Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🚨HUGE. Kerala High Court rules that appointing Temple Priests based on CASTE or lineage isn’t an Essential Religious Practice. ~ Court upheld TDB’s decision to recognise Thanthra Vidyalayas for priest recruitment Equality welcomed. But the same rule for other communities too?

Indian_Analyzer's profile picture

The Analyzer (News Updates🗞️)

145,119 subscribers

54,537 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаОбразование
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨HUGE. Supreme Court rules Reserved category candidates scoring above General Cutoff must be treated as OPEN CATEGORY 🎯 -> "Unreserved category is not a CASTE quota. It is an OPEN MERIT pool for anyone who qualifies on marks alone." · Court calls it “merit-induced shift”, saying it upholds equality under Articles 14 & 16 of the Constitution.
0:34

🚨HUGE. Supreme Court rules Reserved category candidates scoring above General Cutoff must be treated as OPEN CATEGORY 🎯 -> "Unreserved category is not a CASTE quota. It is an OPEN MERIT pool for anyone who qualifies on marks alone." · Court calls it “merit-induced shift”, saying it upholds equality under Articles 14 & 16 of the Constitution.

The Analyzer (News Updates🗞️)

203,263 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🚨🇺🇸 TRUMP GIVES SUPREME COURT "HUGE CREDIT" FOR RESTORING MERIT-BASED SYSTEM “The Supreme Court made a big decision: this country now operates on merit. You don’t have to be a specific gender, race, or anything else - it’s all about ability. I wasn’t sure anyone would have the courage to make that call. We hire based on merit now, and that’s how our country became great. I give the Supreme Court huge credit for this.” Source: Donald J. Trump on Fox & Friends
0:55

🚨🇺🇸 TRUMP GIVES SUPREME COURT "HUGE CREDIT" FOR RESTORING MERIT-BASED SYSTEM “The Supreme Court made a big decision: this country now operates on merit. You don’t have to be a specific gender, race, or anything else - it’s all about ability. I wasn’t sure anyone would have the courage to make that call. We hire based on merit now, and that’s how our country became great. I give the Supreme Court huge credit for this.” Source: Donald J. Trump on Fox & Friends

Mario Nawfal

201,499 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

🚨 HUGE! Supreme Court claims it has authority to decide whether a religious practice is "SUPERSTITIOUS" or not🤯 - Centre hits back bluntly: "Your Lordships are experts in law, NOT IN RELIGION"💥👌🏻 "Even if a practice appears superstitious, it is NOT for the judiciary to declare it so and INTERFERE." The court is hearing petitions on women’s entry into religious places, including Sabarimala. Our take: The Supreme Court must stop playing religious reformer. Judges are not priests, not pandits, and certainly not arbiters of Hindu faith🎯 Leave Sanatan traditions to the believers. Stop this judicial overreach into matters of faith!🙏🏻
0:23

🚨 HUGE! Supreme Court claims it has authority to decide whether a religious practice is "SUPERSTITIOUS" or not🤯 - Centre hits back bluntly: "Your Lordships are experts in law, NOT IN RELIGION"💥👌🏻 "Even if a practice appears superstitious, it is NOT for the judiciary to declare it so and INTERFERE." The court is hearing petitions on women’s entry into religious places, including Sabarimala. Our take: The Supreme Court must stop playing religious reformer. Judges are not priests, not pandits, and certainly not arbiters of Hindu faith🎯 Leave Sanatan traditions to the believers. Stop this judicial overreach into matters of faith!🙏🏻

The Analyzer (News Updates🗞️)

432,733 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨HUGE. Madras HC rules teaching Bhagavad Gita is NOT ‘RELIGIOUS’ for FCRA denial — Justice G R Swaminathan holds that teaching the Bhagavad Gita does not make a trust religious. Court says the Gita cannot be confined to one faith and is part of Bharatiya civilisation👏 Madras High Court directs the Home Ministry to reconsider FCRA registration of a Vedanta-focused charitable trust.
0:30

🚨HUGE. Madras HC rules teaching Bhagavad Gita is NOT ‘RELIGIOUS’ for FCRA denial — Justice G R Swaminathan holds that teaching the Bhagavad Gita does not make a trust religious. Court says the Gita cannot be confined to one faith and is part of Bharatiya civilisation👏 Madras High Court directs the Home Ministry to reconsider FCRA registration of a Vedanta-focused charitable trust.

The Analyzer (News Updates🗞️)

110,701 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

🚨HUGE. Supreme Court rules that SC/ST/OBC candidates can claim OPEN Category seats if they score above the general cut-off purely on merit 🤯 — But there’s a condition: They must not have used reservation benefits like age relaxation or extra attempts. Court underlined that the General category belongs to merit, not caste. Big ruling to clear the air on Reservations.
0:28

🚨HUGE. Supreme Court rules that SC/ST/OBC candidates can claim OPEN Category seats if they score above the general cut-off purely on merit 🤯 — But there’s a condition: They must not have used reservation benefits like age relaxation or extra attempts. Court underlined that the General category belongs to merit, not caste. Big ruling to clear the air on Reservations.

The Analyzer (News Updates🗞️)

225,441 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🚨 HUGE! Supreme Court has ordered that NO namaz will be be held inside the Dhar Bhojshala complex. The interim order upholds the High Court's ruling treating Bhojshala as a Saraswati Temple, while directing authorities to provide an alternative nearby place for Friday prayers.
1:21

🚨 HUGE! Supreme Court has ordered that NO namaz will be be held inside the Dhar Bhojshala complex. The interim order upholds the High Court's ruling treating Bhojshala as a Saraswati Temple, while directing authorities to provide an alternative nearby place for Friday prayers.

Megh Updates 🚨™

43,753 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨 HUGE! Supreme Court affirms: "Hinduism is a Way of Life." Temple visits or rituals are not mandatory to be a Hindu. CJI remarked : “Even if an individual lights a LAMP inside his HUT, it is enough to prove his religion.” The Court also cautioned against challenging every religious practice, noting that Hinduism’s inclusive & flexible nature must be respected💥 A landmark observation that protects Sanatan Dharma from unnecessary interference and selective targeting.
0:25

🚨 HUGE! Supreme Court affirms: "Hinduism is a Way of Life." Temple visits or rituals are not mandatory to be a Hindu. CJI remarked : “Even if an individual lights a LAMP inside his HUT, it is enough to prove his religion.” The Court also cautioned against challenging every religious practice, noting that Hinduism’s inclusive & flexible nature must be respected💥 A landmark observation that protects Sanatan Dharma from unnecessary interference and selective targeting.

The Analyzer (News Updates🗞️)

251,307 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨 HUGE! Allahabad High Court delivers strong verdict: - Refuses to make Namaz on private property a "norm" Order: If there is any THREAT to peace and tranquility, authorities are FREE TO ACT as per law💥 Closes contempt case against UP authorities for obstructing Namaz on private property. Court noted that under the garb of court protection, the petitioner was gathering 52-62 persons for Namaz at the site. Big setback for Maulvis trying to misuse courts for mass gatherings! Rule of law prevails. 🔥🇮🇳
0:27

🚨 HUGE! Allahabad High Court delivers strong verdict: - Refuses to make Namaz on private property a "norm" Order: If there is any THREAT to peace and tranquility, authorities are FREE TO ACT as per law💥 Closes contempt case against UP authorities for obstructing Namaz on private property. Court noted that under the garb of court protection, the petitioner was gathering 52-62 persons for Namaz at the site. Big setback for Maulvis trying to misuse courts for mass gatherings! Rule of law prevails. 🔥🇮🇳

The Analyzer (News Updates🗞️)

67,544 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Some initial thoughts on the Supreme Court judgement today - ir is now essential for the Equality Commission to take note and to act now accordingly. Also important to note that while this case was about legacy, the legal point was on the scope of the "rights" section (art 2) of the Windsor Framework. Important and welcome decision today. That is entirely separate from the need for victims and survivors to be supported and the "access to justice" point - important to ensure everyone is clear on what the court was adjudicating on. While the families will undoubtedly be disappointed, the court has ruled in an important way against the wide and expansionist approach to art 2 WF.
0:51

Some initial thoughts on the Supreme Court judgement today - ir is now essential for the Equality Commission to take note and to act now accordingly. Also important to note that while this case was about legacy, the legal point was on the scope of the "rights" section (art 2) of the Windsor Framework. Important and welcome decision today. That is entirely separate from the need for victims and survivors to be supported and the "access to justice" point - important to ensure everyone is clear on what the court was adjudicating on. While the families will undoubtedly be disappointed, the court has ruled in an important way against the wide and expansionist approach to art 2 WF.

Emma Little-Pengelly BL

17,986 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨 HUGE. Supreme Court has finally FALLEN IN LINE ~ Rules that No court can fix timelines for Governors or the President to assent to bills, and no such thing as ‘deemed assent’ exists 🔥 The bench admits that declaring “deemed assent” is a JUDICIAL OVERREACH into powers constitutionally reserved for the Governor/President 🤯 • It also accepts Article 361 as an absolute bar on judicial review and clarifies that the President need not seek court advice when a bill is reserved. A massive constitutional win for the Modi era, restoring separation of powers and ending judicial adventurism 👌🏼
0:36

🚨 HUGE. Supreme Court has finally FALLEN IN LINE ~ Rules that No court can fix timelines for Governors or the President to assent to bills, and no such thing as ‘deemed assent’ exists 🔥 The bench admits that declaring “deemed assent” is a JUDICIAL OVERREACH into powers constitutionally reserved for the Governor/President 🤯 • It also accepts Article 361 as an absolute bar on judicial review and clarifies that the President need not seek court advice when a bill is reserved. A massive constitutional win for the Modi era, restoring separation of powers and ending judicial adventurism 👌🏼

The Analyzer (News Updates🗞️)

136,228 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

#WATCH | Delhi: On the Supreme Court ruling on the SC, ST Act, Senior Advocate D.V.S.S. Somayajulu says, "... Today the Supreme Court passed a very significant order. We do not yet have the full copy of the judgment, but I can share what we submitted to the Court. Our essential argument was that a person who has converted from an SC/ST background into Christianity cannot claim the benefits or protections of the Act... The Court was categorical: once someone converts to Christianity, caste benefits cannot apply, because Christianity does not recognise caste. The decision is also rooted in the 1950 Presidential Order, which has long been part of the statute book. The judgment clearly defines who is entitled to claim benefits under the Act and who is not. Of course, a review petition remains an option, but as of today, the matter stands settled. In this particular case, the individual was a pastor who had converted, and our submission was that he could not take advantage of SC/ST protections..."
2:02

#WATCH | Delhi: On the Supreme Court ruling on the SC, ST Act, Senior Advocate D.V.S.S. Somayajulu says, "... Today the Supreme Court passed a very significant order. We do not yet have the full copy of the judgment, but I can share what we submitted to the Court. Our essential argument was that a person who has converted from an SC/ST background into Christianity cannot claim the benefits or protections of the Act... The Court was categorical: once someone converts to Christianity, caste benefits cannot apply, because Christianity does not recognise caste. The decision is also rooted in the 1950 Presidential Order, which has long been part of the statute book. The judgment clearly defines who is entitled to claim benefits under the Act and who is not. Of course, a review petition remains an option, but as of today, the matter stands settled. In this particular case, the individual was a pastor who had converted, and our submission was that he could not take advantage of SC/ST protections..."

ANI

50,437 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

WATCH: Sen. Ted Cruz breaks down the 6-3 Supreme Court ruling in Louisiana v. Callais: “The court concluded is that it is not permissible for elected politicians to gerrymander based on race, to draw a black seat or a white seat or an Hispanic seat, that when government draws distinctions based on race, that is contrary to the Constitution.” Cruz explained: “The Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision. Justice Alito wrote the majority opinion. And in that opinion, the court vindicated the Constitution of the United States. And in particular the 14th Amendment that ensures that all persons in the United States are entitled to equal protection of the laws, and also the 15th Amendment which protects the right to vote regardless of race. And what the court concluded is that it is not permissible for elected politicians to gerrymander based on race, to draw a black seat or a white seat or an Hispanic seat, that when government draws distinctions based on race, that is contrary to the Constitution. I think that question is absolutely correct. Uh as Chief Justice Roberts wrote in a previous case, it is a sorted business this divying us up by race. He also said the best way to stop discriminating on race is to stop discriminating based on race. And and I think the court's decision here says our government should be blind to color. We should be colorblind. We should not discriminate in favor of or against any race. I think the Supreme Court is correct and and and that uh that is the result of decades of litigation to to to get these racial gerrymanders struck down.”
3:56

WATCH: Sen. Ted Cruz breaks down the 6-3 Supreme Court ruling in Louisiana v. Callais: “The court concluded is that it is not permissible for elected politicians to gerrymander based on race, to draw a black seat or a white seat or an Hispanic seat, that when government draws distinctions based on race, that is contrary to the Constitution.” Cruz explained: “The Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision. Justice Alito wrote the majority opinion. And in that opinion, the court vindicated the Constitution of the United States. And in particular the 14th Amendment that ensures that all persons in the United States are entitled to equal protection of the laws, and also the 15th Amendment which protects the right to vote regardless of race. And what the court concluded is that it is not permissible for elected politicians to gerrymander based on race, to draw a black seat or a white seat or an Hispanic seat, that when government draws distinctions based on race, that is contrary to the Constitution. I think that question is absolutely correct. Uh as Chief Justice Roberts wrote in a previous case, it is a sorted business this divying us up by race. He also said the best way to stop discriminating on race is to stop discriminating based on race. And and I think the court's decision here says our government should be blind to color. We should be colorblind. We should not discriminate in favor of or against any race. I think the Supreme Court is correct and and and that uh that is the result of decades of litigation to to to get these racial gerrymanders struck down.”

Steve Guest

115,581 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨 The Ghostwritten Glyphosate Paper After the International Agency for Research on Cancer classified glyphosate as a probable carcinogen, a paper defending its safety was published—just before the United States Environmental Protection Agency made its decision. Court documents later revealed that Monsanto had significant undisclosed involvement in drafting that paper. That same paper was cited for years to claim Roundup was safe. This wasn’t speculation. It came out in court. Under oath. Transparency in science isn’t optional.
1:52

🚨 The Ghostwritten Glyphosate Paper After the International Agency for Research on Cancer classified glyphosate as a probable carcinogen, a paper defending its safety was published—just before the United States Environmental Protection Agency made its decision. Court documents later revealed that Monsanto had significant undisclosed involvement in drafting that paper. That same paper was cited for years to claim Roundup was safe. This wasn’t speculation. It came out in court. Under oath. Transparency in science isn’t optional.

Tom Renz

49,092 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

#WATCH | Delhi | 2017 Unnao rape case | Nirbhaya's mother, Asha Devi says, "This is a new rule that is being made... This should not happen... Whether you are 500 km away or at home, it doesn't matter. What matters is that you have committed a crime and you have been punished... The court should hold an impartial hearing on this, considering the victim and what happened to her. There should be no bail at all... That family is still in danger... It has happened many times that the lower court and the high court have punished the victim, but then they got relief in the Supreme Court... The court itself is making a joke of how such a decision can be made..." Delhi High Court suspends the sentence of the 2017 Unnao rape case accused, former MLA Kuldeep Singh Sengar. The High Court has directed that Sengar will not enter the 5-kilometre area where the victim resides in Delhi.
3:30

#WATCH | Delhi | 2017 Unnao rape case | Nirbhaya's mother, Asha Devi says, "This is a new rule that is being made... This should not happen... Whether you are 500 km away or at home, it doesn't matter. What matters is that you have committed a crime and you have been punished... The court should hold an impartial hearing on this, considering the victim and what happened to her. There should be no bail at all... That family is still in danger... It has happened many times that the lower court and the high court have punished the victim, but then they got relief in the Supreme Court... The court itself is making a joke of how such a decision can be made..." Delhi High Court suspends the sentence of the 2017 Unnao rape case accused, former MLA Kuldeep Singh Sengar. The High Court has directed that Sengar will not enter the 5-kilometre area where the victim resides in Delhi.

ANI

139,593 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

The Albanese Government hid a provision in a Superannuation bill which gave charity status to a lobby group, Equality Australia. For those who don't know, Equality Australia is an LGBTQI+ organisation committed to destroying religious freedom in Australia. For many years, Equality Australia has waged a campaign against Christian Schools Australia, as well as almost 2,800 other faith-based schools. Their method is to target exemptions under the Sex Discrimination Act and similar state laws. These laws permit schools to fire, demote, or refuse to hire teachers based on sexual orientation or gender identity, or to expel or deny enrollment to students on those grounds, as being contrary to their religious teachings — although they only target certain religious groups. Equality Australia does not mention Islamic schools or madrasas on their website. They have taken Christian schools to court, yet never Islamic schools, despite both religions treating these issues the same way. It's this double standard that defines Equality Australia as a lobby group, not a charity — and a gutless, dishonest one at that. Equality Australia was refused charity status by the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission, then the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, and finally the full Federal Court, because they are a lobby group, not a charity. The Government has legislated this approval because they are desperate to keep the transgender industry going to secure votes in crucial city electorates, which they are defending from the Greens. I ask suburban, regional, and rural voters to reject the Government’s perverse agenda and vote One Nation to end the transgender madness and the Queer mafia attacks on Christianity.
12:38

The Albanese Government hid a provision in a Superannuation bill which gave charity status to a lobby group, Equality Australia. For those who don't know, Equality Australia is an LGBTQI+ organisation committed to destroying religious freedom in Australia. For many years, Equality Australia has waged a campaign against Christian Schools Australia, as well as almost 2,800 other faith-based schools. Their method is to target exemptions under the Sex Discrimination Act and similar state laws. These laws permit schools to fire, demote, or refuse to hire teachers based on sexual orientation or gender identity, or to expel or deny enrollment to students on those grounds, as being contrary to their religious teachings — although they only target certain religious groups. Equality Australia does not mention Islamic schools or madrasas on their website. They have taken Christian schools to court, yet never Islamic schools, despite both religions treating these issues the same way. It's this double standard that defines Equality Australia as a lobby group, not a charity — and a gutless, dishonest one at that. Equality Australia was refused charity status by the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission, then the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, and finally the full Federal Court, because they are a lobby group, not a charity. The Government has legislated this approval because they are desperate to keep the transgender industry going to secure votes in crucial city electorates, which they are defending from the Greens. I ask suburban, regional, and rural voters to reject the Government’s perverse agenda and vote One Nation to end the transgender madness and the Queer mafia attacks on Christianity.

Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺

63,797 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Bass: We just heard that the administration’s experiment failed. The raids that were happening in Los Angeles—the random pulling and snatching of people off the streets based on the language they spoke, their appearance, where they work—the court has said that can no longer happen. They recognized that it was unconstitutional, that it violated the rule of law, and that it has to stop. That temporary restraining order has been in place for a couple of weeks, and there has been peace in Los Angeles. I’m so hopeful that now the fear will subside and people will be able to come out of their houses. So, we got the decision on a local level, upheld by the 9th Circuit Court. We know it will eventually go to the Supreme Court, but for now, we’ve had a victory—because Los Angeles stood strong. We said: you experimented on us, and it failed. Thank you for standing together. LA stood strong.
1:02

Bass: We just heard that the administration’s experiment failed. The raids that were happening in Los Angeles—the random pulling and snatching of people off the streets based on the language they spoke, their appearance, where they work—the court has said that can no longer happen. They recognized that it was unconstitutional, that it violated the rule of law, and that it has to stop. That temporary restraining order has been in place for a couple of weeks, and there has been peace in Los Angeles. I’m so hopeful that now the fear will subside and people will be able to come out of their houses. So, we got the decision on a local level, upheld by the 9th Circuit Court. We know it will eventually go to the Supreme Court, but for now, we’ve had a victory—because Los Angeles stood strong. We said: you experimented on us, and it failed. Thank you for standing together. LA stood strong.

Acyn

298,134 просмотров • 1 год назад

#WATCH | Kalaburagi, Karnataka: On the Karnataka High Court's decision to stay the state government's cabinet decision to withdraw 52 criminal cases, BJP MLC N. Ravi Kumar says, “An incident occurred in the Aland Taluk of Kalaburagi district—a major clash involving Hindu and Muslim communities—centred on the issue of the Raghavachaitanya Temple. Cases were filed against both Hindus and Muslims; however, the government decided to withdraw all cases registered against Muslims following a cabinet meeting. The matter reached the High Court, which issued a stay, deeming the withdrawal of these cases improper. This outcome vindicates the agitation led by the BJP; the High Court has delivered justice and effectively rebuked the government for its policy of appeasement towards one community at the expense of Hindus. We demand that the government, and D.K. Shivakumar specifically, apologise for attempting to withdraw these cases…”
4:39

#WATCH | Kalaburagi, Karnataka: On the Karnataka High Court's decision to stay the state government's cabinet decision to withdraw 52 criminal cases, BJP MLC N. Ravi Kumar says, “An incident occurred in the Aland Taluk of Kalaburagi district—a major clash involving Hindu and Muslim communities—centred on the issue of the Raghavachaitanya Temple. Cases were filed against both Hindus and Muslims; however, the government decided to withdraw all cases registered against Muslims following a cabinet meeting. The matter reached the High Court, which issued a stay, deeming the withdrawal of these cases improper. This outcome vindicates the agitation led by the BJP; the High Court has delivered justice and effectively rebuked the government for its policy of appeasement towards one community at the expense of Hindus. We demand that the government, and D.K. Shivakumar specifically, apologise for attempting to withdraw these cases…”

ANI

30,171 просмотров • 1 месяц назад