How Michael Saylor Is An Attack On Bitcoin

You’re out of line with this one. You have raised some legitimate points about share dilution, but to frame Saylors actions as an attack on Bitcoin is a bridge too far. Implying deliberate hostility or sabotage is just incorrect. I think Michael has been a net positive for bitcoin over the past six years.

He's absolutely attacking Bitcoin, whether he is aware of it or not. Just watch what he says and does

Nicely laid out again @mattkratter That time @Saylor tried to suggest only a (his) Perpetual Preferred Security Wrapped Synthetic Paper Claim on a Corporate Fiat Balance Sheet can turn Bitcoin into Money.... is when I flipped. I had already jumped ship (Yacht?) and made it back to land before then, but now... now I am swimming back to fight his attack on Bitcoin instead. Run a node. Mine Bitcoin. Self Custody. Stand up and Fight!

I commend you for exposing Saylor and being real

Its good to have comparisons. Saylor offers an example of what not to do, or be. This is good for Bitcoin We become smarter Knots Bip-110

But if Saylor went bankrupt… who would invite us to his parties with “lots of drugs”?

That's simply not true at all Matthew: Saylor's business & support of $BTC is incredible No one else has achieved what $MSTR has while $MSTR is down now while supporting $BTC every day What you have going on now is the one lesser % protocol wanting that one Improvement Proposal no matter that the Consensus number are not in favor: 10 or so days left & there's hope on the bip110 side there will be a huge increase from < 5% to 55%+ however the estimates are not pointing towards that Satoshi was imperfect: Saylor is not perfect, however his support of Bitcoin is one of a few such supports: Saylor's projection is $BTC to $12+ million per coin $MSTR sees that & that is true: [ that's the bitcoin satoshi to $0.12 twelve cents + = $BTC to $12,000,000 per coin plus: each year a few succeed massively with their inventions & start ups that are btc-centric: they build up multi-billion dollar tech: that's important & valuable for Computer Science & sustains the Large Projections of bitcoin up to multi million per coin: still that does depend on those few successes each year that turn into the next very valuable tech achievements: they integrate $BTC & Blockchain, many while being bitcoin-centric ] Bitcoin invented a very valuable branch of Computer Science that can at the current trajectory go to $1 Quadrillion + & do that with volatility mind you: However also with a very strong , supported upward trajectory: It's the simple fact that the best of the best Coders use $BTC to build [ now you got some pro bip110 making fun of that [ they claim computer science applications of bitcoin are pretty much not at all any sort of priority -- when those apps build up multi billion dollar businesses: specifically criticize those who build with bitcoin using something like bUiLd with alternating Cap Locks to indicate to their readers that's something they do not believe in, same with Consortium, 'cOnSortIum' -- & ridiculing one Core Maintainer for using the term "blockchain" when Satoshi first used that exact term "block chain" [ ok one space, you see the point tho ] some are Computer Scientists & work on the Technical and advanced applications of bitcoin in computer science: some while experienced do not have that full understanding & do not fully understand that Computer Scientists working with Bitcoin , a Branch of Computer Science that is called Blockchain: well they might use that term "blockchain" ] some big pro bip 110 tho [ hodlonaut ] did that early on in the Pro bip110 campaign: severely criticized one Core maintainer for using the term "blockchain" Saylor on the other hand works to understand the Computer Science & also the Finance: Huge for $BTC [ what all of finance infrastructure gets are severe software based attacks: one common denominator is those attacks can try to cause a lot of Conflict & have multi objectives: and the one of a few common denominators is: anti-what-is-actually-objectively-beneficial as complicated as that sounds ] $BTC is beneficial to bip110 & some big pro bip110 are objectively on a detach-from-bitcoin-course that is anti-btc & they are condescending bitcoiners literally as part of the pro bip110 push: Knots is doing well with btc however is currently on an anti-btc path: that can actually result from some undefended severe incentivization software based attack on Knots / bip110: as well anti-Saylor when Saylor is Huge in terms of contributing to bitcoin: our editors see that same pattern, unfortunately: it's all of American Finance Infrastructure: where the US on the Whole gets 100s of millions of "cyberattacks" per day according to $MSFT : Those attacks can use frequency weaponry and are very sophisticated and they cause harm to the Public intentionally: The way to try to defend, when there is such a situation is to use objective strategy: recognize if there is that situation: very strongly against something that is objectively beneficial: [ in Colorado in particular it appears that one vulnerability is XCel, they have reported 500,000+ cyberattacks a year in the past: they can be very severe However Colorado & all the other States simply do not detect or defend from those , either //// if it's not the one thing like XCel such Advanced Persistent Threat Attacks easily use some other Vulnerability ] the best thing for Knots is not to detach from btc, the best thing for Knots is to stay with bitcoin: however then, there are some who totally do not want Knots with bitcoin & they would like to see bip110 / Knots detach When as it is bitcoin is very good for Knots: a chain split BIP110coin would not be: and would not be bitcoin: would be a chain split: that is what some of the projections are showing while Knots claims "no chain split" however Ocean has prepared for a chain split Best thing to do is to check the Consensus on the Activation Days & if it is not 55%+ trash that & revise it & resubmit & stay with bitcoin: fact is many Core have not updated [ they are not pro bip110] and they run default & use the old default anyways : as well that makes bitcoin more money so it's a tough argument to try to say do what pulls in less revenue: Where then also the points about bip110 trying to prevent Vandalism are important, however there are numerous Apps of bitcoin in Tech that generate larger Data that the increase on OP_RETURN's default so that it is what the maximum was, accommodates : You got some who don't want Knots to be a part of bitcoin & want Knots to detach: They believe perhaps that is better for $BTC ... while objectively, the fact that bitcoin has succeeded so well is in fact supported by that diversification in terms of protocol : however if the fact is the larger majority, not even a close % , but a large majority is on what Knots cloned, that is Core: then objectively if the side with the much lower % wants something they can work on that or they can potentially detach from bitcoin: the former is more beneficial to Knots & while some argue bitcoin is better if Knots detaches, objectively that is not the case: as it is Core + Knots that together have built success: however by the % objectively: that lower % is more riding on the Coat Tails of Core..... that's the fact according to the real %s: however what you have are some pro bip110 using false propaganda saying "we have consensus" when the numbers are actually < 5% [ less than 5% ] And you see here with your Post: the fact is what Saylor is doing for bitcoin is : Massive and is beneficial to Knots that is the objective fact & $MSTR is working very hard on doing that 24/7 under Bitcoin's HODL 'hold on for dear life' Roller Coaster type of condition : where Cycles can last for long stretches: Huge Successes also can happen nearly overnight also though With bip110 the objective best path for Knots [ in our editors opinion ] is look at the Numbers / the % : as of yet it's not looking like 55% is going to be some Big Swing: however check to see what it is & if it's insufficient, trash that bip110 improvement proposal and revise, resubmit : some pro bip110 are not realizing at all with a chain split to a bip110coin without Saylor and Microstrategy is a Huge Subtraction, in terms of the Tech & the Computer Science that Saylor & Microstrategy build & work on & support 24/7 There are some who don't like bitcoin at all & would like to see bitcoin fail: success is not ever guaranteed: and again as mentioned there are some very complex consideration [ advanced persistent threat attack target $$$ & use very complex strategy : in Cybersecurity and Tech : $BTC can & does begin to fix that: so again the area of Infrastructure / the Markets / Computer Science is as many would expect: Complex: also important & valuable though as all the good tech supports necessary Large Infrastructure Tasks [ better public health, better pretty much everything in terms of modernizing & sustaining strong Technology ]

solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u mode on my node

@1914ad Michael Saylor is a Trojan horse. Subservient to Strategy shareholders and the leading force in centralising Bitcoin for big bankers and institutions. Literally the anti-Christ of Bitcoin. He’s the Reddit or Bitcoin.

Very good thank you, call out the liars 🔥

@BitcoinBombadil Gaslighting master , what an arrogant Person and Fiat Zombie

I wished Saylor never read the Bitcoin standard, rode into his fiat sunset and left us and bitcoin alone

Barely anyone is using Bitcoin as money, and that’s with or without Saylor.

Who, if not you, knows that Bitcoin can't be taken over - not even by Strategy Inc. and BlackRock together? It has survived plenty of attacks already. 🧐

Saylor has been a positive for bip-110 🤣🤣🤣🤣

@Magnify_The_Sun You know the people that buy the stonks they can’t buy bitcoin if they want to right ? Or if they can.

I’m really starting to realize that being a bitcoiner doesn’t always translate to being smart, I don’t like mstr, but your view on btc is a pipe dream. I think an issue a lot of bitcoiners have and it stems from the isolation is an inability to think outside there own perspective

Sind sie/er nicht. Genau wie coinbase früher und bitman den Code nicht ändern können kann es Saylor auch nicht. Hört auf so ein Schwachsinn z verbreiten, leute die das Netzwerk wegen einer Person formen wollen und Mit einem shit fork stehen bleiben wie bch und SV

#BitcoinJudas indeed.

$BTTY has a message for you: @Bitcoin is for everyone. It’s not for people like you to decide what can and cannot be done. You’re the scammer here, attacking @Bitcoin while pretending to protect it.

Buying more Bitcoin than anyone else is somehow an attack on bitcoin😄🤦🏻‍♂️

Prob best use of your time to go attack the bankers and politicians who actually hate bitcoin

How Michael Saylor Is An Attack On Bitcoin .... Fight the Attack On Bitcoin run BIP-110 on your node

Hey @natbrunell , time to slay your hero hm? ;)

Ironic!

he's a fiat maxi captured by financial industrial complex.

@Jethroe111 Can’t stand the voice

This was you, wasn't it.

... Well Michael Saylor is Epstein list

Micheal Saylor is 1000% net positive to Bitcoin you Peter Thiel insider freak.

AGREED. 😠 Bitcoin doesn't Wall Street and Government Adoption (or Approval) to "WIN" 🧐😒 You are being co-opted 🤨 #ResistCentralization #RunKnots #BIP110

🎤 drop. I wish @mattkratter did this as a diss rap

Learn about bitcoin fam

true.