Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

How well does Jonny Clayton know Copenhagen? 🇩🇰 We tested The Ferret's knowledge on the Danish capital through a series of True or False questions! 🏆 Nordic Darts Masters 🗓️ Friday June 5 - Saturday June 6 📍 Forum Copenhagen, Denmark ⏰ 1900 CEST / 1800 BST

PDC Darts

598,282 subscribers

18,850 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

How well does Gerwyn Price know The Big Apple? 🤔🇺🇸 We tested The Iceman's knowledge of New York City through a series of True or False questions! 🏆 US Darts Masters 🗓️ Thursday June 25 - Friday June 26 📍 Infosys Theater at MSG, New York City ⏰ 1900 EDT

How well does Gerwyn Price know The Big Apple? 🤔🇺🇸 We tested The Iceman's knowledge of New York City through a series of True or False questions! 🏆 US Darts Masters 🗓️ Thursday June 25 - Friday June 26 📍 Infosys Theater at MSG, New York City ⏰ 1900 EDT

PDC Darts

42,758 views • 1 month ago

“It was a perfect partnership between me and Daryl” 🤝🏆 Josh Rock watches back last year’s World Cup of Darts winning moment! 🏆 World Cup of Darts 🗓️ Thursday June 11 - Sunday June 14 📍 Eissporthalle, Frankfurt ⏰ 1900 CEST / 1800 BST

“It was a perfect partnership between me and Daryl” 🤝🏆 Josh Rock watches back last year’s World Cup of Darts winning moment! 🏆 World Cup of Darts 🗓️ Thursday June 11 - Sunday June 14 📍 Eissporthalle, Frankfurt ⏰ 1900 CEST / 1800 BST

PDC Darts

24,457 views • 1 month ago

The 2012 World Cup of Darts saw a host of missed match darts in the final, as Phil Taylor and Adrian Lewis claimed the crown over Simon Whitlock and Paul Nicholson in a brutal last-leg decider! 😯 🏆 World Cup of Darts 🗓️ Thursday June 11 - Sunday June 14 📍 Eissporthalle, Frankfurt ⏰ 1900 CEST / 1800 BST

The 2012 World Cup of Darts saw a host of missed match darts in the final, as Phil Taylor and Adrian Lewis claimed the crown over Simon Whitlock and Paul Nicholson in a brutal last-leg decider! 😯 🏆 World Cup of Darts 🗓️ Thursday June 11 - Sunday June 14 📍 Eissporthalle, Frankfurt ⏰ 1900 CEST / 1800 BST

PDC Darts

63,658 views • 1 month ago

ENGLAND DUMPED OUT BY GERMANY! Martin Schindler and Ricardo Pietreczko produced a spectacular performance to topple England's titans Luke Humphries and Luke Littler last year in Frankfurt! 💥 🏆 World Cup of Darts 🗓️ Thursday June 11 - Sunday June 14 📍 Eissporthalle, Frankfurt ⏰ 1900 CEST / 1800 BST

ENGLAND DUMPED OUT BY GERMANY! Martin Schindler and Ricardo Pietreczko produced a spectacular performance to topple England's titans Luke Humphries and Luke Littler last year in Frankfurt! 💥 🏆 World Cup of Darts 🗓️ Thursday June 11 - Sunday June 14 📍 Eissporthalle, Frankfurt ⏰ 1900 CEST / 1800 BST

PDC Darts

211,730 views • 1 month ago

WHY THE NEW GENERATION RAP FANS HATE THE JAY Z FREESTYLE.. 1.) ITS NO BEAT 2.) IT’S TOO MANY WORDS 3.) THEY DON’T HAVE ENOUGH KNOWLEDGE ON THE HISTORY OF RAP TO UNDERSTAND NODS TO PUBLIC ENEMYS “911 IS A JOKE” 4.) ITS NO HOOK 5.) ITS NO AUTO TUNE OR HARMONIZING 6.) HE HAS NO JEWELRY OR DESIGNER CLOTHES ON See today’s casual rap fan does not really understand REAL HIP HOP They know HIP-POP a commercialized version of it That does not deal with knowledge And information through a lot of words from a rapper that make sense They are trained to listen to the beat Or the hook Or the autotune singing Or look at the outfit or the jewelry And since JAY Z WENT BACK TO THE ESSENCE OF WHAT THE ACTUAL ONLY SKILL ELEMENT OF HIP HOP IS “THE LYRICISM” Majority of the fans do not know what they are looking at Or even have the knowledge on how to listen to hip hop correctly enough to judge it properly

WHY THE NEW GENERATION RAP FANS HATE THE JAY Z FREESTYLE.. 1.) ITS NO BEAT 2.) IT’S TOO MANY WORDS 3.) THEY DON’T HAVE ENOUGH KNOWLEDGE ON THE HISTORY OF RAP TO UNDERSTAND NODS TO PUBLIC ENEMYS “911 IS A JOKE” 4.) ITS NO HOOK 5.) ITS NO AUTO TUNE OR HARMONIZING 6.) HE HAS NO JEWELRY OR DESIGNER CLOTHES ON See today’s casual rap fan does not really understand REAL HIP HOP They know HIP-POP a commercialized version of it That does not deal with knowledge And information through a lot of words from a rapper that make sense They are trained to listen to the beat Or the hook Or the autotune singing Or look at the outfit or the jewelry And since JAY Z WENT BACK TO THE ESSENCE OF WHAT THE ACTUAL ONLY SKILL ELEMENT OF HIP HOP IS “THE LYRICISM” Majority of the fans do not know what they are looking at Or even have the knowledge on how to listen to hip hop correctly enough to judge it properly

MASTER STUDENT🤲🏾

75,817 views • 1 month ago

BREAKING: Paul Kwan, Managing Director of General Catalyst's Global Resilience Team: "Capital does not equal contracts" "There's a ton of energy. There's a line out the door just to get in. It's amazing the awareness in the focus on this space, defense, industrial power, but we kind of have to not conflate that contracts & capital are different. We have a lot of capital, private capital, & public capital, but that's not the same as contracts. Capital does not equal contracts. We need to have the follow through on contracts to companies to keep the flywheel going." Say more.. "An example I give you is like NATO did a ton of work to put together this NATO innovation fund a few years ago. They raised $1 billion dollars of capital from all the nations to invest in defense tech. And my thought would've been, instead of spending a billion dollars investing, it should just bought a billion dollars of contracts that would've led to $5 or $6 billion of VC funding. Instead, a few years later, they're just winding the whole thing down and didn't have the impact. So to me. Again, we have all this private capital coming into the ecosystem, it's great, and public capital, but if we don't have the contract follow through from the DOW on these programs, then you don't get the revenues, you don't get the commercial flywheel to go build all the stuff we need to build. Hill & Valley Forum 2026 (The Hill & Valley Forum)

BREAKING: Paul Kwan, Managing Director of General Catalyst's Global Resilience Team: "Capital does not equal contracts" "There's a ton of energy. There's a line out the door just to get in. It's amazing the awareness in the focus on this space, defense, industrial power, but we kind of have to not conflate that contracts & capital are different. We have a lot of capital, private capital, & public capital, but that's not the same as contracts. Capital does not equal contracts. We need to have the follow through on contracts to companies to keep the flywheel going." Say more.. "An example I give you is like NATO did a ton of work to put together this NATO innovation fund a few years ago. They raised $1 billion dollars of capital from all the nations to invest in defense tech. And my thought would've been, instead of spending a billion dollars investing, it should just bought a billion dollars of contracts that would've led to $5 or $6 billion of VC funding. Instead, a few years later, they're just winding the whole thing down and didn't have the impact. So to me. Again, we have all this private capital coming into the ecosystem, it's great, and public capital, but if we don't have the contract follow through from the DOW on these programs, then you don't get the revenues, you don't get the commercial flywheel to go build all the stuff we need to build. Hill & Valley Forum 2026 (The Hill & Valley Forum)

Molly O’Shea

39,908 views • 4 months ago

HEROES REALITY TOUR LIVE HD UPGRADE “We could steal time, just for two days...” A Reality Tour commenced on 7th October 2003 at the Forum Copenhagen in Denmark. The following month, the shows on 22nd and 23rd of November 2003 at The Point in Dublin, were recorded for A Reality Tour for both audio and DVD. "Heroes" was but one of the songs on the impressive setlist played over the two days in Dublin. In a 2010 interview with Mark Adams about the release, Bowie explained how he went about selecting the songs... + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + MA: Fifty plus songs were rehearsed for A Reality Tour, with thirty-five of those being played over the two nights in Dublin. Though you could have easily picked two or three completely different sets of fifty songs from your back catalogue, which no doubt would have equally pleased your audience, how did you go about choosing the songs you eventually settled upon? DB: Every few days or so I’d look back through my old songs and pick on something that particularly caught my fancy or something that I hadn’t played in a few years. + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + Watch "Heroes" in full here: #ICGEAAlbumFocusARealityTour #BowieARealityTour #BowieHeroes

HEROES REALITY TOUR LIVE HD UPGRADE “We could steal time, just for two days...” A Reality Tour commenced on 7th October 2003 at the Forum Copenhagen in Denmark. The following month, the shows on 22nd and 23rd of November 2003 at The Point in Dublin, were recorded for A Reality Tour for both audio and DVD. "Heroes" was but one of the songs on the impressive setlist played over the two days in Dublin. In a 2010 interview with Mark Adams about the release, Bowie explained how he went about selecting the songs... + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + MA: Fifty plus songs were rehearsed for A Reality Tour, with thirty-five of those being played over the two nights in Dublin. Though you could have easily picked two or three completely different sets of fifty songs from your back catalogue, which no doubt would have equally pleased your audience, how did you go about choosing the songs you eventually settled upon? DB: Every few days or so I’d look back through my old songs and pick on something that particularly caught my fancy or something that I hadn’t played in a few years. + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + Watch "Heroes" in full here: #ICGEAAlbumFocusARealityTour #BowieARealityTour #BowieHeroes

David Bowie Official

18,459 views • 9 months ago

.Naval: Epistemology, which is a fancy word for the theory of how knowledge grows or how knowledge growth occurs. And we've all been told since we're young that there's a scientific method and that scientists sort of do this stuff in white lab coats and we're supposed to accept it because of this thing called the scientific method. And then they give us true beliefs that we can then say, well the science is settled and we take that we move on. And we all only have a very, very vague understanding of how this works. And people say, well maybe you go out in the real world, you look at what's happening, you make all these observations, and then based on that you form a theory, you test the theory against more observations, and the more observations you get the closer you get to the truth. And once you have enough observation it's true and then you call it a scientific theory or a law and it's settled and you move on. And this is the popular conception of how science works. And as Popper pointed out and as you take even further, this is completely wrong. And so I'd love for you to get into that, which is what is knowledge? How does it grow? What is the real scientific method? And how do we figure things out? David Deutsch: I love the way you just stated the prevailing view there and laced every aspect of it with the contempt that it deserves. So you just went through touching every base. It's amazing that this series of misconceptions is still common sense. I mean, that it was common sense at a time when we didn't really have science or when science was just starting up, when the main issue in science was freeing itself from dogmatism, freeing itself from religion, freeing itself from authority, and so on. There it was understandable that people would look for an alternative source of authority and they would think, oh, it's sense impressions. We can see the world and you know, these religious people, they can't even see God and so on. And so we are confined to what we can see. That's where we get our ideas from. And as you say, that is completely false. Sense impressions, like all observation, even the most careful scientific observation is all theory laden. And theories are inherently fallible. I mean, we actually want to replace our best theories. Everybody who does a PhD is technically anyway, working to overturn something in the existing body of knowledge. You're not turned away at the door if you say, I don't believe this stuff, I'm going to produce something better. Whereas for most of human history, that was exactly what you were forbidden to do. The idea was that we already had all the important knowledge. If you want to discover something new, what you had to make sure of was that it didn't contradict the existing knowledge. Now, you have to make sure that it does contradict existing knowledge. So more or less. Naval: Yeah, it's this tradition of criticism that you've talked about in the West, that the Enlightenment really ushered in the Enlightenment era. David Deutsch: It has been institutionalized. So in many ways, our institutions are wiser than we are. So the institutions of science, for instance, have this built in, even if scientists actually don't always act that way. In fact, they often don't act that way, and act in a dogmatic way and try to preserve the status quo and are resistant to new ideas and so on. But the institutions, the way the procedures of science work, makes the right thing happen in the end anyway, regardless of what the people are trying to do. Naval: So you're saying the knowledge of the true scientific method is embedded in the institutions of science in the PhD process? David Deutsch: Well, the best scientific method that we know of, and one shouldn't really think of it as a method, you know, there's this wonderful lecture by Popper when he first was made a professor at the London School of Economics. He was made a professor of scientific method, and his first six lectures, I wish the rest of them were, the first six lectures are on the internet somewhere. And he starts the first one by saying, I am the first professor of scientific method in the British Empire. The British Empire still existed at the time, more or less. And so the first thing I want to say to you is that there is no such thing as the scientific method. And then he goes on from there. So this subject does not exist. So if any of you have come here to learn the handle that you have to turn in order to make scientific knowledge come out the other end, you're going to be disappointed.

.Naval: Epistemology, which is a fancy word for the theory of how knowledge grows or how knowledge growth occurs. And we've all been told since we're young that there's a scientific method and that scientists sort of do this stuff in white lab coats and we're supposed to accept it because of this thing called the scientific method. And then they give us true beliefs that we can then say, well the science is settled and we take that we move on. And we all only have a very, very vague understanding of how this works. And people say, well maybe you go out in the real world, you look at what's happening, you make all these observations, and then based on that you form a theory, you test the theory against more observations, and the more observations you get the closer you get to the truth. And once you have enough observation it's true and then you call it a scientific theory or a law and it's settled and you move on. And this is the popular conception of how science works. And as Popper pointed out and as you take even further, this is completely wrong. And so I'd love for you to get into that, which is what is knowledge? How does it grow? What is the real scientific method? And how do we figure things out? David Deutsch: I love the way you just stated the prevailing view there and laced every aspect of it with the contempt that it deserves. So you just went through touching every base. It's amazing that this series of misconceptions is still common sense. I mean, that it was common sense at a time when we didn't really have science or when science was just starting up, when the main issue in science was freeing itself from dogmatism, freeing itself from religion, freeing itself from authority, and so on. There it was understandable that people would look for an alternative source of authority and they would think, oh, it's sense impressions. We can see the world and you know, these religious people, they can't even see God and so on. And so we are confined to what we can see. That's where we get our ideas from. And as you say, that is completely false. Sense impressions, like all observation, even the most careful scientific observation is all theory laden. And theories are inherently fallible. I mean, we actually want to replace our best theories. Everybody who does a PhD is technically anyway, working to overturn something in the existing body of knowledge. You're not turned away at the door if you say, I don't believe this stuff, I'm going to produce something better. Whereas for most of human history, that was exactly what you were forbidden to do. The idea was that we already had all the important knowledge. If you want to discover something new, what you had to make sure of was that it didn't contradict the existing knowledge. Now, you have to make sure that it does contradict existing knowledge. So more or less. Naval: Yeah, it's this tradition of criticism that you've talked about in the West, that the Enlightenment really ushered in the Enlightenment era. David Deutsch: It has been institutionalized. So in many ways, our institutions are wiser than we are. So the institutions of science, for instance, have this built in, even if scientists actually don't always act that way. In fact, they often don't act that way, and act in a dogmatic way and try to preserve the status quo and are resistant to new ideas and so on. But the institutions, the way the procedures of science work, makes the right thing happen in the end anyway, regardless of what the people are trying to do. Naval: So you're saying the knowledge of the true scientific method is embedded in the institutions of science in the PhD process? David Deutsch: Well, the best scientific method that we know of, and one shouldn't really think of it as a method, you know, there's this wonderful lecture by Popper when he first was made a professor at the London School of Economics. He was made a professor of scientific method, and his first six lectures, I wish the rest of them were, the first six lectures are on the internet somewhere. And he starts the first one by saying, I am the first professor of scientific method in the British Empire. The British Empire still existed at the time, more or less. And so the first thing I want to say to you is that there is no such thing as the scientific method. And then he goes on from there. So this subject does not exist. So if any of you have come here to learn the handle that you have to turn in order to make scientific knowledge come out the other end, you're going to be disappointed.

Deutsch Explains

114,992 views • 1 year ago

YG denies the long-standing rumor that he was involved in the murder of Drakeo The Ruler on the new track "We Know the Truth." On Friday (June 19), the Compton, Calif., rapper released his new album The Gentlemen's Club, and he also debuted the video for the song "We Know the Truth," which finds YG finally addressing the speculation. "They say I murdered this, they say I murdered that/Well, if that was true, you'd be a f**king rat," YG raps. "And I'd be in the cell sleeping on a rack/But too bad that ain't a f**king fact." Later in the verse, he further distances himself from the incident, where Drakeo was stabbed to death during a backstage brawl at the Once Upon a Time in L.A. Festival in 2021. "I came to get the dough, was finna hit the stage/Then I heard how y'all heard, somebody got hit with a blade," YG continues. "I heard ni**as saying, 'YG paid'/Stop lying, ni**a, come run YG fade."

YG denies the long-standing rumor that he was involved in the murder of Drakeo The Ruler on the new track "We Know the Truth." On Friday (June 19), the Compton, Calif., rapper released his new album The Gentlemen's Club, and he also debuted the video for the song "We Know the Truth," which finds YG finally addressing the speculation. "They say I murdered this, they say I murdered that/Well, if that was true, you'd be a fking rat," YG raps. "And I'd be in the cell sleeping on a rack/But too bad that ain't a fking fact." Later in the verse, he further distances himself from the incident, where Drakeo was stabbed to death during a backstage brawl at the Once Upon a Time in L.A. Festival in 2021. "I came to get the dough, was finna hit the stage/Then I heard how y'all heard, somebody got hit with a blade," YG continues. "I heard nias saying, 'YG paid'/Stop lying, nia, come run YG fade."

XXL Magazine

35,265 views • 1 month ago

$Gambit Protocol is live on 25 June 2024 It's NOT a Token launch or a NFT mint. You get to OWN a fraction of your favourite gamer, to share in their 💰 or trade for 🪙 Whether you're on the early access WL, a degen trader, or a skilled gamer, here's everything you need to know: Between 25 to 28 June: - Traders & Gamers compete for $50k between 1PM to 2PM UTC - Same time slot for 4 consecutive days - Analyse player stats to build your portfolio of player bits Tell me more👇 How do I get whitelisted? It has been fully allocated through X, Discord & partner communities. Fret not, public access granted immediately after. Benefits of WL? Imagine a Black Friday sale, but you shop before the crowd. Whitelisters are granted a password to trade privately within the first 30mins of launch. Did you say ..... $50k prize pot? The top 100 gamers & 50 traders on the leaderboard will be eligible for the prize 🏆 What is the strategy for traders? Take an early position on high performing gamers by analysing stats on the dashboard📈 Hodl to share their winnings, or flip to cash! What does it mean for gamers? Receive funding when your bits are traded, and maximise trader value to be included in future prize pots. How are player's bits priced? Governed by a bonding curve, it maximises liquidity through an AMM mechanism📈Trade directly with the contract, and prices scale exponentially as outstanding supply increases. What's next for Gambit? 15+ games have been line up for Gambit SDK integration. We will become the underlying platform for all on chain cash games. You are all ready degen, join us in enabling SkillFi for the gamer economy 💀$

Gambit Protocol is live on 25 June 2024 It's NOT a Token launch or a NFT mint. You get to OWN a fraction of your favourite gamer, to share in their 💰 or trade for 🪙 Whether you're on the early access WL, a degen trader, or a skilled gamer, here's everything you need to know: Between 25 to 28 June: - Traders & Gamers compete for $50k between 1PM to 2PM UTC - Same time slot for 4 consecutive days - Analyse player stats to build your portfolio of player bits Tell me more👇 How do I get whitelisted? It has been fully allocated through X, Discord & partner communities. Fret not, public access granted immediately after. Benefits of WL? Imagine a Black Friday sale, but you shop before the crowd. Whitelisters are granted a password to trade privately within the first 30mins of launch. Did you say ..... $50k prize pot? The top 100 gamers & 50 traders on the leaderboard will be eligible for the prize 🏆 What is the strategy for traders? Take an early position on high performing gamers by analysing stats on the dashboard📈 Hodl to share their winnings, or flip to cash! What does it mean for gamers? Receive funding when your bits are traded, and maximise trader value to be included in future prize pots. How are player's bits priced? Governed by a bonding curve, it maximises liquidity through an AMM mechanism📈Trade directly with the contract, and prices scale exponentially as outstanding supply increases. What's next for Gambit? 15+ games have been line up for Gambit SDK integration. We will become the underlying platform for all on chain cash games. You are all ready degen, join us in enabling SkillFi for the gamer economy 💀

Gambit Finance

80,631 views • 2 years ago

✅Explanation of Meaning (by parts): 1. “Why does it exist? In what way does it exist? Does it have a purpose?” : The author opens with foundational questions about the Universe’s existence, its mode of being, and potential purpose, probing the reasons and nature of reality, inviting deep philosophical inquiry. 2. “Could it have not existed at all? Could reality be such that no intelligent being would have appeared?” : These questions explore the contingency of the Universe and the possibility of a reality without intelligence, highlighting the fragility and randomness of conditions that allow for conscious life. 3. “Why does it have the ability to give birth to intelligence?” : The author questions why the Universe possesses the capacity to produce intelligent beings, emphasizing the remarkable and seemingly improbable emergence of consciousness as a key feature of reality. 4. “Why is the world the way it is? Why is it so whimsical?” : These queries address the specific nature of the Universe and its apparent capriciousness, suggesting that its structure and behavior may lack clear logic or predictability, challenging deterministic views. 5. “What is its structure? Is it finite or infinite?” : The author seeks to understand the Universe’s composition and scale, questioning whether it has boundaries or extends infinitely, reflecting on its physical and metaphysical framework. 6. “Has it always existed or does it have a beginning? Does it have a prime cause?” : These questions probe the temporal origin of the Universe and whether it stems from a primary cause, engaging with debates about eternity versus a finite beginning, like the Big Bang. 7. “What lies beyond its limits? Is it eternally evolving or destined to decline in the future?” : The author wonders about what exists outside the Universe and its long-term trajectory, contemplating whether it will continue to evolve or face eventual decline, such as heat death. 8. “Can intelligent beings live forever? Is the world knowable or not?” : The final questions address the potential immortality of intelligent life and the Universe’s comprehensibility, exploring whether consciousness can persist indefinitely and if reality can be fully understood. 🗝️Main Idea (refined version): The author presents a series of profound questions about the Universe’s existence, purpose, structure, and capacity to produce intelligence, probing its contingency, whimsy, and knowability. These inquiries challenge us to reflect on reality’s nature, our place within it, and the possibility of eternal life or decline. They underscore the mystery of why the Universe exists as it does, ensuring humility and curiosity in the face of cosmic unknowns. By engaging with these questions, we confront the randomness and fragility of intelligent life’s emergence. This reflection inspires a quest for knowledge, blending philosophy and science to explore our origins. Ultimately, it urges us to find meaning in an uncertain, evolving cosmos, embracing the pursuit of truth as a guiding purpose.

✅Explanation of Meaning (by parts): 1. “Why does it exist? In what way does it exist? Does it have a purpose?” : The author opens with foundational questions about the Universe’s existence, its mode of being, and potential purpose, probing the reasons and nature of reality, inviting deep philosophical inquiry. 2. “Could it have not existed at all? Could reality be such that no intelligent being would have appeared?” : These questions explore the contingency of the Universe and the possibility of a reality without intelligence, highlighting the fragility and randomness of conditions that allow for conscious life. 3. “Why does it have the ability to give birth to intelligence?” : The author questions why the Universe possesses the capacity to produce intelligent beings, emphasizing the remarkable and seemingly improbable emergence of consciousness as a key feature of reality. 4. “Why is the world the way it is? Why is it so whimsical?” : These queries address the specific nature of the Universe and its apparent capriciousness, suggesting that its structure and behavior may lack clear logic or predictability, challenging deterministic views. 5. “What is its structure? Is it finite or infinite?” : The author seeks to understand the Universe’s composition and scale, questioning whether it has boundaries or extends infinitely, reflecting on its physical and metaphysical framework. 6. “Has it always existed or does it have a beginning? Does it have a prime cause?” : These questions probe the temporal origin of the Universe and whether it stems from a primary cause, engaging with debates about eternity versus a finite beginning, like the Big Bang. 7. “What lies beyond its limits? Is it eternally evolving or destined to decline in the future?” : The author wonders about what exists outside the Universe and its long-term trajectory, contemplating whether it will continue to evolve or face eventual decline, such as heat death. 8. “Can intelligent beings live forever? Is the world knowable or not?” : The final questions address the potential immortality of intelligent life and the Universe’s comprehensibility, exploring whether consciousness can persist indefinitely and if reality can be fully understood. 🗝️Main Idea (refined version): The author presents a series of profound questions about the Universe’s existence, purpose, structure, and capacity to produce intelligence, probing its contingency, whimsy, and knowability. These inquiries challenge us to reflect on reality’s nature, our place within it, and the possibility of eternal life or decline. They underscore the mystery of why the Universe exists as it does, ensuring humility and curiosity in the face of cosmic unknowns. By engaging with these questions, we confront the randomness and fragility of intelligent life’s emergence. This reflection inspires a quest for knowledge, blending philosophy and science to explore our origins. Ultimately, it urges us to find meaning in an uncertain, evolving cosmos, embracing the pursuit of truth as a guiding purpose.

Zafar Mirzo | Quotes

529,789 views • 1 year ago

Daniel Dennett: You don't know your own mind as well as you think you do. In a 1993 Dutch documentary series, A Glorious Accident, philosopher Daniel Dennett laid out one of the most unsettling ideas in all of philosophy, the possibility that we are fundamentally mistaken about our own minds. We assume our minds are the one thing we have certain access to. Whatever else may be uncertain about the world, at least we know what we ourselves are thinking, right? Dennett argues this assumption is exactly what makes consciousness so hard to understand and so hard to challenge. He frames the core tension this way: on one hand, the mind seems like the most intimate thing we have access to. On the other, when we try to locate minds in the physical world as functions of the brain they seem to vanish entirely. "On the one hand we seem to know from the inside our minds… and then when we try to figure out how our minds exist in the world, how they could be a function of what's going on in our brains, it seems utterly mysterious." This is why we've never had a satisfying theory of consciousness, Dennett suggests. Not because we haven't thought hard enough, but because the very intuition we keep relying on that we have privileged, infallible access to our own thoughts may itself be wrong. Here he takes direct aim at Descartes. Descartes famously argued that while everything else could be doubted, the content of one's own conscious thought was beyond doubt. Whatever my thoughts are about may be false but what my thoughts are, and that they are mine? That, Descartes said, was the one certainty. Dennett's move is to reject precisely this: "Oddly enough, I'm claiming that he was wrong about that. The one thing he said was most certain I'm claiming that's not certain at all." We are, in some degree, fooled about our own minds. This isn't a claim that we're completely wrong about everything. It's a subtler and arguably more disturbing point: the seemingly undeniable intuition that we have transparent access to our own conscious states is, to some degree, false. We misread ourselves. We confabulate. The inner narrative we take for granted is, in part, a story we tell after the fact. Dennett spent his career making this case more formally, arguing that consciousness is less like a private theatre and more like a process of ongoing self-interpretation. If he's right, the question isn't just "how does the brain produce consciousness?" but "how does the brain produce the convincing illusion of transparent self-knowledge?"

Daniel Dennett: You don't know your own mind as well as you think you do. In a 1993 Dutch documentary series, A Glorious Accident, philosopher Daniel Dennett laid out one of the most unsettling ideas in all of philosophy, the possibility that we are fundamentally mistaken about our own minds. We assume our minds are the one thing we have certain access to. Whatever else may be uncertain about the world, at least we know what we ourselves are thinking, right? Dennett argues this assumption is exactly what makes consciousness so hard to understand and so hard to challenge. He frames the core tension this way: on one hand, the mind seems like the most intimate thing we have access to. On the other, when we try to locate minds in the physical world as functions of the brain they seem to vanish entirely. "On the one hand we seem to know from the inside our minds… and then when we try to figure out how our minds exist in the world, how they could be a function of what's going on in our brains, it seems utterly mysterious." This is why we've never had a satisfying theory of consciousness, Dennett suggests. Not because we haven't thought hard enough, but because the very intuition we keep relying on that we have privileged, infallible access to our own thoughts may itself be wrong. Here he takes direct aim at Descartes. Descartes famously argued that while everything else could be doubted, the content of one's own conscious thought was beyond doubt. Whatever my thoughts are about may be false but what my thoughts are, and that they are mine? That, Descartes said, was the one certainty. Dennett's move is to reject precisely this: "Oddly enough, I'm claiming that he was wrong about that. The one thing he said was most certain I'm claiming that's not certain at all." We are, in some degree, fooled about our own minds. This isn't a claim that we're completely wrong about everything. It's a subtler and arguably more disturbing point: the seemingly undeniable intuition that we have transparent access to our own conscious states is, to some degree, false. We misread ourselves. We confabulate. The inner narrative we take for granted is, in part, a story we tell after the fact. Dennett spent his career making this case more formally, arguing that consciousness is less like a private theatre and more like a process of ongoing self-interpretation. If he's right, the question isn't just "how does the brain produce consciousness?" but "how does the brain produce the convincing illusion of transparent self-knowledge?"

Mateus — eu/acc 🇪🇺

46,764 views • 3 months ago

#SeriesSocietyxEWB #JanJingjing 💬: (how do you feel about the positive feedback for ewb?) 🦊: i feel soooooo happy! like very! more and more every day. when we were filming together, i thought, “oh, i wonder if fans would like this series and our work.” but once ep1 started, the response was better than expected. then with ep2, 3, 4, 5, 6, up till now 8, it’s still getting better every day. it’s beyond our expectations every time. i feel thankful and very happy. i’m happy to have gotten to know everyone new who came to know each other 🐯: i feel very happy because i feel like a lot more people have gotten to know us, janjingjing and kapookciize. just like i’ve said before in many interviews, with every ep, fans are increasing continuously. we can really feel that with every ep. everyone likes our series so much. people say that the casting is spot-on, actors act well, or or the series does not have a dull moment from ep1 - 8. i’m very happy because the four of us gave it our all

#SeriesSocietyxEWB #JanJingjing 💬: (how do you feel about the positive feedback for ewb?) 🦊: i feel soooooo happy! like very! more and more every day. when we were filming together, i thought, “oh, i wonder if fans would like this series and our work.” but once ep1 started, the response was better than expected. then with ep2, 3, 4, 5, 6, up till now 8, it’s still getting better every day. it’s beyond our expectations every time. i feel thankful and very happy. i’m happy to have gotten to know everyone new who came to know each other 🐯: i feel very happy because i feel like a lot more people have gotten to know us, janjingjing and kapookciize. just like i’ve said before in many interviews, with every ep, fans are increasing continuously. we can really feel that with every ep. everyone likes our series so much. people say that the casting is spot-on, actors act well, or or the series does not have a dull moment from ep1 - 8. i’m very happy because the four of us gave it our all

²²

17,807 views • 26 days ago

We invite Europeans who are fed up with mass immigration to Warsaw! See you at the march under the slogan Poland for Poles! We want Europe for Europeans! ✝️🇵🇱🇪🇸🇭🇺🇸🇰🇫🇷🇮🇪🇦🇹🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇨🇿🇵🇹🇫🇷✝️ Soon we will commemorate one of the most important events in the history of Poland and Europe – the Battle of Vienna in 1683. On that day, Polish troops led by King Jan III Sobieski, in alliance with the troops of Emperor Leopold I, fought against the Ottoman army commanded by Kara Mustafa. It was a pivotal moment for the future of Europe, and its significance went far beyond the outcome of the battle itself. The Polish king was well aware that he was not only fighting for Vienna, but for the future of all of Christian Europe. It was this awareness that drove his soldiers, whose morale grew with every step they took towards the Austrian capital. Aware of the threats posed by mass immigration and the actions of the European Union, we stand up for our heritage and identity❗ 🗓️ September 6 (Saturday) ⏰ 1:00 p.m. 📍 Start: European Commission Representation in Poland, Jasna 14/3, Warsaw

We invite Europeans who are fed up with mass immigration to Warsaw! See you at the march under the slogan Poland for Poles! We want Europe for Europeans! ✝️🇵🇱🇪🇸🇭🇺🇸🇰🇫🇷🇮🇪🇦🇹🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇨🇿🇵🇹🇫🇷✝️ Soon we will commemorate one of the most important events in the history of Poland and Europe – the Battle of Vienna in 1683. On that day, Polish troops led by King Jan III Sobieski, in alliance with the troops of Emperor Leopold I, fought against the Ottoman army commanded by Kara Mustafa. It was a pivotal moment for the future of Europe, and its significance went far beyond the outcome of the battle itself. The Polish king was well aware that he was not only fighting for Vienna, but for the future of all of Christian Europe. It was this awareness that drove his soldiers, whose morale grew with every step they took towards the Austrian capital. Aware of the threats posed by mass immigration and the actions of the European Union, we stand up for our heritage and identity❗ 🗓️ September 6 (Saturday) ⏰ 1:00 p.m. 📍 Start: European Commission Representation in Poland, Jasna 14/3, Warsaw

Młodzież Wszechpolska

26,423 views • 11 months ago

Will Donald Trump annex Greenland? Time will tell. A few thoughts: 🇬🇱 Greenland rightfully belongs to Denmark – the settled parts of it have been in Viking hands for a thousand years. There is no question about this. 🇩🇰 However, Denmark is not strong enough to maintain its claim on it. 🇺🇸 It makes perfect sense for the US to want to control Greenland (the Panama Canal, too, for that matter). In fact, it would be a bad mistake on their part to leave it up for grabs – lest China claims it, for example. 🇪🇺 Denmark is not strong enough on its own. Just as Sweden is not strong enough on its own. The same can be said about former titans such as France and Germany. A united and strong Europe is needed if we are to be able to assert ourselves against other entities. In order to become strong again, the primary objective for European countries is, of course, to enact a large-scale remigration process. European countries are weak because of mass immigration from the Third World (the same is true for the US). 🇪🇺🤝🇺🇸 The optimal scenario is, of course, a close alliance between the EU and the US. However, something to keep in mind is that even though Trump might be a good man (or at least good for Americans), there is a significant risk that coming American regimes will be bad for Whites in the US as well as for Europeans in Europe. ⚜️The EU as we know it today is an abomination. This does not mean that each European country should go its own way. It means that we need good people in Brussels and Strasbourg who can transform the EU into a powerful actor. Exciting times ahead. Francis Fukuyama was wrong, we have not reached the end of history. Onwards!

Will Donald Trump annex Greenland? Time will tell. A few thoughts: 🇬🇱 Greenland rightfully belongs to Denmark – the settled parts of it have been in Viking hands for a thousand years. There is no question about this. 🇩🇰 However, Denmark is not strong enough to maintain its claim on it. 🇺🇸 It makes perfect sense for the US to want to control Greenland (the Panama Canal, too, for that matter). In fact, it would be a bad mistake on their part to leave it up for grabs – lest China claims it, for example. 🇪🇺 Denmark is not strong enough on its own. Just as Sweden is not strong enough on its own. The same can be said about former titans such as France and Germany. A united and strong Europe is needed if we are to be able to assert ourselves against other entities. In order to become strong again, the primary objective for European countries is, of course, to enact a large-scale remigration process. European countries are weak because of mass immigration from the Third World (the same is true for the US). 🇪🇺🤝🇺🇸 The optimal scenario is, of course, a close alliance between the EU and the US. However, something to keep in mind is that even though Trump might be a good man (or at least good for Americans), there is a significant risk that coming American regimes will be bad for Whites in the US as well as for Europeans in Europe. ⚜️The EU as we know it today is an abomination. This does not mean that each European country should go its own way. It means that we need good people in Brussels and Strasbourg who can transform the EU into a powerful actor. Exciting times ahead. Francis Fukuyama was wrong, we have not reached the end of history. Onwards!

The Golden One

172,591 views • 1 year ago

Here’s the entire interaction in one clip. Before she threatens to k*ll me, I asked her a series of questions: 1. At what age is a girl mature enough to have top surgery? 2. How did you feel about your body changing as you were going through puberty? 3. Do you think it’s hatred to tell girls they can be healthy and whole? 4. Do you know any transgender children? 5. Do you have a transgender child? 6. And how did they know they were transgender? 7. At what age did you know you were a c-i-s woman? 8. And why did your child think they were transgender? 9. Does your child go to a public school in California? 10. Did they learn there could be 13 gender identities? 11. How much money does a surgeon make off of giving a girl top surgery? 12. Do you think your transgender child might one day have top surgery and a phalloplasty? 13. Is that something you would allow them to have? This was last Saturday at the California Democratic Party Democratic Party convention in San Francisco.

Here’s the entire interaction in one clip. Before she threatens to k*ll me, I asked her a series of questions: 1. At what age is a girl mature enough to have top surgery? 2. How did you feel about your body changing as you were going through puberty? 3. Do you think it’s hatred to tell girls they can be healthy and whole? 4. Do you know any transgender children? 5. Do you have a transgender child? 6. And how did they know they were transgender? 7. At what age did you know you were a c-i-s woman? 8. And why did your child think they were transgender? 9. Does your child go to a public school in California? 10. Did they learn there could be 13 gender identities? 11. How much money does a surgeon make off of giving a girl top surgery? 12. Do you think your transgender child might one day have top surgery and a phalloplasty? 13. Is that something you would allow them to have? This was last Saturday at the California Democratic Party Democratic Party convention in San Francisco.

Beth Bourne

2,925,898 views • 5 months ago

VALENTINE OZIGBO CONVENES MAIDEN NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE VALIANT MOVEMENT ABUJA, Nigeria — Valentine Ozigbo, business leader and founder of the Valiant Movement, on Saturday, June 13, 2026, convened the organisation's first National Conference, bringing together coordinators and leaders from all 36 states of the federation and the Federal Capital Territory for a day of orientation, leadership training, and strategic planning. Held at Hotel De Bently, Abuja, the conference marked a significant milestone for the non-partisan leadership and citizenship development initiative, which is anchored on the principles of courage, character, and capacity. Activities commenced on Friday, June 12, with a welcome dinner that brought state leaders together for the first time as a national body. The gathering provided an opportunity for delegates travelling from across the country to build relationships ahead of the conference, reflecting the movement's belief that enduring national transformation must be rooted in genuine community and shared purpose. Delegates reconvened on Saturday for the main conference, where they were formally introduced to the movement's vision, values, structure, and strategic direction before participating in a packed programme featuring presentations by members of the national leadership team. Delivering the keynote address, Ozigbo, a multiple-award-winning global CEO, described the gathering as fundamentally different from traditional political assemblies. "This is not merely another conference," Ozigbo told delegates. "It's not another political meeting. It's not another gathering of people looking for positions or titles or applause. This gathering is different." He argued that Nigeria's most pressing challenge extends beyond politics. "At its deepest level, Nigeria suffers from a crisis of leadership values, civic consciousness, and moral courage," he said. Ozigbo painted a picture of decades of normalised corruption, transactional leadership, and widespread civic disengagement. "Too many young people have concluded that integrity does not pay," the acclaimed political leader said. "Too many leaders now pursue power without purpose." While acknowledging leadership failures, he insisted that citizens also bear responsibility for national renewal. "A nation does not collapse only because leaders fail. A nation also collapses when citizens abandon responsibility," Ozigbo said. "A society does not die merely because bad people exist. A society dies when good people surrender responsibility. That is why the Valiant Movement was born." Addressing what he described as "the tyranny of blame," Ozigbo challenged Nigerians to move beyond assigning responsibility for the country's problems and focus instead on solutions. "Responsibility is the highest form of power," he said. On the question of restructuring, Ozigbo clarified his position. "When I say restructuring, let me define it. I don't mean division. I don't mean hatred. I don't mean violence. I don't mean the destruction of Nigeria. I mean the honest redesign of systems and governance structures so that this country can work more fairly, more efficiently, and more sustainably for all its people." He argued that political restructuring must be accompanied by a restructuring of values and mindset. "We must restructure how we think, how we lead, how we speak, how we treat truth, and how we understand citizenship and responsibility, because a corrupt mind will eventually corrupt even the best institutions and constitutions." Responding to questions about the movement's political intentions, Ozigbo emphasised that the nationwide structure was not being built to advance any individual's political ambitions. Instead, he described the Valiant Movement as a long-term civic and cultural intervention aimed at transforming leadership culture and citizenship values.

VALENTINE OZIGBO CONVENES MAIDEN NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE VALIANT MOVEMENT ABUJA, Nigeria — Valentine Ozigbo, business leader and founder of the Valiant Movement, on Saturday, June 13, 2026, convened the organisation's first National Conference, bringing together coordinators and leaders from all 36 states of the federation and the Federal Capital Territory for a day of orientation, leadership training, and strategic planning. Held at Hotel De Bently, Abuja, the conference marked a significant milestone for the non-partisan leadership and citizenship development initiative, which is anchored on the principles of courage, character, and capacity. Activities commenced on Friday, June 12, with a welcome dinner that brought state leaders together for the first time as a national body. The gathering provided an opportunity for delegates travelling from across the country to build relationships ahead of the conference, reflecting the movement's belief that enduring national transformation must be rooted in genuine community and shared purpose. Delegates reconvened on Saturday for the main conference, where they were formally introduced to the movement's vision, values, structure, and strategic direction before participating in a packed programme featuring presentations by members of the national leadership team. Delivering the keynote address, Ozigbo, a multiple-award-winning global CEO, described the gathering as fundamentally different from traditional political assemblies. "This is not merely another conference," Ozigbo told delegates. "It's not another political meeting. It's not another gathering of people looking for positions or titles or applause. This gathering is different." He argued that Nigeria's most pressing challenge extends beyond politics. "At its deepest level, Nigeria suffers from a crisis of leadership values, civic consciousness, and moral courage," he said. Ozigbo painted a picture of decades of normalised corruption, transactional leadership, and widespread civic disengagement. "Too many young people have concluded that integrity does not pay," the acclaimed political leader said. "Too many leaders now pursue power without purpose." While acknowledging leadership failures, he insisted that citizens also bear responsibility for national renewal. "A nation does not collapse only because leaders fail. A nation also collapses when citizens abandon responsibility," Ozigbo said. "A society does not die merely because bad people exist. A society dies when good people surrender responsibility. That is why the Valiant Movement was born." Addressing what he described as "the tyranny of blame," Ozigbo challenged Nigerians to move beyond assigning responsibility for the country's problems and focus instead on solutions. "Responsibility is the highest form of power," he said. On the question of restructuring, Ozigbo clarified his position. "When I say restructuring, let me define it. I don't mean division. I don't mean hatred. I don't mean violence. I don't mean the destruction of Nigeria. I mean the honest redesign of systems and governance structures so that this country can work more fairly, more efficiently, and more sustainably for all its people." He argued that political restructuring must be accompanied by a restructuring of values and mindset. "We must restructure how we think, how we lead, how we speak, how we treat truth, and how we understand citizenship and responsibility, because a corrupt mind will eventually corrupt even the best institutions and constitutions." Responding to questions about the movement's political intentions, Ozigbo emphasised that the nationwide structure was not being built to advance any individual's political ambitions. Instead, he described the Valiant Movement as a long-term civic and cultural intervention aimed at transforming leadership culture and citizenship values.

Valentine Ozigbo

28,480 views • 1 month ago

This workflow combining Loom’s AI features + a custom ChatGPT GPT is saving me hours. Instead of creating onboarding Docs for new team members, I film a Loom → generate SOP → train a GPT to answer questions Game changer for businesses to delegate faster. Here's how to do it: First, I record a video of whatever task I want to delegate to the new team member with Loom. The more in-depth, the better, but I just used a 7-minute video. Then, I use Loom's new AI 'Write a document' feature. Upgrading to Loom AI from the standard Loom plan cost me $2. Loom AI can generate an entire SOP, PR description, step-by-step guide, QA, and more from a simple Loom video in <5 seconds. In the past, I’ve spent 2 hours+ hand-writing each one of these docs to onboard new team members, so Loom AI is already a massive timesaver. But it gets even better! Next, we can take that data from the SOP document, and we use it as 'Knowledge' to train a Custom GPT that can answer the new team members' questions. The more SOP docs/Knowledge you feed the GPT, the better. But one is fine if that's all you have because the GPT will pull any unknown answers from the web or its training data. Here are the prompt Instructions you want to put into the Custom GPT (copy and paste this): You are an expert CEO, specialized in onboarding and training new team members. Using the Knowledge provided, you will help new team members with any questions or stipulations they may have about their new role. Stick as true to the data provided as possible, but if= they ask any questions that the Knowledge base does not have a specific answer for, you are permitted to use your pre-trained data and/or web browsing capabilities. That's it! It can't replace you entirely, but it'll save you 90% of the time you would've wasted on writing an SOP doc and answering questions. Simple AI workflows here and there really add up. There's also a workflow to help with the job screening process, but I'll save that for another day :^)

This workflow combining Loom’s AI features + a custom ChatGPT GPT is saving me hours. Instead of creating onboarding Docs for new team members, I film a Loom → generate SOP → train a GPT to answer questions Game changer for businesses to delegate faster. Here's how to do it: First, I record a video of whatever task I want to delegate to the new team member with Loom. The more in-depth, the better, but I just used a 7-minute video. Then, I use Loom's new AI 'Write a document' feature. Upgrading to Loom AI from the standard Loom plan cost me $2. Loom AI can generate an entire SOP, PR description, step-by-step guide, QA, and more from a simple Loom video in <5 seconds. In the past, I’ve spent 2 hours+ hand-writing each one of these docs to onboard new team members, so Loom AI is already a massive timesaver. But it gets even better! Next, we can take that data from the SOP document, and we use it as 'Knowledge' to train a Custom GPT that can answer the new team members' questions. The more SOP docs/Knowledge you feed the GPT, the better. But one is fine if that's all you have because the GPT will pull any unknown answers from the web or its training data. Here are the prompt Instructions you want to put into the Custom GPT (copy and paste this): You are an expert CEO, specialized in onboarding and training new team members. Using the Knowledge provided, you will help new team members with any questions or stipulations they may have about their new role. Stick as true to the data provided as possible, but if= they ask any questions that the Knowledge base does not have a specific answer for, you are permitted to use your pre-trained data and/or web browsing capabilities. That's it! It can't replace you entirely, but it'll save you 90% of the time you would've wasted on writing an SOP doc and answering questions. Simple AI workflows here and there really add up. There's also a workflow to help with the job screening process, but I'll save that for another day :^)

Rowan Cheung

129,424 views • 2 years ago

Listen closely to this entire clip. Israel, Lyndon Johnson and the CIA attempted to implement a false flag operation by setting up and killing American citizens manning the USS Liberty in order to bring the US into a war with Egypt. The only problem was, they failed to kill everyone or else we wouldn't even know about it. How many wars have been started off of false flag operations that we don't even know about? Not only this, but Lyndon Johnson had a hand in killing John F. Kennedy, a duly elected President of the United States. Absolutely everyone should understand how sick and twisted these people truly are. Understand their playbooks so you can see through them. "False flags are very useful. They work. USS Liberty. A famous false flag. You want to get us in a war against Egypt? Well then Israel and the CIA collaborate and bomb and kill American sailors on the USS Liberty. Too bad you didn't kill all of them because a lot of them lived, and they told the world what the hell happened when they tried to use American sailors as a false flag to get us into a war against Egypt, didn't work. Even though Lyndon Johnson and the CIA tried their damnedest to work with Israel to do it... He was an evil an evil son of a bitch...He knew. He wouldn't allow them to be rescued, by the way. Not only knew about it, but wouldn't allow them to be rescued. They hoped that every American died in the waters that day but they didn't... The CIA collaborated with the Israeli government. And maneuvered a US ship to this position to be killed...The mission was for it to be totally destroyed. So you don't have people coming on my show…telling you what they saw that day..." Clayton Morris

Listen closely to this entire clip. Israel, Lyndon Johnson and the CIA attempted to implement a false flag operation by setting up and killing American citizens manning the USS Liberty in order to bring the US into a war with Egypt. The only problem was, they failed to kill everyone or else we wouldn't even know about it. How many wars have been started off of false flag operations that we don't even know about? Not only this, but Lyndon Johnson had a hand in killing John F. Kennedy, a duly elected President of the United States. Absolutely everyone should understand how sick and twisted these people truly are. Understand their playbooks so you can see through them. "False flags are very useful. They work. USS Liberty. A famous false flag. You want to get us in a war against Egypt? Well then Israel and the CIA collaborate and bomb and kill American sailors on the USS Liberty. Too bad you didn't kill all of them because a lot of them lived, and they told the world what the hell happened when they tried to use American sailors as a false flag to get us into a war against Egypt, didn't work. Even though Lyndon Johnson and the CIA tried their damnedest to work with Israel to do it... He was an evil an evil son of a bitch...He knew. He wouldn't allow them to be rescued, by the way. Not only knew about it, but wouldn't allow them to be rescued. They hoped that every American died in the waters that day but they didn't... The CIA collaborated with the Israeli government. And maneuvered a US ship to this position to be killed...The mission was for it to be totally destroyed. So you don't have people coming on my show…telling you what they saw that day..." Clayton Morris

Green Lives Matter

414,434 views • 1 year ago