Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

How will Polkadot unlock the DOT tokenomics by creating more demand for the DOT token? With the next evolution of Polkadot parachains - multi-core elastic scaling. Here is what it enables: Make your chain run faster, do more transactions and just pay for the extra cores (in DOT) when...

20,813 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

Capo.dot 🎩⭕️'s profile picture
Capo.dot 🎩⭕️1 year ago

@Polkadot Makes total sense. If parachains can pay more $DOT to scale as needed, that creates real, dynamic demand for the token. Huge step for the ecosystem. 🔥 Is there an estimated date for when this will go live? @gavofyork @KevinWSHPod

Josip Rajic's profile picture
Josip Rajic1 year ago

@Polkadot everybody running to buy dot that's why dot is 32nd and falling. 🤡

Bryant's profile picture
Bryant1 year ago

@Polkadot As a builder or user, would you pay more DOT to scale your chain during peak demand?

1Man-show's profile picture
1Man-show1 year ago

@Polkadot Omg..this shit is still existing ! They should go to jail for what they did in last 4 years! Polkadot = just a slowly rugpull!

CRYPTOCYRUS 「 🖐️ ✦ 🌏 」.'s profile picture
CRYPTOCYRUS 「 🖐️ ✦ 🌏 」.1 year ago

@Polkadot if the demand for performance rises, so does the demand for DOT. As @gavofyork said, “They want to pay more DOT… we just needed to give them a reason to.” Now they have one. 🔗⚡

Yamne 🐂⭕️'s profile picture
Yamne 🐂⭕️1 year ago

@Polkadot Beyond elastic scaling, which allows a single parachain to utilize multiple cores for increased throughput. What is the primary factor driving more parachain adoption on Polkadot?

Savvy λ's profile picture
Savvy λ1 year ago

the idea of dynamic scaling and performance optimization is really exciting... especially for projects like Polkadot where parachains can now leverage multi-core elastic scaling. this could really change the game for how chains operate and scale, making $DOT even more essential.

ᑕᗩ₱₱ΞX's profile picture
ᑕᗩ₱₱ΞX1 year ago

@Polkadot Interesting, although there do not seem to be any bottlenecks currently impeding the growth of the current parachains.

PAVLIK's profile picture
PAVLIK1 year ago

@Polkadot if $dot used to be just a pass to the ecosystem, now it becomes a price for speed. this changes everything: each dapp decides for itself how much it costs to be faster

Barbara || Web3 Technical Writer's profile picture
Barbara || Web3 Technical Writer1 year ago

@Polkadot This is the kind of upgrade that turns DOT into real economic bandwidth!

Related Videos

Polkadot ran a major stress test, Spammening, in December 2024 to prove its infra can handle extreme txn loads in a live environment with real economic stakes. The result was 143K TPS, using just 23% of the network’s capacity. But the elephant in the room—does anyone outside of Polkadot even care. TPS is a tricky metric, especially today. Polkadot is a heterogeneous sharded blockchain and was used to be referred as layer 0. Essentially designed to orchestrate multiple chains in parallel, not maximize base layer txns. Therefore fundamentally it isn’t built for single-chain TPS races, but for very high throughput across multiple chains. So Polkadot’s TPS doesn’t compare neatly to monolithic chains, and that led to it staying out of TPS-focused optics in the past. As a result, it’s often misunderstood or seen as slow by this metric. And today, Polkadot has shifted from a chain-centric approach to a blockspace-centric one. It’s no longer about chains but about blockspace and cores—operating much like your multi-core computer. Aka, a chain can eat multiple cores if it needs more throughput. This is called Elastic scaling. With JAM and Elastic scaling, blocks can actually be split into chunks and validated in parallel, allowing the network’s parallel processing to directly impact single-state throughput. Reminder that this Elastic scaling is already live on Kusama and will be coming to Polkadot next quarter. Now, Justin Bons and @0xBreadguy argue that any sharded system can claim millions of TPS, but that doesn’t mean anything as it doesn’t happen within a single state—not equivalent to atomic composability. So, for this time, I’m tossing it to the gigabrains. Do they have a point, or is there more to consider. Shawn Tabrizi Gavin Wood rphmeier

goku

16,687 views • 1 year ago