few years to rewire my brain to learn its ways. Sadly for Motion, features and performance aren’t enough: Apple never cracked how to market it. Similar waste in potential: Final Cut vs. the rest.

Фото профиля Joe Walker
Joe Walker6 месяцев назад

The worst was Apple acquiring Shake from Nothing Real and then killing it. They had something codenamed Phenomenon but never released anything 🤷🏼‍♂️

Фото профиля Bobby Georgiev • He/Him 🏳️‍🌈
Bobby Georgiev • He/Him 🏳️‍🌈6 месяцев назад

Great to see the AOV support being so easy to use!

Фото профиля Eric Levy
Eric Levy6 месяцев назад

OFX for plugins, or something else?

Фото профиля sunwukong
sunwukong6 месяцев назад

I dont know which one to decide, specially since im not a c4d user but I use blender

Похожие видео