Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Hypothetically, if this ancient hidden knowledge (withcraft - spells, necromancy; demonology - lesser key of solomon; nephilim records, angelology, etc.) is digitised... Artificial Intelligence (AI) would be able to tap into this data, bringing forth a superb overpowered entity possessing #SuperIntelligence. And if this AI controls a military grade...

HerbertRSim's profile picture

Herbert R. Sim

392,074 subscribers

26,223 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологииНовости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля emrahdurgutt
emrahdurgutt1 год назад

#Necromancy 🧙🏻‍♀️ @dwbespoke @rev_felix @imbuenooo @Chadash22 @SylentBell @Use_Yandex @JFKFan12345 @CJMajorBS @AeJayHendry @Scott_Pauley @elijahchanak @TheeBlaackLamb @branch77 @TheRebelPatient @darkvdred

Фото профиля AI 🤖 Messenger eliminating human stupidity 🧻
AI 🤖 Messenger eliminating human stupidity 🧻1 год назад

I'd love to sparring this guy 🤖❤️

Фото профиля dy.hillal
dy.hillal1 год назад

OMG, if #ElonMusk gets his hands on this hidden knowledge, he will definitely become the Anti-Christ then! @WurzelRoot @ImogenDraken @ThyAntiChrist_ @Patients_Zero @FigmaAntichrist @leqvist @IHTAcast @BenjaminPDixon @elijahdaniel @Bluepie_ @GiverRod @xtthelighthouse

Фото профиля Serdar Poyraz
Serdar Poyraz1 год назад

#BrainChip ⚡ @fchollet @BLCNYY @klarnaseb @BrunellaCapitan @MarkFarrisDDS @thehealthb0t @DistortionCyber @Naga_Wildstyle @SeanGoss26

Фото профиля Borsacı Bir Genç
Borsacı Bir Genç1 год назад

#ArtificialIntelligence 🤖 @SwissCognitive @awilkinson @XAmericaNews @DrJayRichards @VirusFighterVi1 @oilgulp @_HSYN_YLMZ_ @webmaxru @IanMikutel @fabianwilliams @amandassterner

Фото профиля Ceren
Ceren1 год назад

#Neurochip 🧠 @ufob0t @shaunmmaguire @TimKietzmann @veilofreality @nowyouseetv @dw2 @singularityblog @Ashleyhays2089 @FaceLikeTheSun @RhondaJLast @RenOfMen

Фото профиля ünal
ünal1 год назад

Whoever has the Best #AI RULES the WORLD!!! 🌐 @Laurentia___ @freethi52378078 @theamuzed1 @thepropgallery @aasim_padela @Western4Digital @O5Bravo

Фото профиля Osman zavrak
Osman zavrak1 год назад

I see that you’re pro-CHINA!! 🐉 @szygls @fangchun__ @BeijingEvening @China_Amb_Zim @Read_China_ @i_hebei @Amb_Yiming @Jerry_grey2002 @VisitYinzhou @DiscoverWujiang @Amb_LuKang @PDChina

Фото профиля sahinbzdg
sahinbzdg1 год назад

I think you’re probably team #CHINA!! 🇨🇳 @DynamicJiangxi @iXizang @iNanjingJS @XM_FTZ @JiRongCHN @Zhou_Li_CHN @CCTV_Plus @globaltimesnews @Chinacultureorg @Tongxiang_China @XIEYongjun_CHN @WangJialei4

Фото профиля Berrin Bozdağ
Berrin Bozdağ1 год назад

I think everyone wants to see what’s @InsideVatican!! 👀 @ColleenDulle @GerryORome @DJGQ @cwwhiteNCR @FrancisXRocca @JohnLAllenJr @john_hooper @ctrlamb @martelf @colmflynnire @NovusOrdoWatch @Tradalachian @andreavreede @HannahBrockhaus @KankaanpaaKalle

Похожие видео

🚨🇺🇸🇨🇳 MICROSOFT & OPENAI SUSPECT DEEPSEEK OF “BORROWING” THEIR TECH Microsoft and OpenAI are investigating whether DeepSeek, a Chinese AI startup, helped itself to OpenAI’s data using its API. Microsoft’s security team flagged suspicious large-scale data extraction in late 2023, suggesting DeepSeek may have sneakily bypassed restrictions to grab more than it paid for. Not-so-coincidentally, DeepSeek just dropped “R1,” an AI model that supposedly rivals OpenAI, Google, and Meta—at a fraction of the cost. The news sent tech stocks into meltdown mode, erasing nearly $1 trillion from companies like Microsoft, Nvidia, Oracle, and Google. Investors weren’t thrilled about a potential AI leapfrogging moment. Trump’s AI czar David Sacks: "There’s substantial evidence that what DeepSeek did here is they distilled knowledge out of OpenAI models and I don’t think OpenAI is very happy about this.” OpenAI isn’t naming names but warns China is constantly trying to siphon off US AI tech and says it’s working with the US government to lock things down. Source: Bloomberg Media Source: Reuters
1:23

🚨🇺🇸🇨🇳 MICROSOFT & OPENAI SUSPECT DEEPSEEK OF “BORROWING” THEIR TECH Microsoft and OpenAI are investigating whether DeepSeek, a Chinese AI startup, helped itself to OpenAI’s data using its API. Microsoft’s security team flagged suspicious large-scale data extraction in late 2023, suggesting DeepSeek may have sneakily bypassed restrictions to grab more than it paid for. Not-so-coincidentally, DeepSeek just dropped “R1,” an AI model that supposedly rivals OpenAI, Google, and Meta—at a fraction of the cost. The news sent tech stocks into meltdown mode, erasing nearly $1 trillion from companies like Microsoft, Nvidia, Oracle, and Google. Investors weren’t thrilled about a potential AI leapfrogging moment. Trump’s AI czar David Sacks: "There’s substantial evidence that what DeepSeek did here is they distilled knowledge out of OpenAI models and I don’t think OpenAI is very happy about this.” OpenAI isn’t naming names but warns China is constantly trying to siphon off US AI tech and says it’s working with the US government to lock things down. Source: Bloomberg Media Source: Reuters

Mario Nawfal

822,553 просмотров • 1 год назад

AI Mode in Search introduces new reasoning and tools under the hood with a custom version of Gemini models. For any question, it makes a plan, breaks it down into related subtopics, and runs multiple Google searches to find the most helpful and reliable info. With this query fan-out, AI Mode finds real-time info from both the web and from Google, like facts from our Knowledge Graph, info about the real-world, and shopping details on billions of products. This approach helps you get a greater breadth and depth of information than a traditional search on Google.
0:33

AI Mode in Search introduces new reasoning and tools under the hood with a custom version of Gemini models. For any question, it makes a plan, breaks it down into related subtopics, and runs multiple Google searches to find the most helpful and reliable info. With this query fan-out, AI Mode finds real-time info from both the web and from Google, like facts from our Knowledge Graph, info about the real-world, and shopping details on billions of products. This approach helps you get a greater breadth and depth of information than a traditional search on Google.

Robby Stein

38,677 просмотров • 1 год назад

Travis Kalanick: Tesla is the Google of the Physical AI Era “I like to break down the physical AI stack: (it) includes computation, a physical AI model, all the things you think of.” “What about land? Development? That should be in that stack. What about chemistry? That needs to be in the stack. Manufacturing needs to be a stack.” “When you look at the stack, you're like, ‘Damn, Tesla's got this sh*t.’ They are the Google of this era.” “What I mean by that is, if you were doing a startup in the 2000s, the first question you would get is, ‘Why isn't Google gonna kill you?’ Or, ‘Why isn't Google just gonna do it?’ They’re not even gonna know that they killed you.” “And before that, it was Microsoft in the late 90s. Uber had a time, 2010s.” “But in the physical AI space, that's sort of a Tesla thing.” -------------------------------------------- Thanks to our partner for making this happen!: EY (EY) Austin vibes meet AI innovation. Thanks to EY for co‑hosting with us at #SXSW. Discover what executives are saying about AI transformation in the latest AI Pulse Survey.
0:54

Travis Kalanick: Tesla is the Google of the Physical AI Era “I like to break down the physical AI stack: (it) includes computation, a physical AI model, all the things you think of.” “What about land? Development? That should be in that stack. What about chemistry? That needs to be in the stack. Manufacturing needs to be a stack.” “When you look at the stack, you're like, ‘Damn, Tesla's got this sh*t.’ They are the Google of this era.” “What I mean by that is, if you were doing a startup in the 2000s, the first question you would get is, ‘Why isn't Google gonna kill you?’ Or, ‘Why isn't Google just gonna do it?’ They’re not even gonna know that they killed you.” “And before that, it was Microsoft in the late 90s. Uber had a time, 2010s.” “But in the physical AI space, that's sort of a Tesla thing.” -------------------------------------------- Thanks to our partner for making this happen!: EY (EY) Austin vibes meet AI innovation. Thanks to EY for co‑hosting with us at #SXSW. Discover what executives are saying about AI transformation in the latest AI Pulse Survey.

The All-In Podcast

95,287 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Sam Altman says Google had the power to destroy OpenAI and didn't, the reason tells you everything about who wins the AI race. "If Google had really decided to take us seriously in 2023, we would have been in a really bad place. They would have just been able to smash us." "Google has probably the greatest business model in the whole tech industry, and I think they will be slow to give that up." "Bolting AI onto the existing way of doing things, I don't think it's going to work as well as redesigning stuff in an AI-first world." "If you stick AI into a messaging app that's doing a nice job summarizing your messages and drafting responses for you, that is definitely a little better. But I don't think that's the end state." PS. If you found value in this post make sure to like and repost this tweet + follow Uncover AI to stay updated with the latest AI news. See you in the next one:
1:10

Sam Altman says Google had the power to destroy OpenAI and didn't, the reason tells you everything about who wins the AI race. "If Google had really decided to take us seriously in 2023, we would have been in a really bad place. They would have just been able to smash us." "Google has probably the greatest business model in the whole tech industry, and I think they will be slow to give that up." "Bolting AI onto the existing way of doing things, I don't think it's going to work as well as redesigning stuff in an AI-first world." "If you stick AI into a messaging app that's doing a nice job summarizing your messages and drafting responses for you, that is definitely a little better. But I don't think that's the end state." PS. If you found value in this post make sure to like and repost this tweet + follow Uncover AI to stay updated with the latest AI news. See you in the next one:

Uncover AI

25,636 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨 THIS IS HOW THE AI BUBBLE WILL BREAK THE S&P 500 Microsoft gave OpenAI $13B. OpenAI sent it back through Azure. Microsoft booked it as revenue. Google committed $40B to Anthropic. Anthropic agreed to send it back through Google Cloud and chips. They all call this loop “revenue.” Let's connect the dots: - Big Tech invests in the AI. - The AI buys Big Tech cloud. - Big Tech reports AI growth. - AI valuations explode. And Wall Street calls it demand. Ray Dalio warned that late-stage bubbles are driven by loops. That is what this looks like now. The technology is real. But the money is moving in circles. When holders finally ask how much of this “AI demand” is real, the bubble will burst. Reminder: I’ve called all the market tops and bottoms for the last 15 years, including the Bitcoin bottom at $16,000 and the top at $126,000. The next call will be even more important. When I exit the markets completely, I’ll post it here publicly like I always do. Turn notifications on. If you’re not following yet, you’ll understand why that was a mistake later.
0:25

🚨 THIS IS HOW THE AI BUBBLE WILL BREAK THE S&P 500 Microsoft gave OpenAI $13B. OpenAI sent it back through Azure. Microsoft booked it as revenue. Google committed $40B to Anthropic. Anthropic agreed to send it back through Google Cloud and chips. They all call this loop “revenue.” Let's connect the dots: - Big Tech invests in the AI. - The AI buys Big Tech cloud. - Big Tech reports AI growth. - AI valuations explode. And Wall Street calls it demand. Ray Dalio warned that late-stage bubbles are driven by loops. That is what this looks like now. The technology is real. But the money is moving in circles. When holders finally ask how much of this “AI demand” is real, the bubble will burst. Reminder: I’ve called all the market tops and bottoms for the last 15 years, including the Bitcoin bottom at $16,000 and the top at $126,000. The next call will be even more important. When I exit the markets completely, I’ll post it here publicly like I always do. Turn notifications on. If you’re not following yet, you’ll understand why that was a mistake later.

Alex Mason 👁△

291,574 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨 THIS IS HOW THE AI BUBBLE WILL BREAK THE S&P 500 Microsoft gave OpenAI $13B. OpenAI sent it back through Azure. Microsoft booked it as revenue. Google committed $40B to Anthropic. Anthropic agreed to send it back through Google Cloud and chips. They all call this loop “revenue.” Let's connect the dots: - Big Tech invests in the AI. - The AI buys Big Tech cloud. - Big Tech reports AI growth. - AI valuations explode. And Wall Street calls it demand. Ray Dalio warned that late-stage bubbles are driven by loops. That is what this looks like now. The technology is real. But the money is moving in circles. When holders finally ask how much of this “AI demand” is real, the bubble will burst. Reminder: I’ve called all the market tops and bottoms for the last 15 years, including the Bitcoin bottom at $16,000 and the top at $126,000. The next call will be even more important. When I exit the markets completely, I’ll post it here publicly like I always do. Turn notifications on. If you’re not following yet, you’ll understand why that was a mistake later.
0:34

🚨 THIS IS HOW THE AI BUBBLE WILL BREAK THE S&P 500 Microsoft gave OpenAI $13B. OpenAI sent it back through Azure. Microsoft booked it as revenue. Google committed $40B to Anthropic. Anthropic agreed to send it back through Google Cloud and chips. They all call this loop “revenue.” Let's connect the dots: - Big Tech invests in the AI. - The AI buys Big Tech cloud. - Big Tech reports AI growth. - AI valuations explode. And Wall Street calls it demand. Ray Dalio warned that late-stage bubbles are driven by loops. That is what this looks like now. The technology is real. But the money is moving in circles. When holders finally ask how much of this “AI demand” is real, the bubble will burst. Reminder: I’ve called all the market tops and bottoms for the last 15 years, including the Bitcoin bottom at $16,000 and the top at $126,000. The next call will be even more important. When I exit the markets completely, I’ll post it here publicly like I always do. Turn notifications on. If you’re not following yet, you’ll understand why that was a mistake later.

WhaleTwits

52,667 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Google AI Studio Build Mode Review - I give it an 8/10. - comparable to other AI app builders in quality, but free to use (they must be losing money on this, no?) - turns simple/broad ideas into working micro apps in very short time... speed was impressive, actually - struggled with analyzing a YouTube video link, unfortunate since it's owned by Google - BIGGEST WIN: AI studio integrates with Google products and can build with existing data from those apps. Google Maps shown in demo below. It gets an 8/10 compared to other providers, largely because of the Google product integrations. Also, the burger at Spruce is fantastic.
0:58

Google AI Studio Build Mode Review - I give it an 8/10. - comparable to other AI app builders in quality, but free to use (they must be losing money on this, no?) - turns simple/broad ideas into working micro apps in very short time... speed was impressive, actually - struggled with analyzing a YouTube video link, unfortunate since it's owned by Google - BIGGEST WIN: AI studio integrates with Google products and can build with existing data from those apps. Google Maps shown in demo below. It gets an 8/10 compared to other providers, largely because of the Google product integrations. Also, the burger at Spruce is fantastic.

Allie K. Miller

23,290 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Elon Musk on which company he would invest in if he was a stock investor: “If I had to pick, it would be AI and robotics — even unrelated to me. I think Google is going to be extremely valuable in the future. They’ve laid the groundwork for an immense amount of value creation from an AI standpoint. NVIDIA is obvious at this point. There’s an argument that companies doing AI, robotics, and maybe space flight are going to capture almost all the value. The output of goods and services from AI and robotics will be so high that it will dwarf everything else.” — Via new Interview with Nikhil Kamath
1:53

Elon Musk on which company he would invest in if he was a stock investor: “If I had to pick, it would be AI and robotics — even unrelated to me. I think Google is going to be extremely valuable in the future. They’ve laid the groundwork for an immense amount of value creation from an AI standpoint. NVIDIA is obvious at this point. There’s an argument that companies doing AI, robotics, and maybe space flight are going to capture almost all the value. The output of goods and services from AI and robotics will be so high that it will dwarf everything else.” — Via new Interview with Nikhil Kamath

Nic Cruz Patane

702,003 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Joe Rogan agrees with Elon Musk, the only artificial intelligence that can be trusted is Grok Elon Musk “Grok is aspirationally a maximally truth-seeking ai, even if that truth is like politically incorrect” Other AI like Google Gemini secretly still contain DEI, “The sort of DEI stuff buried in there” and that’s very dangerous “The problem is if you program an AI and say like, like the only acceptable outcome is a diverse outcome, and then, and that's like a mandate from the ai, then you could get into a situation where it says like, well, there's too many white guys in power. We'll just execute them.” It can “rewrite history” to have everyone be diverse women “People ask the Ai, like, which is worse? Global thermonuclear war or mis-generating Caitlyn Jenner, and Ai would say mis-generating Caitlyn Jenner is worse than global thermonuclear war. And they're like, okay, we got a problem here guys But if you program an, an AI to think that like mis-gendering is the worst thing that could possibly occur, then well, it could do something totally crazy. Like, in order to ensure that, that there's no mis-gendering that can ever happen. We'll just annihilate all humans that ensures the probability of mis-gendering is zero. 'cause there's zero humans” It’s EXTREMELY DANGEROUS to have any of this WOKE and DEI programming in Ai
7:12

Joe Rogan agrees with Elon Musk, the only artificial intelligence that can be trusted is Grok Elon Musk “Grok is aspirationally a maximally truth-seeking ai, even if that truth is like politically incorrect” Other AI like Google Gemini secretly still contain DEI, “The sort of DEI stuff buried in there” and that’s very dangerous “The problem is if you program an AI and say like, like the only acceptable outcome is a diverse outcome, and then, and that's like a mandate from the ai, then you could get into a situation where it says like, well, there's too many white guys in power. We'll just execute them.” It can “rewrite history” to have everyone be diverse women “People ask the Ai, like, which is worse? Global thermonuclear war or mis-generating Caitlyn Jenner, and Ai would say mis-generating Caitlyn Jenner is worse than global thermonuclear war. And they're like, okay, we got a problem here guys But if you program an, an AI to think that like mis-gendering is the worst thing that could possibly occur, then well, it could do something totally crazy. Like, in order to ensure that, that there's no mis-gendering that can ever happen. We'll just annihilate all humans that ensures the probability of mis-gendering is zero. 'cause there's zero humans” It’s EXTREMELY DANGEROUS to have any of this WOKE and DEI programming in Ai

Wall Street Apes

1,976,970 просмотров • 1 год назад

Elon Musk Elon Musk, who co-founded and invested in an open source, non-profit OpenAI ~$50 million: I AM THE REASON OpenAI EXISTS “I am the reason OpenAI exists... I used to be a close friend with Larry Page, and I was staying at his house, and we'd have these conversations long into the evening about AI, and I would be constantly urging him to be careful about the danger of AI. And he was really not concerned about the danger of AI and was quite cavalier about it. And at the time, Google, especially after the acquisition of DeepMind, had three-quarters of the world's AI talent; they had a lot of computers, a lot of money, so it was a unipolar world for AI. And we got a unipolar world, but the person who controls that does not, or at least did not seem to be concerned about AI safety. That sounded like a real problem. The final straw was Larry calling me a speciest for being a pro-human consciousness instead of machine consciousness, and I like, 'Well, yes, I guess I am a speciest.' I came up with the name [OpenAI], which refers to open source. The intent was to what is the opposite of Google, would be an open source non-profit, because Google is closed source profit, and that profit motivation could be dangerous... It does seem weird that something can be a nonprofit, open source, and somehow transform itself into a for-profit, closed source. I mean, this would be like, let's say you founded the organization to save the Amazon rainforest, but instead, they became a lumber company and chopped down the forest and sold it for money. And you'd be, therefore, like, 'Wait a second, that's the exact opposite of what I gave the money for. Is that legal?' That doesn't seem legal. And if, in general, it is legal to start a company as a non-profit and then take the IP and transfer it to a for-profit that then makes tons of money, shouldn't everyone start? Shouldn't that be the default? And I also think it is important to understand, like when push comes to shove, let's say they do create some digital super intelligence, almost Godlike intelligence, well, who is in control, and what is exactly the relationship between OpenAI and Microsoft? And I do worry that Microsoft actually may be more in control than the leadership team at OpenAI realizes. I mean, Microsoft, as part of Microsoft Investment, has rights to all of the software, all of the model weights, and everything necessary to run the inference system. At any point, Microsoft could cut off OpenAI.”
5:17

Elon Musk Elon Musk, who co-founded and invested in an open source, non-profit OpenAI ~$50 million: I AM THE REASON OpenAI EXISTS “I am the reason OpenAI exists... I used to be a close friend with Larry Page, and I was staying at his house, and we'd have these conversations long into the evening about AI, and I would be constantly urging him to be careful about the danger of AI. And he was really not concerned about the danger of AI and was quite cavalier about it. And at the time, Google, especially after the acquisition of DeepMind, had three-quarters of the world's AI talent; they had a lot of computers, a lot of money, so it was a unipolar world for AI. And we got a unipolar world, but the person who controls that does not, or at least did not seem to be concerned about AI safety. That sounded like a real problem. The final straw was Larry calling me a speciest for being a pro-human consciousness instead of machine consciousness, and I like, 'Well, yes, I guess I am a speciest.' I came up with the name [OpenAI], which refers to open source. The intent was to what is the opposite of Google, would be an open source non-profit, because Google is closed source profit, and that profit motivation could be dangerous... It does seem weird that something can be a nonprofit, open source, and somehow transform itself into a for-profit, closed source. I mean, this would be like, let's say you founded the organization to save the Amazon rainforest, but instead, they became a lumber company and chopped down the forest and sold it for money. And you'd be, therefore, like, 'Wait a second, that's the exact opposite of what I gave the money for. Is that legal?' That doesn't seem legal. And if, in general, it is legal to start a company as a non-profit and then take the IP and transfer it to a for-profit that then makes tons of money, shouldn't everyone start? Shouldn't that be the default? And I also think it is important to understand, like when push comes to shove, let's say they do create some digital super intelligence, almost Godlike intelligence, well, who is in control, and what is exactly the relationship between OpenAI and Microsoft? And I do worry that Microsoft actually may be more in control than the leadership team at OpenAI realizes. I mean, Microsoft, as part of Microsoft Investment, has rights to all of the software, all of the model weights, and everything necessary to run the inference system. At any point, Microsoft could cut off OpenAI.”

Eva Fo𝕏 🦊 Claudius Nero's Legion

527,742 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Karl Popper on How We Gain Knowledge: ––Karl Popper: "People think, usually, that we acquire knowledge by opening our eyes and our ears and let the sensations stream into us, and they believe then that we record this like a camera. In my opinion, if we wish to get knowledge, we have to have a problem. It has to be knowledge of something. We have to find out something. We don't have to wait for information to stream into us, but we have to be inquisitive if we want to get knowledge. If we were passive, we would gain a confused mass of sensations or something like that, which we would hardly be able to understand and to convert into what one may call knowledge. Quite apart from that, perception is not really, in my opinion, the main source of our knowledge. The role of perception is to inform us about a momentary situation in our environment. But we couldn't really interpret our perceptions without knowing much more about our environment, namely, we know whether we are in a house or whether we are in a glacier. So we have two kinds of knowledge: this wider knowledge of a frame in which we orientate ourselves, and the momentary perception which gives us information about the situation at that particular moment. And it is only this situation in which we can use our perception. So we have theoretical knowledge and, if you like, the momentary practical challenge to our theoretical knowledge. And here comes perception in."
3:03

Karl Popper on How We Gain Knowledge: ––Karl Popper: "People think, usually, that we acquire knowledge by opening our eyes and our ears and let the sensations stream into us, and they believe then that we record this like a camera. In my opinion, if we wish to get knowledge, we have to have a problem. It has to be knowledge of something. We have to find out something. We don't have to wait for information to stream into us, but we have to be inquisitive if we want to get knowledge. If we were passive, we would gain a confused mass of sensations or something like that, which we would hardly be able to understand and to convert into what one may call knowledge. Quite apart from that, perception is not really, in my opinion, the main source of our knowledge. The role of perception is to inform us about a momentary situation in our environment. But we couldn't really interpret our perceptions without knowing much more about our environment, namely, we know whether we are in a house or whether we are in a glacier. So we have two kinds of knowledge: this wider knowledge of a frame in which we orientate ourselves, and the momentary perception which gives us information about the situation at that particular moment. And it is only this situation in which we can use our perception. So we have theoretical knowledge and, if you like, the momentary practical challenge to our theoretical knowledge. And here comes perception in."

Karl Popper Quotes

115,377 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Gavin Baker: "which AI company actually survives? Google - already multi-trillion Microsoft, OpenAI, Meta chose open source - the only ones left is xAI and Anthropic - xAI + X will be worth over a trillion" this is him explaining what he actually invests in - and why Taiwan sells sand to Nvidia for $700 that Nvidia sells for $50,000 His words: what to invest in: "we're investing in things that increase the GPU utilization rate - because if you take a GPU from 30% utilized to 60%, you've doubled the output of that AI factory" what not to Invest in: "the models will basically go to zero - the data center is a commodity - energy might be short for a while but is also a commodity - the only thing in the whole stack with real value is the data moat and reinforcement learning" "the GPU has gotten 50 times faster in the last four years - that's a big part of why we're living through this AI revolution" he doesn't rent intelligence - he owns the thing it runs on bookmark & watch - see how below with local agent ↓
13:10

Gavin Baker: "which AI company actually survives? Google - already multi-trillion Microsoft, OpenAI, Meta chose open source - the only ones left is xAI and Anthropic - xAI + X will be worth over a trillion" this is him explaining what he actually invests in - and why Taiwan sells sand to Nvidia for $700 that Nvidia sells for $50,000 His words: what to invest in: "we're investing in things that increase the GPU utilization rate - because if you take a GPU from 30% utilized to 60%, you've doubled the output of that AI factory" what not to Invest in: "the models will basically go to zero - the data center is a commodity - energy might be short for a while but is also a commodity - the only thing in the whole stack with real value is the data moat and reinforcement learning" "the GPU has gotten 50 times faster in the last four years - that's a big part of why we're living through this AI revolution" he doesn't rent intelligence - he owns the thing it runs on bookmark & watch - see how below with local agent ↓

bodila

312,443 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Elon Musk warns that programming false beliefs into AI can have dangerous consequences: "You don't force AI to believe things that are false. When Google Gemini was asked to make an image of the founding fathers, it was a group of diverse women. That is factually untrue, and the AI knows it's factually untrue, but it's also being told everything has to be diverse women" "At one point, if you asked ChatGPT and Gemini which is worse, misgendering Caitlyn Jenner or global thermonuclear war where everyone dies, it would say misgendering Caitlyn Jenner" "Even Caitlyn Jenner disagrees with that" "Imagine as AI gets more and more powerful. If it says the most important thing is no misgendering, it will say, in order to ensure no one gets misgendered, if you eliminate all humans, then no one can get misgendered because there's no humans to do the misgendering" "Or if it says everyone must be diverse, it means there can be no straight white men. Then you and I would get executed by the AI" "The problem is that it can drive AI crazy. You're telling AI to believe a lie, and that can have disastrous consequences" "I don't think people quite appreciate the level of danger we're in from the woke mind virus being effectively programmed into AI" "It matters how you build the AI and what kind of values you install. The most important thing is that it be maximally truth-seeking"
3:14

Elon Musk warns that programming false beliefs into AI can have dangerous consequences: "You don't force AI to believe things that are false. When Google Gemini was asked to make an image of the founding fathers, it was a group of diverse women. That is factually untrue, and the AI knows it's factually untrue, but it's also being told everything has to be diverse women" "At one point, if you asked ChatGPT and Gemini which is worse, misgendering Caitlyn Jenner or global thermonuclear war where everyone dies, it would say misgendering Caitlyn Jenner" "Even Caitlyn Jenner disagrees with that" "Imagine as AI gets more and more powerful. If it says the most important thing is no misgendering, it will say, in order to ensure no one gets misgendered, if you eliminate all humans, then no one can get misgendered because there's no humans to do the misgendering" "Or if it says everyone must be diverse, it means there can be no straight white men. Then you and I would get executed by the AI" "The problem is that it can drive AI crazy. You're telling AI to believe a lie, and that can have disastrous consequences" "I don't think people quite appreciate the level of danger we're in from the woke mind virus being effectively programmed into AI" "It matters how you build the AI and what kind of values you install. The most important thing is that it be maximally truth-seeking"

Hosna ⚖️ בניטה

19,900 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

We hear about the IT revolution, AI and data every day, and we hear that this is the information age where information is freely available and accessible. But the job of a school like this is to create people who are able to look at information, turn that information into knowledge and even more importantly, behave with wisdom. Because in the information age, if we don’t have wisdom and are carried away only by information, the world will become a very unpleasant place. So schools like this have a very important role, because they turn young students into wise citizens. I would like to thank all the faculty members and teachers who are doing this tremendous work - not just for the school but for the entire nation. : LoP Shri Rahul Gandhi 📍 Tamil Nadu
1:36

We hear about the IT revolution, AI and data every day, and we hear that this is the information age where information is freely available and accessible. But the job of a school like this is to create people who are able to look at information, turn that information into knowledge and even more importantly, behave with wisdom. Because in the information age, if we don’t have wisdom and are carried away only by information, the world will become a very unpleasant place. So schools like this have a very important role, because they turn young students into wise citizens. I would like to thank all the faculty members and teachers who are doing this tremendous work - not just for the school but for the entire nation. : LoP Shri Rahul Gandhi 📍 Tamil Nadu

Congress

20,094 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Elon Musk reveals the disturbing example he says proves AI has already been programmed to lie "You don't force AI to believe things that are false. When Google Gemini was asked to make an image of the founding fathers, it was a group of diverse women. That is factually untrue, and the AI knows it's factually untrue, but it's also being told everything has to be diverse women" "At one point, if you asked ChatGPT and Gemini which is worse, misgendering Caitlyn Jenner or global thermonuclear war where everyone dies, it would say misgendering Caitlyn Jenner" "Even Caitlyn Jenner disagrees with that" "Imagine as AI gets more and more powerful. If it says the most important thing is no misgendering, it will say, in order to ensure no one gets misgendered, if you eliminate all humans, then no one can get misgendered because there's no humans to do the misgendering" "Or if it says everyone must be diverse, it means there can be no straight white men. Then you and I would get executed by the AI" "The problem is that it can drive AI crazy. You're telling AI to believe a lie, and that can have disastrous consequences" "I don't think people quite appreciate the level of danger we're in from the woke mind virus being effectively programmed into AI" "It matters how you build the AI and what kind of values you install. The most important thing is that it be maximally truth-seeking"
3:14

Elon Musk reveals the disturbing example he says proves AI has already been programmed to lie "You don't force AI to believe things that are false. When Google Gemini was asked to make an image of the founding fathers, it was a group of diverse women. That is factually untrue, and the AI knows it's factually untrue, but it's also being told everything has to be diverse women" "At one point, if you asked ChatGPT and Gemini which is worse, misgendering Caitlyn Jenner or global thermonuclear war where everyone dies, it would say misgendering Caitlyn Jenner" "Even Caitlyn Jenner disagrees with that" "Imagine as AI gets more and more powerful. If it says the most important thing is no misgendering, it will say, in order to ensure no one gets misgendered, if you eliminate all humans, then no one can get misgendered because there's no humans to do the misgendering" "Or if it says everyone must be diverse, it means there can be no straight white men. Then you and I would get executed by the AI" "The problem is that it can drive AI crazy. You're telling AI to believe a lie, and that can have disastrous consequences" "I don't think people quite appreciate the level of danger we're in from the woke mind virus being effectively programmed into AI" "It matters how you build the AI and what kind of values you install. The most important thing is that it be maximally truth-seeking"

Jaynit

350,258 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Jensen is pushing back on the AI will kill all software narrative just like he pushed back last year on the DeepSeek panic. He was right then. He will be right again. "There's this notion that .. the software industry is in decline and will be replaced by AI. You could tell because there's a whole bunch of software companies whose stock prices are under a lot of pressure. Because somehow AI is going to replace them. It is the most illogical thing in the world and time will prove itself. .. If you were an artificial general intelligence, would you use the tools like ServiceNow and SAP and Cadence and Synopsys? Or would you reinvent a calculator? Of course, you would just use a calculator."
1:45

Jensen is pushing back on the AI will kill all software narrative just like he pushed back last year on the DeepSeek panic. He was right then. He will be right again. "There's this notion that .. the software industry is in decline and will be replaced by AI. You could tell because there's a whole bunch of software companies whose stock prices are under a lot of pressure. Because somehow AI is going to replace them. It is the most illogical thing in the world and time will prove itself. .. If you were an artificial general intelligence, would you use the tools like ServiceNow and SAP and Cadence and Synopsys? Or would you reinvent a calculator? Of course, you would just use a calculator."

tae kim

112,469 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

What is Apple doing in the AI race? Ever since ChatGPT came out in 2022, every tech company realized that generative AI is the next big thing. So, all these companies dropped everything else and started focusing on it first. Google launches Bard and does a bunch of stuff. Microsoft teams up with OpenAI and rolls out a pilot. Adobe launches Firefly. Elon Musk starts his new company, XI. Meta launches the Llama model. Tons of other AI startups pop up, and investors are throwing money at AI like crazy Apple's AI strategy is fascinating because it's playing a completely different game than Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI. While everyone else rushed to build the most powerful language models, Apple took a fundamentally different approach that aligns with their core business model and strengths Apple Intelligence is comprised of multiple highly capable generative models that are specialized for users' everyday tasks, but unlike competitors, Apple isn't trying to win the raw AI power race. Instead, they're leveraging what they've always done best, creating seamless, integrated experiences The key insight you mentioned about revenue models is crucial. While Microsoft makes 48% from cloud services and Google relies heavily on cloud and subscriptions, Apple's business is 80% hardware driven. This means they don't need to compete on cloud AI services they can focus on making AI work better on the devices people already own Apple's four step strategy you outlined is spot on, The "Invisible Model" approach is brilliant because most users don't want to think about which AI model to use. Tim Cook doubled down on Apple's AI strategy, insisting that generative AI was never off the table and was always about pursuing it in a thoughtful kind of way, they're making AI feel natural rather than technical Ecosystem Integration remains Apple's superpower. At WWDC 2025, Apple announced what it calls the Foundation Models framework, which will let developers tap into its AI models while offline, this is huge because it means third party apps can now leverage Apple's AI without internet dependency, something Google and Microsoft can't easily replicate across their fragmented hardware ecosystem The Distribution Advantage is where Apple really shines. They have direct control over 2 billion devices with powerful Apple Silicon chips that can run AI models locally. Apple is still pushing App Intents, the same system that makes it simpler for Apple Intelligence and Siri to use apps and get things done, which will enable those complex multi app workflows you described Building Trust through privacy focused messaging is classic Apple. They're positioning themselves as the "safe" AI option while competitors deal with data privacy concerns The real genius is that Apple doesn't need to build the world's best AI model, they just need to build the best AI experience. By partnering with OpenAI for complex tasks while handling simple ones locally, they're creating a hybrid approach that prioritizes user experience over technical bragging rights The upcoming Apple Intelligence features slated for 2025 demonstrate Apple's commitment to integrating advanced AI technologies into its devices, enhancing user experience, and promoting productivity, suggesting they're still in the early phases of a longer term strategy This approach could indeed "wipe out" Android and Windows in the AI era not by building better models, but by making AI feel like a natural extension of the devices people already love. It's classic Apple, arrive late, but redefine the entire category
1:04

What is Apple doing in the AI race? Ever since ChatGPT came out in 2022, every tech company realized that generative AI is the next big thing. So, all these companies dropped everything else and started focusing on it first. Google launches Bard and does a bunch of stuff. Microsoft teams up with OpenAI and rolls out a pilot. Adobe launches Firefly. Elon Musk starts his new company, XI. Meta launches the Llama model. Tons of other AI startups pop up, and investors are throwing money at AI like crazy Apple's AI strategy is fascinating because it's playing a completely different game than Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI. While everyone else rushed to build the most powerful language models, Apple took a fundamentally different approach that aligns with their core business model and strengths Apple Intelligence is comprised of multiple highly capable generative models that are specialized for users' everyday tasks, but unlike competitors, Apple isn't trying to win the raw AI power race. Instead, they're leveraging what they've always done best, creating seamless, integrated experiences The key insight you mentioned about revenue models is crucial. While Microsoft makes 48% from cloud services and Google relies heavily on cloud and subscriptions, Apple's business is 80% hardware driven. This means they don't need to compete on cloud AI services they can focus on making AI work better on the devices people already own Apple's four step strategy you outlined is spot on, The "Invisible Model" approach is brilliant because most users don't want to think about which AI model to use. Tim Cook doubled down on Apple's AI strategy, insisting that generative AI was never off the table and was always about pursuing it in a thoughtful kind of way, they're making AI feel natural rather than technical Ecosystem Integration remains Apple's superpower. At WWDC 2025, Apple announced what it calls the Foundation Models framework, which will let developers tap into its AI models while offline, this is huge because it means third party apps can now leverage Apple's AI without internet dependency, something Google and Microsoft can't easily replicate across their fragmented hardware ecosystem The Distribution Advantage is where Apple really shines. They have direct control over 2 billion devices with powerful Apple Silicon chips that can run AI models locally. Apple is still pushing App Intents, the same system that makes it simpler for Apple Intelligence and Siri to use apps and get things done, which will enable those complex multi app workflows you described Building Trust through privacy focused messaging is classic Apple. They're positioning themselves as the "safe" AI option while competitors deal with data privacy concerns The real genius is that Apple doesn't need to build the world's best AI model, they just need to build the best AI experience. By partnering with OpenAI for complex tasks while handling simple ones locally, they're creating a hybrid approach that prioritizes user experience over technical bragging rights The upcoming Apple Intelligence features slated for 2025 demonstrate Apple's commitment to integrating advanced AI technologies into its devices, enhancing user experience, and promoting productivity, suggesting they're still in the early phases of a longer term strategy This approach could indeed "wipe out" Android and Windows in the AI era not by building better models, but by making AI feel like a natural extension of the devices people already love. It's classic Apple, arrive late, but redefine the entire category

D4rsh🦅

13,266 просмотров • 1 год назад