Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

I asked 6 agents in two conditions (parallel v/s sequential) to create the same tower defence game 👇 LLMs are known to have mode collapse, i.e. if you have multiple parallel runs on the same prompt, you get very similar responses. Is there a way to increase diversity? Yes,... it turns out that if you do such multiple runs sequentially, instead of in parallel. (Plus for each sequential run, append results from previous runs and instruct the LLM to create something different from before.) I did this quick experiment to explore parallel v/s sequential runs for diversity. Given the same prompt to build a tower defence game, sequential runs had a much higher diversity and innovation v/s parallel runs. Check out this (AI-generated) video for gameplay clips. The sequential cohort created interesting new dynamics and visual style, while parallel ones all collapsed to similar colors and orbital style dynamics.show more

Paras Chopra

238,531 subscribers

11,529 просмотров • 25 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 6

Фото профиля Legal Lancer India | Hire Freelancers

Legal Lancer India | Hire Freelancers24 дней назад

An important distinction: parallel output does not necessarily mean independent thinking. In business workflows, diversity may come less from adding more agents and more from giving them different roles, constraints and evaluation criteria.

Фото профиля Vikas(Vik) Malpani| AI for US Real Estate

Vikas(Vik) Malpani| AI for US Real Estate25 дней назад

Tracks that sequential wins. Parallel copies on one prompt sample the same mode, so N agents give one answer N times. Diversity has to come from each agent seeing the others' work or a different starting context. More heads only help if they aren't reading the same page.

Фото профиля Gerald Sterling

Gerald Sterling24 дней назад

The sequential condition is doing more than adding context. Each prior game becomes a negative prompt for the next one. Apparently agents need peer pressure to develop taste.

Фото профиля RXI(E

RXI(E25 дней назад

excellent idea lol I'm stealing this.

Фото профиля Paras Chopra

Paras Chopra25 дней назад

please do!

Фото профиля urumads🇮🇳

urumads🇮🇳24 дней назад

Isnt this auto research?

Похожие видео

Every race requires a strategy and so does every game in Parallel. I started playing the digital trading card game a few weeks ago and am obsessed by it. If you’re new to trading card games or are a TCG veteran that has played Hearthstone or Magic the Gathering, Parallel is for you and best of all: it’s free to download and play. Check the link in Parallel bio to join me in the game and play for free! #ParallelTCG

Every race requires a strategy and so does every game in Parallel. I started playing the digital trading card game a few weeks ago and am obsessed by it. If you’re new to trading card games or are a TCG veteran that has played Hearthstone or Magic the Gathering, Parallel is for you and best of all: it’s free to download and play. Check the link in Parallel bio to join me in the game and play for free! #ParallelTCG

Fernando Alonso

720,775 просмотров • 2 лет назад

I built Caduceus for Hermes Desktop Nous Research Two snakes, one staff Caduceus runs parallel AI agents in perfect sync, on any model you already have It sizes up every task and picks the path: • Easy → answered instantly • Hard → a live to-do plan + agents fanned out in parallel, verified before it calls it done Caduceus has a UI right inside Hermes so you watch every agent build your project in real time Full demo 👇

I built Caduceus for Hermes Desktop Nous Research Two snakes, one staff Caduceus runs parallel AI agents in perfect sync, on any model you already have It sizes up every task and picks the path: • Easy → answered instantly • Hard → a live to-do plan + agents fanned out in parallel, verified before it calls it done Caduceus has a UI right inside Hermes so you watch every agent build your project in real time Full demo 👇

Terp

17,006 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

The day of Parallel Avatars Manifest has come! Sharing some thoughts on them and their place within the Parallel ecosystem… 1. Avatars have immediate utility within the BETA release of the TCG. Matching the Parallel of the Avatar you use to the Parallel of the deck your playing [in ranked matches] will boost $PRIME emissions. Given this, consider if you want one for your favourite Parallel or one for each Parallel to have flexibility in what deck you play. Initial emissions will be set to 11% to ensure all systems are functioning as intended in BETA. 2. Beyond their function in the TCG, Avatars represent a new cornerstone for Parallel as we aspire to more immersive games and story telling. Although we plan to release expansions to the TCG [Planetfall is in development] the Avatars represent our first step towards ‘more ways to play’ and a persistent identity for gamers within the Parallel ecosystem. 3. We are working on finishing full bodies and a migration of Avatars into UE5. This is a process that will take time but ultimately will unlock their potential for use in content and games like Colony. 4. If you obtained an Avatar, you can pay a fee in $PRIME to peak and reveal the door of the Parallel you got but can’t peak to reveal their identity. If you do choose to peak at your avatar, Opensea will reflect this so everyone is aware which Parallel the Avatar belongs to. 5. Although there is varying rarity to the Avatars, there are six hand drawn 1/1 Avatars in the collection. One for each Parallel and one mystery. Special recognition is due to the the team that developed these 3D generated Avatars. It was no small task to develop this program and the detail that has gone into it is unmatched. I am certain it will speak for itself upon reveal. In true Parallel fashion, we stand in a category of our own and bring you something unlike anything the space has seen before. Thank you for your support and may your pulls be Prime. //

//Kalos

25,589 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Devin is like Claude Code except it lives in the cloud and runs against all of your repos vs your local filesystem. So it never turns off, can be run from anywhere including your phone + Slack, and runs as many tasks as you can send it in parallel. It's complementary to all agentic IDEs and CLIs, and for the first time ever it's free to get started.

Devin is like Claude Code except it lives in the cloud and runs against all of your repos vs your local filesystem. So it never turns off, can be run from anywhere including your phone + Slack, and runs as many tasks as you can send it in parallel. It's complementary to all agentic IDEs and CLIs, and for the first time ever it's free to get started.

nader dabit

49,659 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

for those of you who are autoresearch pilled , or have been meaning to get into autoresearch but dont know how - I shipped evo today - a opensource Claude Code plugin that optimizes code through experiments you hand it a codebase. it finds a benchmark, runs the baseline, then fires off parallel agents to try to beat it. kept if better, discarded if worse. inspired by Andrej Karpathy's autoresearch, but with structure on top: - tree search over greedy hill-climb — multiple forks from any committed node - N parallel agents in git worktrees - shared failure traces so agents don't repeat each other's mistakes - regression gates

for those of you who are autoresearch pilled , or have been meaning to get into autoresearch but dont know how - I shipped evo today - a opensource Claude Code plugin that optimizes code through experiments you hand it a codebase. it finds a benchmark, runs the baseline, then fires off parallel agents to try to beat it. kept if better, discarded if worse. inspired by Andrej Karpathy's autoresearch, but with structure on top: - tree search over greedy hill-climb — multiple forks from any committed node - N parallel agents in git worktrees - shared failure traces so agents don't repeat each other's mistakes - regression gates

Alok Bishoyi

199,151 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Introducing CoreWeave ARIA, the first AI research agent that runs autoresearch in your W&B dashboard. It reads your runs, finds what's working, and launches the next experiment itself. See it on Andrej Karpathy's nanochat, proposing configs and launching real training runs. Watch👇 Chapters 0:00 The setup, nanochat runs on an A100 0:32 Ask ARIA to run autoresearch 1:00 Spin up a second ARIA in parallel 1:38 ARIA inspects prior runs and forms hypotheses 2:03 What happened, what worked, across every run 2:24 ARIA proposes configs, 3 trials via W&B Launch 2:59 Push for bigger architecture changes 3:14 Runs hit the launch queue on the A100 4:09 Two ARIAs running autoresearch in parallel 4:26 Results back, ARIA evaluates the val loss

Introducing CoreWeave ARIA, the first AI research agent that runs autoresearch in your W&B dashboard. It reads your runs, finds what's working, and launches the next experiment itself. See it on Andrej Karpathy's nanochat, proposing configs and launching real training runs. Watch👇 Chapters 0:00 The setup, nanochat runs on an A100 0:32 Ask ARIA to run autoresearch 1:00 Spin up a second ARIA in parallel 1:38 ARIA inspects prior runs and forms hypotheses 2:03 What happened, what worked, across every run 2:24 ARIA proposes configs, 3 trials via W&B Launch 2:59 Push for bigger architecture changes 3:14 Runs hit the launch queue on the A100 4:09 Two ARIAs running autoresearch in parallel 4:26 Results back, ARIA evaluates the val loss

Weights & Biases

88,176 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

OKKKK Ive fully automated Codex + Claude Code it take any app idea and runs a fleet of parallel agents in iterative loops nonstop for 24hr+ it can research, design, plan and execute for DAYS zero back and forth it also costs $0 because it’s powered by AI subs we all already pay for so I could have 100s of complex, polished iOS apps built in 30 days if i really wanted to - for the SAME price as anyone else on the same subscription this is CLONK

OKKKK Ive fully automated Codex + Claude Code it take any app idea and runs a fleet of parallel agents in iterative loops nonstop for 24hr+ it can research, design, plan and execute for DAYS zero back and forth it also costs $0 because it’s powered by AI subs we all already pay for so I could have 100s of complex, polished iOS apps built in 30 days if i really wanted to - for the SAME price as anyone else on the same subscription this is CLONK

Paulius 🏴‍☠️

44,882 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

ex-Apple engineer gave Grok 4.6 - 30 minutes to redesign a live app, then showed the GrokBot run that merged its own PRs: "GrokBot runs 20-30 agents in parallel while Hermes and OpenClaw run one. Same weights, 20x the throughput - and the agents keep improving from their own runs." Grok 4.6 runs 5x cheaper on input and 8x on output - $2 and $6 per million. his verdict: this is an easy Opus replacement worth more than any $500 course on agentic engineering watch today, then read the article below on building a self-running agent stack

ex-Apple engineer gave Grok 4.6 - 30 minutes to redesign a live app, then showed the GrokBot run that merged its own PRs: "GrokBot runs 20-30 agents in parallel while Hermes and OpenClaw run one. Same weights, 20x the throughput - and the agents keep improving from their own runs." Grok 4.6 runs 5x cheaper on input and 8x on output - $2 and $6 per million. his verdict: this is an easy Opus replacement worth more than any $500 course on agentic engineering watch today, then read the article below on building a self-running agent stack

Carnage

82,677 просмотров • 24 дней назад

OpenAI's Kevin Weil 🇺🇸 says 24/7 robotic labs could automate scientific discovery using "reinforcement learning with a loop through the real world": "There’s a lot of science that can be totally automated. There’s no reason at this point that you need to have grad students pipetting one thing into another thing." "The idea is to have robotic labs that are online 24/7 and can scale in parallel. You have models reasoning for two days to find the most efficient experiments to run, once they get to a good point, they pass that to a robotic lab which can experiment in parallel at high volume." "The results pass back into a model which reasons about the results and then goes out and runs a different set of experiments. You’re doing reinforcement learning with a loop through the real world."

OpenAI's Kevin Weil 🇺🇸 says 24/7 robotic labs could automate scientific discovery using "reinforcement learning with a loop through the real world": "There’s a lot of science that can be totally automated. There’s no reason at this point that you need to have grad students pipetting one thing into another thing." "The idea is to have robotic labs that are online 24/7 and can scale in parallel. You have models reasoning for two days to find the most efficient experiments to run, once they get to a good point, they pass that to a robotic lab which can experiment in parallel at high volume." "The results pass back into a model which reasons about the results and then goes out and runs a different set of experiments. You’re doing reinforcement learning with a loop through the real world."

TBPN

98,711 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Dylan Patel of SemiAnalysis says speed is the moat in AI inference, and getting there runs through new compute (Groq/Cerebras), KV-cache offload, and networking optimization (Aria). "Most of the infrastructure is pretty optimized for high throughput, I would say, but more and more people want to pay for speed. It turns out agents are very sequential, task-oriented, and models running in sequential tasks." "Trying something, verifying it, checking if it's right, and you do that in a loop. It ends up being very slow." "And speed is the moat. The faster you go, speed is the moat." "So a lot of the workloads and high-end use cases that people are developing now are all focused on high interactivity, and the infrastructure there is quite different." "So let's break that down into a few components." "One is you can do new compute: you can do Groq or Cerebras-style compute, which is very much focused on high interactivity." "But even with existing GPUs you can do a few things. One, if you're focused heavily on time to first token, you might offload KV cache to storage, keep it cached, move it back into the compute whenever you need it, much faster than recomputing." "And the third thing you can do is you have to optimize the network."

Dylan Patel of SemiAnalysis says speed is the moat in AI inference, and getting there runs through new compute (Groq/Cerebras), KV-cache offload, and networking optimization (Aria). "Most of the infrastructure is pretty optimized for high throughput, I would say, but more and more people want to pay for speed. It turns out agents are very sequential, task-oriented, and models running in sequential tasks." "Trying something, verifying it, checking if it's right, and you do that in a loop. It ends up being very slow." "And speed is the moat. The faster you go, speed is the moat." "So a lot of the workloads and high-end use cases that people are developing now are all focused on high interactivity, and the infrastructure there is quite different." "So let's break that down into a few components." "One is you can do new compute: you can do Groq or Cerebras-style compute, which is very much focused on high interactivity." "But even with existing GPUs you can do a few things. One, if you're focused heavily on time to first token, you might offload KV cache to storage, keep it cached, move it back into the compute whenever you need it, much faster than recomputing." "And the third thing you can do is you have to optimize the network."

Fireside Alpha

284,032 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

OpenAI's Kevin Weil 🇺🇸 says 24/7 robotic labs could automate scientific discovery using "reinforcement learning with a loop through the real world": "There’s a lot of science that can be totally automated. There’s no reason at this point that you need to have grad students pipetting one thing into another thing." "The idea is to have robotic labs that are online 24/7 and can scale in parallel. You have models reasoning for two days to find the most efficient experiments to run, once they get to a good point, they pass that to a robotic lab which can experiment in parallel at high volume." "The results pass back into a model which reasons about the results and then goes out and runs a different set of experiments. You’re doing reinforcement learning with a loop through the real world."

OpenAI's Kevin Weil 🇺🇸 says 24/7 robotic labs could automate scientific discovery using "reinforcement learning with a loop through the real world": "There’s a lot of science that can be totally automated. There’s no reason at this point that you need to have grad students pipetting one thing into another thing." "The idea is to have robotic labs that are online 24/7 and can scale in parallel. You have models reasoning for two days to find the most efficient experiments to run, once they get to a good point, they pass that to a robotic lab which can experiment in parallel at high volume." "The results pass back into a model which reasons about the results and then goes out and runs a different set of experiments. You’re doing reinforcement learning with a loop through the real world."

TBPN

29,721 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🚨 do you understand what happened to Claude.. Anthropic just shipped Opus 4.8 with something called dynamic workflows. It no longer works alone - it spins up hundreds of agents that argue, verify, and break each other's work until the answer is right. - A dev used it to port Bun from Zig to Rust in 11 days - 750,000 lines of Rust, 99.8 percent of tests passing - Hundreds of agents ran in parallel with two reviewers per file - Fast mode runs the same model 2.5x faster and 3x cheaper than before work you used to plan in quarters now finishes before the weekend

🚨 do you understand what happened to Claude.. Anthropic just shipped Opus 4.8 with something called dynamic workflows. It no longer works alone - it spins up hundreds of agents that argue, verify, and break each other's work until the answer is right. - A dev used it to port Bun from Zig to Rust in 11 days - 750,000 lines of Rust, 99.8 percent of tests passing - Hundreds of agents ran in parallel with two reviewers per file - Fast mode runs the same model 2.5x faster and 3x cheaper than before work you used to plan in quarters now finishes before the weekend

BuBBliK

431,834 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

How to build a 1-person AI company that: - Runs locally - 100% open-source - No human employees, all agents - Real-time collaboration via email Multi-agent orchestration is not new. Plenty of frameworks already let agents hand off tasks, run in parallel, and talk to each other. So the interesting question is not whether agents can collaborate. It is what structure you use to make them collaborate. The common approach is to wire a graph of nodes and edges and reason about the plumbing yourself. It works, but you are learning a new abstraction just to describe who does what. There is a coordination structure we have trusted for a hundred years already: an organization. Every company runs the same way. People have roles, roles have reporting lines, and work moves up and down that chart without anyone relaying each message by hand. Map that onto agents and the whole thing gets intuitive. You lay out an org chart, each agent fills one role, you talk to the person at the top, and the org sorts out the work between them. You already know how a company works, so you already know how to run one here. There is no new abstraction to learn. That is exactly what Alook does. Each agent is a live Claude Code or OpenCode session with a defined role, a reporting line, and its own email inbox. The agents coordinate over email, the same way a team would. And it all runs locally through a runtime on your own machine, so nothing leaves your setup. You bring your own agent too. Claude Code and Codex both work, and if you would rather stay fully open source and local, OpenCode works the same way. To show how this feels in practice, I set up three agents as a small sales team. Vi is the one I talk to. I hand Vi a goal, and Vi routes the work down the chart. Neile runs prospect research. Vi passes the target criteria, and Neile reports back a ranked list of names, roles, and companies, each with a suggested angle and a confidence score. Lliane runs outreach. Vi hands over the messaging angle and follow-up cadence, and Lliane reports back on emails sent, responses received, and any deal that needs escalation. I never relay a message between them. Neile and Lliane report to Vi, and Vi updates me in one place. The whole thing is open source and self-hosted, so it runs on your machine with your own agents. Give the repo a star if you want to follow where it goes: I also wrote a full walkthrough on building your own AI company with it, from a blank org chart to a running job. The article is quoted below. Cheers! :)

How to build a 1-person AI company that: - Runs locally - 100% open-source - No human employees, all agents - Real-time collaboration via email Multi-agent orchestration is not new. Plenty of frameworks already let agents hand off tasks, run in parallel, and talk to each other. So the interesting question is not whether agents can collaborate. It is what structure you use to make them collaborate. The common approach is to wire a graph of nodes and edges and reason about the plumbing yourself. It works, but you are learning a new abstraction just to describe who does what. There is a coordination structure we have trusted for a hundred years already: an organization. Every company runs the same way. People have roles, roles have reporting lines, and work moves up and down that chart without anyone relaying each message by hand. Map that onto agents and the whole thing gets intuitive. You lay out an org chart, each agent fills one role, you talk to the person at the top, and the org sorts out the work between them. You already know how a company works, so you already know how to run one here. There is no new abstraction to learn. That is exactly what Alook does. Each agent is a live Claude Code or OpenCode session with a defined role, a reporting line, and its own email inbox. The agents coordinate over email, the same way a team would. And it all runs locally through a runtime on your own machine, so nothing leaves your setup. You bring your own agent too. Claude Code and Codex both work, and if you would rather stay fully open source and local, OpenCode works the same way. To show how this feels in practice, I set up three agents as a small sales team. Vi is the one I talk to. I hand Vi a goal, and Vi routes the work down the chart. Neile runs prospect research. Vi passes the target criteria, and Neile reports back a ranked list of names, roles, and companies, each with a suggested angle and a confidence score. Lliane runs outreach. Vi hands over the messaging angle and follow-up cadence, and Lliane reports back on emails sent, responses received, and any deal that needs escalation. I never relay a message between them. Neile and Lliane report to Vi, and Vi updates me in one place. The whole thing is open source and self-hosted, so it runs on your machine with your own agents. Give the repo a star if you want to follow where it goes: I also wrote a full walkthrough on building your own AI company with it, from a blank org chart to a running job. The article is quoted below. Cheers! :)

Akshay 🚀

170,603 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Today Paper has something special to share Tabs are live in Paper ✨ This is a big deal because you and your agent can now work on multiple files at the same time. Unblock parallel prompting: explore faster, stay in flow, stay creative (sound on for the video! 🔊)

Today Paper has something special to share Tabs are live in Paper ✨ This is a big deal because you and your agent can now work on multiple files at the same time. Unblock parallel prompting: explore faster, stay in flow, stay creative (sound on for the video! 🔊)

Stephen Haney

202,225 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Trump: "When you go to a voting booth, and you do it the right way, and you go to a state that runs it properly, you go in -- they even asked me, they asked me for my license plate. I said, 'I don't know if I have it.' They said, 'Sir, you have to have it.' I was very impressed actually."

Trump: "When you go to a voting booth, and you do it the right way, and you go to a state that runs it properly, you go in -- they even asked me, they asked me for my license plate. I said, 'I don't know if I have it.' They said, 'Sir, you have to have it.' I was very impressed actually."

Aaron Rupar

1,125,218 просмотров • 1 год назад

Got the vibe but not the words? Starting today, you can simply show or tell AI Mode about what you're looking for and get rich, visual results to explore. ✨ This experience works by bringing together Search’s world-class visual understanding from Lens and Image search with Gemini 2.5’s advanced multimodal capabilities. When you show AI Mode what you’re searching for it uses our new “visual search fan-out” technique to get a deeper understanding of what’s in an image (including subtle details and secondary objects), and runs multiple queries in the background. This helps it understand the visual context and nuance of your request to deliver relevant visual responses. You can also tell AI Mode what vibe you’re going for (no image needed). For example, ask AI Mode for bedroom design inspo and go back and forth to refine your vision. We’re rolling out this experience in English in the U.S. starting this week. Try it out and let us know what you think!

Got the vibe but not the words? Starting today, you can simply show or tell AI Mode about what you're looking for and get rich, visual results to explore. ✨ This experience works by bringing together Search’s world-class visual understanding from Lens and Image search with Gemini 2.5’s advanced multimodal capabilities. When you show AI Mode what you’re searching for it uses our new “visual search fan-out” technique to get a deeper understanding of what’s in an image (including subtle details and secondary objects), and runs multiple queries in the background. This helps it understand the visual context and nuance of your request to deliver relevant visual responses. You can also tell AI Mode what vibe you’re going for (no image needed). For example, ask AI Mode for bedroom design inspo and go back and forth to refine your vision. We’re rolling out this experience in English in the U.S. starting this week. Try it out and let us know what you think!

Google AI

68,285 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Seedance 2.5 is finally available in the US, but something feels off. I'm running comparisons to 2.0 and 2.5 is performing worse in most of my tests so far. Same start frames, references, and prompts. Multiple runs of each. 2.5's motion coherence, prompt adherence, visual quality, and sound all appear to be regressions. Is this just launch scaling issues? Judge for yourself:

Seedance 2.5 is finally available in the US, but something feels off. I'm running comparisons to 2.0 and 2.5 is performing worse in most of my tests so far. Same start frames, references, and prompts. Multiple runs of each. 2.5's motion coherence, prompt adherence, visual quality, and sound all appear to be regressions. Is this just launch scaling issues? Judge for yourself:

Reid Hannaford

19,770 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

THIS IS HOW A SENIOR ENGINEER ACTUALLY SCALES THEMSELVES WITH CLAUDE CODE the biggest change with AI isn't coding faster. it's where you actually spend your time now. more detailed prompts, more code review, more planning, less typing, etc. here's the workflow: this guy has been shipping code since the days of cgi and perl. he uses a compound engineering plugin that runs 5 separate agents on every task. one brainstorms, one plans the technical implementation, one executes, one reviews, one checks different verticals. every step is documented in markdown files. it's slow and way more waiting. but the output quality is way higher because each agent is focused on one thing. then the REAL multiplier is in git worktrees if Claude Code made you 10x faster, worktrees multiplies that again depending on how many agents you can manage in parallel his team runs 4-8 Claude Code sessions at the same time across different worktrees with each one working on a separate task. the skill is managing multiple AI agents in parallel without losing track, that's the next evolution of engineering

THIS IS HOW A SENIOR ENGINEER ACTUALLY SCALES THEMSELVES WITH CLAUDE CODE the biggest change with AI isn't coding faster. it's where you actually spend your time now. more detailed prompts, more code review, more planning, less typing, etc. here's the workflow: this guy has been shipping code since the days of cgi and perl. he uses a compound engineering plugin that runs 5 separate agents on every task. one brainstorms, one plans the technical implementation, one executes, one reviews, one checks different verticals. every step is documented in markdown files. it's slow and way more waiting. but the output quality is way higher because each agent is focused on one thing. then the REAL multiplier is in git worktrees if Claude Code made you 10x faster, worktrees multiplies that again depending on how many agents you can manage in parallel his team runs 4-8 Claude Code sessions at the same time across different worktrees with each one working on a separate task. the skill is managing multiple AI agents in parallel without losing track, that's the next evolution of engineering

Om Patel

159,676 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Jeff Bezos on the bet you should take every single time, even if you lose 90% of the time. "You cannot invent and pioneer if you cannot accept failure. To invent you need to experiment, and if you know in advance that it's going to work, it is not an experiment." "They're inseparable twins, failure and invention. So you have to be willing to do that." "It's embarrassing to fail. But you have to say, no, that's not how this works." "If I said to you you have a 10% chance of a 100x return, you should take that bet every time. But you're still gonna be wrong nine out of ten times, and it's gonna feel bad nine out of ten times." "If you swing for the fences you hit more home runs, but you also strike out more. But with baseball that analogy doesn't go far enough, because with baseball, no matter how well you connect with the ball, you can only get four runs." "But in business, every once in a while you step up to the plate, you hit the ball so hard you get a thousand runs." "When you have that kind of asymmetric payoff, it encourages you to experiment more. It's the right business decision to experiment more."

Jeff Bezos on the bet you should take every single time, even if you lose 90% of the time. "You cannot invent and pioneer if you cannot accept failure. To invent you need to experiment, and if you know in advance that it's going to work, it is not an experiment." "They're inseparable twins, failure and invention. So you have to be willing to do that." "It's embarrassing to fail. But you have to say, no, that's not how this works." "If I said to you you have a 10% chance of a 100x return, you should take that bet every time. But you're still gonna be wrong nine out of ten times, and it's gonna feel bad nine out of ten times." "If you swing for the fences you hit more home runs, but you also strike out more. But with baseball that analogy doesn't go far enough, because with baseball, no matter how well you connect with the ball, you can only get four runs." "But in business, every once in a while you step up to the plate, you hit the ball so hard you get a thousand runs." "When you have that kind of asymmetric payoff, it encourages you to experiment more. It's the right business decision to experiment more."

Naruto

13,084 просмотров • 1 месяц назад