Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

I don't think the Lancet left much to be finalized or that there is any proof that these two Challengers were recovered, but ok.

31,352 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

7 Kommentare

Profilbild von 2S7 Pion (trost)
2S7 Pion (trost)vor 1 Jahr

And are you sure it's worth throwing a short-range ballistic missile that costs 3 million dollars and that above all in Iskander-M version has an accuracy of 5-7 meters in >>one<< tank that clearly became a rocket after the Lancet hit it?

Profilbild von Dan Ryder - primedefi.com
Dan Ryder - primedefi.comvor 1 Jahr

DeFi’s momentum is just getting started. BTC staking is poised to become a $12B industry by 2025. Ethereum L2s are proving their profitability with skyrocketing gains. AI-powered tools are redefining the way trades are executed. The future belongs to those who stay ahead of the curve. What’s your top pick for the next big leap in DeFi?

Profilbild von Egg
Eggvor 1 Jahr

Summary of every exploding Challenger video: Shots 1-5: Clearly missed. Shots 6-9: Missed due to recoil (bad spray control). Shots 10-11: Very close, but recoil and inaccuracy make these reasonable misses. Challenger is clearly the best tank of this conflict.

Profilbild von OilOnCanvas
OilOnCanvasvor 1 Jahr

lmao new levels of cope have been reached. Using an Iskander to destroy an already damaged Challenger? Is it possible to be more retarded?

Profilbild von Arbalet Intelligence
Arbalet Intelligencevor 1 Jahr

It’s true unfortunately. RT released footage of the Iskander hitting it, generating a singular large shaft-like explosion in the center and two adjacent, rounded secondary explosions (likely internal ammunition release).

Profilbild von Goldberg 🇺🇦🇵🇱
Goldberg 🇺🇦🇵🇱vor 1 Jahr

0 proof it was challenger most likely some ammo stash

Profilbild von Paulo Guerra
Paulo Guerravor 1 Jahr

Maybe for a NATO scrap exhibition in Moscow. 😂😂

Ähnliche Videos