Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

I confronted a 🇨🇳#PRC diplomat 3 times about whether #China's "indisputable sovereignty" claim over the Spratly Islands included 🇲🇾#Malaysia's occupied features. His 🫢response was revealing.🤔 From Why Should We Care: Indo-Pacific Pod Ep. 53, "Why Should We Care About China's Gray-Zone Warfare?"

6 Kommentare

Profilbild von Dissenting Voice
Dissenting Voicevor 1 Jahr

@IndoPacPodcast There is a commenter here that says the Philippines is the one doing the provocations. Manila tried that for 6 years with a massively pro-China president, Rodrigo Duterte. Even then, Beijing failed to come up with an agreement. The rhetoric calmed a bit, but that's the extent.

Profilbild von Gary Sands
Gary Sandsvor 1 Jahr

@danzwku @IndoPacPodcast "Indisputable" is merely an opening salvo in all Chinese negotiations.

Profilbild von 慕洋直仁☯️禍害中國
慕洋直仁☯️禍害中國vor 1 Jahr

I really don’t know what nonsense you’re talking about. The South China Sea issue is very simple: either the U.S. fights China in the South China Sea, or it acknowledges China’s control over it. For us, China, it’s also very simple. Our goal is to push the U.S. military out of the first and second island chains surrounding China. The third island chain doesn’t even exist because the distance between the points is too far. What’s the use of all your meaningless talk?

Profilbild von Dino Quantum
Dino Quantumvor 1 Jahr

@IndoPacPodcast Any dispute can be negotiated directly with China. Unlike Philippines that chose to provoke.

Profilbild von 慕洋直仁☯️禍害中國
慕洋直仁☯️禍害中國vor 1 Jahr

@IndoPacPodcast the Philippines is just following the orders of the US.👇🏻

Profilbild von Dmitri Allen
Dmitri Allenvor 1 Jahr

@IndoPacPodcast Following thanks for the info

Ähnliche Videos