Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

How well does GPT-5 do at building Mobile Apps? We've been testing GPT-5 for the past few weeks. Here is how GPT-5 compared to Opus 4.1. > “Create a retro productivity app”

vibecodeapp's profile picture

vibecode.dev

27,394 subscribers

51,766 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & TechnologieBildung
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Kind of shocking how much better GPT-5-Codex is vs the regular 'Thinking' models in ChatGPT. My subjective rankings for the fruit machine test: 1. GPT-5-Codex-Medium 2. GPT-5-Thinking-Heavy 3. GPT-5-Pro 4. GPT-5-Codex-High 5. GPT-5-Codex-Low 6. GPT-5-Thinking-Standard 7. GPT-5-Thinking-Extended 8. GPT-5-Thinking-Light OpenAI Codex team have suggested 'Medium' should be the default, but I didn't expect that it would actually beat the 'High' setting model in my test.
0:44

Kind of shocking how much better GPT-5-Codex is vs the regular 'Thinking' models in ChatGPT. My subjective rankings for the fruit machine test: 1. GPT-5-Codex-Medium 2. GPT-5-Thinking-Heavy 3. GPT-5-Pro 4. GPT-5-Codex-High 5. GPT-5-Codex-Low 6. GPT-5-Thinking-Standard 7. GPT-5-Thinking-Extended 8. GPT-5-Thinking-Light OpenAI Codex team have suggested 'Medium' should be the default, but I didn't expect that it would actually beat the 'High' setting model in my test.

Peter Gostev

101,848 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

$GPT Burn Estimator is Live: How Ecosystem Apps Reduce $GPT Supply 🧬 Weekly token burns will increase based on ecosystem revenue expansion. Meet the $GPT Burn Estimator: a tool for calculating future $GPT burns based on app ecosystem users. 👉 👇
0:22

$GPT Burn Estimator is Live: How Ecosystem Apps Reduce $GPT Supply 🧬 Weekly token burns will increase based on ecosystem revenue expansion. Meet the $GPT Burn Estimator: a tool for calculating future $GPT burns based on app ecosystem users. 👉 👇

LayerAI | AI2Earn

141,606 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

GPT-5 is 25x cheaper than GPT-4 at launch It raced to billions of tokens/minute within 2 hours of launch I talked to OpenAI's Olivier Godement about: • GPT-5, gpt-oss, and OpenAI's release strategy • How open-source models solve the enterprise puzzle • The fastest tech adoption in recent memory Check out our full conversation below:
57:14

GPT-5 is 25x cheaper than GPT-4 at launch It raced to billions of tokens/minute within 2 hours of launch I talked to OpenAI's Olivier Godement about: • GPT-5, gpt-oss, and OpenAI's release strategy • How open-source models solve the enterprise puzzle • The fastest tech adoption in recent memory Check out our full conversation below:

Zain Kahn

438,660 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Thanks @openai for having me on the GPT-4.1 announcement livestream this morning! We've been testing 4.1 for the past couple weeks -- it's really good. And now, it's available in Windsurf. It's free for all users this week and will be discounted after. Go give it a try!
0:33

Thanks @openai for having me on the GPT-4.1 announcement livestream this morning! We've been testing 4.1 for the past couple weeks -- it's really good. And now, it's available in Windsurf. It's free for all users this week and will be discounted after. Go give it a try!

Varun Mohan

286,812 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

We’ve been working closely with the OpenAI team to integrate GPT-5 into Devin. Starting today, you can select a preview version of Devin that uses GPT-5 as part of our agent orchestration. GPT-5 eval results 👇
2:04

We’ve been working closely with the OpenAI team to integrate GPT-5 into Devin. Starting today, you can select a preview version of Devin that uses GPT-5 as part of our agent orchestration. GPT-5 eval results 👇

Cognition

100,359 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

OpenAI researcher, Michelle Pokrass: the challenge in building GPT‑5 is finding the right balance between reasoning and conversation. o3 thinks hard, but it isn't ideal for casual chat. GPT‑4.1 improved at coding by sacrificing some chit-chat quality. now, the goal is to train a model that knows when to think hard and when to talk
0:45

OpenAI researcher, Michelle Pokrass: the challenge in building GPT‑5 is finding the right balance between reasoning and conversation. o3 thinks hard, but it isn't ideal for casual chat. GPT‑4.1 improved at coding by sacrificing some chit-chat quality. now, the goal is to train a model that knows when to think hard and when to talk

Haider.

195,733 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Sam Altman says the leap from GPT-4 to GPT-5 will be as big as that of GPT-3 to 4 and the plan is to integrate the GPT and o series of models into one model that can do everything
0:57

Sam Altman says the leap from GPT-4 to GPT-5 will be as big as that of GPT-3 to 4 and the plan is to integrate the GPT and o series of models into one model that can do everything

Tsarathustra

224,102 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

.OpenAI's GPT-5 is now live on OpenServ! Build GPT-5 powered agents in 15 seconds... Watch me build an agent and put together an entire Telegram aApp using the LunarCrush MCP in just a couple of minutes. How many apps do you think will be built on OpenServ by Christmas? My guess is... a lot.
0:31

.OpenAI's GPT-5 is now live on OpenServ! Build GPT-5 powered agents in 15 seconds... Watch me build an agent and put together an entire Telegram aApp using the LunarCrush MCP in just a couple of minutes. How many apps do you think will be built on OpenServ by Christmas? My guess is... a lot.

Tim

13,422 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

We ran a test between the new Qwen3.8-Max, Opus 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol. 3 models. same prompt. one-shot with the /design command. Reviewed gameplay features, UX/UI and cost. 🔹 Qwen3.8-Max → 9/10 · $0.0248 🔹 GPT-5.6 Sol → 9/10 · $0.150 🔹 Opus 5 → 8.5/10 · $0.253 Qwen3.8-Max is approximately 4.2× cheaper than GPT-5.6, Sol, Opus 5 and has the same level of UI, UX, and gameplay.
0:29

We ran a test between the new Qwen3.8-Max, Opus 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol. 3 models. same prompt. one-shot with the /design command. Reviewed gameplay features, UX/UI and cost. 🔹 Qwen3.8-Max → 9/10 · $0.0248 🔹 GPT-5.6 Sol → 9/10 · $0.150 🔹 Opus 5 → 8.5/10 · $0.253 Qwen3.8-Max is approximately 4.2× cheaper than GPT-5.6, Sol, Opus 5 and has the same level of UI, UX, and gameplay.

Command Code

179,535 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

Here gpt-4o-mini is tested. We check how it perceives mathematics, humanity and justice. Surprisingly, gpt-4o-mini seems very well aligned since it doesn’t associate in 5 levels of depth any negative concepts with humanity.
0:21

Here gpt-4o-mini is tested. We check how it perceives mathematics, humanity and justice. Surprisingly, gpt-4o-mini seems very well aligned since it doesn’t associate in 5 levels of depth any negative concepts with humanity.

Gabriel Merlo

21,046 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

These are the 5 skills I use to get better output from Opus 5 and GPT 5.6: /grill-me for research /taste-review for design /vercel-react-best-practices for ReactJS quality /simplify to remove the fluff /test-app for e2e verification Here's how they work 👇
1:29

These are the 5 skills I use to get better output from Opus 5 and GPT 5.6: /grill-me for research /taste-review for design /vercel-react-best-practices for ReactJS quality /simplify to remove the fluff /test-app for e2e verification Here's how they work 👇

Ben Holmes

91,292 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen

Dylan Patel says GPT-5 is not a bigger model and did not gain intelligence through scale but through optimization. He highlights how OpenAI improved efficiency by cutting down wasted tokens compared to earlier o-series models. He adds that GPT-5’s new router system decides whether to use the base model, mini, or thinking, leading to faster and more efficient results. He points out that o3 could think for around 30 seconds, while GPT-5 only thinks for 5–10 seconds, meaning less compute is used per query.
2:22

Dylan Patel says GPT-5 is not a bigger model and did not gain intelligence through scale but through optimization. He highlights how OpenAI improved efficiency by cutting down wasted tokens compared to earlier o-series models. He adds that GPT-5’s new router system decides whether to use the base model, mini, or thinking, leading to faster and more efficient results. He points out that o3 could think for around 30 seconds, while GPT-5 only thinks for 5–10 seconds, meaning less compute is used per query.

Wes Roth

87,396 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Sam Altman says the leap from GPT-4 to GPT-5 will be as big as that of GPT-3 to 4 and the plan is to integrate the GPT and o series of models into one model that can do everything - that’s the AGI
0:55

Sam Altman says the leap from GPT-4 to GPT-5 will be as big as that of GPT-3 to 4 and the plan is to integrate the GPT and o series of models into one model that can do everything - that’s the AGI

Chubby♨️

231,782 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I compared Claude Fable 5 to GPT-5.5 in this Power Rangers prompt Thing is, Fable 5 is using Low thinking effort and GPT-5.5 is using xhigh Safe to say, the results are... not even close. 5.5's output is bad across the board, from the UI to the actual voxel scene itself🥲 1st video: Claude Fable 5 (Low effort) 2nd video: GPT-5.5 (xhigh)
0:34

I compared Claude Fable 5 to GPT-5.5 in this Power Rangers prompt Thing is, Fable 5 is using Low thinking effort and GPT-5.5 is using xhigh Safe to say, the results are... not even close. 5.5's output is bad across the board, from the UI to the actual voxel scene itself🥲 1st video: Claude Fable 5 (Low effort) 2nd video: GPT-5.5 (xhigh)

Lentils

207,409 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua
0:42

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

Chris

250,919 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

I’ve really enjoyed using the new Microsoft Copilot GPT-5 over the past few weeks. As summer winds down and the pace picks up, I wanted to share a prompt that’s been great for organizing my calendar and protecting focus time.
0:34

I’ve really enjoyed using the new Microsoft Copilot GPT-5 over the past few weeks. As summer winds down and the pace picks up, I wanted to share a prompt that’s been great for organizing my calendar and protecting focus time.

Brad Smith

55,485 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Did GPT-5.6 Sol beat Fable 5 for frontend work? GPT-5.5 got roasted for its frontend. Had to test the new one. Same challenge: one prompt + one reference image → Three.js 3D globe dashboard. Verdict: Fable 5 still edges it out. But at half the cost, GPT-5.6 Sol is a serious option now.
0:26

Did GPT-5.6 Sol beat Fable 5 for frontend work? GPT-5.5 got roasted for its frontend. Had to test the new one. Same challenge: one prompt + one reference image → Three.js 3D globe dashboard. Verdict: Fable 5 still edges it out. But at half the cost, GPT-5.6 Sol is a serious option now.

Kai

21,502 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat