Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
How much capital should an AI agent be allowed to move before a human has to intervene? That question is becoming less theoretical. Three developments are beginning to converge: financial assets are moving onchain, transaction rules are becoming enforceable through code, and AI systems are becoming capable of acting... show more
13,418 views • 11 days ago •via X (Twitter)
34 Comments

That's pretty much important, there's nerf for control in certain matter when certain conditions are met for security purpose

gADI

Well detailed.

Adi 🔥

gadi

Fair enough

Damn this is interesting

Thanks for the clip

Oooohh my opinion it should be supervised by humans

Clear opportunity, Clear risk

Fabulous convo

Real

Important question for the future of finance!

gadi

The real challenge is defining where automation ends and human control begins

Clear governance is crucial when AI moves capital

how much money an ai can move before a human steps in is the real question now. not theory anymore

Very clear convo

That depends on how the owner sees the transaction

Much more

Always on point, trying to get better

Governance must match AI agent automation in finance.

真正难的不是给额度,而是把权限拆成可撤销、可审计的动作;否则人类只是最后一道背锅流程。

Interchangeable according to the user need

It’s great

Yeah, that’s a fair concern human oversight is still needed.

ADI chain keeps cooking

This is so informative The part of it adding value is the best

interesting

interesting

interesting one here!👏🏽

mice

nice clip

The hard part isn’t giving AI agents more control. It’s deciding how much control they should have in the first place.



