Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

I came across this video a while ago and it didn’t sit right with me. This is September 12th. Tyler had not been arrested yet. We still didn’t know who the FBI would say killed Charlie. We had a photo of who they were looking for, the engraving on...

RavenGrace0613's profile picture

Raven Grace 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

20,547 subscribers

30,014 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

“Charlie was a product to everybody else. He was not a human being. He was a product that they felt that they had manufactured…and they felt that he was now malfunctioning.” I had said previously that Candace wants us to believe she was Charlie’s only friend, and now she’s just coming right out and saying that. This was her response to Taylor Lorenz of all people (brilliant mind that she is) asking why it seems like only Candace is mourning him as a friend. So when Candace says “everybody else,” she means everybody else. She’s the only exception. It’s propaganda I’m still not falling for. Moreover, for it to be true, Charlie would have to be a naive moron with an awful judge of character.
1:12

“Charlie was a product to everybody else. He was not a human being. He was a product that they felt that they had manufactured…and they felt that he was now malfunctioning.” I had said previously that Candace wants us to believe she was Charlie’s only friend, and now she’s just coming right out and saying that. This was her response to Taylor Lorenz of all people (brilliant mind that she is) asking why it seems like only Candace is mourning him as a friend. So when Candace says “everybody else,” she means everybody else. She’s the only exception. It’s propaganda I’m still not falling for. Moreover, for it to be true, Charlie would have to be a naive moron with an awful judge of character.

Natalie Jean Beisner

36,640 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Candace Owens explains why Erika Kirk’s 100% certainty that Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk made her question whether Erika was somehow complicit. Candace Owens: "How could you sit up there and say, yes I 100% believe Tyler Robinson did it? That right there is why it is impossible for me to think that Erika Kirk is not complicit somehow." Andrew Wilson: "How would it be the case that even if Erika Kirk did believe that Tyler Robinson was 100% responsible for the death of Charlie Kirk, that somehow she's complicit?" Candace Owens: "When I sat down with [Erika] and I was expecting for her to say, well, you know, I'm obviously the victim on the case and we got to see the shot, you know, taken or this or that or whatever, but when I sat down with her, it was nothing, it was nothing."
1:45

Candace Owens explains why Erika Kirk’s 100% certainty that Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk made her question whether Erika was somehow complicit. Candace Owens: "How could you sit up there and say, yes I 100% believe Tyler Robinson did it? That right there is why it is impossible for me to think that Erika Kirk is not complicit somehow." Andrew Wilson: "How would it be the case that even if Erika Kirk did believe that Tyler Robinson was 100% responsible for the death of Charlie Kirk, that somehow she's complicit?" Candace Owens: "When I sat down with [Erika] and I was expecting for her to say, well, you know, I'm obviously the victim on the case and we got to see the shot, you know, taken or this or that or whatever, but when I sat down with her, it was nothing, it was nothing."

PBD Podcast

252,104 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

I know many people have seen this video but I’d like to break it down a bit. I found this interesting for the timeline I’ve been putting together. Many of you have seen it. I’ll publish it again soon updated. Mark met Candace before she was anyone at TPUsa? Back in early 2017 at a TPUsa event? This is when she started doing her YouTube videos that took off. Was she stalking conservative events and high profile people to get into the circle? Did she stalk Charlie for months at events? Interesting. I remember her talking once about running around a TPUsa event handing out her cards to people so they’d know who she was. And then when Mark met her he offered to help her financially by giving her 1k a month for her bills. By just meeting her at an event? Because he was impressed with her. And thought she had potential. And she wasn’t a TpUSA employee? She’s good at manipulating for sure then. Then Charlie hires her at TPUsa in November about 6 months later then when Mark met her. That seems to be when she sent Mark the vile text saying she didn’t want to ever talk to him again with no explanation. I think it’s because she didn’t need him anymore. She succeeded in getting Charlie to hire her. It lines up. Then he says Charlie and him are hunting while the Kanye blowup is going on. So it’s really early in the Candace saga when Charlie says he needs to apologize for something. That people don’t change meaning Candace. That was Oct 2018. He says on that trip it was obvious Candace and Charlie had issues. Remember Candace was fired in May of 2019 from TPUsa. So Candace was being vicious from the beginning? I bet she was the one blowing up his phone in this clip. I wonder how long after Charlie hired Candace he regretted it. I bet immediately but he had her sign a contract the day he met her so he was locked in. My question is all this is was she stalking TPUsa events to get hired before Dave Rubin introduced Charle and Candace? Dave met her in early 2017 too. Mark says he tried to warn PragerU and DW about her. And that PragerU ended ugly. Why would these companies hire her after they saw what she had done at TPUsa. That will always confuse me. No matter how popular someone is if your friends are telling you she’s psychotic why would you invite that in? Just thinking out loud. So she’s made enemies with Dave, Mark, Dennis, Jeremy, Andrew, Blake, Mikey and everyone that she’s come into contact with. They all say she’s psycho. But she’s not the problem? Anyone see a pattern? Common denominator?
0:46

I know many people have seen this video but I’d like to break it down a bit. I found this interesting for the timeline I’ve been putting together. Many of you have seen it. I’ll publish it again soon updated. Mark met Candace before she was anyone at TPUsa? Back in early 2017 at a TPUsa event? This is when she started doing her YouTube videos that took off. Was she stalking conservative events and high profile people to get into the circle? Did she stalk Charlie for months at events? Interesting. I remember her talking once about running around a TPUsa event handing out her cards to people so they’d know who she was. And then when Mark met her he offered to help her financially by giving her 1k a month for her bills. By just meeting her at an event? Because he was impressed with her. And thought she had potential. And she wasn’t a TpUSA employee? She’s good at manipulating for sure then. Then Charlie hires her at TPUsa in November about 6 months later then when Mark met her. That seems to be when she sent Mark the vile text saying she didn’t want to ever talk to him again with no explanation. I think it’s because she didn’t need him anymore. She succeeded in getting Charlie to hire her. It lines up. Then he says Charlie and him are hunting while the Kanye blowup is going on. So it’s really early in the Candace saga when Charlie says he needs to apologize for something. That people don’t change meaning Candace. That was Oct 2018. He says on that trip it was obvious Candace and Charlie had issues. Remember Candace was fired in May of 2019 from TPUsa. So Candace was being vicious from the beginning? I bet she was the one blowing up his phone in this clip. I wonder how long after Charlie hired Candace he regretted it. I bet immediately but he had her sign a contract the day he met her so he was locked in. My question is all this is was she stalking TPUsa events to get hired before Dave Rubin introduced Charle and Candace? Dave met her in early 2017 too. Mark says he tried to warn PragerU and DW about her. And that PragerU ended ugly. Why would these companies hire her after they saw what she had done at TPUsa. That will always confuse me. No matter how popular someone is if your friends are telling you she’s psychotic why would you invite that in? Just thinking out loud. So she’s made enemies with Dave, Mark, Dennis, Jeremy, Andrew, Blake, Mikey and everyone that she’s come into contact with. They all say she’s psycho. But she’s not the problem? Anyone see a pattern? Common denominator?

Raven Grace 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

12,435 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🔥WOW…Harpole talks about THE SHOT TYLER ROBINSON TOOK that killed Charlie Kirk at UVU on 9/10. "IT IS A VERY SPECIFIC SPOT" - Shawn Ryan Brian Harpole says "He wants to know when he got on the roof. 3 meters to the left & to the right..THERE WAS NO SHOT. DID YOU GET ALL THAT OF GOOGLE?" Shawn Ryan says "IT HAD TO HAVE BEEN REHEARSED." Harpole also says that someone early that day had a drone up but it is not UNCOMMON for the AV team to use a drone. Once again a lot of this goes back to relying on the Chief of UVU and the belief that they had those roofs covered. And like I said that day..how did they know the exact perfect spot for that shot when Charlie NEVER did an event there? When was the tent SETUP? This wasn’t announced to the public under about 8/29..so when did he scout this? Did he go before? How was he lucky enough to know that THE UVU POLICE WOULD NOT cover that staircase. Why didn’t UVU ask for police assistance from Orem PD who are ALLOWED TO FLY DRONES?
7:39

🔥WOW…Harpole talks about THE SHOT TYLER ROBINSON TOOK that killed Charlie Kirk at UVU on 9/10. "IT IS A VERY SPECIFIC SPOT" - Shawn Ryan Brian Harpole says "He wants to know when he got on the roof. 3 meters to the left & to the right..THERE WAS NO SHOT. DID YOU GET ALL THAT OF GOOGLE?" Shawn Ryan says "IT HAD TO HAVE BEEN REHEARSED." Harpole also says that someone early that day had a drone up but it is not UNCOMMON for the AV team to use a drone. Once again a lot of this goes back to relying on the Chief of UVU and the belief that they had those roofs covered. And like I said that day..how did they know the exact perfect spot for that shot when Charlie NEVER did an event there? When was the tent SETUP? This wasn’t announced to the public under about 8/29..so when did he scout this? Did he go before? How was he lucky enough to know that THE UVU POLICE WOULD NOT cover that staircase. Why didn’t UVU ask for police assistance from Orem PD who are ALLOWED TO FLY DRONES?

Johnny St.Pete

77,483 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Candace deleted this video off every platform. It was the first podcast she did with PragerU. Now why would she want this particular video taken down right after Charlie died? It was up in Sept. I watched the entire video. Now it's gone. This is why Charlie didn't want to deal with the wrath of Candace. Just remember while watching the video the look on Charlie's face while she says it. Can you imagine her calling him up in the middle of the night crying, yelling and screaming at him like a raging lunatic? Also, remember she wouldn't go to the events and hang out with the students. A lot of the times she wouldn't show at all. She would demand to be taken back to the hotel immediately after any of the events. The hurt and the angst I believe came from Erika showing up on the scene. Notice how she tries to make it Charlie and Candace and everyone ties their names together. She was trying to make that connection as something between them. Then later in the video she jokes that everyone thought that her and Charlie were dating and people were disappointed to learn that they weren't a couple. I may have that clip, but I will have to look for it. This is right after she was asked to leave from TPUSA the first time over the "Hitler" comments. I don't think it was the Hitler comments. Can you imagine being Charlie and Erika and having to travel with Candace? I don't think it went well.
0:41

Candace deleted this video off every platform. It was the first podcast she did with PragerU. Now why would she want this particular video taken down right after Charlie died? It was up in Sept. I watched the entire video. Now it's gone. This is why Charlie didn't want to deal with the wrath of Candace. Just remember while watching the video the look on Charlie's face while she says it. Can you imagine her calling him up in the middle of the night crying, yelling and screaming at him like a raging lunatic? Also, remember she wouldn't go to the events and hang out with the students. A lot of the times she wouldn't show at all. She would demand to be taken back to the hotel immediately after any of the events. The hurt and the angst I believe came from Erika showing up on the scene. Notice how she tries to make it Charlie and Candace and everyone ties their names together. She was trying to make that connection as something between them. Then later in the video she jokes that everyone thought that her and Charlie were dating and people were disappointed to learn that they weren't a couple. I may have that clip, but I will have to look for it. This is right after she was asked to leave from TPUSA the first time over the "Hitler" comments. I don't think it was the Hitler comments. Can you imagine being Charlie and Erika and having to travel with Candace? I don't think it went well.

Raven Grace - Operative #22/92

139,506 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Two things. First I should finish watching a video before I make comments on it. I didn’t realize Candace herself says the camera was on the inside of his shirt in 2025. Candace Charlie wasn’t an idiot. He knew why they were putting it on the inside of the shirt. Don’t you think he’d be a part of the change on how it was worn? He was Not a frog. Smh. And second. If her followers still believe her after the second video here where the demonstrator puts it on the way Charlie has it on there’s no helping them. But did you guys see her face. She knew her team had F’d up and put too much info out there. Lmao. Candace that sucked for you but your face was priceless. You were so pissed they let it run that long. When she does the little sniff it’s a sign she’s mad, happens every time. Remember she did it when Elizebeth said she had a dream about Charlie? Is someone getting fired?
1:00

Two things. First I should finish watching a video before I make comments on it. I didn’t realize Candace herself says the camera was on the inside of his shirt in 2025. Candace Charlie wasn’t an idiot. He knew why they were putting it on the inside of the shirt. Don’t you think he’d be a part of the change on how it was worn? He was Not a frog. Smh. And second. If her followers still believe her after the second video here where the demonstrator puts it on the way Charlie has it on there’s no helping them. But did you guys see her face. She knew her team had F’d up and put too much info out there. Lmao. Candace that sucked for you but your face was priceless. You were so pissed they let it run that long. When she does the little sniff it’s a sign she’s mad, happens every time. Remember she did it when Elizebeth said she had a dream about Charlie? Is someone getting fired?

Raven Grace 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

17,916 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Everyone’s SCARED of Candace Owens — Even Megyn Kelly & Jack Posobiec?! Kelly had close associate of TPUSA on yesterday "who is another person who will never mention Candace and it makes me rage... I do not understand why they tolerate Jack's silence." In today's from the Chicks on the Right podcast, host Mock addressed Megyn Kelly's recent comments on the Charlie thing. Mock said, "And so Megyn Kelly, she is now trying to act as though she has never bought into any of the conspiracies. The evidence is overwhelming now. She is on that side. It is absolutely mesmerizing to watch her bounce all over the place." Mock continued by questioning Kelly's reasons for the shift and stated, "Why do you think she is doing it? I am just curious. Like do you think it is because of clicks? Because I think she does everything because of clicks. I think she is smart enough to realize that the evidence against Tyler Robinson is overwhelming and she is going to have to own that but also she refuses to address Candace directly. So she just will not. She is afraid of Candace. I do not think she wants her wrath and so she is trying to fence it a little bit. They do not want the wrath. A lot of people, so many people are afraid of her and I do not get it." Mock expressed further frustration about other figures avoiding direct mention of Candace and said, "So here she had on Jack Posobiec yesterday who is another person who will never mention Candace and it makes me rage. I know that he is very close with the folks at TPUSA. I do not understand why they tolerate Jack's silence, Benny's silence, Tucker, all of it. It makes me insane." The podcast hosts then shared a clip from Megyn Kelly's program. In the clip, Kelly stated, "Ridiculous. It is surveillance video. We are lucky it exists at all. And some people who refuse to believe that Tyler Robinson did this have been saying for quite some time, 'Oh, but there is no video of the actual shooting. Oh, it is so convenient how they only have him running across the roof.' And then we actually find out there is video of the actual moment the shooter drops down and pulls the trigger.
1:43

Everyone’s SCARED of Candace Owens — Even Megyn Kelly & Jack Posobiec?! Kelly had close associate of TPUSA on yesterday "who is another person who will never mention Candace and it makes me rage... I do not understand why they tolerate Jack's silence." In today's from the Chicks on the Right podcast, host Mock addressed Megyn Kelly's recent comments on the Charlie thing. Mock said, "And so Megyn Kelly, she is now trying to act as though she has never bought into any of the conspiracies. The evidence is overwhelming now. She is on that side. It is absolutely mesmerizing to watch her bounce all over the place." Mock continued by questioning Kelly's reasons for the shift and stated, "Why do you think she is doing it? I am just curious. Like do you think it is because of clicks? Because I think she does everything because of clicks. I think she is smart enough to realize that the evidence against Tyler Robinson is overwhelming and she is going to have to own that but also she refuses to address Candace directly. So she just will not. She is afraid of Candace. I do not think she wants her wrath and so she is trying to fence it a little bit. They do not want the wrath. A lot of people, so many people are afraid of her and I do not get it." Mock expressed further frustration about other figures avoiding direct mention of Candace and said, "So here she had on Jack Posobiec yesterday who is another person who will never mention Candace and it makes me rage. I know that he is very close with the folks at TPUSA. I do not understand why they tolerate Jack's silence, Benny's silence, Tucker, all of it. It makes me insane." The podcast hosts then shared a clip from Megyn Kelly's program. In the clip, Kelly stated, "Ridiculous. It is surveillance video. We are lucky it exists at all. And some people who refuse to believe that Tyler Robinson did this have been saying for quite some time, 'Oh, but there is no video of the actual shooting. Oh, it is so convenient how they only have him running across the roof.' And then we actually find out there is video of the actual moment the shooter drops down and pulls the trigger.

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

19,960 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Ben Shapiro to Megyn Kelly: “This is why, you know, I think you and I differ on our angle with regard to, for example, Candace Owens. I think that what Candace Owens is doing right now is evil. It is evil what she is doing right now, OK? And I say that, again—” Megyn Kelly: “I didn’t opine on whether it’s evil or not. But my position is: it’s really none of my business and—” Ben Shapiro: “Why is it-, but I have a question: why is it none of your business? I mean, you comment on these things for a living.” Megyn Kelly: “I’m not mother of the internet.” Ben Shapiro: “No, but if this were on the left and somebody were accusing Charlie Kirk of his wife having mu*dered him, I assume that you would be talking about it.”
1:14

Ben Shapiro to Megyn Kelly: “This is why, you know, I think you and I differ on our angle with regard to, for example, Candace Owens. I think that what Candace Owens is doing right now is evil. It is evil what she is doing right now, OK? And I say that, again—” Megyn Kelly: “I didn’t opine on whether it’s evil or not. But my position is: it’s really none of my business and—” Ben Shapiro: “Why is it-, but I have a question: why is it none of your business? I mean, you comment on these things for a living.” Megyn Kelly: “I’m not mother of the internet.” Ben Shapiro: “No, but if this were on the left and somebody were accusing Charlie Kirk of his wife having mu*dered him, I assume that you would be talking about it.”

RedWave Press

2,134,659 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

“We did send Erika an email on February 24th, 8 days ago, asking specifically how many times and for what duration she had visited Romania in the past. We got no response. Well we did get a response. We got a response from a lawyer saying that she was getting ready for the SOTU and didn’t have time to reply. That was days ago. I feel like she’s had some time to reply but she’s chosen not to.” So let me get this straight: Candace sent an email to Erika AFTER dropping her “Bride of Charlie” hit piece trailer (dropped on February 23, Candace says she emailed on the 24), and she has the nerve to expect Erika and her team to answer? I’m surprised the lawyer didn’t say “go fuck yourself, Candace.” TPUSA and Erika shouldn’t be talking or responding to Candace at all—save to take her dirty ass to court. Erika already flew to Candace and sat with her for 4.5 hours. Candace didn’t change her tune for even a second after that meeting. They’ve given her the benefit of the doubt over and over again; they’ve been gracious. Now they need to not respond to anything and haul her to court.
0:46

“We did send Erika an email on February 24th, 8 days ago, asking specifically how many times and for what duration she had visited Romania in the past. We got no response. Well we did get a response. We got a response from a lawyer saying that she was getting ready for the SOTU and didn’t have time to reply. That was days ago. I feel like she’s had some time to reply but she’s chosen not to.” So let me get this straight: Candace sent an email to Erika AFTER dropping her “Bride of Charlie” hit piece trailer (dropped on February 23, Candace says she emailed on the 24), and she has the nerve to expect Erika and her team to answer? I’m surprised the lawyer didn’t say “go fuck yourself, Candace.” TPUSA and Erika shouldn’t be talking or responding to Candace at all—save to take her dirty ass to court. Erika already flew to Candace and sat with her for 4.5 hours. Candace didn’t change her tune for even a second after that meeting. They’ve given her the benefit of the doubt over and over again; they’ve been gracious. Now they need to not respond to anything and haul her to court.

Natalie Jean Beisner

157,227 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨 A WOMAN IN IRAN JUST PAINTED THIS ON A WALL AND SENT IT TO ME: TRUMP, MEET PAHLAVI. It reached me a few hours ago. She went out in the dark, wrote it herself, filmed it, and said it out loud: "Trump, meet Pahlavi. In memory of those killed on the 8th and 9th of January." The 8th and 9th of January are the two nights the regime shot people in the streets and shut down the internet of an entire country so that nobody could film what they were doing. That is who she dedicated the wall to. She keeps her own face out of the shot and keeps the street in it, so nobody can tell you this is not Iran. She is not asking for another round of talks with the men who did that. She is asking the President of the United States to meet Prince Reza Pahlavi, and to say out loud that he is the man the Iranian people have chosen. It would take him one afternoon. It is also the single thing this regime fears more than anything else. Iranians already chose. The only one missing is Trump. Do you agree? Tell me why or why not. I read every reply. #TrumpMeetPahlavi
0:36

🚨 A WOMAN IN IRAN JUST PAINTED THIS ON A WALL AND SENT IT TO ME: TRUMP, MEET PAHLAVI. It reached me a few hours ago. She went out in the dark, wrote it herself, filmed it, and said it out loud: "Trump, meet Pahlavi. In memory of those killed on the 8th and 9th of January." The 8th and 9th of January are the two nights the regime shot people in the streets and shut down the internet of an entire country so that nobody could film what they were doing. That is who she dedicated the wall to. She keeps her own face out of the shot and keeps the street in it, so nobody can tell you this is not Iran. She is not asking for another round of talks with the men who did that. She is asking the President of the United States to meet Prince Reza Pahlavi, and to say out loud that he is the man the Iranian people have chosen. It would take him one afternoon. It is also the single thing this regime fears more than anything else. Iranians already chose. The only one missing is Trump. Do you agree? Tell me why or why not. I read every reply. #TrumpMeetPahlavi

Armin Navabi

45,138 просмотров • 10 дней назад

ALEX JONES: “I have not commented on the TPUSA and Candace Owens multi-month long soap opera, that has been sucking all the oxygen out of the room and become the only major issue anyone’s talking about literally…I haven’t had time to really investigate all the angles of it…I’m not trying to blame TPUSA, I’m not trying to blame Candace…I haven’t figured out EXACTLY what’s going on yet, but I’ve hit a tipping point on the information, and in the next few days I’m going to cover it…”
2:55

ALEX JONES: “I have not commented on the TPUSA and Candace Owens multi-month long soap opera, that has been sucking all the oxygen out of the room and become the only major issue anyone’s talking about literally…I haven’t had time to really investigate all the angles of it…I’m not trying to blame TPUSA, I’m not trying to blame Candace…I haven’t figured out EXACTLY what’s going on yet, but I’ve hit a tipping point on the information, and in the next few days I’m going to cover it…”

MAGA Kitty

364,539 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

This is the definition of delusional. Sarah Huckabee Sanders says Trump did not start the war in Iran and that he's trying to end it. She directly blames Biden for the Russia-Ukraine war. "It's not a new war. And we have a president who is trying to put a stop to it. This has been going on for decades. This isn't new. We're putting an end to it. The war that you see between Russia and Ukraine was born out of the weakness of the Biden administration."
1:42

This is the definition of delusional. Sarah Huckabee Sanders says Trump did not start the war in Iran and that he's trying to end it. She directly blames Biden for the Russia-Ukraine war. "It's not a new war. And we have a president who is trying to put a stop to it. This has been going on for decades. This isn't new. We're putting an end to it. The war that you see between Russia and Ukraine was born out of the weakness of the Biden administration."

Reggie B.

120,550 просмотров • 5 дней назад

🚨 CANDACE OWENS: “CHARLIE CAME TO ME AND SAID HE WAS BETRAYED.” 🚨 “I had a vivid dream this weekend. Charlie came to me and he told me that he was betrayed. I don’t know who exactly it is that betrayed him, but I felt in the dream that it is soon going to be revealed. It's inevitable. There’s nothing and no one that’s going to stop the truth from coming out. And it’s going to have international consequences. Take that to the bank. Quote me on that.” ~ Candace Owens She said this on camera, describing it as a prophetic dream, that souls can communicate “on their way in and on their way out of this world.” If Candace is right, who betrayed Charlie and what “international consequences” was she warning about?
0:40

🚨 CANDACE OWENS: “CHARLIE CAME TO ME AND SAID HE WAS BETRAYED.” 🚨 “I had a vivid dream this weekend. Charlie came to me and he told me that he was betrayed. I don’t know who exactly it is that betrayed him, but I felt in the dream that it is soon going to be revealed. It's inevitable. There’s nothing and no one that’s going to stop the truth from coming out. And it’s going to have international consequences. Take that to the bank. Quote me on that.” ~ Candace Owens She said this on camera, describing it as a prophetic dream, that souls can communicate “on their way in and on their way out of this world.” If Candace is right, who betrayed Charlie and what “international consequences” was she warning about?

HustleBitch

166,607 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

WOW 😮 Candace Owens just stooped down to a brand new low‼️ On the same day that Charlie Kirk was killed there was a school sh**ting at Evergreen High School in Colorado. Candace claims that parents of students at the school reached out to her asking her to cover the story because it wasn’t getting any media coverage. But Candace says she didn’t have time. She had time to spread Charlie Kirk conspiracies. She had time to rant about getting fired from the Daily Wire. She had time to troll Ben Shapiro. She had time to stalk and harass Erika Kirk. But zero time to cover this story for some odd reason until…. EIGHT MONTHS LATER !!! After she’s run out of things to talk about and needs to fill time on her show Candace finally acknowledges the story. But she doesn’t bring it up to help the parents. That ship already sailed months ago. She brings it up in a weak attempt to somehow tie it all to her Charlie Kirk conspiracies.
0:48

WOW 😮 Candace Owens just stooped down to a brand new low‼️ On the same day that Charlie Kirk was killed there was a school sh**ting at Evergreen High School in Colorado. Candace claims that parents of students at the school reached out to her asking her to cover the story because it wasn’t getting any media coverage. But Candace says she didn’t have time. She had time to spread Charlie Kirk conspiracies. She had time to rant about getting fired from the Daily Wire. She had time to troll Ben Shapiro. She had time to stalk and harass Erika Kirk. But zero time to cover this story for some odd reason until…. EIGHT MONTHS LATER !!! After she’s run out of things to talk about and needs to fill time on her show Candace finally acknowledges the story. But she doesn’t bring it up to help the parents. That ship already sailed months ago. She brings it up in a weak attempt to somehow tie it all to her Charlie Kirk conspiracies.

Cinema Shogun

39,057 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

“How did Erika Kirk scam a genius like Charlie? The more I hear her past interviews, the dumber she sounds.” Candace Owens is asked how Charlie could fall for Erika. Her answer is that “we’re all human, and we all make mistakes.” She suggests that Charlie didn’t know the real Erika, and if he had things might’ve been different. But sure, tell me this woman isn’t in love with Charlie and bitter towards Erika. This is a despicable way for a Christian woman to talk about her murdered “best friend” and the widow he leaves behind. But that’s the trap Candace and her fans fall into—for them to be right about even half of this, Charlie had to have been really dumb. And we’re not talking one or two big betrayals over the course of a life. We’re talking about being—according to Candace—“betrayed by EVERYONE.”
1:30

“How did Erika Kirk scam a genius like Charlie? The more I hear her past interviews, the dumber she sounds.” Candace Owens is asked how Charlie could fall for Erika. Her answer is that “we’re all human, and we all make mistakes.” She suggests that Charlie didn’t know the real Erika, and if he had things might’ve been different. But sure, tell me this woman isn’t in love with Charlie and bitter towards Erika. This is a despicable way for a Christian woman to talk about her murdered “best friend” and the widow he leaves behind. But that’s the trap Candace and her fans fall into—for them to be right about even half of this, Charlie had to have been really dumb. And we’re not talking one or two big betrayals over the course of a life. We’re talking about being—according to Candace—“betrayed by EVERYONE.”

Natalie Jean Beisner

44,068 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Charlie found out that the marriage was arranged and that Candace had formed an alliance with UK donors and politicians. Stay with me…… Lord Farmer started funding Brexit in 2016. Farage and him work together on pushing it through. Also George starts heavily working with Farage sometime in 2017. Candace met Farage in 2017 or 2018 at CPAC. Her memory varies on who she’s talking to. April 2018 Candace spent a wonderful evening with Farage. I bet she did. Was George with him? Was this where the meetings first started about the alliance? George and Candace magically meet by chance in December of 2018? She had never heard of George before? Really Candace? George had never been brought up to you for months? Even though he was working with Farage closely and funding him? When George came over to spend 3 days after they magically met Farage came too? And says he played Cupid? First time I found Farage came with George. First time I’ve seen them admit Farage was behind them meeting. They get engaged right after. They were sealing the plan. Get married and get support in the US politics. She had Trump meet him March of 2019. Farage is trying to get Brexit through. Lord Farmer is bank rolling it. Candace meets Farage in 2017. And many times that next year but never knew George? George who was working closely with Farage on Brexit? George then takes over TPUK to help push Brexit but it fails. Charlie found out about the sham and fired him less than two months later and Candace a few weeks after. I think it was a few weeks later because he had to tell the major donors he was letting her go and had to have time to explain to them why. But Charlie also knew Candace was huge in the conservative movement and to split publicly would mean a split in the 2020 elections. During this time they remained cordial and she was still useful to the movement. Hence DW picking her up. Then after DW fired her Charlie and Candace had a huge falling out where they were not on speaking terms for a couple years. That’s why she wasn’t at Amfest for 24/25. Candace blames Ben for the rift with Charlie. She says he played a crucial part in their split. But she also says Ben and Charlie weren’t friends. So which is it Candace? The video here where she says Charlie lied to her about a donor meeting….i don’t think it was a donor meeting. I think it was Charlie meeting with the big donors letting them know he was letting her go. This meeting was just days before they split. I’m about to bring this to today. And what is happening now. Where we are with Mappin/Farage/Lowe/Tucker/Candace and how it ties back to the UK and the split on the right both in the US and the UK. Stay tuned. I need to write a book at this point.
1:37

Charlie found out that the marriage was arranged and that Candace had formed an alliance with UK donors and politicians. Stay with me…… Lord Farmer started funding Brexit in 2016. Farage and him work together on pushing it through. Also George starts heavily working with Farage sometime in 2017. Candace met Farage in 2017 or 2018 at CPAC. Her memory varies on who she’s talking to. April 2018 Candace spent a wonderful evening with Farage. I bet she did. Was George with him? Was this where the meetings first started about the alliance? George and Candace magically meet by chance in December of 2018? She had never heard of George before? Really Candace? George had never been brought up to you for months? Even though he was working with Farage closely and funding him? When George came over to spend 3 days after they magically met Farage came too? And says he played Cupid? First time I found Farage came with George. First time I’ve seen them admit Farage was behind them meeting. They get engaged right after. They were sealing the plan. Get married and get support in the US politics. She had Trump meet him March of 2019. Farage is trying to get Brexit through. Lord Farmer is bank rolling it. Candace meets Farage in 2017. And many times that next year but never knew George? George who was working closely with Farage on Brexit? George then takes over TPUK to help push Brexit but it fails. Charlie found out about the sham and fired him less than two months later and Candace a few weeks after. I think it was a few weeks later because he had to tell the major donors he was letting her go and had to have time to explain to them why. But Charlie also knew Candace was huge in the conservative movement and to split publicly would mean a split in the 2020 elections. During this time they remained cordial and she was still useful to the movement. Hence DW picking her up. Then after DW fired her Charlie and Candace had a huge falling out where they were not on speaking terms for a couple years. That’s why she wasn’t at Amfest for 24/25. Candace blames Ben for the rift with Charlie. She says he played a crucial part in their split. But she also says Ben and Charlie weren’t friends. So which is it Candace? The video here where she says Charlie lied to her about a donor meeting….i don’t think it was a donor meeting. I think it was Charlie meeting with the big donors letting them know he was letting her go. This meeting was just days before they split. I’m about to bring this to today. And what is happening now. Where we are with Mappin/Farage/Lowe/Tucker/Candace and how it ties back to the UK and the split on the right both in the US and the UK. Stay tuned. I need to write a book at this point.

Raven Grace 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

80,589 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

“If only people had predicted that this would happen…” GregGutfeld calls out Democrats and the liberal media for four years of silence on the border, followed by round-the-clock coverage of ICE “If it wasn’t for your malfeasance on the border we wouldn’t be in this situation. So this is on the Dems, it’s not on ICE. If only people had predicted that this would happen… Oh yeah, it was Bill Melugin. It was the years that FOX did this coverage on the border that NO ONE else did in the media. They’re now covering it WALL to WALL. They didn’t do a damn thing before!”
3:49

“If only people had predicted that this would happen…” GregGutfeld calls out Democrats and the liberal media for four years of silence on the border, followed by round-the-clock coverage of ICE “If it wasn’t for your malfeasance on the border we wouldn’t be in this situation. So this is on the Dems, it’s not on ICE. If only people had predicted that this would happen… Oh yeah, it was Bill Melugin. It was the years that FOX did this coverage on the border that NO ONE else did in the media. They’re now covering it WALL to WALL. They didn’t do a damn thing before!”

The Five

67,827 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

🔥 "I had a friend of mine, sent me a text the day after Charlie was killed, really distraught and she said, "What do we do now? I know the answer should be love. The answer should be peace, but Charlie tried that and it didn't work." And my response to her was, "No, it did work. That's why they killed him."'
0:40

🔥 "I had a friend of mine, sent me a text the day after Charlie was killed, really distraught and she said, "What do we do now? I know the answer should be love. The answer should be peace, but Charlie tried that and it didn't work." And my response to her was, "No, it did work. That's why they killed him."'

Ellie A

364,526 просмотров • 1 год назад