Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

How will Polkadot unlock the DOT tokenomics by creating more demand for the DOT token? With the next evolution of Polkadot parachains - multi-core elastic scaling. Here is what it enables: Make your chain run faster, do more transactions and just pay for the extra cores (in DOT) when...

20,813 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

10 Yorum

Capo.dot 🎩⭕️ profil fotoğrafı
Capo.dot 🎩⭕️1 yıl önce

@Polkadot Makes total sense. If parachains can pay more $DOT to scale as needed, that creates real, dynamic demand for the token. Huge step for the ecosystem. 🔥 Is there an estimated date for when this will go live? @gavofyork @KevinWSHPod

Josip Rajic profil fotoğrafı
Josip Rajic1 yıl önce

@Polkadot everybody running to buy dot that's why dot is 32nd and falling. 🤡

Bryant profil fotoğrafı
Bryant1 yıl önce

@Polkadot As a builder or user, would you pay more DOT to scale your chain during peak demand?

1Man-show profil fotoğrafı
1Man-show1 yıl önce

@Polkadot Omg..this shit is still existing ! They should go to jail for what they did in last 4 years! Polkadot = just a slowly rugpull!

CRYPTOCYRUS 「 🖐️ ✦ 🌏 」. profil fotoğrafı
CRYPTOCYRUS 「 🖐️ ✦ 🌏 」.1 yıl önce

@Polkadot if the demand for performance rises, so does the demand for DOT. As @gavofyork said, “They want to pay more DOT… we just needed to give them a reason to.” Now they have one. 🔗⚡

Yamne 🐂⭕️ profil fotoğrafı
Yamne 🐂⭕️1 yıl önce

@Polkadot Beyond elastic scaling, which allows a single parachain to utilize multiple cores for increased throughput. What is the primary factor driving more parachain adoption on Polkadot?

Savvy λ profil fotoğrafı
Savvy λ1 yıl önce

the idea of dynamic scaling and performance optimization is really exciting... especially for projects like Polkadot where parachains can now leverage multi-core elastic scaling. this could really change the game for how chains operate and scale, making $DOT even more essential.

ᑕᗩ₱₱ΞX profil fotoğrafı
ᑕᗩ₱₱ΞX1 yıl önce

@Polkadot Interesting, although there do not seem to be any bottlenecks currently impeding the growth of the current parachains.

PAVLIK profil fotoğrafı
PAVLIK1 yıl önce

@Polkadot if $dot used to be just a pass to the ecosystem, now it becomes a price for speed. this changes everything: each dapp decides for itself how much it costs to be faster

Barbara || Web3 Technical Writer profil fotoğrafı
Barbara || Web3 Technical Writer1 yıl önce

@Polkadot This is the kind of upgrade that turns DOT into real economic bandwidth!

Benzer Videolar

Polkadot ran a major stress test, Spammening, in December 2024 to prove its infra can handle extreme txn loads in a live environment with real economic stakes. The result was 143K TPS, using just 23% of the network’s capacity. But the elephant in the room—does anyone outside of Polkadot even care. TPS is a tricky metric, especially today. Polkadot is a heterogeneous sharded blockchain and was used to be referred as layer 0. Essentially designed to orchestrate multiple chains in parallel, not maximize base layer txns. Therefore fundamentally it isn’t built for single-chain TPS races, but for very high throughput across multiple chains. So Polkadot’s TPS doesn’t compare neatly to monolithic chains, and that led to it staying out of TPS-focused optics in the past. As a result, it’s often misunderstood or seen as slow by this metric. And today, Polkadot has shifted from a chain-centric approach to a blockspace-centric one. It’s no longer about chains but about blockspace and cores—operating much like your multi-core computer. Aka, a chain can eat multiple cores if it needs more throughput. This is called Elastic scaling. With JAM and Elastic scaling, blocks can actually be split into chunks and validated in parallel, allowing the network’s parallel processing to directly impact single-state throughput. Reminder that this Elastic scaling is already live on Kusama and will be coming to Polkadot next quarter. Now, Justin Bons and @0xBreadguy argue that any sharded system can claim millions of TPS, but that doesn’t mean anything as it doesn’t happen within a single state—not equivalent to atomic composability. So, for this time, I’m tossing it to the gigabrains. Do they have a point, or is there more to consider. Shawn Tabrizi Gavin Wood rphmeier

goku

16,687 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🚨 “Utah is planning on taking water away from farmers and ranchers right now” “They are currently writing new legislation that is going to put new regulations on farmers and ranchers water use — We need your help. We need to save the farmers and ranchers” “The verbiage in the bill is that they are going to require them to use less water, water that has been already granted to them from generations past, or they're going to require them to use more water saving technologies. But who is going to pay for that? It sure as hell isn't going to be the legislators, it's not going to be the senators, it's not going to be the governor. It's going to be the taxpayers and the farmers and ranchers who are going to have to equip for this. So right now we need your help. We need you to call all of the state senators, we need to call all the city offices, we need to send as many emails as we possibly can. Leave the farmers out of this bill. There should be no reason that they're included in this whatsoever —- So if you guys can please make the calls, please send the emails. We need your help.” ‘The Utah farmers and ranchers truly need your help. We barely have enough water as it is to raise our crops to feed and grow our animals. If there is any more regulation, we will lose more and more and more of our family farms and ranches. They will not be able to survive this. This is just a stepping stone and if it happens in one place, it will continue to happen all across the nation please if you can share with your family and friends please leave your comments below. We need your help.”

Wall Street Apes

107,117 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce