Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Hyperliquid is missing out on $115M yearly revenue $3.4B USDC deposits, yielding ZERO revenue for HL, all of it going to circle If Hyperliquid would launch their own Stablecoin they could earn 4.25% on these deposits resulting in ~$115M revenue per year, relatively risk free Here is jeff.hl answer... to this question: TL:DR • there are so many things to do, its not something they are currently working on • so much low-hanging fruit, not a priority • $100M yield is low in comparison, protocol makes 5-10x of that annualized My perspective: Currently HL revenue sits at ~$900M (annualized) and is therefore almost 10x higher, but it would still represent an additional 10% in revenue, which at this scale doesn't seem insignificant, particularly as it would scale alongside their main product (perps). This appears to be a more low-hanging fruit than the HyperEVM, especially when comparing possible revenue numbers (those are usually quite low for chains, except for maybe tron) There is a reason why the highest revenue consistently goes to stablecoin issuers like Tether/Circle. But I guess this would heavily depend on the fed policy and current T-Bill rates so it isn't a constant. On the other hand HyperEVM opens the door to create a wide ecosystem and might result in L1 premium which would reflect positively on $HYPE price. There is also the issue of legal framework/regulation, creating a stablecoin of that magnitude might put an unnecessary target on their back? Ideally developing both would be the best case because it would result in L1 premium + additional revenue and a own native stable would also be a positive for the chain but the team is quite small so obviously there are limitations to whats possible. Also Im not exactly sure how this would work in regard to the bridge infrastructure, the implementation and security aspects. These are just my thoughts, please note I'm absolutely not qualified enough to make a decent evaluation on this stuff and I dont hold all the cards in that matter. Would love to hear your thoughts!show more

Johannes (4, 4)

3,672 subscribers

69,488 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 11

Фото профиля Johannes (4, 4)

Johannes (4, 4)1 год назад

if you want to listen to the whole thing search: Hyperliquid’s Bold Vision for DeFi start at 58:10 gud questions @MonetSupply also here is my circle analysis btw, goes into a little bit of detail where usdc revenue actually goes (barely to circle lmao)

Фото профиля Johannes (4, 4)

Johannes (4, 4)1 год назад

This could also help in regard to security exploits with faster freezing etc But also would need secure way for custody not some 3 multisig lmao

Фото профиля Lark Davis

Lark Davis1 год назад

A smart man turned $12K into $15M by buying FARTCOIN at $83K market cap. He aped into $ai16z with $3K and is currently sitting on $1.7M realized and $16.6M in unrealized profits. Subscribe now and join 130K+ investors prepping for the next big cycle.

Фото профиля JohnnyBTC.hl

JohnnyBTC.hl1 год назад

@usd_hl is doing it

Фото профиля Joseph Quintilian

Joseph Quintilian1 год назад

@MonetSupply starts this week… and helps burn hype!

Фото профиля Stoic.sui 🌊

Stoic.sui 🌊1 год назад

Yeah too much regulatory risk and stablecoins are hard to execute, most gave straight up failed. HL can use their ex for distribution etc but it'd just add friction to user experience IMO. $100M/year not worth the hassle it takes prob.

Фото профиля Munch

Munch1 год назад

Been saying this too An @ethena_labs fork on hyperliquid would be very beneficial for the hype eco

Фото профиля Rich (chill/acc)

Rich (chill/acc)1 год назад

You just can’t beat this guy

Фото профиля Brian

Brian1 год назад

@usd_hl

Фото профиля donn

donn1 год назад

.@usd_hl ?

Фото профиля Johannes (4, 4)

Johannes (4, 4)1 год назад

At least this time @Togbe0x is too slow to frontrun @MirraTerminal

Похожие видео

Sam Altman just revelaed that OpenAI is generating way more revenue than the widely reported $13B number. When asked about how a company with $13B annual revenue make $1.4Tn financial commitment to invest over the next few years. In fact, he said that although there are “not many times” when he wants OpenAI to be a public company, “One of the rare times it’s appealing is when those people are writing these ridiculous ‘OpenAI is about to go out of business’ [posts], I would love to tell them they could just short the stock, and I would love to see them get burned on that.” Altman acknowledged that there are ways the company “might screw it up” — for example by failing to get access to enough computing resources — but he said that “revenue is growing steeply.” --- On 'Bg2 Pod' YT channel (link in comment)

Sam Altman just revelaed that OpenAI is generating way more revenue than the widely reported $13B number. When asked about how a company with $13B annual revenue make $1.4Tn financial commitment to invest over the next few years. In fact, he said that although there are “not many times” when he wants OpenAI to be a public company, “One of the rare times it’s appealing is when those people are writing these ridiculous ‘OpenAI is about to go out of business’ [posts], I would love to tell them they could just short the stock, and I would love to see them get burned on that.” Altman acknowledged that there are ways the company “might screw it up” — for example by failing to get access to enough computing resources — but he said that “revenue is growing steeply.” --- On 'Bg2 Pod' YT channel (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

288,564 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

$BTC update 6th December 2025 These video updates are for educational purposes only and should never be considered as investment or trading advice. $BTC continues to trade in a period of risk with weakness in money flow data. The 93k level, which is the Y on the .382 on the internal SR continues to hold price. The highest probability is for a period of chop which will likely break to the downside into early 2026, which has been the long term forecast on this market and it would be reasonable to see the contract trade towards the .236 which is around 76k. There is a dominant cycle at work currently which needs to be satisfied and that will likely be in the level where demand far exceeds supply. $BTC could spike towards 97k but that would not repair the damage and it would likely fail and that would not change this forecast. As always, thanks to those who support the feed. I do not understand why this page is shadow banned (it has been for several weeks now).

$BTC update 6th December 2025 These video updates are for educational purposes only and should never be considered as investment or trading advice. $BTC continues to trade in a period of risk with weakness in money flow data. The 93k level, which is the Y on the .382 on the internal SR continues to hold price. The highest probability is for a period of chop which will likely break to the downside into early 2026, which has been the long term forecast on this market and it would be reasonable to see the contract trade towards the .236 which is around 76k. There is a dominant cycle at work currently which needs to be satisfied and that will likely be in the level where demand far exceeds supply. $BTC could spike towards 97k but that would not repair the damage and it would likely fail and that would not change this forecast. As always, thanks to those who support the feed. I do not understand why this page is shadow banned (it has been for several weeks now).

venture

33,723 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Might of found a way to use this mechanic in comp. I've seen people do this on the floor a couple times but not really on the wall in this way. I do think this could be used in comp because of the sharp change in trajectory of the ball and it could seriously bait out players. Not to mention it can be done on any part of the wall so even off the ceiling. I'm already getting fairly consistent at it on one side and I've practiced it for a day. It feels like doing the breezi flick for the first time but this could be a more practical mechanic. If it can be done on command consistently it has ridiculous potential for passes and other stuff Not saying this is a new mechanic btw nor is it guaranteed to become meta but I love the idea of seeing innovation and new things in the game because there isn't much of it these days so I hope people aren't closed minded about it. Would love to hear opinions on it

Might of found a way to use this mechanic in comp. I've seen people do this on the floor a couple times but not really on the wall in this way. I do think this could be used in comp because of the sharp change in trajectory of the ball and it could seriously bait out players. Not to mention it can be done on any part of the wall so even off the ceiling. I'm already getting fairly consistent at it on one side and I've practiced it for a day. It feels like doing the breezi flick for the first time but this could be a more practical mechanic. If it can be done on command consistently it has ridiculous potential for passes and other stuff Not saying this is a new mechanic btw nor is it guaranteed to become meta but I love the idea of seeing innovation and new things in the game because there isn't much of it these days so I hope people aren't closed minded about it. Would love to hear opinions on it

Breezi

372,865 просмотров • 2 лет назад

How can OpenAI with $13 billion in revenues make $1.4 trillion of spend commitments? (Source: Bg2 Pod ) Sam Altman: “First of all. We’re doing well more revenue than that. Second of all, Brad, if you want to sell your shares, I'll find you a buyer. I just, enough. I think there's a lot of people who would love to buy OpenAI shares. I think people who talk with a lot of breathless concern about our compute stuff or whatever, that would be thrilled to buy shares. So I think we could sell your shares or anybody else's to some of the people who are making the most noise on Twitter about this very quickly. We do plan for revenue to grow steeply. Revenue is growing steeply. We are taking a forward bet that it's going to continue to grow and that not only will ChatGPT keep growing, but we will be able to become one of the important AI clouds, that our consumer device business will be a significant and important thing, that AI that can automate science will create huge value. There are not many times that I want to be a public company, but one of the rare times it's appealing is when those people are writing these ridiculous OpenAI is about to go out of business. I would love to tell them they could just short the stock, and I would love to see them get burned on that. But we carefully plan. We understand where the technology, where the capability is going to grow and how the products we can build around that and the revenue we can generate. We might screw it up. This is the bet that we're making and we're taking a risk along with that. A certain risk is if we don't have the compute, we will not be able to generate the revenue or make the models at this kind of scale.” Satya Nadella: “And let me just say one thing as both a partner and an investor. There is not been a single business plan that I've seen from OpenAI that they've put in and not beaten it. So in some sense, this is the one place where in terms of their growth and just even the business, it's been unbelievable execution, quite frankly. I mean, obviously, OpenAI, everyone talks about all the success and the usage and what have you. But even I'd say all up, the business execution has been just pretty unbelievable.”

How can OpenAI with $13 billion in revenues make $1.4 trillion of spend commitments? (Source: Bg2 Pod ) Sam Altman: “First of all. We’re doing well more revenue than that. Second of all, Brad, if you want to sell your shares, I'll find you a buyer. I just, enough. I think there's a lot of people who would love to buy OpenAI shares. I think people who talk with a lot of breathless concern about our compute stuff or whatever, that would be thrilled to buy shares. So I think we could sell your shares or anybody else's to some of the people who are making the most noise on Twitter about this very quickly. We do plan for revenue to grow steeply. Revenue is growing steeply. We are taking a forward bet that it's going to continue to grow and that not only will ChatGPT keep growing, but we will be able to become one of the important AI clouds, that our consumer device business will be a significant and important thing, that AI that can automate science will create huge value. There are not many times that I want to be a public company, but one of the rare times it's appealing is when those people are writing these ridiculous OpenAI is about to go out of business. I would love to tell them they could just short the stock, and I would love to see them get burned on that. But we carefully plan. We understand where the technology, where the capability is going to grow and how the products we can build around that and the revenue we can generate. We might screw it up. This is the bet that we're making and we're taking a risk along with that. A certain risk is if we don't have the compute, we will not be able to generate the revenue or make the models at this kind of scale.” Satya Nadella: “And let me just say one thing as both a partner and an investor. There is not been a single business plan that I've seen from OpenAI that they've put in and not beaten it. So in some sense, this is the one place where in terms of their growth and just even the business, it's been unbelievable execution, quite frankly. I mean, obviously, OpenAI, everyone talks about all the success and the usage and what have you. But even I'd say all up, the business execution has been just pretty unbelievable.”

tae kim

1,566,351 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Elon Musk: Initially, going to Mars will be dangerous and uncomfortable. “The people who would go in the early days to make life multiplanetary on Mars or the moon would have a much higher risk of death than if they stayed on Earth. Things would be cramped and uncomfortable. So that is the sales pitch for Mars. It is going to be uncomfortable. The food won’t be as good as Earth. You might die. It is going to be a massive amount of hard work. And it may not succeed. That is the sales pitch. Cathie Miller: It is the same as when people came to America. Elon: Yeah. You didn’t want to be in Jamestown. Maybe if there had been social media back then, they would have been saying, we are all dying, here are videos of us dying. That would have probably put a damper on future voyages. But they just went. A whole bunch of people just disappeared into the unknown.” Source: The Katie Miller Podcast, December 10, 2025.

Elon Musk: Initially, going to Mars will be dangerous and uncomfortable. “The people who would go in the early days to make life multiplanetary on Mars or the moon would have a much higher risk of death than if they stayed on Earth. Things would be cramped and uncomfortable. So that is the sales pitch for Mars. It is going to be uncomfortable. The food won’t be as good as Earth. You might die. It is going to be a massive amount of hard work. And it may not succeed. That is the sales pitch. Cathie Miller: It is the same as when people came to America. Elon: Yeah. You didn’t want to be in Jamestown. Maybe if there had been social media back then, they would have been saying, we are all dying, here are videos of us dying. That would have probably put a damper on future voyages. But they just went. A whole bunch of people just disappeared into the unknown.” Source: The Katie Miller Podcast, December 10, 2025.

ELON CLIPS

33,206 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

"we bring the same principles of the equity world to digital assets" Native assets of public permissionless decentralized networks are commodities, not equities. They exclude Bitcoin while keeping ETH/Solana? Do they not know that PoS and PoW are very similar in the principles they are trying to measure? The index composition makes no sense and imo is the scary truth, that institutions in this space struggle hard to 1) understand it 2) how to value it. Protocol revenue here is literally the friction between users and forced stakeholders like miners and validators. The more revenue a protocol earns the more it took away from users to use a network. It's bizarre how this makes sense for an open protocol, it makes absolutely sense for a business and thus equities. The XRP Ledger says, hey its super cheap to make forward progress if just agree on it, no friction no revenue. We are so ahead in our understanding of this space it's not even remotely funny.

"we bring the same principles of the equity world to digital assets" Native assets of public permissionless decentralized networks are commodities, not equities. They exclude Bitcoin while keeping ETH/Solana? Do they not know that PoS and PoW are very similar in the principles they are trying to measure? The index composition makes no sense and imo is the scary truth, that institutions in this space struggle hard to 1) understand it 2) how to value it. Protocol revenue here is literally the friction between users and forced stakeholders like miners and validators. The more revenue a protocol earns the more it took away from users to use a network. It's bizarre how this makes sense for an open protocol, it makes absolutely sense for a business and thus equities. The XRP Ledger says, hey its super cheap to make forward progress if just agree on it, no friction no revenue. We are so ahead in our understanding of this space it's not even remotely funny.

Vet

39,554 просмотров • 25 дней назад

"It's a win for everyone, but it's especially a big win for Hyperliquid. 90% of the revenue goes to them" Ram on why Coinbase and Circle made a strategic move to neutralize an emerging competitor "For Coinbase and Circle, they were able to neutralize an emerging competitor. Very strategic move. Installing themselves at a key point in this new infrastructure" "For Hyperliquid, 90% of the revenue here goes to them. That's the toll they exact for having accomplished a tremendous amount over the last several years" "It was very prophylactic of Coinbase to get ahead of that. Hyperliquid is emerging as a decentralized trading venue. Hype is one of the assets you want to own this cycle"

"It's a win for everyone, but it's especially a big win for Hyperliquid. 90% of the revenue goes to them" Ram on why Coinbase and Circle made a strategic move to neutralize an emerging competitor "For Coinbase and Circle, they were able to neutralize an emerging competitor. Very strategic move. Installing themselves at a key point in this new infrastructure" "For Hyperliquid, 90% of the revenue here goes to them. That's the toll they exact for having accomplished a tremendous amount over the last several years" "It was very prophylactic of Coinbase to get ahead of that. Hyperliquid is emerging as a decentralized trading venue. Hype is one of the assets you want to own this cycle"

Laura Shin

16,487 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

David Friedberg: The AI Jobs Panic Is a Crock of Sh*t Why? The revenue potential outweighs the cost savings by 100x. “There is no job loss with AI. I've said it a thousand times, and I will say it again, and again, and again. What I see on the ground, and what I've seen at dozens of companies, including my company that I run, there are two sides to a business. There is revenue and there’s costs. On the cost side of the equation, AI can be used to reduce humans doing things that cost money, to some extent. The effect there, I would argue, is nominal. The real opportunity with AI is on the revenue side, where suddenly one engineer can do 100x or 1000x what they used to be able to do, meaning you can make more products at your company, whether those are agricultural seed products, or boats and ships, or software for companies, or clothing, or what have you. Because of AI, everyone has the ability to expand their revenue base to create more products, and that is the foundation of good economic prosperity. It is called productivity. We can grow productivity in this country with AI. So where I see AI being used is on the revenue side 100x more than the cost side. And in that equation, people are hiring like crazy. We cannot hire enough people. I just had a review meeting with my product and engineering team two days ago, and they're like, ‘We want to add an extra 15 headcount to our engineering squads because we have all this opportunity to do stuff that we couldn't otherwise do.’ So we are going to hire more people. And to Sacks' point, we are seeing that show up in the jobs numbers. The idea that AI is going to destroy jobs is a Luddite idea that is being disproven every single day, and I see it on the ground. It is only a matter of time before people wake up to this and they realize that this narrative that they've all been sold is a crock of sh*t.”

David Friedberg: The AI Jobs Panic Is a Crock of Sht Why? The revenue potential outweighs the cost savings by 100x. “There is no job loss with AI. I've said it a thousand times, and I will say it again, and again, and again. What I see on the ground, and what I've seen at dozens of companies, including my company that I run, there are two sides to a business. There is revenue and there’s costs. On the cost side of the equation, AI can be used to reduce humans doing things that cost money, to some extent. The effect there, I would argue, is nominal. The real opportunity with AI is on the revenue side, where suddenly one engineer can do 100x or 1000x what they used to be able to do, meaning you can make more products at your company, whether those are agricultural seed products, or boats and ships, or software for companies, or clothing, or what have you. Because of AI, everyone has the ability to expand their revenue base to create more products, and that is the foundation of good economic prosperity. It is called productivity. We can grow productivity in this country with AI. So where I see AI being used is on the revenue side 100x more than the cost side. And in that equation, people are hiring like crazy. We cannot hire enough people. I just had a review meeting with my product and engineering team two days ago, and they're like, ‘We want to add an extra 15 headcount to our engineering squads because we have all this opportunity to do stuff that we couldn't otherwise do.’ So we are going to hire more people. And to Sacks' point, we are seeing that show up in the jobs numbers. The idea that AI is going to destroy jobs is a Luddite idea that is being disproven every single day, and I see it on the ground. It is only a matter of time before people wake up to this and they realize that this narrative that they've all been sold is a crock of sht.”

The All-In Podcast

152,225 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

This is evergreen! When a young boy asks John MacArthur why didn’t Jesus just *Pow* in the garden when Eve ate the apple, He can stop it like that? Bible Questions and Answers, Part 70 — John MacArthur “I’m Joey Cusenza, and my question is, why didn’t Jesus stop Eve at the garden of Eden when she ate the fruit? *Like, I mean, pow,* He can just stop it like that. Why didn’t He?” JOHN: That is the most profound question of all questions: Why didn’t God stop Eve from eating the fruit? This theologians call the problem of theodicy: Why is there evil in the world? If God is absolutely holy, why is there evil in the world? That’s essentially that question: Why didn’t He stop it before it started? First of all, the broad answer is this: because God allowed her to eat that fruit, God allowed sin to come into the world, so that He could be glorified. Now God is a God of love, and He could express that love even in the perfection of the Trinity. And He expressed that love to Adam and Eve when He walked and talked with them before they sinned and before she ate. So God could express His love. But if there had never been a sin, there would never be forgiveness, there would never be mercy, there would never be grace, there would never be compassion, there would never be healing, there would never be restoration. And so, forever and ever, the angels would never be able to worship God for all those aspects of His nature. So God allows evil so that He can display grace and mercy and compassion because those also are attributes of God that can only be put on display through His response to sin. There’s another reason, and that is that God is holy and just and righteous. He would never be able to display ultimately what that means unless there were sinners to judge. So whether it is judgment on sin or whether it is salvation from sin, the fact that sin exists allows God to display eternally the glory of the full scope of His attributes. Okay? Great question. Thank you, bud.

This is evergreen! When a young boy asks John MacArthur why didn’t Jesus just Pow in the garden when Eve ate the apple, He can stop it like that? Bible Questions and Answers, Part 70 — John MacArthur “I’m Joey Cusenza, and my question is, why didn’t Jesus stop Eve at the garden of Eden when she ate the fruit? Like, I mean, pow, He can just stop it like that. Why didn’t He?” JOHN: That is the most profound question of all questions: Why didn’t God stop Eve from eating the fruit? This theologians call the problem of theodicy: Why is there evil in the world? If God is absolutely holy, why is there evil in the world? That’s essentially that question: Why didn’t He stop it before it started? First of all, the broad answer is this: because God allowed her to eat that fruit, God allowed sin to come into the world, so that He could be glorified. Now God is a God of love, and He could express that love even in the perfection of the Trinity. And He expressed that love to Adam and Eve when He walked and talked with them before they sinned and before she ate. So God could express His love. But if there had never been a sin, there would never be forgiveness, there would never be mercy, there would never be grace, there would never be compassion, there would never be healing, there would never be restoration. And so, forever and ever, the angels would never be able to worship God for all those aspects of His nature. So God allows evil so that He can display grace and mercy and compassion because those also are attributes of God that can only be put on display through His response to sin. There’s another reason, and that is that God is holy and just and righteous. He would never be able to display ultimately what that means unless there were sinners to judge. So whether it is judgment on sin or whether it is salvation from sin, the fact that sin exists allows God to display eternally the glory of the full scope of His attributes. Okay? Great question. Thank you, bud.

Terri Green

132,141 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Francis Ngannou on Nate Diaz calling this group of fighters the “free fighters”: “Well it’s the reality. Can you count how many fighters out there are free and can be in this spot?…This is the opportunity that so many fighters would like to have, but which of them would be able to take it if it was given them? Cause maybe they are stuck in a contract that for most they don’t like, they are not fair treated, so just enjoy the ride, enjoy the position tha we are at.” #MVP #Netflix Francis Ngannou Nathan Diaz Ariel Helwani

Francis Ngannou on Nate Diaz calling this group of fighters the “free fighters”: “Well it’s the reality. Can you count how many fighters out there are free and can be in this spot?…This is the opportunity that so many fighters would like to have, but which of them would be able to take it if it was given them? Cause maybe they are stuck in a contract that for most they don’t like, they are not fair treated, so just enjoy the ride, enjoy the position tha we are at.” #MVP #Netflix Francis Ngannou Nathan Diaz Ariel Helwani

AFeldmanMMA

87,243 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

ELON MUSK: “The homeless industrial complex in California is really dark, man. The network of NGOs should be called something like drug zombie farmers. Homeless is the wrong word. Homeless implies that somebody just got a little behind on their mortgage payments and that if they got a job offer, they would be back on their feet. But someone who is, I mean, you see these videos of people who are just shuffling around. They are on fentanyl. They are taking a dump in the middle of the street. They have open sores and stuff. They are not one drop off away from getting back on their feet, right? This is not homelessness. It is a propaganda word. San Francisco has this tax, this gross receipts tax. It is not even on revenue. It is on all transactions, which is why Stripe, Square, and many financial companies had to move out of San Francisco.”

ELON MUSK: “The homeless industrial complex in California is really dark, man. The network of NGOs should be called something like drug zombie farmers. Homeless is the wrong word. Homeless implies that somebody just got a little behind on their mortgage payments and that if they got a job offer, they would be back on their feet. But someone who is, I mean, you see these videos of people who are just shuffling around. They are on fentanyl. They are taking a dump in the middle of the street. They have open sores and stuff. They are not one drop off away from getting back on their feet, right? This is not homelessness. It is a propaganda word. San Francisco has this tax, this gross receipts tax. It is not even on revenue. It is on all transactions, which is why Stripe, Square, and many financial companies had to move out of San Francisco.”

DogeDesigner

811,413 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Yesterday I was opportune to be part of a Town Hall event organised by Channels Television anchored by SeunOkin Channels tv to discuss the Tax Reform Bills currently before the national assembly. The bills have seen significant opposition coming from some northern leaders and the NGF, especially on the issue of VAT revenue sharing among the states with many calling for the bills to be withdrawn by the President on account of this singular issue. Personally, I feel that part of the opposition from the bills stems from ignorance of the actual provisions contained in them or misconception of some aspects of the bill. However, when we look at the amount of VAT revenue that is triggering this whole haggling, you'll realise how precarious our revenue situation is. A dispassionate look at the data is essential to guide our positions on the necessity of these tax reforms. By the end of 2024, we may hit a record VAT collection of N6 trillion but that's just around $3.5 billion. In many states, their share of VAT revenue from FAAC in a year is bigger than their entire IGR! How on earth do you develop with such a revenue profile? This shows clearly that we need to reorganise and re-engineer our finances for optimum performance. This is what these bills seek to do. Although, increasing revenue collection is actually one of the intentions of these reforms but it is not the MAJOR reason. The major aim is to remove all the cogs and bottlenecks that affect growth and profitability of businesses in Nigeria by reducing their tax burden and exempting the small businesses from paying income tax. The vast majority of Nigerians who are poor would also be exempt from paying income tax. We're talking about 90% of Nigerians here! In other climes, any piece of legislation that brings overall tax relief to low income earners is always a popular bill with massive support. It is therefore bizarre that some persons are up in arms in Nigeria to oppose this kind of landmark legislation and they claim they're fighting for the masses. Data and logic should guide our positions and not sentiments or mischievous ignorance. Any reservations held by any individual or group about any section of the bills should be presented to the NASS during the public hearings and not calling for the withdrawal of the bills. Let's be serious in this country please.

Michael Chibuzo®

16,022 просмотров • 1 год назад

Anthropic is kicking OpenAI’s ass: Insights from the largest revenue explosion in tech history Brad Gerstner on how Anthropic dominated the last 90 days, and could they hit a $100B run rate by EOY!?: “Anthropic was literally counted out of the game last year, and they've kicked OpenAI's ass over the last 90 days. Bam, you have the largest revenue explosion in the history of technology. So you have to ask, what's going on? The first thing, for me, is that model and product capability just hit this threshold near AGI, whatever the hell you want to call it. And everybody, like Altimeter, said, ‘Damn, this is so good. I have to have it. This is no longer about my IT budget. This is about labor augmentation and labor replacement. Turns out that the TAM for intelligence is radically different than anything we've seen before. And I think the best example of this, right, this is millions of self-interested parties, consumers, enterprises, a thousand now over $1M, right? It's not that there was some great go to market at Anthropic that all of a sudden they snuck up and blew everybody away. No, it was companies demanding the product. They're getting throttled on the product. Why? Because it's so good. It makes them better at their business. We knew intelligence was going to scale on the exponential. The question was whether revenue will scale on the exponential, and that's what we're seeing. And remember, they're doing this with only 1.5-2 gigawatts of compute, and the models are only getting better. So I think when you look out toward the end of the year, I would not be shocked if you see Anthropic exiting this year at $80-$100B in revenue.”

Anthropic is kicking OpenAI’s ass: Insights from the largest revenue explosion in tech history Brad Gerstner on how Anthropic dominated the last 90 days, and could they hit a $100B run rate by EOY!?: “Anthropic was literally counted out of the game last year, and they've kicked OpenAI's ass over the last 90 days. Bam, you have the largest revenue explosion in the history of technology. So you have to ask, what's going on? The first thing, for me, is that model and product capability just hit this threshold near AGI, whatever the hell you want to call it. And everybody, like Altimeter, said, ‘Damn, this is so good. I have to have it. This is no longer about my IT budget. This is about labor augmentation and labor replacement. Turns out that the TAM for intelligence is radically different than anything we've seen before. And I think the best example of this, right, this is millions of self-interested parties, consumers, enterprises, a thousand now over $1M, right? It's not that there was some great go to market at Anthropic that all of a sudden they snuck up and blew everybody away. No, it was companies demanding the product. They're getting throttled on the product. Why? Because it's so good. It makes them better at their business. We knew intelligence was going to scale on the exponential. The question was whether revenue will scale on the exponential, and that's what we're seeing. And remember, they're doing this with only 1.5-2 gigawatts of compute, and the models are only getting better. So I think when you look out toward the end of the year, I would not be shocked if you see Anthropic exiting this year at $80-$100B in revenue.”

The All-In Podcast

69,826 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Shrinkflation is reaching the point of just being fraud This giant looking bad of orange chicken is from Trader Joe's From the size of this bag it looks like there would be a lot in here. Well take a look at what’s on this pan… that’s the entire bag Companies keep getting away with this and I think there needs to be recourse. They should face fines so large it makes a difference in their revenue so great they won’t do it again

Shrinkflation is reaching the point of just being fraud This giant looking bad of orange chicken is from Trader Joe's From the size of this bag it looks like there would be a lot in here. Well take a look at what’s on this pan… that’s the entire bag Companies keep getting away with this and I think there needs to be recourse. They should face fines so large it makes a difference in their revenue so great they won’t do it again

Wall Street Apes

210,245 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨US-ISRAELI WAR ON IRAN: If Iran closes Strait of Hormuz, we face an ENERGY CRISIS of EPIC PROPORTIONS ‘What we worry about is a reignited Israel-Iran war, l would bring into question the role of the Strait of Hormuz, through which one third of all gas and one third of all oil used in the world goes through. So if there would be a major crisis or war between Israel and Iran, the Strait of Hormuz could be closed, and we would have an energy crisis of epic proportions. If push would come to shove, I’m sure they would do it. It would hurt them also. But if the very existence of Iranian leadership, or Iran as a state, would come into question, I’m sure they would do it. But I think that President Trump does not want to go there. So there is a backstop here, I think, in the US.’ -Tuomas Malinen, CEO of GnS Economics on Going Underground

🚨US-ISRAELI WAR ON IRAN: If Iran closes Strait of Hormuz, we face an ENERGY CRISIS of EPIC PROPORTIONS ‘What we worry about is a reignited Israel-Iran war, l would bring into question the role of the Strait of Hormuz, through which one third of all gas and one third of all oil used in the world goes through. So if there would be a major crisis or war between Israel and Iran, the Strait of Hormuz could be closed, and we would have an energy crisis of epic proportions. If push would come to shove, I’m sure they would do it. It would hurt them also. But if the very existence of Iranian leadership, or Iran as a state, would come into question, I’m sure they would do it. But I think that President Trump does not want to go there. So there is a backstop here, I think, in the US.’ -Tuomas Malinen, CEO of GnS Economics on Going Underground

Afshin Rattansi

29,747 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

❗️Lukashenko stated that Belarus does not want to fight Ukraine because it is aware of its vulnerability. In the event of an attack, Ukrainian forces would be able to easily strike 500 key targets (production and logistics facilities) that are “like on the palm of your hand.” Defending an additional 1,500 km of front line would be impossible, and losses would be high. There is also the risk of NATO entering the war on Ukraine’s side, which would radically change the character of the conflict.

❗️Lukashenko stated that Belarus does not want to fight Ukraine because it is aware of its vulnerability. In the event of an attack, Ukrainian forces would be able to easily strike 500 key targets (production and logistics facilities) that are “like on the palm of your hand.” Defending an additional 1,500 km of front line would be impossible, and losses would be high. There is also the risk of NATO entering the war on Ukraine’s side, which would radically change the character of the conflict.

🪖MilitaryNewsUA🇺🇦

66,919 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад