“I didn’t have any doubts.” Michael P. Desronvil, the lone holdout juror whose vote led to a mistrial in the Lindsay Clancy case, breaks his silence and stands firmly behind his decision. Desronvil says the physical evidence, key witnesses and prosecution’s case convinced him Clancy “knew exactly what she... was doing and planned” the killings of her three young children. His attorney is now calling him an “American Hero and Champion of Justice” as scrutiny over the explosive 11-1 deadlock continues. Clancy is due back in court Sept. 29 as prosecutors weigh whether to retry the case and her defense pushes to have the charges dismissed.show more

"Reasonable doubt". He didn't have any. That's the law. That's the way it works. He's the only reason those kids still have a chance to get justice.

Jurors deserve a right to privacy. This guy was doxxed by “journalists” bc they don’t like his position as a jury member. Now he has to defend himself publicly. This is not okay.

Hero! Protect this man at all costs. Fuck Lindsay Clancy AND her supporters. Rage away nerds. Nobody gives a fuck.

Michael's are legends

🇺🇸 Standing by your conscience under pressure takes courage. Desronvil says the evidence led him to his decision—now the legal process should determine what comes next.

Protect that man and prosecute her

It's up to We the People of the United States Constitution Republic-can form of government to keep its Bill of Rights that guarantees All Americans our individual freedoms and our God-given rights! Who wants to live in a Democratic Slaves Masters Party Slaves States Democracy?

Every SANE person has no doubt of her GUILT!

Fox News tv schedule today: Trans, murder trial, immigrants, Biden administration, Democrats are socialists, woke, Trump renames a body of water, trans, Sydney Sweeney, Democrats are socialists. I just saved you A LOT of time today and you're welcome! 🙄

Get rid of “by reason of insanity” defense. She knew what she was doing. Planned and coordinated. God rest the souls of those poor little sweethearts. 💔💔💔

Michael P. Desronvil killed no one, but the far left demonizes him as if he killed his own children.

The prosecution obviously failed to completely lock down their case if they couldn't even convince a unanimous room, so people blaming the juror need to look at how the state presented the facts instead

Why does a juror now require an attorney? Who will serve if they're forced to defend themselves - only lunatics will be your peers. This whole psyop is tired and old. Fking stop already.

It was premeditated.

Retry case and use lawyer interns as jurors.. this case is worldwide known. COMMONWEALTH PROSECUTORS...PREPARE 100%

The question for the jury was: Was she sane or insane? He said she was sane and planned it all. (Agree) Clearly, he did not have any reasonable doubt.

He is the only person in that room who is sane

Standing firm as a lone juror in a high-profile case like Michael P. Desronvil did takes immense weight, regardless of how one views the physical evidence. How much pressure.

U CAN TAKE UR MENTAL SHIT GOVERNMENT STICK UP UR FUCKIN ASS BY NOVEMBER

A lone juror standing firm shows why evidence and due process matter. Let the courts handle the next steps fairly.

☪️MOON SPLIT A APART.. Judgement day, when Islam will end is written in Quran54/1 The smallest sect of world is most wealthy intelligent,Army,Undercover,Nobel winner jews✡️never allows anyone to enter their religion at any cost. Allah show Mercy even to them that oppos him(2/47,122Quran)as they do not converts others through the Temptation of scriptures,sword or wealth. While real reason is Allah is happy that jews🕎 doesn't change the religion (of birth) given by me into another religion, therefore extra blessings 🚨Anyone who tries to change religion given by God will face God's punishment 16/25 & 29/13..Quran----3/35 Gita🕉 Yes if someone changes on his own then no punishment,,exact same way, if a person commits suicide, no legal action against deceased Meraj with an Indian on6.10.2016 night Full map cosmosDPsent NASA2018.P i L ⚖️ Meraj pnding SC🇮🇳2022..covid,claimities disasters,rising wars as Quran to support truth that👑Quran is an unrevealed book of india,written against 🇸🇦☪️ 🆘️msg of Allah

Well done 👍 sir

A single holdout blocked a verdict in a triple child murder trial. Framing the lone juror as a hero or a villain misses the point: the US jury system relies entirely on who breaks first under peer pressure.

Why are the jurors who are doxing other jurors not in prison? And the ones who during the process bullied the others into a not-guilty verdict? USA the greatest country? More like banana republic.

The att yahoo browser opens and fox was 1st, I clicked it, was messed up, didn't load. Went to app, didn't see same story.

She knew what she was doing

Massachusetts just proved the insanity defense works best when the victims are too young to testify. Eleven adults needed a “voice in her head” to explain exercise bands around a baby’s throat. One juror refused to join the therapy session. That’s the whole country in a jury room. Follow me for more ugly truth.

A heartbreaking case with a deeply divided jury. Whatever happens next, the evidence, due process, and pursuit of justice should remain at the center. ⚖️🙏

Crazy 🙏🏻🇺🇸🙂‍↕️

When the holdout juror pulled the cord tight and crushed the empty water bottle he proved that he did not know the difference between choking and strangling. He ignored the lack of evidence presented to him by the prosecution. He invented his own narrative based on his own personal biases. I am going to use a dog as an example. A dog playing with the cord on blinds can end up passing out. If in a few minutes no one loosen the cord, then the dog will die. The dog did not stop playing with the cord, because the dog did not suffer any pain. On the other hand, if the cord was tied tightly around the dogs neck, then the dog would suffer pain the entire time it was choking to death. Since the exercise straps were tied loosely, it proved Lindsey did not want her children to suffer pain. Lindsay was not in her right mind when she heard CVS did not have the medication to stop her daughter from suffering. It is possible there was no elaborate plan. It is possible that all Lindsay wanted was for the suffering to end. The holdout juror's empty water bottle demo proved he doubted the evidence he was shown.

Be like Michael.

If he genuinely had no reasonable doubt based on the evidence, I can understand why he stood by his decision. A mistrial shows just how deeply divided the jury was.