正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

I asked former U.S. Senator and current candidate for U.S. Senate Scott P. Brown a simple question: If Iran has been an “imminent threat” for 47 years… why didn’t he introduce a declaration of war when he served in the Senate? If the war is justified, why not give... show more

Dan McKnight

5,837 subscribers

27,263 次观看 • 5 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Ron Paul was booed at the 2012 Republican debate when he said Iran didn't have a weapon (they didn't). He then made my favorite statement of the debate: "Now, if they're so determined to go to war, the only thing I plead with you for if this is the case, is do it properly. Ask the people and ask the Congress for a declaration of war. This is war! People are gonna die and you gotta get a declaration of war!"

Ron Paul was booed at the 2012 Republican debate when he said Iran didn't have a weapon (they didn't). He then made my favorite statement of the debate: "Now, if they're so determined to go to war, the only thing I plead with you for if this is the case, is do it properly. Ask the people and ask the Congress for a declaration of war. This is war! People are gonna die and you gotta get a declaration of war!"

Good Morning Liberty

361,609 次观看 • 1 年前

WATCH: BlackRock's Larry Fink say the quiet part out loud. He implies the U.S. must finish the war with Iran at all costs, because losing it means a great depr/recession. "If there's a cessation of war and yet Iran remains a threat... We could have years, years of $100-150 oil."

WATCH: BlackRock's Larry Fink say the quiet part out loud. He implies the U.S. must finish the war with Iran at all costs, because losing it means a great depr/recession. "If there's a cessation of war and yet Iran remains a threat... We could have years, years of $100-150 oil."

Financelot

151,442 次观看 • 4 个月前

It’s a little excursion of major combat operations to keep us out of a war that we’ve been in for 47 years because Iran was an imminent threat and the weakest they’ve ever been which is why we had to strike first in the war that’s been going on for 47 years to stay out of war.

It’s a little excursion of major combat operations to keep us out of a war that we’ve been in for 47 years because Iran was an imminent threat and the weakest they’ve ever been which is why we had to strike first in the war that’s been going on for 47 years to stay out of war.

Caroline Sunshine

40,645 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨 UPDATE: RINO Senator Bill Cassidy reportedly BLEW UP and WENT BERSERK to President Trump's face in the Senate GOP meeting Cassidy LOST his Senate seat to Trump, and he's just LIVID about it! "Cassidy BERATED the president for what transpired in Iran." "He 'lost his temper.' Essentially, the president asked why Republican senators voted for the War Powers resolution last night. He asked the president, is that a rhetorical question or do you want to actually know the answer?" "Cassidy said that the president was raising his voice and in response he continued to raise his." "He lost his temper, he's not necessarily proud of that fact."

🚨 UPDATE: RINO Senator Bill Cassidy reportedly BLEW UP and WENT BERSERK to President Trump's face in the Senate GOP meeting Cassidy LOST his Senate seat to Trump, and he's just LIVID about it! "Cassidy BERATED the president for what transpired in Iran." "He 'lost his temper.' Essentially, the president asked why Republican senators voted for the War Powers resolution last night. He asked the president, is that a rhetorical question or do you want to actually know the answer?" "Cassidy said that the president was raising his voice and in response he continued to raise his." "He lost his temper, he's not necessarily proud of that fact."

Eric Daugherty

539,526 次观看 • 1 个月前

VIDEO: "I'm Not A Fan Of The Guy... He Said Very Strongly That Iran Was Not A Threat! Iran Has Been A Threat For 47 Years, & There's Not A Country In The World Who Doesn't Agree With Me On That!" President Attacks Joe Kent For Publicly Criticizing His Iran War Efforts From Within The Trump Admin When Asked If The NCTC Director Was Leaking! 🔴WATCH/SHARE THE LIVE ALEX JONES SHOW NOW:

VIDEO: "I'm Not A Fan Of The Guy... He Said Very Strongly That Iran Was Not A Threat! Iran Has Been A Threat For 47 Years, & There's Not A Country In The World Who Doesn't Agree With Me On That!" President Attacks Joe Kent For Publicly Criticizing His Iran War Efforts From Within The Trump Admin When Asked If The NCTC Director Was Leaking! 🔴WATCH/SHARE THE LIVE ALEX JONES SHOW NOW:

Alex Jones

118,288 次观看 • 3 个月前

⭕️ “He Needs To Find A Way Out Quickly”: Republican Trump Voter Calls Iran War a Disaster Nora Lee Notzon, a Republican and former Trump supporter, told LBC that she views the war with Iran as a strategic catastrophe that betrayed the anti-war platform Trump ran on. “It was not self-defense. There was no imminent threat,” she said, noting that even Rubio acknowledged the justification for war was that Netanyahu warned the U.S. Iran would retaliate if Israel struck first. “It’s been disastrous and I think Trump knows it, which is why we see this erratic behavior — very much like a child throwing the toys out of the pram. He needs to find a way out quickly,” she added. “Like a gambler winning at the table, he thought he’d go all out and look like a hero. I think Benjamin Netanyahu played a big part in convincing him they could do that together. He overplayed his hand.” She cited polls showing two-thirds of Americans oppose the war and three-quarters disapprove of how the administration is handling it, and said it will take six years to replenish U.S. munitions expended in the conflict.

⭕️ “He Needs To Find A Way Out Quickly”: Republican Trump Voter Calls Iran War a Disaster Nora Lee Notzon, a Republican and former Trump supporter, told LBC that she views the war with Iran as a strategic catastrophe that betrayed the anti-war platform Trump ran on. “It was not self-defense. There was no imminent threat,” she said, noting that even Rubio acknowledged the justification for war was that Netanyahu warned the U.S. Iran would retaliate if Israel struck first. “It’s been disastrous and I think Trump knows it, which is why we see this erratic behavior — very much like a child throwing the toys out of the pram. He needs to find a way out quickly,” she added. “Like a gambler winning at the table, he thought he’d go all out and look like a hero. I think Benjamin Netanyahu played a big part in convincing him they could do that together. He overplayed his hand.” She cited polls showing two-thirds of Americans oppose the war and three-quarters disapprove of how the administration is handling it, and said it will take six years to replenish U.S. munitions expended in the conflict.

Drop Site

23,097 次观看 • 3 个月前

Has anyone ever asked the current president why would he have a classified document outside of the SCIF from his Senate days? Has he ever been confronted with that question?

Has anyone ever asked the current president why would he have a classified document outside of the SCIF from his Senate days? Has he ever been confronted with that question?

Kevin McCarthy

1,294,225 次观看 • 3 年前

This is Scott Jennings at his absolute best. “The MOST courageous commander in chief of my lifetime.” When CNN’s Sara Sidner tried to corner Scott Jennings over Trump’s “no war” promise — he delivered a 60-second masterclass. SIDNER: “How do you square the no war promise with the potential of a protracted war?” JENNINGS: “Well, first of all, the president has consistently, over the course of his entire public life, said he will NEVER permit the Iranian regime to have a nuclear weapon.” “That’s why he took action last summer, and that’s part of the reason he took action today.” “So I don’t see this as him starting a war. I see this as a preventative measure to prevent a war against the largest state sponsor of terror in the world.” “My view is this is a new day for the people of Iran.” “It’s a new day for the Middle East.” “And it’s a new day for the world, because the most courageous commander in chief of my lifetime said, I’m not putting up with this.” “We’ve been banging our head against a wall for 47 years, while these guys terrorized the world.” “And I’m not going to permit it any longer.” “So when I see these Iranian people in LA and other places celebrating, I can only imagine their emotions and the emotions of the people in Iran who now have a chance to take back their country and restore what was once a great pro-Western country.” “That’s the end goal here. No more war, but peace and a government and a culture in Iran that can actually participate with the rest of the world, instead of terrorize it.” “That’s what the president did, he oughta be commended for it.”

This is Scott Jennings at his absolute best. “The MOST courageous commander in chief of my lifetime.” When CNN’s Sara Sidner tried to corner Scott Jennings over Trump’s “no war” promise — he delivered a 60-second masterclass. SIDNER: “How do you square the no war promise with the potential of a protracted war?” JENNINGS: “Well, first of all, the president has consistently, over the course of his entire public life, said he will NEVER permit the Iranian regime to have a nuclear weapon.” “That’s why he took action last summer, and that’s part of the reason he took action today.” “So I don’t see this as him starting a war. I see this as a preventative measure to prevent a war against the largest state sponsor of terror in the world.” “My view is this is a new day for the people of Iran.” “It’s a new day for the Middle East.” “And it’s a new day for the world, because the most courageous commander in chief of my lifetime said, I’m not putting up with this.” “We’ve been banging our head against a wall for 47 years, while these guys terrorized the world.” “And I’m not going to permit it any longer.” “So when I see these Iranian people in LA and other places celebrating, I can only imagine their emotions and the emotions of the people in Iran who now have a chance to take back their country and restore what was once a great pro-Western country.” “That’s the end goal here. No more war, but peace and a government and a culture in Iran that can actually participate with the rest of the world, instead of terrorize it.” “That’s what the president did, he oughta be commended for it.”

Overton

648,053 次观看 • 5 个月前

Victor Davis Hanson draws an uncanny comparison between President Trump and Winston Churchill — two leaders warning about a growing threat while the world refuses to listen. Hanson said that for 47 years, every U.S. president promised to deal with Iran, but Trump is the first one to actually do it. HANSON: “In 1939 Churchill had warned everybody about the threat of fascism on the continent…nobody listened to him.” “Then after the war broke out, nobody called on him and then finally he came in and from May 10th of 1940 he was saying to everybody, these people want to take over the continent.” “He was the voice in the wilderness.” “That’s what Trump is trying to do, trying to say to the American Democratic party, what’s left of it, you don’t understand what’s going on here.” “You Europeans don’t understand, you people in the Middle East don’t fully understand what this regime is about.” “When people say we did not have an imminent threat, we didn’t have an imminent threat when they took our hostages, when they blew up our barracks.” “Nobody said we better attack Iran because we need an imminent threat when they blew up our embassy, they always acted spontaneously with surprises and we never knew what they were going to do.” “The idea you have to have a telegraphed imminent threat, it’s not the nature of that regime.” “It’s lying, disguise and dissimulation. That’s their pattern for the last 47 years.” “But nobody’s taken them seriously.” “Every president’s said we’re going to deal with this, all seven of them and all seven did not.” “And then all seven of them when they got out of office said I regret that I didn’t” “He’s the first one that warned the world and said he’s not going to be one of those presidents.”

Victor Davis Hanson draws an uncanny comparison between President Trump and Winston Churchill — two leaders warning about a growing threat while the world refuses to listen. Hanson said that for 47 years, every U.S. president promised to deal with Iran, but Trump is the first one to actually do it. HANSON: “In 1939 Churchill had warned everybody about the threat of fascism on the continent…nobody listened to him.” “Then after the war broke out, nobody called on him and then finally he came in and from May 10th of 1940 he was saying to everybody, these people want to take over the continent.” “He was the voice in the wilderness.” “That’s what Trump is trying to do, trying to say to the American Democratic party, what’s left of it, you don’t understand what’s going on here.” “You Europeans don’t understand, you people in the Middle East don’t fully understand what this regime is about.” “When people say we did not have an imminent threat, we didn’t have an imminent threat when they took our hostages, when they blew up our barracks.” “Nobody said we better attack Iran because we need an imminent threat when they blew up our embassy, they always acted spontaneously with surprises and we never knew what they were going to do.” “The idea you have to have a telegraphed imminent threat, it’s not the nature of that regime.” “It’s lying, disguise and dissimulation. That’s their pattern for the last 47 years.” “But nobody’s taken them seriously.” “Every president’s said we’re going to deal with this, all seven of them and all seven did not.” “And then all seven of them when they got out of office said I regret that I didn’t” “He’s the first one that warned the world and said he’s not going to be one of those presidents.”

Overton

85,200 次观看 • 4 个月前

President Trump was FURIOUS before the Senate rejected a measure to restrict his war powers regarding Iran, according to Sen. Rick Scott. "The president came to lunch... I run the Wednesday lunch, it was a policy lunch. He came and said, 'What the hell are you guys doing? I'm in the middle of a negotiation trying to bring Iran to the table and you guys say I have to withdraw troops? This is the craziest thing in the world. Why would you ever give the Iranians any idea that we're not united?'" "He was furious with the people that voted to say he had to withdraw troops when he's trying to get a deal."

President Trump was FURIOUS before the Senate rejected a measure to restrict his war powers regarding Iran, according to Sen. Rick Scott. "The president came to lunch... I run the Wednesday lunch, it was a policy lunch. He came and said, 'What the hell are you guys doing? I'm in the middle of a negotiation trying to bring Iran to the table and you guys say I have to withdraw troops? This is the craziest thing in the world. Why would you ever give the Iranians any idea that we're not united?'" "He was furious with the people that voted to say he had to withdraw troops when he's trying to get a deal."

FOX & Friends

153,110 次观看 • 1 个月前

Why would DJT say he IS the 45th, 46th and 47the President🤔? I’ll tell you why he said it, BECAUSE HE IS🫨! How do you think it would have played out if he used the military in 2020 to destroy the coup🧐? It would have caused a Civil War with a lot of bloodshed🇺🇸. It had to play out like it has👊

Why would DJT say he IS the 45th, 46th and 47the President🤔? I’ll tell you why he said it, BECAUSE HE IS🫨! How do you think it would have played out if he used the military in 2020 to destroy the coup🧐? It would have caused a Civil War with a lot of bloodshed🇺🇸. It had to play out like it has👊

Bobby D🎙

42,393 次观看 • 10 个月前

REP. BURCHETT ON HIS TALIBAN FUNDING BILL: “IF THEY’RE NOT DOING IT, WHY WON’T THEY PASS IT?” Rep. Tim Burchett Press Office is blasting the Senate for failing to act on his bill to stop U.S. taxpayer dollars from reaching the Taliban - nearly a year after it passed the House. When told that Senate Majority Leader John Thune said he hadn't seen the bill and that NO VOTE is currently scheduled, Burchett wasn't buying the excuses. “$40 million a week... and if they're not doing it, then why the heck won't they just pass it anyway?” Burchett suggested too many people have a stake in keeping the money flowing and questioned why the Senate continues to delay action. When asked by Alison Steinberg whether he believed Thune's claim that he hadn't seen the bill, Burchett replied: “I personally asked him about it.” “I just don't think he cares. It's not a top priority.” The bill passed the House. The question now is: Why is it collecting dust in the Senate while millions continue flowing into Afghanistan?

REP. BURCHETT ON HIS TALIBAN FUNDING BILL: “IF THEY’RE NOT DOING IT, WHY WON’T THEY PASS IT?” Rep. Tim Burchett Press Office is blasting the Senate for failing to act on his bill to stop U.S. taxpayer dollars from reaching the Taliban - nearly a year after it passed the House. When told that Senate Majority Leader John Thune said he hadn't seen the bill and that NO VOTE is currently scheduled, Burchett wasn't buying the excuses. “$40 million a week... and if they're not doing it, then why the heck won't they just pass it anyway?” Burchett suggested too many people have a stake in keeping the money flowing and questioned why the Senate continues to delay action. When asked by Alison Steinberg whether he believed Thune's claim that he hadn't seen the bill, Burchett replied: “I personally asked him about it.” “I just don't think he cares. It's not a top priority.” The bill passed the House. The question now is: Why is it collecting dust in the Senate while millions continue flowing into Afghanistan?

LindellTV

38,741 次观看 • 2 个月前

#BREAKING: Lawrence: “… so, Donald Trump is asked if he’s losing control of the Senate and his answer is I don’t know. So that means Donald Trump KNOWS he has completely lost control of the Republican Senate. And then he says, I don’t need money…for the ballroom. Remember when he said when he was first running for president in 2015…he promised he would not ask for a single campaign contribution because he was so rich, he would pay for his campaign himself, and he was collecting…contributions for his campaign the NEXT WEEK after that lie? I don’t need money, was Donald Trump’s lie of the day.”😂😳

#BREAKING: Lawrence: “… so, Donald Trump is asked if he’s losing control of the Senate and his answer is I don’t know. So that means Donald Trump KNOWS he has completely lost control of the Republican Senate. And then he says, I don’t need money…for the ballroom. Remember when he said when he was first running for president in 2015…he promised he would not ask for a single campaign contribution because he was so rich, he would pay for his campaign himself, and he was collecting…contributions for his campaign the NEXT WEEK after that lie? I don’t need money, was Donald Trump’s lie of the day.”😂😳

Emoluments Clause

163,397 次观看 • 2 个月前

Senator-elect Vicente Sotto III believes he has an edge in the Senate leadership race if track record and experience are the basis. "I have been Senate president for 4.5 years, never charged with corruption, and budget has never been said as most corrupt," he said. #ANCHeadstart

Senator-elect Vicente Sotto III believes he has an edge in the Senate leadership race if track record and experience are the basis. "I have been Senate president for 4.5 years, never charged with corruption, and budget has never been said as most corrupt," he said. #ANCHeadstart

ABS-CBN News Channel

55,476 次观看 • 1 年前

When a Freshman Senator had the Guts to Call Out an Alleged Bribe in Public Only to be Muted and Have Everyone Look Away Last year, something happened on the floor of the South Carolina Senate that should have stopped everything. A freshman firebrand state senator said a hidden truth out loud. I was not surprised that the senator from Berkeley County had the courage to speak the truth and call out at the very least questionable unethical behavior. After all, he is a lawyer legislator who has stood up to the establishment to fight for judicial reform putting his money where his mouth is by not voting in judicial elections. We need more in the General Assembly with his integrity. So I was unsurprised when he stood up during session and said, plainly and on camera, that he had been offered between $50,000 and $100,000 by a lobbyist group for his campaign account if he would vote against tort reform. He didn’t say it in private. He didn’t say it anonymously. He said it out loud, in the Senate chamber, where laws are supposed to be made in the open. Anyone who believes in the rule of law should have had the same reaction I did: how is that not immediately investigated? What followed was just as telling as the allegation itself. The President of the Senate visibly lost control of the moment. He struggled to respond. When he finally did, he didn’t ask questions or refer the matter to law enforcement. He adjourned the Senate. They disappeared for two hours. When they returned, they went on with business as if nothing had happened. That silence wasn’t accidental. It was instinctive. It was the system protecting itself. If an ordinary citizen accused a powerful interest of offering a bribe, the wheels of government would turn quickly. Subpoenas. Statements. Investigators. But when the accusation lands inside the club, the first impulse is not truth. It’s containment. That is not how a healthy legislature behaves. That is how an institution behaves when it has something to lose. When I say that, as Attorney General, there will be no statute of limitations on misconduct in office, I mean exactly that. On day one, SLED will interview every senator who was present that day. Not to embarrass anyone. Not to posture. To answer the most basic question a free society must answer: what happened? Was money offered? Who made the offer? When did it happen? How was it communicated? Was it reported? Was it ignored? Those aren’t political questions. They’re law-enforcement questions. And the fact that no one asked them tells you everything you need to know about why corruption survives in Columbia. This is why there has been such an intense effort by the good o'le boys to keep me off the ballot. I will bring an end to the era of toleration. The good ole boys in both parties understand what comes next if I am Attorney General. They understand I don’t protect institutions at the expense of the public. I don’t confuse seniority with legitimacy. And I don’t pretend corruption doesn’t exist just because acknowledging it makes powerful people uncomfortable. For years, my opponents have tried to brand me as a wolf in sheep’s clothing. That’s never been true. I’m a wolf in wolf’s clothing. I don’t hide my intentions. I don’t pretend to be something I’m not. And I don’t apologize for enforcing the law evenly. If you think that moment on the Senate floor was an anomaly, you haven’t been paying attention. If you think it didn’t deserve investigation, you’re accepting a double standard that only benefits insiders. And if you think the system will fix itself without pressure, history says otherwise. Corruption doesn’t disappear because people are polite. It disappears when someone is willing to confront it directly, document it carefully, and prosecute it without fear. I’ve done that work before. I know what it costs. And I know why the establishment would rather stop me now than deal with what comes later. The culture of corruption in Columbia didn’t grow overnight. It won’t end overnight either. But it will end, not with speeches or slogans, but with enforcement. That’s what scares them.

David Pascoe

173,049 次观看 • 5 个月前

🇺🇸🇮🇷🇮🇱 Robert Gates said what a lot of people have suspected for years. Netanyahu has been lobbying U.S. presidents to strike Iran for a long time… For years. Gates served as CIA Director and Defense Secretary across 2 administrations, he was in those rooms where it all happened. So when he says Israel has been pushing America toward military confrontation with Iran, that's not a conspiracy theory. The question now: whose war is this? CBS News

🇺🇸🇮🇷🇮🇱 Robert Gates said what a lot of people have suspected for years. Netanyahu has been lobbying U.S. presidents to strike Iran for a long time… For years. Gates served as CIA Director and Defense Secretary across 2 administrations, he was in those rooms where it all happened. So when he says Israel has been pushing America toward military confrontation with Iran, that's not a conspiracy theory. The question now: whose war is this? CBS News

Mario Nawfal

31,257 次观看 • 3 个月前

Sky's Kamali Melbourne asks David Lammy about a reported U.S. strike on a school in Iran on the first day of the war and if the UK has assessed what happened. The deputy PM says he is not aware of any assessment, and it is for the U.S. to comment.

Sky's Kamali Melbourne asks David Lammy about a reported U.S. strike on a school in Iran on the first day of the war and if the UK has assessed what happened. The deputy PM says he is not aware of any assessment, and it is for the U.S. to comment.

Sky News

13,699 次观看 • 5 个月前

These are the facts. Yesterday, he explicitly stated that declaring a state of emergency doesn’t remove the governor. Today, he’s claiming that the president is in a precarious situation. Watch the entire video until the end. He said expressly no be can declare state of emergency in Nigeria and remove the governor but Pres.Tinubu did, so why can’t he say Expressly President Tinubu was wrong. He stated boldly no body can declare state of emergency in Nigeria and remove the governor he said if anyone tried it they will fail. So when Tinubu tried it 2 hours why didn’t he say Tinubu is operating an illegal law! He then said the president was pushed to declare state of emergency? Based on his argument yesterday why didn’t he say the president has no powers to declare state of emergency and suspend the governor He then pushes the argument to the National Assembly to decide which is a grand pivot mechanism. I have been in this business for 20 years so I know a pivot. The same 1961 law that he claimed didn’t exist ( he called it an antiquated law/ an illegal law)yesterday is now the same law he claims some lawyers informed him is still active. Before I intervened today, I watched the video multiple times and noticed that the speaker had pivoted. If he adheres to the constitution he quoted the previous day, why can’t he explicitly condemn President Tinubu in the same manner as he condemned Obasanjo in his previous intervention? It’s evident that he’s playing a strategic game. All the other things he said were to prolong the situation and ultimately support President Tinubu while citing the opinions of some lawyers, the same law he discarded the previous day. I’ve shared the entire video for accountability. We’re also aware of other events that transpired yesterday.

These are the facts. Yesterday, he explicitly stated that declaring a state of emergency doesn’t remove the governor. Today, he’s claiming that the president is in a precarious situation. Watch the entire video until the end. He said expressly no be can declare state of emergency in Nigeria and remove the governor but Pres.Tinubu did, so why can’t he say Expressly President Tinubu was wrong. He stated boldly no body can declare state of emergency in Nigeria and remove the governor he said if anyone tried it they will fail. So when Tinubu tried it 2 hours why didn’t he say Tinubu is operating an illegal law! He then said the president was pushed to declare state of emergency? Based on his argument yesterday why didn’t he say the president has no powers to declare state of emergency and suspend the governor He then pushes the argument to the National Assembly to decide which is a grand pivot mechanism. I have been in this business for 20 years so I know a pivot. The same 1961 law that he claimed didn’t exist ( he called it an antiquated law/ an illegal law)yesterday is now the same law he claims some lawyers informed him is still active. Before I intervened today, I watched the video multiple times and noticed that the speaker had pivoted. If he adheres to the constitution he quoted the previous day, why can’t he explicitly condemn President Tinubu in the same manner as he condemned Obasanjo in his previous intervention? It’s evident that he’s playing a strategic game. All the other things he said were to prolong the situation and ultimately support President Tinubu while citing the opinions of some lawyers, the same law he discarded the previous day. I’ve shared the entire video for accountability. We’re also aware of other events that transpired yesterday.

oseni rufai

41,108 次观看 • 1 年前

BANNON: Now they’re saying a “Freudian slip” is going to ruin Acting AG Todd Blanche’s confirmation. What was the slip? They asked, “Are you a friend of the president?” He said, “No, I’m not the friend of the president. I’m his lawyer. I was his lawyer.” He’s saying the same thing. I’m not his buddy. I’m not a friend of his. I am his lawyer. I was his lawyer. They’re saying that Freudian slip, where he says “is,” shows that Todd Blanche is going to be so biased that they have to vote against him.

BANNON: Now they’re saying a “Freudian slip” is going to ruin Acting AG Todd Blanche’s confirmation. What was the slip? They asked, “Are you a friend of the president?” He said, “No, I’m not the friend of the president. I’m his lawyer. I was his lawyer.” He’s saying the same thing. I’m not his buddy. I’m not a friend of his. I am his lawyer. I was his lawyer. They’re saying that Freudian slip, where he says “is,” shows that Todd Blanche is going to be so biased that they have to vote against him.

Grace Chong, MBI

35,264 次观看 • 29 天前