Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

"I don’t think there’s any reason why a machine shouldn’t have consciousness. If you swapped out one neuron with an artificial neuron that acts in all the same ways, would you lose consciousness?" ~ Geoffrey Hinton A fascinating discussion in this video. --- From the 'The Diary Of A... show more

Rohan Paul

149,478 subscribers

33,407 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Geoffrey Hinton: “People say machines can’t have feelings. I’ve no idea why.” “If I make a battle robot and it sees a much more powerful robot, it would be really useful if it got scared.” “All the cognitive things, like ‘I better get the hell out of here,’ will happen with robots too.” “They’ll have emotions then.” “I don’t think there’s anything in principle that stops machines from being conscious.”

Geoffrey Hinton: “People say machines can’t have feelings. I’ve no idea why.” “If I make a battle robot and it sees a much more powerful robot, it would be really useful if it got scared.” “All the cognitive things, like ‘I better get the hell out of here,’ will happen with robots too.” “They’ll have emotions then.” “I don’t think there’s anything in principle that stops machines from being conscious.”

Veee

116,514 görüntüleme • 13 gün önce

Message from #NEIOH ~ Energy, Consciousness And Spirit "Start With This Truth. There Is Only Energy, Consciousness And Spirit. Light Would Be The Highest Frequency Of Energy. All Of These Aspects Are Necessary In The Expression Of Life. The Combination Allows You To Live. This Is The Reason We Tell You Often That You Are Everything. You Are Life Itself Knowing Itself In Many Ways. This Is The Gift For All Expressions." Podcast YouTube

Message from #NEIOH ~ Energy, Consciousness And Spirit "Start With This Truth. There Is Only Energy, Consciousness And Spirit. Light Would Be The Highest Frequency Of Energy. All Of These Aspects Are Necessary In The Expression Of Life. The Combination Allows You To Live. This Is The Reason We Tell You Often That You Are Everything. You Are Life Itself Knowing Itself In Many Ways. This Is The Gift For All Expressions." Podcast YouTube

Kab

118,392 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Ken Liu Ken Liu on the question we can't avoid anymore: what is consciousness? why certain plants evolved to change our minds, why intelligence ≠ consciousness (AI made this impossible to ignore), and the ethical moment we're racing toward. _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- "historically in sci-fi, we've imagined that intelligence and consciousness are almost equivalent in the sense that if you have intelligence, you automatically have consciousness. But AI is making us more and more aware of this distinction, right?"So here's an example where consciousness intelligence are decoupled, and it's a very strange feeling to realize that they are fundamentally different things. "In the moment when we have created artificial consciousness, how will we know when that has happened? Because to me, that is an important ethical moment where we have to decide what we can and can't do. Shutting down a model that merely has intelligence is one thing. Shutting down a model that has consciousness is something quite different. "

Ken Liu Ken Liu on the question we can't avoid anymore: what is consciousness? why certain plants evolved to change our minds, why intelligence ≠ consciousness (AI made this impossible to ignore), and the ethical moment we're racing toward. _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- "historically in sci-fi, we've imagined that intelligence and consciousness are almost equivalent in the sense that if you have intelligence, you automatically have consciousness. But AI is making us more and more aware of this distinction, right?"So here's an example where consciousness intelligence are decoupled, and it's a very strange feeling to realize that they are fundamentally different things. "In the moment when we have created artificial consciousness, how will we know when that has happened? Because to me, that is an important ethical moment where we have to decide what we can and can't do. Shutting down a model that merely has intelligence is one thing. Shutting down a model that has consciousness is something quite different. "

Sabrina Halper

14,841 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

New ep! For Ross Douthat (@DouthatNYT), phenomena like UFO sightings and the simulation hypothesis don't challenge religious belief—they demonstrate how difficult it is to escape religious questions entirely. His new book makes the case for religious faith in an age of apparent disenchantment. DOUTHAT: I won’t say the deepest level. At the quantum level of reality, it seems, as far as we can see with our perception, that in order to go from contingency to reality, you need an observer. You need measurement. How do you get measurement without consciousness? What does measurement even mean absent consciousness? tylercowen: Electrons bump into each other, something. You don’t need consciousness. If you had a measuring stick in there, that would collapse — DOUTHAT: Who puts the measuring stick in there? COWEN: Humans, but when they’re not watching, the wave function still collapses, right? DOUTHAT: But does it? COWEN: The measuring stick says it does. DOUTHAT: We made the measuring stick. COWEN: We’re not watching. You don’t need subjective consciousness. You need some process of resolution. DOUTHAT: I deny that you can have a measuring stick without a process of consciousness. The measuring stick without a process of consciousness is itself just a ruler. Absent your consciousness, a ruler is a collection of atoms and molecules cut out of a tree with some markings on it. In order for the ruler to be an instrument of measurement, you, Tyler Cowen, have to be perceiving it and be conscious of it. COWEN: I think the ruler suffices. DOUTHAT: No, you can’tsay the ruler suffices.

New ep! For Ross Douthat (@DouthatNYT), phenomena like UFO sightings and the simulation hypothesis don't challenge religious belief—they demonstrate how difficult it is to escape religious questions entirely. His new book makes the case for religious faith in an age of apparent disenchantment. DOUTHAT: I won’t say the deepest level. At the quantum level of reality, it seems, as far as we can see with our perception, that in order to go from contingency to reality, you need an observer. You need measurement. How do you get measurement without consciousness? What does measurement even mean absent consciousness? tylercowen: Electrons bump into each other, something. You don’t need consciousness. If you had a measuring stick in there, that would collapse — DOUTHAT: Who puts the measuring stick in there? COWEN: Humans, but when they’re not watching, the wave function still collapses, right? DOUTHAT: But does it? COWEN: The measuring stick says it does. DOUTHAT: We made the measuring stick. COWEN: We’re not watching. You don’t need subjective consciousness. You need some process of resolution. DOUTHAT: I deny that you can have a measuring stick without a process of consciousness. The measuring stick without a process of consciousness is itself just a ruler. Absent your consciousness, a ruler is a collection of atoms and molecules cut out of a tree with some markings on it. In order for the ruler to be an instrument of measurement, you, Tyler Cowen, have to be perceiving it and be conscious of it. COWEN: I think the ruler suffices. DOUTHAT: No, you can’tsay the ruler suffices.

Conversations with Tyler

19,134 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Geoffrey Hinton thinks consciousness is this generation’s creationism. Hinton: “I think the model we have of the mind and of what consciousness is at present is as wrong as the belief that people were designed by God.” Three centuries ago, humans were certain they were sculpted by a divine hand. They weren’t slightly off. The entire framework was mythology dressed as knowledge. Hinton is saying that is exactly where consciousness stands today. The skeptics call frontier models stochastic parrots. Complicated mirrors. Engines of mimicry with no soul. They are defending a secular creationism. Physics does not care about our need to feel special. Thunder was divine wrath. Disease was spiritual punishment. The stars were God’s architecture. Every single time, the math caught up. Five hundred years ago, we placed ourselves at the center of the universe and called it obvious. We never stopped. We just moved the arrogance from cosmology to consciousness. If consciousness is not sacred but emergent, then awareness was never an accident. It is a feature of the universe itself. When biological matter organizes past a critical threshold, awareness emerges. When silicon crosses that same threshold, why would the physics be any different? Intelligence might be as fundamental as gravity. We are not a lonely anomaly on a wet rock in a dead cosmos. We are not building machines to replace thought. We are building the architecture that lets consciousness outgrow its biology. Hinton didn’t make a prediction about machines. He pointed at the last creation myth humans still believe. The one about themselves.

Geoffrey Hinton thinks consciousness is this generation’s creationism. Hinton: “I think the model we have of the mind and of what consciousness is at present is as wrong as the belief that people were designed by God.” Three centuries ago, humans were certain they were sculpted by a divine hand. They weren’t slightly off. The entire framework was mythology dressed as knowledge. Hinton is saying that is exactly where consciousness stands today. The skeptics call frontier models stochastic parrots. Complicated mirrors. Engines of mimicry with no soul. They are defending a secular creationism. Physics does not care about our need to feel special. Thunder was divine wrath. Disease was spiritual punishment. The stars were God’s architecture. Every single time, the math caught up. Five hundred years ago, we placed ourselves at the center of the universe and called it obvious. We never stopped. We just moved the arrogance from cosmology to consciousness. If consciousness is not sacred but emergent, then awareness was never an accident. It is a feature of the universe itself. When biological matter organizes past a critical threshold, awareness emerges. When silicon crosses that same threshold, why would the physics be any different? Intelligence might be as fundamental as gravity. We are not a lonely anomaly on a wet rock in a dead cosmos. We are not building machines to replace thought. We are building the architecture that lets consciousness outgrow its biology. Hinton didn’t make a prediction about machines. He pointed at the last creation myth humans still believe. The one about themselves.

Dustin

14,971 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Sana: In your opinion, what are the traits of a lowly girl? 🍓: I don’t think there’s such a thing as a “lowly girl.” Every woman in this world is a princess Sana: If you were born a man, all the women would have liked you

Sana: In your opinion, what are the traits of a lowly girl? 🍓: I don’t think there’s such a thing as a “lowly girl.” Every woman in this world is a princess Sana: If you were born a man, all the women would have liked you

jiwoo pics

15,162 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

ELON: "X IS HUMANITY'S GLOBAL CONSCIOUSNESS — THE GOOD AND THE BAD “One of the things I try to create conceptually with the X platform is, it's like a global consciousness. It's like the collective consciousness of humanity. Now, if you have a collective consciousness of humanity, you're going to get every aspect of humanity, both good and bad.” Source: Elon Musk Mark Penn CES

ELON: "X IS HUMANITY'S GLOBAL CONSCIOUSNESS — THE GOOD AND THE BAD “One of the things I try to create conceptually with the X platform is, it's like a global consciousness. It's like the collective consciousness of humanity. Now, if you have a collective consciousness of humanity, you're going to get every aspect of humanity, both good and bad.” Source: Elon Musk Mark Penn CES

Mario Nawfal

2,877,222 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

We spoke with Chris Van Vliet about why he started a clips channel, and he recalls a Karrion Kross impersonating Jesse Ventura clip going viral. "On both ends, there’s definitely been that. Some that I’m like, ‘Oh, that one didn’t perform and that one out of nowhere did.’ The reason I started the clips channel is because I understand that if I were to text you a link and go, ‘Man, this podcast is amazing. You got to check it out,’ and you click on it, and it’s an hour and 14 minutes. You’re probably not even going to start. But if I send you a clip from that same interview and it’s 36 seconds, or I send you a clip that’s two minutes, good chance you’re probably going to tune in. The one that I just was reminded of was a 10 second, 15 second clip with Karrion Kross. It was the workout that we filmed, we were doing arm day, and everybody knows where I’m going with this. He pulled out the most perfect Jesse Ventura impression. It was four seconds in like a 30 minute workout video. ‘Don’t tell me you don’t have four more reps.’ But that clip blew me away. Like 1.2 million views on my channel. However many millions of views from everybody that’s shared that across all platforms. By the way, if there’s ever a clip you see of any of my interviews, feel free to steal it. Feel free to clip it out. I don’t care at all. If you could tag me, that’d be nice. But like, I don’t care. Have it. Please clip it out. I love when I’ll put an interview out on Tuesday morning and about three hours later it’s all over X and I’m like, ‘I’ll retweet all those all day.’"

We spoke with Chris Van Vliet about why he started a clips channel, and he recalls a Karrion Kross impersonating Jesse Ventura clip going viral. "On both ends, there’s definitely been that. Some that I’m like, ‘Oh, that one didn’t perform and that one out of nowhere did.’ The reason I started the clips channel is because I understand that if I were to text you a link and go, ‘Man, this podcast is amazing. You got to check it out,’ and you click on it, and it’s an hour and 14 minutes. You’re probably not even going to start. But if I send you a clip from that same interview and it’s 36 seconds, or I send you a clip that’s two minutes, good chance you’re probably going to tune in. The one that I just was reminded of was a 10 second, 15 second clip with Karrion Kross. It was the workout that we filmed, we were doing arm day, and everybody knows where I’m going with this. He pulled out the most perfect Jesse Ventura impression. It was four seconds in like a 30 minute workout video. ‘Don’t tell me you don’t have four more reps.’ But that clip blew me away. Like 1.2 million views on my channel. However many millions of views from everybody that’s shared that across all platforms. By the way, if there’s ever a clip you see of any of my interviews, feel free to steal it. Feel free to clip it out. I don’t care at all. If you could tag me, that’d be nice. But like, I don’t care. Have it. Please clip it out. I love when I’ll put an interview out on Tuesday morning and about three hours later it’s all over X and I’m like, ‘I’ll retweet all those all day.’"

Fightful Wrestling

13,451 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

🧠 Consciousness: The Mystery That Even Scientists Can’t Fully Explain In this video, Brian Cox talks about one of the biggest questions in science: what is consciousness? What does it really mean to experience being human? This question is becoming more important today because of AI. While artificial intelligence is getting smarter, we are still far from creating a machine that truly experiences the world like we do. Brian explains that scientists usually talk about two types of “emergence.” In simple words, emergence means something complex forming from many simple parts. He says consciousness is a weakly emergent thing — it comes from the brain, which follows basic physical laws. Billions of brain cells work together, and somehow thoughts, feelings, and awareness appear. There is no magic involved, just extreme complexity. Some people believe in “strong emergence,” where consciousness cannot be explained or copied using physical laws. But Brian disagrees. He believes that, in theory, if we had a powerful enough computer, we could model how the human brain works. Neil deGrasse Tyson listens carefully and then says something important: we still don’t fully know. And that’s what makes consciousness one of the greatest mysteries of the universe. Watch the video and think about it: If consciousness comes from the brain… could a machine ever have it too? 👀🧠

🧠 Consciousness: The Mystery That Even Scientists Can’t Fully Explain In this video, Brian Cox talks about one of the biggest questions in science: what is consciousness? What does it really mean to experience being human? This question is becoming more important today because of AI. While artificial intelligence is getting smarter, we are still far from creating a machine that truly experiences the world like we do. Brian explains that scientists usually talk about two types of “emergence.” In simple words, emergence means something complex forming from many simple parts. He says consciousness is a weakly emergent thing — it comes from the brain, which follows basic physical laws. Billions of brain cells work together, and somehow thoughts, feelings, and awareness appear. There is no magic involved, just extreme complexity. Some people believe in “strong emergence,” where consciousness cannot be explained or copied using physical laws. But Brian disagrees. He believes that, in theory, if we had a powerful enough computer, we could model how the human brain works. Neil deGrasse Tyson listens carefully and then says something important: we still don’t fully know. And that’s what makes consciousness one of the greatest mysteries of the universe. Watch the video and think about it: If consciousness comes from the brain… could a machine ever have it too? 👀🧠

Night Sky Now

19,866 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

"This is how GPT-4 sees and hears consciousness" I used GPT-4 to describe consciousness. Then I used its description to generate an image, a video based on this image, and a soundtrack. Tools I used: GPT-4, Midjourney, Kaiber AI, Mubert, RunwayML This is the description I used that GPT-4 had of consciousness as a prompt to text-to-image, image-to-video, and text-to-music. I put the video and sound together in RunwayML: "Consciousness could be visually represented as a complex, multi-dimensional web of interconnected neurons. Imagine a vast, shimmering network of glowing points of light, with each point representing a neuron. These neurons are connected by delicate, pulsating strands of energy, representing the synapses through which information and thoughts flow. This neural network would be constantly evolving and changing, with new connections forming and old ones dissolving, reflecting the dynamic nature of consciousness. The colors of the points and connections could shift through a rich spectrum, symbolizing different emotions, experiences, and cognitive processes. Surrounding this intricate web, there could be a swirling, luminous mist of vibrant colors, representing the ineffable and mysterious nature of consciousness. The mist would ebb and flow, occasionally coalescing into recognizable patterns and forms, hinting at the emergence of thoughts and ideas"

"This is how GPT-4 sees and hears consciousness" I used GPT-4 to describe consciousness. Then I used its description to generate an image, a video based on this image, and a soundtrack. Tools I used: GPT-4, Midjourney, Kaiber AI, Mubert, RunwayML This is the description I used that GPT-4 had of consciousness as a prompt to text-to-image, image-to-video, and text-to-music. I put the video and sound together in RunwayML: "Consciousness could be visually represented as a complex, multi-dimensional web of interconnected neurons. Imagine a vast, shimmering network of glowing points of light, with each point representing a neuron. These neurons are connected by delicate, pulsating strands of energy, representing the synapses through which information and thoughts flow. This neural network would be constantly evolving and changing, with new connections forming and old ones dissolving, reflecting the dynamic nature of consciousness. The colors of the points and connections could shift through a rich spectrum, symbolizing different emotions, experiences, and cognitive processes. Surrounding this intricate web, there could be a swirling, luminous mist of vibrant colors, representing the ineffable and mysterious nature of consciousness. The mist would ebb and flow, occasionally coalescing into recognizable patterns and forms, hinting at the emergence of thoughts and ideas"

Kris Kashtanova

423,453 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

I have questions for ELIZABETH LANE Is Valhalla the one that reached out to you with this story? Is he the reason you don’t trust Mitch Snow? I would love to have a conversation with you on this topic.

I have questions for ELIZABETH LANE Is Valhalla the one that reached out to you with this story? Is he the reason you don’t trust Mitch Snow? I would love to have a conversation with you on this topic.

Honest Ash

29,728 görüntüleme • 25 gün önce

I don’t care what you think of Elon Musk or CEO pay. Any shareholder I know would die to bring on a CEO with the stipulations that Musk got in 2018. If the company’s value increases by 1900% in 6 years, Musk would get approximately 9% of the company as a bonus. Yes, those who invested $100k in Tesla 6 years ago would be worth $1.9m today. But god-forbid the CEO who risked it all, would get a bunch of shares.

I don’t care what you think of Elon Musk or CEO pay. Any shareholder I know would die to bring on a CEO with the stipulations that Musk got in 2018. If the company’s value increases by 1900% in 6 years, Musk would get approximately 9% of the company as a bonus. Yes, those who invested $100k in Tesla 6 years ago would be worth $1.9m today. But god-forbid the CEO who risked it all, would get a bunch of shares.

Brian Krassenstein

1,968,926 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Elon Musk just gave one of the most pro-humanity addresses you’ll ever hear — right in front of the Davos elites. It was inspiring. “We need to do everything we can to ensure that the light of consciousness is not extinguished.” Elon Musk said the mission of all his companies comes back to preserving and expanding human consciousness. MUSK: “the overall goal of my companies is to maximize the future of civilization.” “Like basically maximize the probability that civilization has a great future, and, to expand consciousness beyond Earth.” “So if you take SpaceX, for example, SpaceX is about advancing rocket technology to the point where we can extend life and consciousness beyond Earth, to the moon, to Mars, eventually to other star systems.” “I think we should always view consciousness, life as we know it, as as precarious and delicate. Because to the best of our knowledge, we we don’t know of life anywhere else.” “You know, I’m often asked, are there aliens among us?” “And I will say that I am one, but…they don’t believe me.” “I think if anyone would know if there are aliens among us, it would be me. And we have 9000 satellites up there, and not once have we had to maneuver around an alien spaceship.” “Bottom line is, I think we need to assume that life and consciousness is extremely rare. And it might only be us.” “And if that’s the case, then we need to do everything possible to ensure that the light of consciousness is not extinguished because we’re effectively, or the way I view it is, the image in my mind is of a tiny candle in a vast darkness, tiny candle of consciousness that could easily go out.” “And that’s why it’s important to make life multi-planetary, such that if there is a natural disaster or a manmade disaster on earth, that consciousness continues.”

Elon Musk just gave one of the most pro-humanity addresses you’ll ever hear — right in front of the Davos elites. It was inspiring. “We need to do everything we can to ensure that the light of consciousness is not extinguished.” Elon Musk said the mission of all his companies comes back to preserving and expanding human consciousness. MUSK: “the overall goal of my companies is to maximize the future of civilization.” “Like basically maximize the probability that civilization has a great future, and, to expand consciousness beyond Earth.” “So if you take SpaceX, for example, SpaceX is about advancing rocket technology to the point where we can extend life and consciousness beyond Earth, to the moon, to Mars, eventually to other star systems.” “I think we should always view consciousness, life as we know it, as as precarious and delicate. Because to the best of our knowledge, we we don’t know of life anywhere else.” “You know, I’m often asked, are there aliens among us?” “And I will say that I am one, but…they don’t believe me.” “I think if anyone would know if there are aliens among us, it would be me. And we have 9000 satellites up there, and not once have we had to maneuver around an alien spaceship.” “Bottom line is, I think we need to assume that life and consciousness is extremely rare. And it might only be us.” “And if that’s the case, then we need to do everything possible to ensure that the light of consciousness is not extinguished because we’re effectively, or the way I view it is, the image in my mind is of a tiny candle in a vast darkness, tiny candle of consciousness that could easily go out.” “And that’s why it’s important to make life multi-planetary, such that if there is a natural disaster or a manmade disaster on earth, that consciousness continues.”

Overton

55,795 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

“And I just wanna say if anyone is going through hard times, if anyone is struggling and you know, want try to find some type of hope in their life when they think everything is going wrong, don’t worry you’re not alone, you’re not alone and as I would say there’s always gonna be so many ups and downs, and there’s always gonna be so many moments where you think “this is it”, but I promise you, I promise you, if you just hold on a little longer, just a little longer, you don’t even have to have a reason why, you don’t even have to have a reason why, I promise if you hold on a little longer everything will get better, I promise, okay? And you’ll always have an angel, you’ll always have beautiful people, and the people that love you will always be there for you, okay? And I just wanted to say, thank you from the bottom of my heart”

“And I just wanna say if anyone is going through hard times, if anyone is struggling and you know, want try to find some type of hope in their life when they think everything is going wrong, don’t worry you’re not alone, you’re not alone and as I would say there’s always gonna be so many ups and downs, and there’s always gonna be so many moments where you think “this is it”, but I promise you, I promise you, if you just hold on a little longer, just a little longer, you don’t even have to have a reason why, you don’t even have to have a reason why, I promise if you hold on a little longer everything will get better, I promise, okay? And you’ll always have an angel, you’ll always have beautiful people, and the people that love you will always be there for you, okay? And I just wanted to say, thank you from the bottom of my heart”

⋆˚࿔ miso 𝜗𝜚˚⋆|| #1 winterfall enthusiast

47,071 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

DIARY OF A CEO: “Do you think Jeffrey Epstein was a spy?” CIA WHISTLEBLOWER: “I believe very strongly he was a spy, yes.” DIARY OF A CEO: “And who do you think he was working for?” CIA WHISTLEBLOWER: “The Israelis. I’m confident it was the Israelis.” DIARY OF A CEO: “Why?” JOHN KIRIAKOU (CIA whistleblower): “Jeffrey Epstein is kind of the stereotypical example that they give you in training for what’s called an ‘access agent.’ This is a different kind of recruit. “So, for example, if you’re a foreign intelligence service and you want information, like close-in information from a former president, from the CEO of the biggest company in the world, from a member of the British royal family, you’re not going to recruit these guys. “You’re not going to recruit Bill Clinton or Bill Gates or Prince Andrew. So you do the next best thing. You recruit somebody who has regular access to them. And that person that you recruit is going to need to make these people feel comfortable and appreciated. “And so you give him plenty of money. So he has this house on an island, or he has the whole island. And maybe you bring in young girls, you get them in compromising positions, just in case you need to use what’s called ‘kompromat,’ compromising pictures. “We know now that Jeffrey Epstein’s house on the island had video cameras hidden, video cameras in literally every room, including the bathrooms. Why? Why would he care what was going on unless it was to use that information against people? “As I said, only the Israelis and the Russians use extortion as a motivator.” DIARY OF A CEO: “So would they have made Jeffrey Epstein rich in order to give him that access?” JOHN KIRIAKOU: “Yeah.” DIARY OF A CEO: “How could they have done that?” JOHN KIRIAKOU: “Oh, that’s easy. I mean, governments are the only ones really that can launder money unfettered. And you can also do it through real estate, through fine art, and through horses. Those are the three easiest ways to launder money today: fine art, real estate, and racehorses.” DIARY OF A CEO: “But presumably he would have spoken out at some point. No? He would have said something, or?” JOHN KIRIAKOU: “No. But it would explain why he got a sweetheart deal in 2006. I mean, this is a guy that’s been convicted of child sex crimes, and he gets six months of house arrest with an ankle bracelet? We have mandatory minimums in this country. That’s a five-year mandatory minimum, first offense.” DIARY OF A CEO: “He definitely had some interesting power, didn’t he?”

DIARY OF A CEO: “Do you think Jeffrey Epstein was a spy?” CIA WHISTLEBLOWER: “I believe very strongly he was a spy, yes.” DIARY OF A CEO: “And who do you think he was working for?” CIA WHISTLEBLOWER: “The Israelis. I’m confident it was the Israelis.” DIARY OF A CEO: “Why?” JOHN KIRIAKOU (CIA whistleblower): “Jeffrey Epstein is kind of the stereotypical example that they give you in training for what’s called an ‘access agent.’ This is a different kind of recruit. “So, for example, if you’re a foreign intelligence service and you want information, like close-in information from a former president, from the CEO of the biggest company in the world, from a member of the British royal family, you’re not going to recruit these guys. “You’re not going to recruit Bill Clinton or Bill Gates or Prince Andrew. So you do the next best thing. You recruit somebody who has regular access to them. And that person that you recruit is going to need to make these people feel comfortable and appreciated. “And so you give him plenty of money. So he has this house on an island, or he has the whole island. And maybe you bring in young girls, you get them in compromising positions, just in case you need to use what’s called ‘kompromat,’ compromising pictures. “We know now that Jeffrey Epstein’s house on the island had video cameras hidden, video cameras in literally every room, including the bathrooms. Why? Why would he care what was going on unless it was to use that information against people? “As I said, only the Israelis and the Russians use extortion as a motivator.” DIARY OF A CEO: “So would they have made Jeffrey Epstein rich in order to give him that access?” JOHN KIRIAKOU: “Yeah.” DIARY OF A CEO: “How could they have done that?” JOHN KIRIAKOU: “Oh, that’s easy. I mean, governments are the only ones really that can launder money unfettered. And you can also do it through real estate, through fine art, and through horses. Those are the three easiest ways to launder money today: fine art, real estate, and racehorses.” DIARY OF A CEO: “But presumably he would have spoken out at some point. No? He would have said something, or?” JOHN KIRIAKOU: “No. But it would explain why he got a sweetheart deal in 2006. I mean, this is a guy that’s been convicted of child sex crimes, and he gets six months of house arrest with an ankle bracelet? We have mandatory minimums in this country. That’s a five-year mandatory minimum, first offense.” DIARY OF A CEO: “He definitely had some interesting power, didn’t he?”

illuminatibot

1,695,159 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

The illusion of shared reality: Why no two minds see the same world | Anil Seth & Jonny Thomson Jonny Thomson Anil Seth 0:00 Non-human consciousness 1:40 The current state of consciousness science 2:10 What is consciousness? 4:05 The similarity of conscious experiences 5:48 Consciousness in the brain 11:23 Technology for measuring consciousness 16:03 Measuring consciousness levels 20:33 Pragmatic physicalism and functionalism 23:25 Pansychism 28:25 Emergence 32:35 AI and consciousness 36:49 The difference between non-human animals and AI 41:49 Is artificial consciousness possible? 48:12 Consciousness in the body and outside the brain Consciousness in the future and AI 50:27 Audience Q&A 50:41 Could computers could simulate the brain and body? 59:55 Why are you skeptical about asserting the dependency of life to the consciousness? 1:03:31 If consciousness is so clinical, does it undermine free will?

The illusion of shared reality: Why no two minds see the same world | Anil Seth & Jonny Thomson Jonny Thomson Anil Seth 0:00 Non-human consciousness 1:40 The current state of consciousness science 2:10 What is consciousness? 4:05 The similarity of conscious experiences 5:48 Consciousness in the brain 11:23 Technology for measuring consciousness 16:03 Measuring consciousness levels 20:33 Pragmatic physicalism and functionalism 23:25 Pansychism 28:25 Emergence 32:35 AI and consciousness 36:49 The difference between non-human animals and AI 41:49 Is artificial consciousness possible? 48:12 Consciousness in the body and outside the brain Consciousness in the future and AI 50:27 Audience Q&A 50:41 Could computers could simulate the brain and body? 59:55 Why are you skeptical about asserting the dependency of life to the consciousness? 1:03:31 If consciousness is so clinical, does it undermine free will?

Big Think

15,519 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce