Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Huge crowd outside Krishnagar Circuit House shouting “Jai Shree Ram” while district administration calling/messaging me repeatedly to vacate room. Supreme Court asked me to face bullets so here I am … not backing down

MahuaMoitra's profile picture

Mahua Moitra

955,797 subscribers

696,155 просмотров • 18 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Video of BJP crowd waiting outside gate of Circuit House (opposite SP & DM’s bungalow) while administration asking me to vacate room. This after Kolkata HC told police to ensure law & order.
1:12

Video of BJP crowd waiting outside gate of Circuit House (opposite SP & DM’s bungalow) while administration asking me to vacate room. This after Kolkata HC told police to ensure law & order.

Mahua Moitra

95,433 просмотров • 18 дней назад

I, as sitting woman MP, staying night in circuit house in my own constituency received call at 9:47 pm from Additional District Magistrate asking me to vacate my room! Imagine the audacity!
2:21

I, as sitting woman MP, staying night in circuit house in my own constituency received call at 9:47 pm from Additional District Magistrate asking me to vacate my room! Imagine the audacity!

Mahua Moitra

357,588 просмотров • 19 дней назад

BREAKING NEWS: The Texas Attorney General just filed a lawsuit to vacate my seat and remove me from office along with 12 of my colleagues from the Texas House Democratic Caucus. I broke quorum to protect the voice of millions of Texans. This seat belongs to the people of Texas House District 27 — not Ken Paxton. I’m not backing down. #TeamReynolds #txlege #goodtrouble #ElectionsMatter
0:37

BREAKING NEWS: The Texas Attorney General just filed a lawsuit to vacate my seat and remove me from office along with 12 of my colleagues from the Texas House Democratic Caucus. I broke quorum to protect the voice of millions of Texans. This seat belongs to the people of Texas House District 27 — not Ken Paxton. I’m not backing down. #TeamReynolds #txlege #goodtrouble #ElectionsMatter

State Representative Ron Reynolds

456,178 просмотров • 1 год назад

Do you understand how just how massive the Supreme Court ruling today about District Court judges not being able to issue nationwide injunctions was? Me neither, until I heard Stephen Miller masterfully explain the “momentous ruling” to me. The establishment essentially just lost their main weapon in trying to stop the Trump agenda. Judicial lawfare just took a huge blow. Huge W for MAGA. Onward 🇺🇸
2:48

Do you understand how just how massive the Supreme Court ruling today about District Court judges not being able to issue nationwide injunctions was? Me neither, until I heard Stephen Miller masterfully explain the “momentous ruling” to me. The establishment essentially just lost their main weapon in trying to stop the Trump agenda. Judicial lawfare just took a huge blow. Huge W for MAGA. Onward 🇺🇸

TheStormHasArrived

287,265 просмотров • 1 год назад

#WATCH | Supreme Court lawyer Jai Anant Dehadrai says, "I have filed a defamation suit against Mahua Moitra and certain other news agencies and Internet intermediaries for carrying some of the defamatory abusive statements that she's made about me. So that was listed today and summons have been issued to the defendants today by the Delhi High Court... I only want the abusive remarks that she has made about me, to be removed. That's all I am asking for...."
3:50

#WATCH | Supreme Court lawyer Jai Anant Dehadrai says, "I have filed a defamation suit against Mahua Moitra and certain other news agencies and Internet intermediaries for carrying some of the defamatory abusive statements that she's made about me. So that was listed today and summons have been issued to the defendants today by the Delhi High Court... I only want the abusive remarks that she has made about me, to be removed. That's all I am asking for...."

ANI

156,850 просмотров • 2 лет назад

“This guy has been coming to my house almost every day recently, and every time he comes, he calls me ‘Jemima.’ I am not Jemima, and I have no idea who Jemima is.” — woman shares a strange encounter after a man repeatedly visited her home, entered her compound and knocked on her door while calling her by a name she says she does not recognize.
1:57

“This guy has been coming to my house almost every day recently, and every time he comes, he calls me ‘Jemima.’ I am not Jemima, and I have no idea who Jemima is.” — woman shares a strange encounter after a man repeatedly visited her home, entered her compound and knocked on her door while calling her by a name she says she does not recognize.

.

80,834 просмотров • 23 дней назад

You are not a political scientist, you have no knowledge about the question asked yet you are struggling to answer and analyse what you have admitted to have no knowledge about. Now as a lawyer, you drag someone to court, representing a state, and here you are saying the because you represent a state, the court shouldn’t listen to the respondent? This is ridiculous reasoning. This is saying that ICC will not listen to me if i present evidence against Nigeria 😂 so why am i in the court then? Nigeria lawyer.
4:15

You are not a political scientist, you have no knowledge about the question asked yet you are struggling to answer and analyse what you have admitted to have no knowledge about. Now as a lawyer, you drag someone to court, representing a state, and here you are saying the because you represent a state, the court shouldn’t listen to the respondent? This is ridiculous reasoning. This is saying that ICC will not listen to me if i present evidence against Nigeria 😂 so why am i in the court then? Nigeria lawyer.

Simon Ekpa

42,807 просмотров • 1 год назад

Is the Supreme Court ruling on the impeachment of Sara Zimmerman Duterte based on erroneous facts? I was there! I didn’t miss the chance to witness history — I can say for a fact that the ruling of the Supreme Court was based on erroneous facts and anyone can check it via the Livestream of the House of Representatives that day. February 5, 2025. One of the things which concerns me here is the additional requirement that came out of nowhere— not in the 1987 Constitution and not even in the existing ruling of the Supreme Court. Speaker Martin Romualdez in an interview yesterday said that the House of Representatives followed the existing precedent also from the Supreme Court — the Francisco and Gutierrez ruling. How can the House follow something that doesn’t exist during that time? Please make sense. Atty. Princess Abante released an explainer video explaining the factual truth about what transpired in the House of Representatives on February 5. Aside from the House Journal and official reports, the public can easily check the livestream of the House of Representatives. I don’t care if the Supreme Court ruling was written by an Aquino appointee because it doesn’t make sense to me at all! Please take time to watch the video — Atty. Abante was able to explain the side of the House of Representatives. Also, why would the Supreme Court put more weight to a news article versus an official journal and actually videos? Now, please tell me… How can we just trust the decision of the Supreme Court?
6:54

Is the Supreme Court ruling on the impeachment of Sara Zimmerman Duterte based on erroneous facts? I was there! I didn’t miss the chance to witness history — I can say for a fact that the ruling of the Supreme Court was based on erroneous facts and anyone can check it via the Livestream of the House of Representatives that day. February 5, 2025. One of the things which concerns me here is the additional requirement that came out of nowhere— not in the 1987 Constitution and not even in the existing ruling of the Supreme Court. Speaker Martin Romualdez in an interview yesterday said that the House of Representatives followed the existing precedent also from the Supreme Court — the Francisco and Gutierrez ruling. How can the House follow something that doesn’t exist during that time? Please make sense. Atty. Princess Abante released an explainer video explaining the factual truth about what transpired in the House of Representatives on February 5. Aside from the House Journal and official reports, the public can easily check the livestream of the House of Representatives. I don’t care if the Supreme Court ruling was written by an Aquino appointee because it doesn’t make sense to me at all! Please take time to watch the video — Atty. Abante was able to explain the side of the House of Representatives. Also, why would the Supreme Court put more weight to a news article versus an official journal and actually videos? Now, please tell me… How can we just trust the decision of the Supreme Court?

Just

36,083 просмотров • 1 год назад

Many people asked me why I am so bullish on #XENCrypto #X1 Here is my answer 👇 If you are true believer of $Xen please like, comment and repost as much you can 🙏 DOYR it's up to you I am not telling you to invest or anything 💰💰🙏
1:24

Many people asked me why I am so bullish on #XENCrypto #X1 Here is my answer 👇 If you are true believer of $Xen please like, comment and repost as much you can 🙏 DOYR it's up to you I am not telling you to invest or anything 💰💰🙏

Mozaffar Mandal

32,154 просмотров • 1 год назад

The PM told me to take it outside the House. So here I am: were the safeguards around market sensitive Budget info in place, so no one in government could act on it for private gain? A government with nothing to hide can answer that in one sentence. Instead, he belittled councils
2:37

The PM told me to take it outside the House. So here I am: were the safeguards around market sensitive Budget info in place, so no one in government could act on it for private gain? A government with nothing to hide can answer that in one sentence. Instead, he belittled councils

Dai Le MP

81,529 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Thunderpick really outdid themselves with this room and view they gave me in Malta, so beautiful. Just wow. Don’t deserve or need all of this but I absolutely am going to enjoy it while I’m here. Once again, thank you to everyone who has supported me and made this possible 🥹
1:11

Thunderpick really outdid themselves with this room and view they gave me in Malta, so beautiful. Just wow. Don’t deserve or need all of this but I absolutely am going to enjoy it while I’m here. Once again, thank you to everyone who has supported me and made this possible 🥹

ModernWarzone

40,123 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

“You hear me or you don’t hear me, it doesn’t matter to me. This cage is the most honorable spot. And I will not remain silent. I am denied even a paper and a pen. I am not allowed to meet with my lawyer unless an officer is sitting with us. I am here in this “court”, while my defense lawyer is held by a State Security officer. There is no reason for me to remain before you in this invalid trial.” - Inside the courtroom, Egyptian political prisoner and lawyer Hazem Salah Abu Ismail describes what has happened to him and how verdicts are written before the trial even begins.
1:54

“You hear me or you don’t hear me, it doesn’t matter to me. This cage is the most honorable spot. And I will not remain silent. I am denied even a paper and a pen. I am not allowed to meet with my lawyer unless an officer is sitting with us. I am here in this “court”, while my defense lawyer is held by a State Security officer. There is no reason for me to remain before you in this invalid trial.” - Inside the courtroom, Egyptian political prisoner and lawyer Hazem Salah Abu Ismail describes what has happened to him and how verdicts are written before the trial even begins.

Warfare Analysis

73,285 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨 BREAKING: Trump just went to bat for Elon Musk outside the White House while examining the Teslas. So true. TRUMP: I ended the EV mandate. He never even complained to me. Who would do that? Elon Musk has never asked me for a thing. He's built a great company and he SHOULDN'T be penalized. He's a patriot. I don't even know if he's a Republican.
0:26

🚨 BREAKING: Trump just went to bat for Elon Musk outside the White House while examining the Teslas. So true. TRUMP: I ended the EV mandate. He never even complained to me. Who would do that? Elon Musk has never asked me for a thing. He's built a great company and he SHOULDN'T be penalized. He's a patriot. I don't even know if he's a Republican.

Eric Daugherty

28,294,604 просмотров • 1 год назад

Is it making sense yet? While exposing the Supreme Court, this “decision” actually CODIFIED the President’s powers… President Trump: "In actuality, while I am sure that they did not mean to do so, the Supreme Court's decision today made a president's ability to both regulate trade and impose tariffs more powerful and more crystal clear rather than less." Do you remember what we posed about the acts of 1962 and 1974 months ago? Scroll down 👇👇 🇺🇸🟨🇺🇸
2:31

Is it making sense yet? While exposing the Supreme Court, this “decision” actually CODIFIED the President’s powers… President Trump: "In actuality, while I am sure that they did not mean to do so, the Supreme Court's decision today made a president's ability to both regulate trade and impose tariffs more powerful and more crystal clear rather than less." Do you remember what we posed about the acts of 1962 and 1974 months ago? Scroll down 👇👇 🇺🇸🟨🇺🇸

Paul White Gold Eagle

50,992 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

a plli asked bmby about the members looking down at him while he was acting 😂 💗 we filmed that scene many times because i kept laughing... 💗 the thing is, i had to gradually smile (for the scene) but it wasn't easy since the members were looking at me while i was lying down 💗 it's quiet difficult 💗 but it was filmed really well 💗 but why did all four of them have to look at me? only my face was in the shot, so why were they looking at me? it's enough to just film me though... 💗 my face turned a little red too 💗 the members were looking at me and it obviously wasn't going to show on camera, but they were still acting while looking at my face. so i realized once again that they're such professionals... there are such amazing people with me... who's gonna tell him that yhe members are just really down bad for him 🙂‍↕️
1:52

a plli asked bmby about the members looking down at him while he was acting 😂 💗 we filmed that scene many times because i kept laughing... 💗 the thing is, i had to gradually smile (for the scene) but it wasn't easy since the members were looking at me while i was lying down 💗 it's quiet difficult 💗 but it was filmed really well 💗 but why did all four of them have to look at me? only my face was in the shot, so why were they looking at me? it's enough to just film me though... 💗 my face turned a little red too 💗 the members were looking at me and it obviously wasn't going to show on camera, but they were still acting while looking at my face. so i realized once again that they're such professionals... there are such amazing people with me... who's gonna tell him that yhe members are just really down bad for him 🙂‍↕️

𝘳𝘢𝘧 🌸

12,126 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Pappy: let’s go and cuddle. Let’s go so that we’ll go & cuddle. Ah awurade. M’abr3 o Priscary: w’abr3 Pappy: it’s not easy seeing other people cuddling & then me, I have to be going up & down Priscary: what was even paining me is when we go downstairs, living room. Everybody is sitting with their partners. Me p3. Why? Did I come to this house to suffer? #PerfectMatchXtra #PriscaryPrincilla
0:49

Pappy: let’s go and cuddle. Let’s go so that we’ll go & cuddle. Ah awurade. M’abr3 o Priscary: w’abr3 Pappy: it’s not easy seeing other people cuddling & then me, I have to be going up & down Priscary: what was even paining me is when we go downstairs, living room. Everybody is sitting with their partners. Me p3. Why? Did I come to this house to suffer? #PerfectMatchXtra #PriscaryPrincilla

Selly

54,337 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

“To me, this doesn’t stand out as a case that the U.S. Supreme court would typically take because it’s an evidentiary question and there’s no broader constitutional question here. So, I think he had a decent argument below. I don’t think he’s got a great argument for why the U.S. Supreme Court can take it.” CNN Senior Legal Analyst and former Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York Elie Honig speaking with Anderson Cooper on CNN The Lead CNN about Donald Trump’s appeal over E. Jean Carroll sexual abuse verdict stalling at the U.S. Supreme Court via #StudiGo
5:12

“To me, this doesn’t stand out as a case that the U.S. Supreme court would typically take because it’s an evidentiary question and there’s no broader constitutional question here. So, I think he had a decent argument below. I don’t think he’s got a great argument for why the U.S. Supreme Court can take it.” CNN Senior Legal Analyst and former Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York Elie Honig speaking with Anderson Cooper on CNN The Lead CNN about Donald Trump’s appeal over E. Jean Carroll sexual abuse verdict stalling at the U.S. Supreme Court via #StudiGo

StudiGo

44,010 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад