Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

HOW TO SCORE EVERY HEADER GOALS (Aerial+ & base power header recommended) 🥶 ✅ L1 + cross (put the ball very high) ✅ Ball roll + cross (better precision) ✅ Green time the header ✅ Good Jumping & Header accuracy stats ✅ 192cm(M) or 6'3" Height required ✅ Precision shooting

69,298 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

9 Kommentare

Profilbild von Der Bvb Don(yell)
Der Bvb Don(yell)vor 1 Jahr

Die leaken unser erfunden Taktik ich raste aus @SchalkeKnappe04

Profilbild von BALLERSHUB
BALLERSHUBvor 1 Jahr

i feel like with precision aiming headers is a lot harder especially when you’re trying to aim it back across goal how do you recommend i fix that?

Profilbild von xRodman
xRodmanvor 1 Jahr

wdym bro

Profilbild von DON nagendra🇳🇬
DON nagendra🇳🇬vor 1 Jahr

Question do you need to green time it my ping is ass

Profilbild von xRodman
xRodmanvor 1 Jahr

yes

Profilbild von Winni
Winnivor 1 Jahr

Ball roll + cross (better precision) wdym bro?

Profilbild von xRodman
xRodmanvor 1 Jahr

hi, watch at 00:11, the james cross, without the roll ball, it wouldnt be this precise

Profilbild von Bradcola123
Bradcola123vor 1 Jahr

just press shoot button or with r2 plus l2?

Profilbild von xRodman
xRodmanvor 1 Jahr

press shoot button

Ähnliche Videos

🚨 POC for CVE-2025-55182 that works on Next.js 16.0.6 Here are the exact, battle-tested queries you need — Censys, Shodan, FOFA, ZoomEye, Quake, BinaryEdge, and Nuclei matchers — all tuned specifically to find Next.js RSC / React Server Components instances vulnerable to CVE-2025-55182 (React2Shell). ⸻ ✅ 1. SHODAN QUERY (380K+ ASSETS) Find all servers leaking RSC Server Actions: Basic Query "Vary: RSC, Next-Router-State-Tree" More Aggressive Variant http.headers.vary:"RSC" AND http.headers.vary:"Next-Router-State-Tree" Superwide Coverage "Next-Router-State-Tree" OR "x-nextjs-cache" OR "server-actions" OR "__RSC__" Focused on Vulnerable Cache Indicators "x-nextjs-cache: HIT" "Next-Router-State-Tree" ⸻ ✅ 2. CENSYS QUERY (270K+ ASSETS) (match the screenshot you posted) Exact Censys Search services.http.response.headers.vary: "RSC, Next-Router-State-Tree" Safer Multi-Matcher services.http.response.headers.vary: "RSC" AND services.http.response.headers.vary: "Next-Router-State-Tree" Detect RSC Payload Exposure (critical) services.http.response.body: "__RSC__" Detect Flight Data Leaks services.http.response.body: "server-reference-manifest" ⸻ ✅ 3. FOFA QUERY (CHINA’S OSINT GIANT) (VERY POWERFUL for RSC/Next.js) Exact Header Based header="Next-Router-State-Tree" && header="RSC" Alternative (match screenshot patterns) "Next-Router-State-Tree" && "x-nextjs-cache" For massive result count body="__RSC__" || header="server-actions" ⸻ ✅ 4. ZOOMEYE QUERY ZoomEye scans often catch Node.js apps Shodan misses. Exact Unicode-Ready Query "Next-Router-State-Tree" && "RSC" Advanced app:"Next.js" && header:"RSC" ⸻ ✅ 5. QUAKE SEARCH (360K+ MATCHES) header:"Next-Router-State-Tree" AND header:"RSC" ⸻ ✅ 6. BINARYEDGE QUERY http.response.headers.vary:"Next-Router-State-Tree" ⸻ ✅ 7. QUERY headers:"Next-Router-State-Tree" && headers:"RSC" ⸻ 🎯 8. NUCLEI MATCHER (to detect RSC without scanning payloads) If you want a nuclei detector you can plug into your scanner: matchers: - type: word part: header words: - "RSC" - "Next-Router-State-Tree" - "server-actions" - "__RSC__" ⸻ 🚩 BONUS — THE MOST ADVANCED CROSS-ENGINE QUERY Use this when you want maximum global coverage: "Next-Router-State-Tree" OR "RSC" OR "__RSC__" OR "server-actions" OR "x-nextjs-cache" OR "Next-Server-Action" This identifies: •Next.js App Router •RSC endpoints •Server Actions •Flight data APIs •Pages exposing cache HITs (required for exploitation) •Systems likely vulnerable to CVE-2025-55182 (React2Shell)

X

10,544 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Lebron Fans Always Ask Me What has Kobe done that LeBron hasn't? The answer: ✅Have a winning Finals record ✅Win 5 rings ✅Defeat 20+ 50 wins teams ✅Score 81 points in a game ✅Have more 40, 50, 60 point games ✅Win titles without a super team ✅Three-peat ✅Win a title without a 20+ ppg second leading scorer ✅Beat the Celtics without a super team ✅Beat the 2009 Orlando Magic ✅Average 35 ppg for a season ✅Selected to 12 All- Defensive teams ✅Win more than 1 scoring title ✅Average 30+ ppg vs on a playoff series vs Spurs at 22 years old ✅Shot over 80% FT for career ✅Average 30+ ppg in three seasons ✅Play 82 games four times in career ✅Make 10+ threes in a game ✅Win 23 Finals games ✅180+ Steals In A Season ✅30 BLOCKS & Steals In 1 Playoff Run A FEW reasons why Kobe is better than LeBron: ✅Better mid range shooter ✅Good FT shooter ✅Excellent footwork, coordination and balance ✅Can score from anywhere on the floor. ✅Doesnt need a system centered around him to hide his flaws like LeBron ✅Won titles w/out a super team ✅Mamba mentality ✅Better on ball defender ✅Better post fadeaway shot ✅Ability to create space off the dribble ✅Can pull up, work off the ball, catch and shoot. ✅less TOVs , Better STL/TOV RATIO , Better FT% , better 3-10 FT %, Better 10-16feet%, better 16feet-3pt%, less TOVs per game , better sloppy stats, more PPG in contextualized stats, more STLs in contextualized stats, more 1st team All-League selections, more Ist All-Def, more ASG MVPs, a slam dunk champ, more scoring titles Kobe will forever be better than LeBron

8/24MαɱႦα.Aɾƈԋιʋҽʂ🐐

61,120 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Lebron Fans Always Ask Me What has Kobe done that LeBron hasn't? The answer: ✅Have a winning Finals record ✅Win 5 rings ✅Defeat 20+ 50 wins teams ✅Score 81 points in a game ✅Have more 40, 50, 60 point games ✅Win titles without a super team ✅Three-peat ✅Win a title without a 20+ ppg second leading scorer ✅Beat the Celtics without a super team ✅Beat the 2009 Orlando Magic ✅Average 35 ppg for a season ✅Selected to 12 All- Defensive teams ✅Win more than 1 scoring title ✅Average 30+ ppg vs on a playoff series vs Spurs at 22 years old ✅Shot over 80% FT for career ✅Average 30+ ppg in three seasons ✅Play 82 games four times in career ✅Make 10+ threes in a game ✅Win 23 Finals games ✅180+ Steals In A Season ✅30 BLOCKS & Steals In 1 Playoff Run A FEW reasons why Kobe is better than LeBron: ✅Better mid range shooter ✅Good FT shooter ✅Excellent footwork, coordination and balance ✅Can score from anywhere on the floor. ✅Doesnt need a system centered around him to hide his flaws like LeBron ✅Won titles w/out a super team ✅Mamba mentality ✅Better on ball defender ✅Better post fadeaway shot ✅Ability to create space off the dribble ✅Can pull up, work off the ball, catch and shoot. ✅less TOVs , Better STL/TOV RATIO , Better FT% , better 3-10 FT %, Better 10-16feet%, better 16feet-3pt%, less TOVs per game , better sloppy stats, more PPG in contextualized stats, more STLs in contextualized stats, more 1st team All-League selections, more Ist All-Def, more ASG MVPs, a slam dunk champ, more scoring titles Kobe will forever be better than LeBron

8/24MαɱႦα.Aɾƈԋιʋҽʂ🐐

32,590 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

A team tested Pi0, Pi0 Fast, Gr00t, and ACT on real robot arms in manufacturing tasks. (🔖 Bookmark this for later!) The task was precise: place thin rectangular frames from a messy stack into a holder. The team fine-tuned each model on 100 real trajectories and compared training time, inference speed, motion quality, and success rates. ⬇️ Here’s a breakdown of what they found Pi0 (Original) ✅ Strongest overall performance in precise pick-and-place ✅ High success rate even in edge cases ✅ Longest training time (~11 hours, ~$30 per run) ✅ Inference time of 80 ms causes short pauses between actions Despite delays, it handles complex scenarios well… solid for high-precision tasks, but slow to train. Gr00t ✅ Trains fast (~2 hours, ~$5 per run) ✅ Performs almost as well as Pi0 on large-object tasks ✅ Struggles with fine precision; random movement in some trials ✅ More training didn’t fix jitter or random offsets Best suited for tasks where exact precision isn’t critical. Not ready for manufacturing-grade accuracy without more tuning. Pi0 Fast ✅ Promised faster training, but results were underwhelming ✅ Training at 6 hours still showed low success rates ✅ Inference was slower than expected ✅ Not reliable for generalizing even slightly new tasks Currently too unstable for real-world deployment. Doesn’t live up to the “Fast” name yet. ACT (Baseline) ✅ 200MB model—lightweight, but limited ✅ Struggles with stacked objects or ambiguous scenes ✅ Success rates around 70% in best-case setups ✅ Can’t match newer models on precision or generalization Still a solid baseline, but clearly a generation behind in robustness. 🚨 Extra Notes All newer models share a common issue: •Inference takes longer than a frame (80 ms vs 33 ms), so robots “pause” between chunks. •This results in jittery movements, but not a dealbreaker unless tasks are time-sensitive. Language-conditioned tasks also fell short: after training on two labeled tasks, the model couldn’t generalize to a third unseen combination using only text prompts. ✅ The good news? These models adapt well to new robot arms with quick fine-tuning. ❌ The bad news? There’s still no plug-and-play solution for improving performance after deployment. Reinforcement learning or DAgger-style data collection during real-world operation may be the next big step, something many teams in robotics are actively working on.

Ilir Aliu

21,844 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

4v4 (+2) | Possession vs. Regain and Counter to Goal 🥅. ✅ Aim: ✔️ Regain Possession and Counter Attack Quickly. ✅ Set Up: ✔️ Space: 40 (L) x 30 (W) yards. All players start in one half of the pitch. ✔️Place 2 x mini goals 🥅 at one end of the pitch and 2x mini goals in one half of the pitch in diagonally opposite corners. ✔️⚫️s = Possession Team ✔️🔴s = Regain and Counter Team ✔️🟢s = Support Players for the team with the ball ⚽️. ✅ Scoring: ✔️ ⚫️s connect 5 passes or play a wall pass around a player = 1 goal ✔️🔴s regain the ball and 1️⃣ break into the other half and score quickly in a mini goal. Or 2️⃣ connect 4 passes in the half they are in and score in the corner mini goals. ✅ Session Guidance: ➡️ When the 🔴s break over over the halfway line 3 x of them can attack and 2x ⚫️s can recover to get the ball back into the possession half. (3v2). ➡️ Flip the roles of the teams every 3-5 minutes to allow them to practice possession and counters. ✅ Notes: ✔️ ⚫️s: Try keep the ball using controlled possession- spotting the right time to pause on the ball, play through opponents, or play a wall pass. ✔️ 🔴s: Try to win the ball cleanly using interceptions: THEN: 1️⃣ Counter quickly using forward passing and running 🏃‍♂️ 2️⃣ Secure possession and score in the mini goals in the half where the ball ⚽️ was won. Created On: TacticalPad® #SundayShare #SundayShare Temisan Williams @TheCoachesArea Lloyd Owers @FootballTrnng 205 Academy Conor Edwards Breakthrough Soccer The Sporting Resource Felix Lehmann Brett Godwin

JUST COACH

12,294 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren