正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
I asked Rep. Eric Burlison the same question regarding an update on the missing scientists. “I think they are centering their investigation around General McCasland… we need to figure out what happened to him.” I appreciate that Burlison took the time to provide a thoughtful response, unlike Tim Burchett.... show more
0 条评论
暂无评论
原始帖子的评论将显示在这里
![🚨 This is important... 🚨 "If you don't clear [Grusch's] record and demonstrate that you're able to make him right. You're sending a message to everybody else...that you're going to get punished if you come forward." ~Rep. Eric Burlison (Burlison is the only MAGA politician who's willing to call out the Trump administration like this, on the UFO topic. It's subtle, but it's there. So what happens if they don't do this for Grusch? What will Burlison say and do? To me, if they don't do this for Grusch, we'll know that the Trump administration isn't serious about Disclosure. And why is he the only MAGA pol wiling to speak like this when it comes to the Trump admin? Where are Rep. Anna Paulina Luna and Rep. Tim Burchett Press Office? We need them to speak up on these types of issues. And I'm only including a minute of what Matt Laslo got from Burlison so people can go support him by clicking on his YT videos and tweets, and subscribe to the only guy in DC who is trying to get us UAP answers from Congress on a daily basis.) Laslo: "What's up with these whispers about Grusch maybe getting his NDA waived?" Rep. Eric Burlison: "It needs to get... Well, he'll waive it. What he needs is his clearances all brought back." (Will Trump issue a SF-312 NDA waiver so Grusch can share a lot more of what he knows with the public?) Dr. Eric Davis to me in July... Davis: "Trump did NOT issue a SF-312 NDA waiver for us whistleblowers to reveal classified information to the public." ~ Laslo: "Are you talking with Stephen Miller and them about that?" Burlison: "Yes, I've been tenacious about that...because, to me, if you don't clear his record and demonstrate that you're able to make him right. You're sending a message to everybody else who might wanna come forward that you're going to get punished if you come forward." (I think we need a lot more in order for whistleblowers to feel comfortable enough to come forward, but this would be a good first step.) Laslo: "Would that be the President himself giving him that waiver? Or, what would that look like?" Burlison: "Yeah, I mean, honestly, the administration... And I've talked to them... They will readily admit that it was probably, they probably went too far with him." (Who are "they"?) Laslo: "Interesting." Burlison: "Yeah, they didn't need to make..." Laslo: "Who would admit that? FBI?" Burlison: "I'm not gonna say, because..yeah. Just out of a level of confidence.." (Great question by Laslo, as we REALLY need to know who admitted that. I'll link to the rest of the interview in the replies. They talk about the FBI, DoE, CIA, and FFRDCs.)](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2095895124970807452/amplify_video_thumb/2095894838357184512/img/aPDjWn3TYacQ1BYX.jpg)
![🔥 Burlison: UFOs Have Moved from Priority 598 of 600, up to the Top Ten - We Have Requested UFO-Related Files in a Letter to Gabbard, Rubio and Hegseth 🔥 Rep. Eric Burlison: "This is what I was told last week. They (people in the Trump administration who have investigated UAP) said, 'Congressman, prior to last week, and the President's [Truth Social post on UFOs], this was probably,' and I think this was just a random number, but they said, 'number 598 out of the 600 priorities that we had. But now it's in the top 10. "So...it's clear to me, and having met the new staff that have been sourced to this, to dedicate to this topic, and these are serious scientists and investigators, I think that that we're gonna see a lot of movement." (I'd love to know who these scientists and investigators are, and I hope they are not connected to the UFO subject. We need fresh voices.) Leslie Kean: "What are the next steps that need to happen? So [Trump] has put this message out, but does he have to issue an Executive Order (EO)? What kind of steps need to be made to formalize it more and to actually make it start, and what would be the process by which the information would be disclosed?" Burlison: "Yeah, it's my hope that he does an Executive Order, and then, in addition, I think that we should make it permanent through the UAP Disclosure Act, because I don't think that the investigation will...this topic is not gonna stop when Trump leaves the White House. This is going to be a continuing topic. Hopefully, we get all of the information up to date that we can out to the American people, to the world, but again, this is going to be, I certainly wanna put something in statute or in federal law so that it outlasts President Trump. So I think that that's important." (Remember how many people said the EO was already issued, based on Hegseth mentioning it in an interview? Myself, and a few others, told you that that was NOT the case. A post on Truth Social, while helpful, is NOT an EO. We need the latter.) Burlison: "So I'm trying to lead the effort to try to encourage the White House to do an Executive Order, because I think it will have teeth in it. But even just as a statement on Truth Social, that was a green light for a lot of these agencies who have wanted to investigate this topic and dedicate resources to it. It, basically, was giving them permission to do what they've been wanting to do. And so, that in and of itself is a big win." (Let's hope these agencies play ball. I'll believe it when I see it.) Burlison: "And the other thing that it's giving is, me and our team, you know, that's being led by Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, a little bit more, you know, authority, if you will. And I'm announcing this with you right now, is that we put out a letter that was sent yesterday to Marco Rubio, to Pete Hegseth, to Tulsi Gabbard and to Chris Wright in the DOE. That is a letter from myself, that's signed by Nancy Mace, Eli Crane, Scott Perry, Anna Paulina Luna, Tim Burchett, [Suhas] Subramanyam - a Democrat member, and Andre Carson, who's a Democrat member. "So, of note is the two individuals on this list (Perry and Carson are on the HPSCI) that signed this letter are on the Intelligence Committee. So you have the Task Force and members of intelligence committee asking for, basically, following up on the President's [Truth Social post], and then furthermore, specifically, giving a list of items: file names that and the dates of these files, the metadata on these files that we are we're aware of, but we do not have the files themselves. And so this letter is requesting that Congress get...that we're able to see these files, specifically." (Fingers crossed this bears fruit and we get some of these files made public. I won't be holding my breath. Also, I like how Burlison included "the world" when he said this: "Hopefully, we get all of the information up to date that we can out to the American people, to the world." This is not an American issue.)](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2030357848820265222/amplify_video_thumb/2030355270967382016/img/H6HXEYP0rI04EXHQ.jpg)
![🔥 Burlison to Trump: "Just waive [NDAs] completely for anything related to...non-human intelligence." 🔥 (Yes!!! He gets it. Burlison is one of the few Rs who will push (even if it's gently) the Trump admin on these issues. Make it right for whistleblowers like Grusch, Dylan Borland, Matthew and others.) Rep. Eric Burlison: "...the cost of pensions, their medical benefits, you know, etc. I think that, first and foremost, you got to make it right to those people. That will demonstrate to everybody else who wants to come forward that it's a safe place to come into. "And then I think what what Rep. Anna Paulina Luna is leading on is fantastic, in that making sure that the administration knows that there may be some times where these individuals who were working, you know, they were promoted into a system or a program. Sometimes...they're now inheriting things where they, where they realize, well, there's crimes involved in this. "And so, you know, they're kind of put in an awkward situation. Do they do their patriotic duty? What do they do? I think that providing some level of amnesty for them to be able to come forward is very, very important. And then, I finally think, also, that they need to waive the non-disclosure agreements on this topic. Particularly just waive it completely for anything related to the knowledge of life that's outside, you know, non-human intelligence. I mean, I don't see why we possibly should even allow that to be a top secret thing. "And so, if there's anything that's related to that, it should be waived. I think that that's what our ask is of this administration, as well as to continue digging into the private sector. I think that a lot of this information is in the in the hands of either the...or the archives of these federally-funded research and development centers and then further some of the some of the prime subs (subcontractors) that have been working on this topic. "And so I think that it's gonna take making it clear that to our major companies that we do business with, or do business with the United States, that it's okay to come forward. And I think that we're gonna have to have a discussion if they do have - if they're reverse engineering stuff that they got because it was from non-human intelligence - we need to make sure that we can have that conversation about intellectual property, so that those are the next steps."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2070156660132470811/amplify_video_thumb/2070153614874828800/img/pNcDajnAL8J3YoPR.jpg)
![SCOOP: Burlison's planning to "work with the White House on language" for updated UAPDA Who? Rep. Eric Burlison (R-MO) — Oversight Committee & Secrets Task Force Ask a Pol asks: The annual NDAA — or National Defense Authorization Act — season’s coming soon. Do you think there might be more support for something like Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Sen. Mike Rounds’ UAP Disclosure Act this time around? Key Burlison: “I do,” Rep. Eric Burlison exclusively tells Ask a Pol UAP. “The time that I spent [last year] talking to these Committee Chairs in both the House and Senate has at least loosened the soil. So I think that’ll give me an opportunity when I go back and have the conversation, it’s not going to be a fresh topic to them.” LISTEN — full interview & transcript at Ask a Pol UAP on Substack.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2040031836823310458/amplify_video_thumb/2040031781571772416/img/MUShMzASRFWUGcSN.jpg)
