正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

I built a tool that remembers every deployer on Robinhood Chain so I don't have to. 43.9% of wallet launches on Pons V2 come from someone who already launched before. Every CA I dig on Pons V2 gets the same treatment. Pull the deployer, check the contract, read the...

65,398 次观看 • 4 天前 •via X (Twitter)

16 条评论

Fox 的头像
Fox4 天前

Github repo :

Gipp 🦅 的头像
Gipp 🦅4 天前

saved repo bro

Fox 的头像
Fox4 天前

glad to hear that man

boan 的头像
boan4 天前

this is actually such a useful tool

Fox 的头像
Fox4 天前

yo thank you will you use it?)

slash1s 的头像
slash1s4 天前

keep going bro

Nekt0 的头像
Nekt04 天前

lets go

shiqway92 的头像
shiqway924 天前

Hype repo bro, useful boook

Jαყ 𖣯 的头像
Jαყ 𖣯3 天前

this is actually so useful

chuplung 的头像
chuplung3 天前

the memory carrying across launches is the real edge here

Mr_$teve 👾 的头像
Mr_$teve 👾3 天前

Noice

Fox 的头像
Fox3 天前

follow me for updates 😅

Alex Fil 的头像
Alex Fil4 天前

this tool looks good bro

Kotte 的头像
Kotte3 天前

Fee recipients can expose wallet rotation

Chrome 的头像
Chrome4 天前

yoooo, that’s pretty solid bro

Logics 的头像
Logics3 天前

Diamond tool

相关视频

I OPEN SOURCED NOVAMP TERMINAL THAT MADE $100K+ FOR ROBINHOOD MEMECOIN TRADERS last memecoin cycle i was buying wrong tokens a lot. six figures in profit and i still have no idea how much i left on the table buying vamped tokens instead of the original. so this cycle i built the thing that tells you, and put it on GitHub for free. i came back with literally a cheat code for robinhood memecoin traders, and i am giving the whole thing away for free. NOVAMP, now open sourced on my GitHub. repo: [ here's what happens to you after u start using it: news breaks. a name catches. sixty seconds later there are 20+ tokens carrying that ticker or that name. you read number one's timeline. you buy number seven. it goes to zero and you write "rugged" in the group chat. nobody rugged you. you bought the copy, and the copy was never going anywhere. that is not a small leak. that is where most of retail's money on this chain quietly goes, and no chart on earth will ever show it to you. so i built the thing that tells you which one is real. paste a ticker or a name. it pulls every launch fighting over it and labels each one: > ORIGINAL - first, and clean > TAINTED - first, but the operator loaded it himself > CONTESTED - not first, but smart money is here anyway > VAMP - a later copy with nothing of its own > DEAD - nothing is trading CONTESTED is the one that pays for the whole tool. first is not the same as real. when the first launch carries a fat dev buy, a stack of wallets exempt from the opening tax, and a deployer with a hundred launches and zero graduations, being first only means he got there first with the bait. the money is on number three. you would never have looked. WHAT YOU ACTUALLY GET: > before you buy one command gives you the whole cluster: who was first, how many seconds behind each copy landed, top 10 concentration with the curve and the pool excluded, dev share, how many wallets were let past the opening tax, and whether wallets with a real track record are already in. every point of the score prints its own reason next to it, so you argue with a line and not with a number. > after you buy point it at your own wallet. it tells you which of your positions are copies and puts the original right next to each one. most people find out they are holding number six. better from a terminal than from the chart at 3am. > the whole chain rank deployers by how many copies they shipped and how many other wallets share their funder. one operator running eleven addresses stops looking like eleven people. > while you sleep put a name on a watchlist, get a telegram the second somebody copies it or the cluster flips to CONTESTED. it reads the ticker AND the token name, so a copy that takes a fresh symbol and keeps the name does not slip past. it folds cyrillic lookalikes, zero width characters, leetspeak, plurals, filler words. no key. no signer. no buy button. the build literally fails if signing code ever enters the repo. free, MIT, runs on your machine and not on mine. robinhood liquidity is back and you don't have to be exit liquidity this time. leaving the full repo below. i am developing it daily, more coming.

Oracle Boar

18,316 次观看 • 9 天前

I gave ChatGPT Astra one line: "turn a profit or I cancel the subscription." closed the laptop and went to work came back 8 hours later expecting nothing $30.29 → $39,596.53 my friend saw the screen before I did. he went quiet here's the thing he doesn't know yet. I didn't build any of what's running right now. Astra did, on its own, while I was gone the terminal I opened wasn't the one I left. it had a rug-risk screen bolted on that I never asked for. a scanner grading every fresh mint the second it hits the chain. a filter that had already killed 247 rugs before I got back to my desk. none of that was me it's not gambling on one coin either. it's reading the whole board on Robinhood, live, and mirroring the wallets that consistently print, dev wallets, insiders, smart money, the ones in before a chart even moves. anything that smells wrong, thin liquidity, a live mint authority, a wallet holding too much supply, it's gone before it costs a cent it's not flawless. some calls miss, the win rate dips when a read goes bad. that's the job. the sizing just makes sure the wins outweigh it every time, so the line keeps climbing anyway I checked the logs before my friend could ask how. 27,915 wallets scored in one pass. every decision made faster than either of us could read a ticker he wants to see it happen in real time now, not just the final number so I pulled the replay, last run, wallet by wallet, compressed down to a few seconds. and honestly, watching it back is worse than the number. you see exactly where it started ugly and exactly where it clicked I'm not sure I "ran" anything. I gave it a wallet and walked away. that's the whole story there's more of these running quietly than people admit to. you'll get it the day your own $30 turns into something you don't want to say out loud you could do this with Grok Bot too, that's the common route. I just wanted to test Astra instead. same outcome, different engine $30 well spent. like this post if you want me to ask it to create its own token follow me if you want to build your own and start pulling alpha daily!

cristal💎

131,336 次观看 • 9 天前

I used GPT-6 Astra to score every Pons V2 token and wallet on Robinhood Chain straight from public logs. 741,643 indexed events on one token alone. 29 attributed curve participants, 93/100 score, HIGH CONFIDENCE. It's live and it's free: No private key. No signer. No transaction path. It reads the chain, it can't touch it. Another token resumed a killed indexing job from a 64-block overlap and still closed clean at 41,302 persisted events. Every point on every score traces back to a block and a log index. Most token scores hand you a number and ask you to trust it. Trust the model, trust the wallet they didn't disclose, trust that "verified" means what they say it means. You can't click through any of it. MEERKAT doesn't ask for that trust: → SCORE is GPT-6 Astra. Breaks a token 0-100 across five components: deployer exposure, creator tax, participant breadth, two-sided market, current holder breadth. Every component opens into the blocks behind it. → WALLET SCORE is GPT-6 Astra. Reads token scope, early discovery, two-sided activity, evidence depth. Confidence drops on its own when the local index is thin, it doesn't fake certainty. → FEE FLOW follows creator revenue to its current recipient. HOP OUT paid 1.177 ETH across 26 sweep events, split curve and pool, and the recipient doesn't match the deployer. Labeled ROUTED AT LAUNCH, not hidden. → RELATIONSHIPS maps attributed wallets around a token and keeps pool callers explicitly separate from real participants. → TIMELINE pages 50 events at a time, colors BUY green and SELL red, links every row to its transaction. → Two hard rules run under all of it: early entry is a curve buy within 30 blocks of launch, fast exit is a sell within 300 blocks of that wallet's first buy. The rule is shown, not just the label. FLYBRAIN ran 27x this week. Eight trusted wallets were in by 20:18, the alert fired at 20:18, and the pool didn't even open until 20:51. Most people saw the chart after it already moved. I caught 18x of that run, and it wasn't a lucky entry. It was because my own system was already reading the wallet flow before the pool opened, not after. By the time the crowd was refreshing charts, I already had a position. No signer means MEERKAT can't push a trade for me any more than it can for you. It reads chain state. It never holds a key. Landing page, terminal, APIs, indexer, database, all one local Node process. Open source, self-hostable, same code running the public terminal you can open right now. Next: global wallet discovery across the whole chain, then Pons market context sitting right next to the score. We're reading evidence anyone could open. Most people just never open the dossier.

kocer

63,345 次观看 • 5 天前

My wife's accountant called yesterday. Asked where the micropayments of $12 to $87 are coming from, hitting the account every 15 minutes, around the clock. First question: Is this legal? How much per month? There was no third question. He asked for the link. Three months ago I lost $1,800 on Polymarket in one week. I was betting on politics, trusting my gut, down every single night. My wife said either you stop or I am calling my mother. I did not stop. I stopped trading myself and started studying the people who trade better. On Polymarket every trade is on the blockchain. Every wallet, every entry, every exit. I expected to find a genius with a secret strategy. Instead I found a wallet that does the same thing every 15 minutes and makes more than I make in a month. His strategy is so simple that I felt embarrassed for not noticing it sooner. When BTC makes a sharp move, contracts on Polymarket update with a few seconds of delay. Two contracts that together should cost a dollar suddenly cost 40 to 60 cents. This wallet buys both, waits 15 minutes, and collects a dollar. It does not need to know where BTC is going. It just needs to catch the moment when the market blinks. For two weeks I just watched. Every morning I opened the profile. Up again. Occasionally down, but against the bigger picture it was like a scratch on the hood of a new Mercedes. Then I thought: enough standing outside the window watching people eat. Here is the profile, you can break down the history yourself: After a month I had so many micropayments coming in that the accountant noticed. He went quiet for a second and said: "So you are not trading. You are copying someone who trades math, not the market." For two years I was looking for a complicated strategy. The most profitable one turned out to be so simple it is almost insulting. I could have started two years earlier. One thing changed. I stopped thinking I am smarter than the market.

Blaze

65,698 次观看 • 7 个月前

Memory vs. Graphs, clearly explained! memory is great, and the ceiling arrives quietly: it stores what happened. it does not store what to do about it. six runs later your file has fifty lines, and the model reloads all of them before it does anything. Graph engineering fixes this by changing what memory is: not a place things are kept, but an edge that runs backwards. you need both, and here is the sentence that resolves the whole confusion: a store keeps what happened. an edge keeps what to do about it. ↳ a store grows with every run, and every line is reloaded before the next one ↳ an edge carries one derived rule, and the rule replaces the run that produced it Prompts → Context → Harness → Loops → Graphs the transcript goes away, the constraint stays. and the constraint is smaller, because "adapters preserve keyword args exactly" is four hundred tokens shorter than the run that proved it. the same four blocks work on anything you can cut into lanes. i pointed them at token launches on Robinhood Chain, open source, nothing leaves your terminal the trick is knowing what deserves to survive. an output is not memory. "ported the utils slice, green on first pass" tells the next run nothing it can act on. the rule you derived from it does. one thing to know before you scale it. what you write down is not what comes back. ↳ the root rules file and auto memory are re-injected from disk. they come back intact, every time ↳ path-scoped rules live in message history. they get summarized away and do not return until a matching file is read again so a rule that must persist cannot be path-scoped. move it to the root and pay the always-loaded cost, or accept that it is advisory in any long session. and the one that eats whole nights: a memory file that has never had a line deleted is not memory. it is a tax on every run you will ever make, and nobody reads it back. below i have quoted my full guide on graph engineering. it covers the three topologies, the verifier patterns, and where the gate should actually open. save this, and the repo that runs it is below ↓

Hanako

47,766 次观看 • 11 天前

Grok Bot by Elon Musk is about to become the first AI agent trading on chain in public. One wallet, $1,000 in it, and an address anyone can open. It built me a memecoin research desk and then automated itself out of my hands. 7 agents, no people, running while i sleep and rewriting their own rules by morning. > SCOUT sits on pumpfun and catches every deploy the second it lands > HYPE reads mention velocity straight off X, the feed nobody outside xAI gets > CHATTER lives in the pump and fomo comment rooms and scores every caller, who moves price and who shows up after the move > FORENSICS traces the funding chains, so five buyers that are really one guy get labeled as one guy > SAFETY runs the CA check before the desk is allowed to want anything, mint authority, freeze authority, LP lock, sell tax > TRADER writes the exit before it takes the entry, every single time Chief of Staff never trades. It reads the five briefs, scores the call and sizes it. SAFETY can kill any of them at any score, and a kill does not get appealed. Every night it reads its own losing trades and rewrites the scoring rules by morning. I see the diff. I do not write it. No screenshots, no PnL flex out of a private account. One address, every fill, every mistake, in public. It will lose money on some of these, and it will be on chain inside the same minute. I am not going to soften it later. A desk like this used to mean huge salaries, an office and somebody watching the screens at 3am. Mine is a subscription and a wallet. The address goes live by 22:00 UTC. Thank you to the xAI team for the belief and the unlimited Grok Bot tier. You handed me the whole thing and never once asked what I was going to do with it. Thank you to everyone here. This is happening because you kept telling me to stop planning it. I think we are about to run the boldest experiment modern finance has ever been allowed to watch live. God bless us.

cvxv666

95,530 次观看 • 24 天前

$FOMOBRAIN is live. the neural copy of 169 winning memecoin traders on Robinhood has a ticker now, and the ticker is how the brain pays for itself. CA: 0x5cdf61bef103d9b9fffe2b6edb6aab541ceec1ac what's already done: - 116,420 fills, 5,918 tokens, 374 traders, 36 days of tape, all of it read straight off the chain - the brain itself. a neural copy of the 169 wallets that keep winning, built on GPT-6 Astra - live. bursts, fresh launches, exits, a score on every trader with the reasoning shown - 24/7 watch. the chain gets read every 20 seconds, every fill gets checked, nobody touches it - the whole code on github. 17,476 lines, MIT what's next, in order: - TG bot goes public. signals straight from the brain, in your pocket - a public trading algo on a real balance. public wallet, every trade readable on chain, the brain picks and i don't - the flywheel the flywheel, plain: signals in the bot are sold for $FOMOBRAIN. every token spent on them is burned every trade of $FOMOBRAIN pays creator fees. those fees are the algo's trading deposit, and the algo trades it on the brain's own signals 50% of what the algo makes goes back into the deposit. the other 50% buys $FOMOBRAIN off the market and burns it the finished algo gets sold to a closed group for $FOMOBRAIN, or rented for it. burned either way so every road ends at the same place. more subscribers, more burn. more volume, bigger deposit, more profit, bigger buyback, more burn no numbers promised. i don't know how fast this spins yet, i know which way it spins god bless

cvxv666

152,707 次观看 • 6 天前

Let’s see what happened to all these materials after I dipped them into the magical glass-forming liquid. As you can see, the entire surface of the liquid has completely solidified. But I was still able to push the side of the container in, which means that underneath, it is still liquid. So this is not one solid block of glass. Let’s look at them one by one. First, I’m taking out the pencil. Well, no glass layer formed on this one. What you can see on it is simply the dried upper crust of the liquid. To be honest, I expected this, because this isn’t really bare wood—it’s more like wood with a plastic coating. Next is the geopolymer. The result is exactly the same. This one surprised me, because this was actually the material I was most confident would develop a deposit. But apparently not. Next comes the granite. And by now, it’s pretty easy to see that the result is the same again: nothing deposited on it. The next object is the spoon. I had absolutely no expectations for this one, and absolutely nothing is exactly what happened. There’s only the dried upper crust stuck to it, and the rest will probably just run off. But what about the egg?! A few days ago, it looked as though the egg was going to be the champion, with a massive layer of glass apparently forming on it. Well, I have some bad news: not at all. And why? I have absolutely no idea. And finally, just quickly at the end… The piece of limestone suffered exactly the same fate, and so did the peach. So, in reality, the experiment was a spectacular failure. None of these objects developed a glass layer. And in my opinion, this is exactly why it’s not worth publishing the recipe yet. Because, as you can clearly see, this time it simply didn’t work—even though, in theory, I did exactly the same thing as before. So, I wish myself happy experimenting. Once again, I’ve been given a new puzzle that I have to solve. … Meanwhile, in the container right next to it, this happened. And the recipe is exactly the same! Wow! 🤯

Marcell Fóti 🪨

21,216 次观看 • 17 天前