Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🚨 HUGE: OTTAWA JUST CONFIRMED IT An Alberta independence referendum would only require: 50% + 1 Not 60%. Not 66%. Not some impossible supermajority. The House of Commons was forced to acknowledge that under Canada’s own democratic framework, a simple majority is the threshold. That changes EVERYTHING. The debate...

JimFergusonUK's profile picture

Jim Ferguson

446,466 subscribers

109,179 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Quebec gets it. Bloc Québécois House Leader Christine Normandin was asked about Alberta separation and the referendum question. The reporter kept pressing. She refused the bait. Her answer was simple: She is not Albertan. Ottawa is not Albertan. Albertans decide. She even warned against “Papa Ottawa” talking down to people with disdain. For once, I agree with the Bloc. You do not have to support Alberta separation to understand the principle. If Albertans want to ask the question, it is Alberta’s question. Not Ottawa’s. Not federal politicians’. Not some managed national-unity script from people who helped create the anger in the first place.
1:55

Quebec gets it. Bloc Québécois House Leader Christine Normandin was asked about Alberta separation and the referendum question. The reporter kept pressing. She refused the bait. Her answer was simple: She is not Albertan. Ottawa is not Albertan. Albertans decide. She even warned against “Papa Ottawa” talking down to people with disdain. For once, I agree with the Bloc. You do not have to support Alberta separation to understand the principle. If Albertans want to ask the question, it is Alberta’s question. Not Ottawa’s. Not federal politicians’. Not some managed national-unity script from people who helped create the anger in the first place.

The Real Mr Bench

52,523 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

People are told Alberta independence is extreme, illegal, or treasonous. It is not. The Supreme Court of Canada confirmed that if a province clearly votes to leave, the federal government has a legal obligation to negotiate in good faith.
0:58

People are told Alberta independence is extreme, illegal, or treasonous. It is not. The Supreme Court of Canada confirmed that if a province clearly votes to leave, the federal government has a legal obligation to negotiate in good faith.

Rise Of Alberta

14,595 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Mark Carney has now made it obvious: Ottawa will use the Clarity Act as a gatekeeping tool against Alberta independence. Quebec responded to the Clarity Act with Bill 99, a law asserting Quebec’s right to self-determination, defending the authority of its National Assembly, and recognizing that a referendum is decided by a majority of valid votes cast. Alberta needs its own Bill 99. The future of Alberta should be decided by Albertans, not by the House of Commons.
1:16

Mark Carney has now made it obvious: Ottawa will use the Clarity Act as a gatekeeping tool against Alberta independence. Quebec responded to the Clarity Act with Bill 99, a law asserting Quebec’s right to self-determination, defending the authority of its National Assembly, and recognizing that a referendum is decided by a majority of valid votes cast. Alberta needs its own Bill 99. The future of Alberta should be decided by Albertans, not by the House of Commons.

Rise Of Alberta

77,026 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨 ALBERTA AWAKENS — THE WEST REMEMBERS WHO IT IS Something historic is stirring on the Canadian plains. Not protest. Not complaint. But resolve. For decades, Alberta has powered Canada while being ruled by a distant political class in Ottawa that neither understands nor respects it. The deal was simple: Alberta would produce, Ottawa would decide. And year after year, that deal bled the province dry. Now, Alberta is asking the question no one was supposed to ask: Why do we stay? Alberta is not poor. Alberta is not dependent. Alberta is not fragile. It is one of the most resource-rich regions in the Western world. • Vast oil and gas reserves • Critical minerals and rare earths • Timber, agriculture, and energy infrastructure • A highly skilled workforce • A culture built on production, not bureaucracy If Alberta were a country, it would rank among the wealthiest per capita on Earth. And unlike Ottawa, Alberta actually creates wealth. For years, that wealth has been siphoned off through equalization payments, federal regulation, and policies written for urban centres thousands of miles away — policies that punish energy, restrict land use, and criminalise the very industries that made the nation viable. Albertans have watched their rights curtailed. Their livelihoods targeted. Their values dismissed as backward. And still, they paid the bills. Until now. A new generation of leaders and citizens are openly challenging Ottawa’s grip — not with anger, but with clarity. They are pointing out an obvious truth: Alberta does not need permission to succeed. It already feeds, powers, and funds the country. Independence is no longer unthinkable. It is being discussed seriously, methodically, and confidently. Because Alberta has something Ottawa cannot manufacture: • Economic leverage • Cultural cohesion • Energy sovereignty • And the will to stand alone History shows that nations are not born from chaos — they are born when productive regions refuse to be ruled by systems that drain them. Alberta is reaching that moment. Not in haste. Not in hatred. But in strength. This is not a threat. It is a reckoning. And if Alberta does choose its own path, the world may soon witness something rare in modern politics: A wealthy, capable, freedom-minded people stepping out from under a collapsing centre — not to burn bridges, but to finally build their own future. The West is remembering who it is. And Ottawa can feel it. Jason Coursey
3:51

🚨 ALBERTA AWAKENS — THE WEST REMEMBERS WHO IT IS Something historic is stirring on the Canadian plains. Not protest. Not complaint. But resolve. For decades, Alberta has powered Canada while being ruled by a distant political class in Ottawa that neither understands nor respects it. The deal was simple: Alberta would produce, Ottawa would decide. And year after year, that deal bled the province dry. Now, Alberta is asking the question no one was supposed to ask: Why do we stay? Alberta is not poor. Alberta is not dependent. Alberta is not fragile. It is one of the most resource-rich regions in the Western world. • Vast oil and gas reserves • Critical minerals and rare earths • Timber, agriculture, and energy infrastructure • A highly skilled workforce • A culture built on production, not bureaucracy If Alberta were a country, it would rank among the wealthiest per capita on Earth. And unlike Ottawa, Alberta actually creates wealth. For years, that wealth has been siphoned off through equalization payments, federal regulation, and policies written for urban centres thousands of miles away — policies that punish energy, restrict land use, and criminalise the very industries that made the nation viable. Albertans have watched their rights curtailed. Their livelihoods targeted. Their values dismissed as backward. And still, they paid the bills. Until now. A new generation of leaders and citizens are openly challenging Ottawa’s grip — not with anger, but with clarity. They are pointing out an obvious truth: Alberta does not need permission to succeed. It already feeds, powers, and funds the country. Independence is no longer unthinkable. It is being discussed seriously, methodically, and confidently. Because Alberta has something Ottawa cannot manufacture: • Economic leverage • Cultural cohesion • Energy sovereignty • And the will to stand alone History shows that nations are not born from chaos — they are born when productive regions refuse to be ruled by systems that drain them. Alberta is reaching that moment. Not in haste. Not in hatred. But in strength. This is not a threat. It is a reckoning. And if Alberta does choose its own path, the world may soon witness something rare in modern politics: A wealthy, capable, freedom-minded people stepping out from under a collapsing centre — not to burn bridges, but to finally build their own future. The West is remembering who it is. And Ottawa can feel it. Jason Coursey

Jim Ferguson

342,413 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

'Can you justify why there is a subsidy for alcohol in the House of Commons & Lords?' Susanna Reid Home Secretary James Cleverly says the alcohol is cheaper because 'it is not a profit-making venture and the vast majority of people that use it are not parliamentarians.'
1:50

'Can you justify why there is a subsidy for alcohol in the House of Commons & Lords?' Susanna Reid Home Secretary James Cleverly says the alcohol is cheaper because 'it is not a profit-making venture and the vast majority of people that use it are not parliamentarians.'

Good Morning Britain

251,545 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🇺🇸DAVID SACKS: MOST PEOPLE DON’T UNDERSTAND THE FILIBUSTER OR HOW IT WORKS “Most people don't understand the filibuster or how it works or why that's even a part of democracy. Basically, what it says is that for votes where the filibuster’s in play, you need 60 votes. You need a super majority in the Senate as opposed to 50. If you ask most people in the country what is democracy, they would say it's 50 plus one in the House, 50 plus one in the Senate, and the presidency. That's all you need, but that's not true.” Source: David Sacks / The All-In Podcast
2:38

🇺🇸DAVID SACKS: MOST PEOPLE DON’T UNDERSTAND THE FILIBUSTER OR HOW IT WORKS “Most people don't understand the filibuster or how it works or why that's even a part of democracy. Basically, what it says is that for votes where the filibuster’s in play, you need 60 votes. You need a super majority in the Senate as opposed to 50. If you ask most people in the country what is democracy, they would say it's 50 plus one in the House, 50 plus one in the Senate, and the presidency. That's all you need, but that's not true.” Source: David Sacks / The All-In Podcast

Mario Nawfal

690,495 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

For the first time in history, Alberta independence is not a question of “if people care.” It’s a question of what happens next. For decades, Alberta independence was dismissed. Now it’s polling higher than most federal parties. #AlbertaIndependence
1:03

For the first time in history, Alberta independence is not a question of “if people care.” It’s a question of what happens next. For decades, Alberta independence was dismissed. Now it’s polling higher than most federal parties. #AlbertaIndependence

Rise Of Alberta

20,506 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Rep. Roy: "What good is it to protect the Senate if the Senate is not advancing the cause of freedom for the people of the country? A 60 vote threshold is fake, and now we can't pass the SAVE America Act. That's old thinking. New thinking is President Trump. Get it done!"
0:34

Rep. Roy: "What good is it to protect the Senate if the Senate is not advancing the cause of freedom for the people of the country? A 60 vote threshold is fake, and now we can't pass the SAVE America Act. That's old thinking. New thinking is President Trump. Get it done!"

Rep. Chip Roy Press Office

12,688 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🇺🇸 The CLARITY Act could become one of the most important crypto bills EVER. Not because it’s pro-crypto. But because it creates a framework institutions can actually work with. The biggest shift: Crypto would not be treated like a regulatory experiment anymore. Instead, it would be treated like financial infrastructure. That changes the game for: • exchanges • stablecoins • tokenization • institutional adoption The market isn’t reacting to headlines. It’s reacting to the fact that the US is building actual rules around crypto. And now that the bill is advancing through Congress, the next crypto cycle could look VERY DIFFERENT from the last one.
0:25

🇺🇸 The CLARITY Act could become one of the most important crypto bills EVER. Not because it’s pro-crypto. But because it creates a framework institutions can actually work with. The biggest shift: Crypto would not be treated like a regulatory experiment anymore. Instead, it would be treated like financial infrastructure. That changes the game for: • exchanges • stablecoins • tokenization • institutional adoption The market isn’t reacting to headlines. It’s reacting to the fact that the US is building actual rules around crypto. And now that the bill is advancing through Congress, the next crypto cycle could look VERY DIFFERENT from the last one.

CryptoGoos

39,564 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🇺🇸 SHOCKING TRUTH: JOHN THUNE IS NOT YOUR ONLY PROBLEM. THE MATH IS YOUR PROBLEM. I understand the frustration. I feel it too. John Thune sits in the most powerful seat in the Senate and too often it feels like he is running interference against the very agenda the American people voted for. That anger is legitimate. But I want to offer a different way to look at this, because I think we are aiming at the wrong target. Thune is a symptom. The disease is the math. Here is how a Majority Leader actually gets chosen. It is not a public vote. It is not decided by you or me. It is decided by the Republican Senate caucus, meaning every Republican senator votes for who leads them. And right now, MAGA is a minority inside that caucus. That is not an opinion. That is a head count. So when people ask why we cannot get a true MAGA leader in the Senate, the answer is brutally simple. The votes are not there yet. Think about what a slim majority actually means in practice. When you are working with two or three seat margins, a handful of globalist Republicans become kingmakers. They know it. They use it. Five RINOs in a slim majority have more leverage than fifty conservatives in a landslide majority. That is not an accident. That is how they survive. And make no mistake about what a RINO actually is. These are not just old school Republicans who like tax cuts and hate spending. These are globalists. They serve multinational corporate interests that have no loyalty to this country, its workers, or its borders. They oppose fair trade because their masters profit from cheap foreign labor. They oppose border security because multinationals do not see America as a nation. They see it as a market. They just happen to operate here. McConnell built that machine and ran it for decades. His influence is finally fading. That matters more than most people realize. But here is the hard truth. If we replace Thune tomorrow with another leader chosen by the same caucus, we get another Thune with a different face. The globalist bloc inside the Republican Senate conference does not disappear because we change the nameplate on the door. The real win is what is already happening. We have primaried out a number of RINOs this cycle. Real ones. And if those seats hold and the majority grows, the math starts to shift. A ten seat majority is a completely different world than a three seat majority. The leverage these people hold evaporates when the numbers move against them. Do not stop being angry. Channel it into the right fight. Grow the majority. Primary the globalists. And understand that the enemy is not one man in a leadership office. The enemy is a caucus that does not yet reflect the will of the people who sent them there. That is changing. Stay in the fight.
0:25

🇺🇸 SHOCKING TRUTH: JOHN THUNE IS NOT YOUR ONLY PROBLEM. THE MATH IS YOUR PROBLEM. I understand the frustration. I feel it too. John Thune sits in the most powerful seat in the Senate and too often it feels like he is running interference against the very agenda the American people voted for. That anger is legitimate. But I want to offer a different way to look at this, because I think we are aiming at the wrong target. Thune is a symptom. The disease is the math. Here is how a Majority Leader actually gets chosen. It is not a public vote. It is not decided by you or me. It is decided by the Republican Senate caucus, meaning every Republican senator votes for who leads them. And right now, MAGA is a minority inside that caucus. That is not an opinion. That is a head count. So when people ask why we cannot get a true MAGA leader in the Senate, the answer is brutally simple. The votes are not there yet. Think about what a slim majority actually means in practice. When you are working with two or three seat margins, a handful of globalist Republicans become kingmakers. They know it. They use it. Five RINOs in a slim majority have more leverage than fifty conservatives in a landslide majority. That is not an accident. That is how they survive. And make no mistake about what a RINO actually is. These are not just old school Republicans who like tax cuts and hate spending. These are globalists. They serve multinational corporate interests that have no loyalty to this country, its workers, or its borders. They oppose fair trade because their masters profit from cheap foreign labor. They oppose border security because multinationals do not see America as a nation. They see it as a market. They just happen to operate here. McConnell built that machine and ran it for decades. His influence is finally fading. That matters more than most people realize. But here is the hard truth. If we replace Thune tomorrow with another leader chosen by the same caucus, we get another Thune with a different face. The globalist bloc inside the Republican Senate conference does not disappear because we change the nameplate on the door. The real win is what is already happening. We have primaried out a number of RINOs this cycle. Real ones. And if those seats hold and the majority grows, the math starts to shift. A ten seat majority is a completely different world than a three seat majority. The leverage these people hold evaporates when the numbers move against them. Do not stop being angry. Channel it into the right fight. Grow the majority. Primary the globalists. And understand that the enemy is not one man in a leadership office. The enemy is a caucus that does not yet reflect the will of the people who sent them there. That is changing. Stay in the fight.

Bill Mitchell

47,075 просмотров • 18 дней назад

Alberta just opened the door to separation—and we’re done getting screwed Let me (Sheila Gunn Reid) be clear: This isn’t a meme. It’s not wishful thinking. This is a legal path to independence. And it just became achievable. Mark Carney is Prime Minister. Ontario, Quebec, and Atlantic Canada handed him a majority. The West? Irrelevant again. We’ve been here before—forced into policies we didn’t vote for, led by a man we didn’t elect, governed by people who think Alberta exists to be taxed, scolded, and shut down. But this time, Alberta did something different. Because the very next day, Danielle Smith’s government introduced a bill that could change everything. Buried in Alberta's Election Statutes Amendment Act, 2025 is a change that makes it possible—finally—for regular Albertans to trigger a binding referendum on separation. The Citizen Initiative Act has been in the books for years. But it was a fraud. It required 600,000 signatures in 90 days—20% of all eligible voters. That’s not a citizen petition. That’s a brick wall. But now? Smith’s government just cut the threshold in half, and changed the calculation to 10% of voters from the last election. According to constitutional lawyer Keith Wilson, that’s fewer than 200,000 signatures. Let me be clear: This isn’t a meme. It’s not wishful thinking. This is a legal path to independence. And it just became achievable. This isn’t about bluster—it’s about options. It’s about leverage. It’s about Alberta saying: we’re done getting screwed. And that’s why we’re launching It’s where you can support fair-minded journalism on Western alienation and the growing push for real autonomy—or even independence. It’s where you’ll find honest reporting that the Laurentian press won’t touch. It’s where you can say: we’ve had enough. We’re not here to blow smoke. We’re here to tell the truth. Because the next time Ottawa tries to grab our guns, kill our industries, or ram through their globalist vision—we’ll remind them of one number: 177,000. That’s all it takes now. And the West? We’re done getting screwed. And we are not going to tell people who want out, 1/3 in the West, to shut up. They are not fringe, not radical. They are bigger than those who vote for the NDP and Carney in the West. And you ignore them at your peril. Go to to learn more, buy your Western First merch and support our journalism.
4:32

Alberta just opened the door to separation—and we’re done getting screwed Let me (Sheila Gunn Reid) be clear: This isn’t a meme. It’s not wishful thinking. This is a legal path to independence. And it just became achievable. Mark Carney is Prime Minister. Ontario, Quebec, and Atlantic Canada handed him a majority. The West? Irrelevant again. We’ve been here before—forced into policies we didn’t vote for, led by a man we didn’t elect, governed by people who think Alberta exists to be taxed, scolded, and shut down. But this time, Alberta did something different. Because the very next day, Danielle Smith’s government introduced a bill that could change everything. Buried in Alberta's Election Statutes Amendment Act, 2025 is a change that makes it possible—finally—for regular Albertans to trigger a binding referendum on separation. The Citizen Initiative Act has been in the books for years. But it was a fraud. It required 600,000 signatures in 90 days—20% of all eligible voters. That’s not a citizen petition. That’s a brick wall. But now? Smith’s government just cut the threshold in half, and changed the calculation to 10% of voters from the last election. According to constitutional lawyer Keith Wilson, that’s fewer than 200,000 signatures. Let me be clear: This isn’t a meme. It’s not wishful thinking. This is a legal path to independence. And it just became achievable. This isn’t about bluster—it’s about options. It’s about leverage. It’s about Alberta saying: we’re done getting screwed. And that’s why we’re launching It’s where you can support fair-minded journalism on Western alienation and the growing push for real autonomy—or even independence. It’s where you’ll find honest reporting that the Laurentian press won’t touch. It’s where you can say: we’ve had enough. We’re not here to blow smoke. We’re here to tell the truth. Because the next time Ottawa tries to grab our guns, kill our industries, or ram through their globalist vision—we’ll remind them of one number: 177,000. That’s all it takes now. And the West? We’re done getting screwed. And we are not going to tell people who want out, 1/3 in the West, to shut up. They are not fringe, not radical. They are bigger than those who vote for the NDP and Carney in the West. And you ignore them at your peril. Go to to learn more, buy your Western First merch and support our journalism.

Rebel News

167,030 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 BREAKING: Rep. Brandon Gill just EVISCERATED the Senate for constantly excusing inaction with "safeguarding the institution" We're still waiting on the SAVE America Act. "The people want to know when they elect a senator, THEY'LL DO SOMETHING!" 🔥 "The argument that you'll hear from the Senate, will say that 'we are protecting the institution, that the Senate is different from the House and that it ought to operate differently, that we are the deliberative body and we deliberate legislation.'" "But the reality is they're not doing ANY of that. The Senate is not deliberating legislation!" "You don't see any real Senate debates on the Senate floor anymore!" "What you see is senators threatening to debate so that they have that 60 vote, you know, cloture threshold. So the impact is that the Senate can't actually do anything." "They're basically have very little democratic accountability because they have 6 year terms and they have very little, you know, they don't listen to the people because they have this 60 vote threshold that they can hide behind." "In effect, this call to protect the Senate as an institution is destroying the Senate as an institution." Congressman Brandon Gill
2:24

🚨 BREAKING: Rep. Brandon Gill just EVISCERATED the Senate for constantly excusing inaction with "safeguarding the institution" We're still waiting on the SAVE America Act. "The people want to know when they elect a senator, THEY'LL DO SOMETHING!" 🔥 "The argument that you'll hear from the Senate, will say that 'we are protecting the institution, that the Senate is different from the House and that it ought to operate differently, that we are the deliberative body and we deliberate legislation.'" "But the reality is they're not doing ANY of that. The Senate is not deliberating legislation!" "You don't see any real Senate debates on the Senate floor anymore!" "What you see is senators threatening to debate so that they have that 60 vote, you know, cloture threshold. So the impact is that the Senate can't actually do anything." "They're basically have very little democratic accountability because they have 6 year terms and they have very little, you know, they don't listen to the people because they have this 60 vote threshold that they can hide behind." "In effect, this call to protect the Senate as an institution is destroying the Senate as an institution." Congressman Brandon Gill

Eric Daugherty

45,315 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Another strong conversation in Red Deer was with a supporter who put his finger on something important: for a lot of Albertans, this is no longer mainly about oil or even economics. It is about freedom, rights, and whether Alberta still has a future inside a country that no longer feels like the one people grew up loving. He says it directly: this is not the Canada he fell in love with, and more and more people feel the same way. What makes this exchange significant is that it shows how the movement is maturing. It starts with the visible size of the line, the honking, and the energy on the street, but very quickly the conversation goes deeper. He argues that if people really understood what Ottawa is doing, they would be all over this. That is a revealing point because it frames Alberta independence not as some fringe impulse, but as a conclusion people arrive at once they stop assuming Canada still operates on the values it claims to stand for. We then get into one of the deepest issues of all: rights. He makes the argument that Canadians are taught to think they have rights, but in practice many of those rights function more like privileges that can be overridden. I respond by pointing to the first clause of the Charter and the broader constitutional problem that Canadians often speak as if they have American-style guarantees when they do not. That matters because once people conclude their freedoms are conditional, they stop thinking only in economic terms and start thinking civilizationally. What kind of country do we actually live in, and what kind of country do we want to build? He also makes a crucial point when he says this has gone way beyond oil and pipelines. He brings up unfair representation, the treatment of Alberta, and the feeling that the system has never really been fair to this province, only now it is being said openly and to our faces. That is one of the reasons the independence argument is broadening. It is no longer just resource frustration. It is about political dignity, democratic legitimacy, and whether Alberta is treated as a partner or as a region to be used. And the ending says a lot too. He brings it back to the kids, to affordability, to family formation, and to the people who are hurting the most. That is the deeper moral force behind this movement. For many supporters, Alberta independence is not mainly about anger. It is about creating a future where the next generation can still afford a home, raise a family, and live with real freedom and real opportunity.
6:09

Another strong conversation in Red Deer was with a supporter who put his finger on something important: for a lot of Albertans, this is no longer mainly about oil or even economics. It is about freedom, rights, and whether Alberta still has a future inside a country that no longer feels like the one people grew up loving. He says it directly: this is not the Canada he fell in love with, and more and more people feel the same way. What makes this exchange significant is that it shows how the movement is maturing. It starts with the visible size of the line, the honking, and the energy on the street, but very quickly the conversation goes deeper. He argues that if people really understood what Ottawa is doing, they would be all over this. That is a revealing point because it frames Alberta independence not as some fringe impulse, but as a conclusion people arrive at once they stop assuming Canada still operates on the values it claims to stand for. We then get into one of the deepest issues of all: rights. He makes the argument that Canadians are taught to think they have rights, but in practice many of those rights function more like privileges that can be overridden. I respond by pointing to the first clause of the Charter and the broader constitutional problem that Canadians often speak as if they have American-style guarantees when they do not. That matters because once people conclude their freedoms are conditional, they stop thinking only in economic terms and start thinking civilizationally. What kind of country do we actually live in, and what kind of country do we want to build? He also makes a crucial point when he says this has gone way beyond oil and pipelines. He brings up unfair representation, the treatment of Alberta, and the feeling that the system has never really been fair to this province, only now it is being said openly and to our faces. That is one of the reasons the independence argument is broadening. It is no longer just resource frustration. It is about political dignity, democratic legitimacy, and whether Alberta is treated as a partner or as a region to be used. And the ending says a lot too. He brings it back to the kids, to affordability, to family formation, and to the people who are hurting the most. That is the deeper moral force behind this movement. For many supporters, Alberta independence is not mainly about anger. It is about creating a future where the next generation can still afford a home, raise a family, and live with real freedom and real opportunity.

Jon Alberta Patriot

12,159 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

"I want to make sure those numbers do not get higher, and those numbers end up going lower because we're successful in negotiating a new arrangement with Canada" Danielle Smith yesterday afternoon. This video clearly lays out the Premiers marching orders. She does not support a referendum on independence, it should be said the very opposite is true. She has been instructed and will do what she can to prevent the support of separatism breaching 30%. The newly tabled Bill 54 will lower the threshold required to trigger a citizens initiative. A direct and what I believe to be the intended consequence of changing the threshold is less public support for the referendum question which follows a successful citizens initiative. Lower threshold+less public support= failed referendum. In short, a lower threshold to initiate the citizens initiatives will result in a higher likelihood that a referendum stemming out of the proposed legislation also fails. Alberta Separatists need to have a serious discussion on not just how much support is needed to hold a referendum but also how much support is needed to hold a SUCCESSFUL referendum. #AlbertaSeparation
0:50

"I want to make sure those numbers do not get higher, and those numbers end up going lower because we're successful in negotiating a new arrangement with Canada" Danielle Smith yesterday afternoon. This video clearly lays out the Premiers marching orders. She does not support a referendum on independence, it should be said the very opposite is true. She has been instructed and will do what she can to prevent the support of separatism breaching 30%. The newly tabled Bill 54 will lower the threshold required to trigger a citizens initiative. A direct and what I believe to be the intended consequence of changing the threshold is less public support for the referendum question which follows a successful citizens initiative. Lower threshold+less public support= failed referendum. In short, a lower threshold to initiate the citizens initiatives will result in a higher likelihood that a referendum stemming out of the proposed legislation also fails. Alberta Separatists need to have a serious discussion on not just how much support is needed to hold a referendum but also how much support is needed to hold a SUCCESSFUL referendum. #AlbertaSeparation

Marco Van Huigenbos

48,375 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 BREAKING: Sen. Mike Lee is saying if the Senate GOP gets tough and enforces EXISTING Senate rules, the MAGA agenda can be passed with a simple majority of 51 votes "If we enforce the cloture rule, we can end the cloture abuse! [60 votes for cloture]" "Require them to debate. The MINUTE they stop debating...you can call the vote, a simple majority! We need to get BACK into that business." DO IT! NO EXCUSE! Mike Lee
0:59

🚨 BREAKING: Sen. Mike Lee is saying if the Senate GOP gets tough and enforces EXISTING Senate rules, the MAGA agenda can be passed with a simple majority of 51 votes "If we enforce the cloture rule, we can end the cloture abuse! [60 votes for cloture]" "Require them to debate. The MINUTE they stop debating...you can call the vote, a simple majority! We need to get BACK into that business." DO IT! NO EXCUSE! Mike Lee

Eric Daugherty

659,224 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

POLL: Nearly half of First Nations voters in Alberta back independence A poll commissioned by @ActForAlberta found 46% of First Nations respondents said they'd vote to leave Canada in a referendum on independence. Sheila Gunn Reid shares details from a poll commissioned by Act For Alberta, which found 46% of First Nations respondents would support independence if a referendum were held on the matter. For months, we’ve been told Alberta independence is fringe. That Indigenous people oppose it. That claim is doing a lot of work right now, especially in court. And then this lands: Nearly half of indigenous voters support independence. Someone tell the activist chiefs — the narrative just blew apart. According to exclusive polling commissioned by Act For Alberta, and full disclosure, I’m the listed contact for that third-party advertiser, 46% of First Nations respondents say they would vote to leave Canada. Nearly half. That's higher than support in the general Alberta population, which sits at one in three. That alone should force a rethink. Now layer this on top: 301,000 signatures, collected by 7,000 volunteers. In a long, bitterly cold Alberta winter. And what happens next? They don’t get verified. Not counted. Not certified. They're stopped, wrapped in evidence tape like some crime scene because a judge has issued a stay blocking the validation process while a legal challenge from First Nations groups plays out. So, line this up. Nearly half of First Nations respondents are open to independence. But activist chiefs claiming to speak for all Indigenous Albertans want to protect the failing federalist status quo, not just for their people, but for all of us. Hundreds of thousands of Albertans signed a petition to at least ask the question. And the activist chiefs involved in the lawsuit are asking the court to freeze the process before it reaches a result. That’s the moment we’re in. A political question with massive public engagement, halted before it could be measured. There’s a gap here. Between what’s being argued in court by gatekeepers and what people are actually saying when you ask them directly. And it is not a small gap. Indigenous communities are not one voice. Albertans are not one voice. That is the whole point of a vote. Everyone gets their say on referendum day. So, here’s the question that does not go away: if the answer is so obvious, why not let the process finish? Why not count the signatures and drop the lawsuit? Why not let people speak? Because once it becomes one person, one vote, the outcome is not controlled anymore, and the narrative is shattered for good.
3:08

POLL: Nearly half of First Nations voters in Alberta back independence A poll commissioned by @ActForAlberta found 46% of First Nations respondents said they'd vote to leave Canada in a referendum on independence. Sheila Gunn Reid shares details from a poll commissioned by Act For Alberta, which found 46% of First Nations respondents would support independence if a referendum were held on the matter. For months, we’ve been told Alberta independence is fringe. That Indigenous people oppose it. That claim is doing a lot of work right now, especially in court. And then this lands: Nearly half of indigenous voters support independence. Someone tell the activist chiefs — the narrative just blew apart. According to exclusive polling commissioned by Act For Alberta, and full disclosure, I’m the listed contact for that third-party advertiser, 46% of First Nations respondents say they would vote to leave Canada. Nearly half. That's higher than support in the general Alberta population, which sits at one in three. That alone should force a rethink. Now layer this on top: 301,000 signatures, collected by 7,000 volunteers. In a long, bitterly cold Alberta winter. And what happens next? They don’t get verified. Not counted. Not certified. They're stopped, wrapped in evidence tape like some crime scene because a judge has issued a stay blocking the validation process while a legal challenge from First Nations groups plays out. So, line this up. Nearly half of First Nations respondents are open to independence. But activist chiefs claiming to speak for all Indigenous Albertans want to protect the failing federalist status quo, not just for their people, but for all of us. Hundreds of thousands of Albertans signed a petition to at least ask the question. And the activist chiefs involved in the lawsuit are asking the court to freeze the process before it reaches a result. That’s the moment we’re in. A political question with massive public engagement, halted before it could be measured. There’s a gap here. Between what’s being argued in court by gatekeepers and what people are actually saying when you ask them directly. And it is not a small gap. Indigenous communities are not one voice. Albertans are not one voice. That is the whole point of a vote. Everyone gets their say on referendum day. So, here’s the question that does not go away: if the answer is so obvious, why not let the process finish? Why not count the signatures and drop the lawsuit? Why not let people speak? Because once it becomes one person, one vote, the outcome is not controlled anymore, and the narrative is shattered for good.

Rebel News

37,196 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Most $ONDO holders are waiting for the fee switch. Nobody is asking who is actually allowed to flip it. Here is what the DAO docs say and why it changes everything. You need 100 million ONDO just to submit a proposal. Not to pass one. Not to win a vote. Just to put something on the table for discussion. There have been exactly 9 proposals in the entire history of the ONDO DAO. Zero of them have ever touched fees. Zero have ever discussed revenue sharing. Zero have proposed any form of value accrual to token holders. The last proposal was a simple token unlock in January 2024. That was 16 months ago. This is not governance apathy. This is governance architecture. The rules were written so that retail cannot force this conversation. Mid-sized holders cannot force it either. Only whales, VCs, and foundation-aligned wallets hold enough ONDO to submit anything. Past votes averaged between 50 and 600 participating addresses. In a protocol with 3,040 delegates and tens of thousands of holders, that number tells you everything about who is actually in control. The fee switch is not delayed because nobody wants it. It is delayed because the people who can call the vote have not decided it is time yet. That changes the entire question you should be asking. Stop asking when the fee switch drops. Start asking which wallet submits it. And what changes between now and then that makes it worth their while to pull the trigger. The answer to that question is where the real alpha lives. Agree or cap?
12:22

Most $ONDO holders are waiting for the fee switch. Nobody is asking who is actually allowed to flip it. Here is what the DAO docs say and why it changes everything. You need 100 million ONDO just to submit a proposal. Not to pass one. Not to win a vote. Just to put something on the table for discussion. There have been exactly 9 proposals in the entire history of the ONDO DAO. Zero of them have ever touched fees. Zero have ever discussed revenue sharing. Zero have proposed any form of value accrual to token holders. The last proposal was a simple token unlock in January 2024. That was 16 months ago. This is not governance apathy. This is governance architecture. The rules were written so that retail cannot force this conversation. Mid-sized holders cannot force it either. Only whales, VCs, and foundation-aligned wallets hold enough ONDO to submit anything. Past votes averaged between 50 and 600 participating addresses. In a protocol with 3,040 delegates and tens of thousands of holders, that number tells you everything about who is actually in control. The fee switch is not delayed because nobody wants it. It is delayed because the people who can call the vote have not decided it is time yet. That changes the entire question you should be asking. Stop asking when the fee switch drops. Start asking which wallet submits it. And what changes between now and then that makes it worth their while to pull the trigger. The answer to that question is where the real alpha lives. Agree or cap?

2xnmore

24,313 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

A guy in Calgary told me we’re not even allowed to discuss Alberta independence. Think about that. Apparently in Canada, we’re only allowed to talk about approved political topics. Then he said Alberta leaving Canada isn’t legal because one judge said the petition can’t be counted. So I asked him: If that decision was successfully appealed, would that change your mind? He said no. And that’s the whole point. For a lot of people, “it’s not legal” is not actually a legal argument. It’s just a talking point. The second the legal process doesn’t support them anymore, they still oppose it anyway. Quebec had two referendums. The Supreme Court already dealt with the issue of secession. But somehow when Alberta wants to even talk about it, people act like the conversation itself is forbidden. All the more reason for Alberta to quickly get off this dystopian train.
2:57

A guy in Calgary told me we’re not even allowed to discuss Alberta independence. Think about that. Apparently in Canada, we’re only allowed to talk about approved political topics. Then he said Alberta leaving Canada isn’t legal because one judge said the petition can’t be counted. So I asked him: If that decision was successfully appealed, would that change your mind? He said no. And that’s the whole point. For a lot of people, “it’s not legal” is not actually a legal argument. It’s just a talking point. The second the legal process doesn’t support them anymore, they still oppose it anyway. Quebec had two referendums. The Supreme Court already dealt with the issue of secession. But somehow when Alberta wants to even talk about it, people act like the conversation itself is forbidden. All the more reason for Alberta to quickly get off this dystopian train.

Jon Alberta Patriot

32,508 просмотров • 1 месяц назад