正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

"I don’t think there’s such a thing as a decisive strike against Iran, because that would require a long, drawn-out military campaign — and I don’t think the Trump administration is ready for that. If what they want instead is a punitive, stand-off strike, they would likely have to...

andreas_krieg's profile picture

Dr Andreas Krieg

51,287 subscribers

16,119 次观看 • 6 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治教育
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Trump Comments on the Drones and Cancels his Trip to Bedminster, NJ— But Pay Attention to what he says at the end When asked if he received any Intel briefings on the drones, he says I don’t wanna comment on that. Do you think he’s worried at all? “The Government knows what is happening… Look, our military knows where they took off from. If it’s a garage, they can go right into that garage… They know where it came from and where it went. And for some reason they don’t want to comment… and I think they’d be better off saying what it is… our military knows and our president knows. And for some reason they want to keep people in suspense. I can’t imagine it’s the enemy, because if it’s the enemy, they’d blast it out… even if they were late, they’d blast it. Something strange is going on, and for some reason they don’t want to tell the people. They happen to be over Bedminster, they’re very close to Bedminster. I think maybe I won’t spend the weekend in Bedminster.”
1:02

Trump Comments on the Drones and Cancels his Trip to Bedminster, NJ— But Pay Attention to what he says at the end When asked if he received any Intel briefings on the drones, he says I don’t wanna comment on that. Do you think he’s worried at all? “The Government knows what is happening… Look, our military knows where they took off from. If it’s a garage, they can go right into that garage… They know where it came from and where it went. And for some reason they don’t want to comment… and I think they’d be better off saying what it is… our military knows and our president knows. And for some reason they want to keep people in suspense. I can’t imagine it’s the enemy, because if it’s the enemy, they’d blast it out… even if they were late, they’d blast it. Something strange is going on, and for some reason they don’t want to tell the people. They happen to be over Bedminster, they’re very close to Bedminster. I think maybe I won’t spend the weekend in Bedminster.”

MJTruthUltra

344,115 次观看 • 1 年前

The Anchormen on Israel using a nuclear weapon against Iran: GAETZ: “If Israel believes that this bombing campaign of the United States, that is relentless and effective at destroying infrastructure and military material, but not effective at regime change. If they don’t think that’s enough to send Iran into chaos, they may use the nuclear weapon we all know they have. I shudder to think that. I would like to believe that no country would do that again, and so I’m not of that ilk yet, but the argument was made.” SHARP: “What would the consequences be? Is the U.S. gonna bomb Israel? How is that gonna shake out? Who’s gonna hold them account for that? Not that I think Israel wouldn’t do it. They have their pathological hatred of Iran and they wanna take that region out, and they have the Greater Israel objective. From a philosophical standpoint, they wouldn’t have a problem with it, but God, what would the consequences be?” WATCH NOW:
1:14

The Anchormen on Israel using a nuclear weapon against Iran: GAETZ: “If Israel believes that this bombing campaign of the United States, that is relentless and effective at destroying infrastructure and military material, but not effective at regime change. If they don’t think that’s enough to send Iran into chaos, they may use the nuclear weapon we all know they have. I shudder to think that. I would like to believe that no country would do that again, and so I’m not of that ilk yet, but the argument was made.” SHARP: “What would the consequences be? Is the U.S. gonna bomb Israel? How is that gonna shake out? Who’s gonna hold them account for that? Not that I think Israel wouldn’t do it. They have their pathological hatred of Iran and they wanna take that region out, and they have the Greater Israel objective. From a philosophical standpoint, they wouldn’t have a problem with it, but God, what would the consequences be?” WATCH NOW:

Former Congressman Matt Gaetz

122,267 次观看 • 9 天前

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte PRAISES President Trump for decisive action in Iran, calling it “CRUCIAL” for the entire world if reports that Iran can strike as far as Diego Garcia are confirmed. RUTTE: “We are looking into that. But if this would be true, it is the more evidence what the president is doing here, taking out the ballistic missile capability, taking out the nuclear capability from Iran, is crucial.” “And exactly as the ambassador just said, Ambassador Waltz, we have seen with North Korea if we negotiate for too long, you might pass the moment when you can still get things done and North Korea now has the nuclear capability.” “If Iran would have the nuclear capability including together with missile capability, it would be a direct threat to Israel and to the region and to Europe and to the stability in the world.” “So the president doing this is crucial.” “And I have seen the polling. But I really hope the American people will be with him because he is doing this to make the whole world safer.”
1:00

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte PRAISES President Trump for decisive action in Iran, calling it “CRUCIAL” for the entire world if reports that Iran can strike as far as Diego Garcia are confirmed. RUTTE: “We are looking into that. But if this would be true, it is the more evidence what the president is doing here, taking out the ballistic missile capability, taking out the nuclear capability from Iran, is crucial.” “And exactly as the ambassador just said, Ambassador Waltz, we have seen with North Korea if we negotiate for too long, you might pass the moment when you can still get things done and North Korea now has the nuclear capability.” “If Iran would have the nuclear capability including together with missile capability, it would be a direct threat to Israel and to the region and to Europe and to the stability in the world.” “So the president doing this is crucial.” “And I have seen the polling. But I really hope the American people will be with him because he is doing this to make the whole world safer.”

Overton

49,983 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨Iran’s🇮🇷 DEVASTATING Capabilities to strike the US🇺🇸: Cyber-attacks, Super EMPs…NUKES? ‘Iran has a number of options to attack the US, both in terms of attacking US forces in the 50 military bases we have in the region, and US carrier strike groups. They have hypersonic missiles which we cannot intercept. If they were proven accurate enough, it’s very likely they could strike a US carrier. Probably they couldn’t sink it, but they could cause it to catch fire and limp away. That would be a tremendous blow to US prestige. Other things they can do: they have tremendous offensive cyber capabilities. They’ve demonstrated capability to take down our water purification distribution system, at least on a regional basis. I would assess that they have the capability to shut down America’s entire critical infrastructure for a period of weeks, perhaps months. And that would be devastating to the US. I don’t think there’s anyone that doubts they have that capability. In terms of nuclear capabilities, I assess that they likely already have nuclear weapons. Whether they have the miniaturisation technology necessary to put them atop missiles is unclear. But I think it’s likely they had a nuclear test in North Korea as recently as 2017. They also may likely have super EMP satellites. Super EMP is a way that Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran could potentially take out all US critical infrastructure at the beginning of a conflict, or even, in the case of Russia or China, before a nuclear first strike against the United States. So those are all devastating capabilities that could potentially kill tens of millions of Americans. And there’s not a lot the US can do about it, because US leaders have spent so much time with offensive power projection, with conventional forces around the world, and neglected our homeland and strategic defences here at home.’ -David Pyne, Deputy Director of the US Task Force on National and Homeland Security, on Going Underground
2:40

🚨Iran’s🇮🇷 DEVASTATING Capabilities to strike the US🇺🇸: Cyber-attacks, Super EMPs…NUKES? ‘Iran has a number of options to attack the US, both in terms of attacking US forces in the 50 military bases we have in the region, and US carrier strike groups. They have hypersonic missiles which we cannot intercept. If they were proven accurate enough, it’s very likely they could strike a US carrier. Probably they couldn’t sink it, but they could cause it to catch fire and limp away. That would be a tremendous blow to US prestige. Other things they can do: they have tremendous offensive cyber capabilities. They’ve demonstrated capability to take down our water purification distribution system, at least on a regional basis. I would assess that they have the capability to shut down America’s entire critical infrastructure for a period of weeks, perhaps months. And that would be devastating to the US. I don’t think there’s anyone that doubts they have that capability. In terms of nuclear capabilities, I assess that they likely already have nuclear weapons. Whether they have the miniaturisation technology necessary to put them atop missiles is unclear. But I think it’s likely they had a nuclear test in North Korea as recently as 2017. They also may likely have super EMP satellites. Super EMP is a way that Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran could potentially take out all US critical infrastructure at the beginning of a conflict, or even, in the case of Russia or China, before a nuclear first strike against the United States. So those are all devastating capabilities that could potentially kill tens of millions of Americans. And there’s not a lot the US can do about it, because US leaders have spent so much time with offensive power projection, with conventional forces around the world, and neglected our homeland and strategic defences here at home.’ -David Pyne, Deputy Director of the US Task Force on National and Homeland Security, on Going Underground

Afshin Rattansi

80,346 次观看 • 6 个月前

Angry Democrat caller ERUPTS live on C-SPAN, torches Democrats over govt shutdown — announces he’s LEAVING the party. “I’m a Democrat, but I don’t understand what the party is doing… They’re holding out because THEY DON’T LIKE THE ORANGE MAN IN OFFICE. “So why are they blaming the other side when they’re the ones that have to come to the table and do the votes? They have to vote the right way to open the government and make sure that everybody has their checks and is getting paid. “And I think it’s kind of cruel to actually sit back and not participate because you don’t feel like the other party is doing what you want them to do. “There’s a trans section in there as well. They want to give money to afford trans surgeries for young kids. “And all this stuff that the Democrats have now gone into, which I am nowhere near. In fact, I think I’m going to be LEAVING the Democrat Party because this happens too often where they’re blaming the opposite party when they know they can do the right thing. “They need to do the right thing and reopen this government instead of keeping it shut down. Like they’re hijacking the American people. I’ve seen it before. We’ve seen them vote the right way when they’re in power, so why the hell can’t they vote the right way when they’re not in power? “So get this government back open. Get the American people what they deserve. And this is basically a Schumer shutdown. From what I’ve seen, from what I’ve been watching on C-SPAN, what they show [is] the Democrats whining and crying and blaming. That’s what I see.” The caller’s rant clearly left the C-SPAN host unamused. “All right, Jason,” she said before moving on to the next caller.
2:12

Angry Democrat caller ERUPTS live on C-SPAN, torches Democrats over govt shutdown — announces he’s LEAVING the party. “I’m a Democrat, but I don’t understand what the party is doing… They’re holding out because THEY DON’T LIKE THE ORANGE MAN IN OFFICE. “So why are they blaming the other side when they’re the ones that have to come to the table and do the votes? They have to vote the right way to open the government and make sure that everybody has their checks and is getting paid. “And I think it’s kind of cruel to actually sit back and not participate because you don’t feel like the other party is doing what you want them to do. “There’s a trans section in there as well. They want to give money to afford trans surgeries for young kids. “And all this stuff that the Democrats have now gone into, which I am nowhere near. In fact, I think I’m going to be LEAVING the Democrat Party because this happens too often where they’re blaming the opposite party when they know they can do the right thing. “They need to do the right thing and reopen this government instead of keeping it shut down. Like they’re hijacking the American people. I’ve seen it before. We’ve seen them vote the right way when they’re in power, so why the hell can’t they vote the right way when they’re not in power? “So get this government back open. Get the American people what they deserve. And this is basically a Schumer shutdown. From what I’ve seen, from what I’ve been watching on C-SPAN, what they show [is] the Democrats whining and crying and blaming. That’s what I see.” The caller’s rant clearly left the C-SPAN host unamused. “All right, Jason,” she said before moving on to the next caller.

Vigilant Fox 🦊

73,192 次观看 • 9 个月前

Sen. Eric Schmitt says President Trump achieved what many thought was impossible, crippling Iran’s military and nuclear capabilities while creating an opening for diplomacy: “President Trump was very clear from the beginning about the mission here, which was to ensure that Iran would never have a nuclear weapon. They no longer have the ability to do that, and now they’re signing on the dotted line, for the first time, that they won’t pursue it. And we don’t need to trust them—we just need to verify it. The president effectively knocked out their military capability. Their navy is at the bottom of the sea. They have no air defense. Their nuclear program is in shambles and nowhere near being restarted. And if necessary, we can always go back and mow the lawn because we’ve got eyes on it. What the president has done is create space for diplomacy, which has always been his North Star. There’s still more work to do, and we need to verify all of this, but he has accomplished something that most experts six months ago would have said was impossible. I think it’s a good outcome for the American people.”
0:53

Sen. Eric Schmitt says President Trump achieved what many thought was impossible, crippling Iran’s military and nuclear capabilities while creating an opening for diplomacy: “President Trump was very clear from the beginning about the mission here, which was to ensure that Iran would never have a nuclear weapon. They no longer have the ability to do that, and now they’re signing on the dotted line, for the first time, that they won’t pursue it. And we don’t need to trust them—we just need to verify it. The president effectively knocked out their military capability. Their navy is at the bottom of the sea. They have no air defense. Their nuclear program is in shambles and nowhere near being restarted. And if necessary, we can always go back and mow the lawn because we’ve got eyes on it. What the president has done is create space for diplomacy, which has always been his North Star. There’s still more work to do, and we need to verify all of this, but he has accomplished something that most experts six months ago would have said was impossible. I think it’s a good outcome for the American people.”

Sean Hannity 🇺🇸

490,941 次观看 • 1 个月前

President Trump achieved what many thought was impossible, crippling Iran’s military and nuclear capabilities while creating an opening for diplomacy. President Trump was very clear from the beginning about the mission here, which was to ensure that Iran would never have a nuclear weapon. They no longer have the ability to do that, and now they’re signing on the dotted line, for the first time, that they won’t pursue it. And we don’t need to trust them—we just need to verify it. The president effectively knocked out their military capability. Their navy is at the bottom of the sea. They have no air defense. Their nuclear program is in shambles and nowhere near being restarted. And if necessary, we can always go back and mow the lawn because we’ve got eyes on it. What the president has done is create space for diplomacy, which has always been his North Star. There’s still more work to do, and we need to verify all of this, but he has accomplished something that most experts six months ago would have said was impossible. I think it’s a good outcome for the American people.
1:01

President Trump achieved what many thought was impossible, crippling Iran’s military and nuclear capabilities while creating an opening for diplomacy. President Trump was very clear from the beginning about the mission here, which was to ensure that Iran would never have a nuclear weapon. They no longer have the ability to do that, and now they’re signing on the dotted line, for the first time, that they won’t pursue it. And we don’t need to trust them—we just need to verify it. The president effectively knocked out their military capability. Their navy is at the bottom of the sea. They have no air defense. Their nuclear program is in shambles and nowhere near being restarted. And if necessary, we can always go back and mow the lawn because we’ve got eyes on it. What the president has done is create space for diplomacy, which has always been his North Star. There’s still more work to do, and we need to verify all of this, but he has accomplished something that most experts six months ago would have said was impossible. I think it’s a good outcome for the American people.

Eric Schmitt

53,461 次观看 • 1 个月前

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent delivered the perfect answer when Maria Bartiromo asked whether he is confident that the Iranians will keep their promises when it comes to a deal. He ended with a warning to the regime. BESSENT: “Well, what I have confidence in is that President Trump’s going to hold them to it.” “That with the Iranians, we’ll see. Their government, as I’ve said, we didn’t have regime change, but we changed the regime.” “The first layer was decapitated, second layer decapitated. We’re on the third group so maybe they have seen what happened to the others and they see what President Trump is willing to do.” “So if President Trump agrees to this deal, I would tell the Iranian leaders right now, he will enforce it. And both military and economically.” Trump will enforce any Iran deal with full force.
0:49

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent delivered the perfect answer when Maria Bartiromo asked whether he is confident that the Iranians will keep their promises when it comes to a deal. He ended with a warning to the regime. BESSENT: “Well, what I have confidence in is that President Trump’s going to hold them to it.” “That with the Iranians, we’ll see. Their government, as I’ve said, we didn’t have regime change, but we changed the regime.” “The first layer was decapitated, second layer decapitated. We’re on the third group so maybe they have seen what happened to the others and they see what President Trump is willing to do.” “So if President Trump agrees to this deal, I would tell the Iranian leaders right now, he will enforce it. And both military and economically.” Trump will enforce any Iran deal with full force.

Overton

138,265 次观看 • 2 个月前

NEW: George Clooney claims MAGA is dead after Trump finishes this term. ANDERSON COOPER: “Do you think Trumpism lasts beyond this term?” CLOONEY: “Don’t think so. I think it’d be very hard to do it.” Clooney then put on his “expert” hat to explain why he thinks that is: “He [Trump] is also a celebrity, and he is charming. And to the people who like him, they think he’s funny. To a great many others, they don’t. And so when he is finished, and he will be finished, they’re going to have to go looking for someone who can deliver the message that he delivered with the same kind of charisma. And they don’t have that.” Clooney is about to get a rude awakening because he still thinks MAGA is a Trump fan club, not a reckoning.
0:55

NEW: George Clooney claims MAGA is dead after Trump finishes this term. ANDERSON COOPER: “Do you think Trumpism lasts beyond this term?” CLOONEY: “Don’t think so. I think it’d be very hard to do it.” Clooney then put on his “expert” hat to explain why he thinks that is: “He [Trump] is also a celebrity, and he is charming. And to the people who like him, they think he’s funny. To a great many others, they don’t. And so when he is finished, and he will be finished, they’re going to have to go looking for someone who can deliver the message that he delivered with the same kind of charisma. And they don’t have that.” Clooney is about to get a rude awakening because he still thinks MAGA is a Trump fan club, not a reckoning.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

2,304,145 次观看 • 1 年前

ABC’s Mary Bruce: “On the rising oil and gas prices, the President has said that this is a small price to pay for getting rid of a nuclear weapon. But ten weeks in, are we any closer to getting rid of Iran’s nuclear material?” Secretary Marco Rubio: “Yeah, but look, here’s the way to think about Iran. And this is what I described at the very beginning of this. What was Iran’s plan? You have to understand what their plan was. Their plan was they were going to build this conventional shield where they would have so many thousands of missiles and drones and rockets that they couldn’t be attacked. And behind that conventional shield that they were trying to build, they would then break out and do whatever they wanted with their nuclear program. They no longer have that conventional shield, okay? We told you guys from the very beginning, and we’re very consistent in this messaging. The operation that has concluded was going to destroy their navy. They have no navy left. They don’t. Not a navy. They have small boats and Boston Whalers, but they don’t have a navy left. They don’t have an air force. I challenge you. When is the last time you read or heard about an Iranian jet flying anywhere? They don’t have an air force. Their missile launching capability has been substantially degraded. And their industrial base — their defense industrial base has been severely, severely damaged. So, their ability to build a shield behind which they could hide their nuclear program was wiped out. That’s a very substantial achievement. And that was the purpose of this operation from day one.” Bruce: “But do you HAVE to get their nuclear material in order for this war to end?” Rubio: “Well, that’s one of the topics that needs to be discussed. I don’t know about. I think you’re linking it — the operation is over. Epic Fury is — President notified Congress we’re done with that stage of it. Okay. We’re now on to this project of freedom. As far as the negotiation is concerned, I think the President’s been clear that part of the negotiation process has to be not just the enrichment, but what happens to this material that’s buried deep somewhere that they have still have access to if they ever wanted to dig it out, that has to be addressed. And that’s being addressed in the negotiation. I’m not going to go further on what progress has been made on that topic, because I don’t want to endanger the negotiations, but suffice it to say that the President and this entire team is aware of the centrality of that question, and that will have to be addressed one way or the other.”
1:59

ABC’s Mary Bruce: “On the rising oil and gas prices, the President has said that this is a small price to pay for getting rid of a nuclear weapon. But ten weeks in, are we any closer to getting rid of Iran’s nuclear material?” Secretary Marco Rubio: “Yeah, but look, here’s the way to think about Iran. And this is what I described at the very beginning of this. What was Iran’s plan? You have to understand what their plan was. Their plan was they were going to build this conventional shield where they would have so many thousands of missiles and drones and rockets that they couldn’t be attacked. And behind that conventional shield that they were trying to build, they would then break out and do whatever they wanted with their nuclear program. They no longer have that conventional shield, okay? We told you guys from the very beginning, and we’re very consistent in this messaging. The operation that has concluded was going to destroy their navy. They have no navy left. They don’t. Not a navy. They have small boats and Boston Whalers, but they don’t have a navy left. They don’t have an air force. I challenge you. When is the last time you read or heard about an Iranian jet flying anywhere? They don’t have an air force. Their missile launching capability has been substantially degraded. And their industrial base — their defense industrial base has been severely, severely damaged. So, their ability to build a shield behind which they could hide their nuclear program was wiped out. That’s a very substantial achievement. And that was the purpose of this operation from day one.” Bruce: “But do you HAVE to get their nuclear material in order for this war to end?” Rubio: “Well, that’s one of the topics that needs to be discussed. I don’t know about. I think you’re linking it — the operation is over. Epic Fury is — President notified Congress we’re done with that stage of it. Okay. We’re now on to this project of freedom. As far as the negotiation is concerned, I think the President’s been clear that part of the negotiation process has to be not just the enrichment, but what happens to this material that’s buried deep somewhere that they have still have access to if they ever wanted to dig it out, that has to be addressed. And that’s being addressed in the negotiation. I’m not going to go further on what progress has been made on that topic, because I don’t want to endanger the negotiations, but suffice it to say that the President and this entire team is aware of the centrality of that question, and that will have to be addressed one way or the other.”

Curtis Houck

51,169 次观看 • 2 个月前

Sen. Ted Cruz says President Trump has drawn a clear red line with Iran, zero enrichment and no blackmail in the Strait of Hormuz, warning any violation will bring serious consequences: “Now there is a pause in hostilities, and President Trump is absolutely right when he says what he expects of Iran is, number one, zero enrichment, and number two, that they hand over the enriched uranium they have right now. President Trump is right to draw that line and to insist upon that. And he’s been clear as well that Iran will open and keep open the Strait of Hormuz—they will not use it for negotiating or blackmail. And I think if they try to do so, the president’s threat remains very operative—that if they shut down the Strait of Hormuz, if they break this agreement, I think the president is prepared to take out Iran’s power generation and its bridges. Hopefully, he does not have to do that. Here’s the outcome I’d like to see: a peaceful Iran with a government that wants to be friends with America, that is not waging war on America or killing Americans. That would be good for the people of Iran, and that would be good for America. That’s what President Trump, I believe, is trying to achieve.”
1:10

Sen. Ted Cruz says President Trump has drawn a clear red line with Iran, zero enrichment and no blackmail in the Strait of Hormuz, warning any violation will bring serious consequences: “Now there is a pause in hostilities, and President Trump is absolutely right when he says what he expects of Iran is, number one, zero enrichment, and number two, that they hand over the enriched uranium they have right now. President Trump is right to draw that line and to insist upon that. And he’s been clear as well that Iran will open and keep open the Strait of Hormuz—they will not use it for negotiating or blackmail. And I think if they try to do so, the president’s threat remains very operative—that if they shut down the Strait of Hormuz, if they break this agreement, I think the president is prepared to take out Iran’s power generation and its bridges. Hopefully, he does not have to do that. Here’s the outcome I’d like to see: a peaceful Iran with a government that wants to be friends with America, that is not waging war on America or killing Americans. That would be good for the people of Iran, and that would be good for America. That’s what President Trump, I believe, is trying to achieve.”

Sean Hannity 🇺🇸

209,926 次观看 • 3 个月前

Joe Rogan just opened up about his journey to Christianity. “I don’t think it’s myth.” “I think they’re relaying truth.” “I think it is an ancient relaying of a real event and the real history of human beings.” “I don’t think the whole thing is myth, but I don’t think it’s entirely accurate either.” “I don’t know what the serpent in the garden and Adam and Eve and the apple … means.” “When they talk about the first human beings, I assume that that is a recounting of a genetic manipulation.” “If you’re telling a story for thousands of years where people don’t even have books, they don’t have paper, they don’t have a written language … they’re just trying to remember what they knew from thousands and thousands of years before when they had achieved a very high level of sophistication—which is what I think happened—this is the kind of story that you get.” “There’s a lot of truth in there.” “But I think the, the ultimate story is lost.” “The ultimate truth … I don’t think it’s accurately documented anywhere.” Joe Rogan Jesse Michels
3:14

Joe Rogan just opened up about his journey to Christianity. “I don’t think it’s myth.” “I think they’re relaying truth.” “I think it is an ancient relaying of a real event and the real history of human beings.” “I don’t think the whole thing is myth, but I don’t think it’s entirely accurate either.” “I don’t know what the serpent in the garden and Adam and Eve and the apple … means.” “When they talk about the first human beings, I assume that that is a recounting of a genetic manipulation.” “If you’re telling a story for thousands of years where people don’t even have books, they don’t have paper, they don’t have a written language … they’re just trying to remember what they knew from thousands and thousands of years before when they had achieved a very high level of sophistication—which is what I think happened—this is the kind of story that you get.” “There’s a lot of truth in there.” “But I think the, the ultimate story is lost.” “The ultimate truth … I don’t think it’s accurately documented anywhere.” Joe Rogan Jesse Michels

Holden Culotta

818,608 次观看 • 8 个月前

TRUMP ISN'T HOLDING BACK! When it comes to Somalia and Ilhan Omar, President Trump isn't leaving ANY ROOM for misinterpretation on how he feels about them! "It’s not a country, they don’t have a government when they don’t have anything. I always hate to see this. Ilhan Omar, she comes from Somalia." "A BACKWARDS country. They say it’s the worst country in the world, if it’s a country. I don’t even think it’s a country. There is an organization. They don’t have police. They don’t have military. They don’t have anything." SEND HER BACK!
2:23

TRUMP ISN'T HOLDING BACK! When it comes to Somalia and Ilhan Omar, President Trump isn't leaving ANY ROOM for misinterpretation on how he feels about them! "It’s not a country, they don’t have a government when they don’t have anything. I always hate to see this. Ilhan Omar, she comes from Somalia." "A BACKWARDS country. They say it’s the worst country in the world, if it’s a country. I don’t even think it’s a country. There is an organization. They don’t have police. They don’t have military. They don’t have anything." SEND HER BACK!

Gunther Eagleman™

16,745 次观看 • 6 个月前

Me: “You have to ask yourself the question, if Trump says the war is going to end ‘very soon,’ then what’s the $200 billion for? Because if the war is going to end very soon, then it doesn’t cost $200 billion. And he gave us a hint. He said, ‘Oh, I want you to fund the next war.’ What’s that one? ‘Oh, it’s Cuba.’ What are you going to do? ‘Oh, I’m going to take Cuba.’ What does that mean? ‘Don’t worry about it.’” Moynihan: Don’t you think we don’t want to telegraph to the enemy our exact timeline? Me: “I wish they would at least tell the president, because he doesn’t seem to know how long this is going to to take.”
0:30

Me: “You have to ask yourself the question, if Trump says the war is going to end ‘very soon,’ then what’s the $200 billion for? Because if the war is going to end very soon, then it doesn’t cost $200 billion. And he gave us a hint. He said, ‘Oh, I want you to fund the next war.’ What’s that one? ‘Oh, it’s Cuba.’ What are you going to do? ‘Oh, I’m going to take Cuba.’ What does that mean? ‘Don’t worry about it.’” Moynihan: Don’t you think we don’t want to telegraph to the enemy our exact timeline? Me: “I wish they would at least tell the president, because he doesn’t seem to know how long this is going to to take.”

Josh Rogin

252,835 次观看 • 4 个月前

WATCH: Very newsy exchange at the White House Tuesday afternoon between President Trump and CBS’s Ed O'Keefe about Iran, revealing the U.S. was gifted “a present” from whatever remains of the new/old Iranian regime that is “oil and gas related”.... President Trump: “Do you have another question? You haven’t been here in a while.” O’Keefe: “Well, on Iran, can you give us any more sense of who exactly in Iran it is, either Witkoff or Kushner you’re speaking with?” Trump: “Yeah. We had — I hate to say this in front of these young people — they’re not children. I spoke to most of them. They sound like adults to me. Even though they are sort of children, right? They’ll always be your children. But I hate to say it, but we killed all their leadership. And then they met to choose new leaders, and we killed all of them. And now, we have a new group and we can easily do that. But let’s see how they turn out. It’s — we have, really, regime change. You know, this is a change in the regime because the leaders are all very different than the ones that we started off with that created all those problems. So this was — I think we can say, Jason, this is regime change, right?” O’Keefe: “What makes you trust them?” Trump: “I don’t trust anybody. I don’t trust you. I mean, that’s only because I know you, but if I didn’t know you, I’d probably have more trust. But I don’t trust anyone.” O’Keefe: “Why bother talking to them?” Trump: “Why do you — why do you say that? Why do you say what makes you — do you think I trust them? I don’t trust them.” O’Keefe: “Then why bother talking to them?” Trump: “Because they’re going to make a deal. They’re going to make a deal. They did something yesterday that was amazing. Actually. They gave us a present. And the president arrived today and it was a very big present worth a tremendous amount of money. And I’m not going to tell you what that present is, but it was a very significant prize. And they gave it to us, and they said they were going to give it, so that meant one thing to me. We’re dealing with the right people —” O’Keefe: “Was it nuclear related.” Trump: “No, it wasn’t nuclear related. It was oil and gas related. And it was a very nice thing they did. But what it showed me is that we’re dealing with the right people because, you know, you don’t know because the leadership was killed, all gone. Khamenei, all gone. As the expression goes, the past Supreme Leader and then the new Supreme Leader was racked up at a minimum, racked up pretty good, and everyone else was gone. And then many of the people in the third tier are gone. But we’re dealing with a group of people that I think turn out and the — the present, the gift they made to us was very significant. And they said they were going to do it and it happened. And they’re the only ones that could have done it.”
2:36

WATCH: Very newsy exchange at the White House Tuesday afternoon between President Trump and CBS’s Ed O'Keefe about Iran, revealing the U.S. was gifted “a present” from whatever remains of the new/old Iranian regime that is “oil and gas related”.... President Trump: “Do you have another question? You haven’t been here in a while.” O’Keefe: “Well, on Iran, can you give us any more sense of who exactly in Iran it is, either Witkoff or Kushner you’re speaking with?” Trump: “Yeah. We had — I hate to say this in front of these young people — they’re not children. I spoke to most of them. They sound like adults to me. Even though they are sort of children, right? They’ll always be your children. But I hate to say it, but we killed all their leadership. And then they met to choose new leaders, and we killed all of them. And now, we have a new group and we can easily do that. But let’s see how they turn out. It’s — we have, really, regime change. You know, this is a change in the regime because the leaders are all very different than the ones that we started off with that created all those problems. So this was — I think we can say, Jason, this is regime change, right?” O’Keefe: “What makes you trust them?” Trump: “I don’t trust anybody. I don’t trust you. I mean, that’s only because I know you, but if I didn’t know you, I’d probably have more trust. But I don’t trust anyone.” O’Keefe: “Why bother talking to them?” Trump: “Why do you — why do you say that? Why do you say what makes you — do you think I trust them? I don’t trust them.” O’Keefe: “Then why bother talking to them?” Trump: “Because they’re going to make a deal. They’re going to make a deal. They did something yesterday that was amazing. Actually. They gave us a present. And the president arrived today and it was a very big present worth a tremendous amount of money. And I’m not going to tell you what that present is, but it was a very significant prize. And they gave it to us, and they said they were going to give it, so that meant one thing to me. We’re dealing with the right people —” O’Keefe: “Was it nuclear related.” Trump: “No, it wasn’t nuclear related. It was oil and gas related. And it was a very nice thing they did. But what it showed me is that we’re dealing with the right people because, you know, you don’t know because the leadership was killed, all gone. Khamenei, all gone. As the expression goes, the past Supreme Leader and then the new Supreme Leader was racked up at a minimum, racked up pretty good, and everyone else was gone. And then many of the people in the third tier are gone. But we’re dealing with a group of people that I think turn out and the — the present, the gift they made to us was very significant. And they said they were going to do it and it happened. And they’re the only ones that could have done it.”

Curtis Houck

108,556 次观看 • 4 个月前

"A new Trump administration would at a minimum put enormous pressure on the Ukrainians: 'If you don’t come to terms, we’re going to cut you off.' That, I think, would be the most likely outcome. And then that has ramifying effects on everything else…"
1:22

"A new Trump administration would at a minimum put enormous pressure on the Ukrainians: 'If you don’t come to terms, we’re going to cut you off.' That, I think, would be the most likely outcome. And then that has ramifying effects on everything else…"

Bill Kristol

37,797 次观看 • 1 年前

☢️Col. Lawrence Wilkerson: ‘IRAN HAS ALREADY WON…if they want nuclear weapons, they will make one.’ 'I think Iran is perched right now exactly where Haaretz said they were. All they have to do to win is not lose, and All the United States and Israel have to do is achieve a spectacular victory, and they aren't going to do that. So Iran’s already won. The question is, How much damage is Donald Trump and what’s left of the American military going to be done to in the interim? And How much damage is going to be done to that military, particularly its maritime elements? They have not unleashed anything significant yet on a US warship. They could and they might, and that's the end of that warship if they do. The carrier is holding off at least 1300 kilometres. Not just because of range. Because there are some missiles that can go that far. It's because the carrier is so capable of getting up to flight speed so fast that once it has a warning of a missile launch, it can itself defend fairly successfully without subsurface, surface, or airborne assets. If the carrier moves at the right moment, at the speed it's capable of achieving, it's going to be very hard to hit it in that terminal phase. But they would ultimately fail with a hypersonic missile. I take my experience from Kang Sok-Ju and Kye-Gwan in North Korea in October 2002, when we went to present them with an economic package the President and even the Vice President thought would be persuasive in getting them to back off their nuclear programme. Kye-Gwan looked right at us and said…we already have nuclear weapons. So I know how we were fooled by North Korea. I know North Korea in 2002 was working with Iran, not just on underground fortifications but also on nuclear weapons, how to match warhead to missile. So Ted, I think, is right. If the Iranians want a nuclear weapon, they'll make one.’ — Former Chief of Staff at the State Department, Col. Lawrence Wilkerson on the latest episode of New Order Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇
2:55

☢️Col. Lawrence Wilkerson: ‘IRAN HAS ALREADY WON…if they want nuclear weapons, they will make one.’ 'I think Iran is perched right now exactly where Haaretz said they were. All they have to do to win is not lose, and All the United States and Israel have to do is achieve a spectacular victory, and they aren't going to do that. So Iran’s already won. The question is, How much damage is Donald Trump and what’s left of the American military going to be done to in the interim? And How much damage is going to be done to that military, particularly its maritime elements? They have not unleashed anything significant yet on a US warship. They could and they might, and that's the end of that warship if they do. The carrier is holding off at least 1300 kilometres. Not just because of range. Because there are some missiles that can go that far. It's because the carrier is so capable of getting up to flight speed so fast that once it has a warning of a missile launch, it can itself defend fairly successfully without subsurface, surface, or airborne assets. If the carrier moves at the right moment, at the speed it's capable of achieving, it's going to be very hard to hit it in that terminal phase. But they would ultimately fail with a hypersonic missile. I take my experience from Kang Sok-Ju and Kye-Gwan in North Korea in October 2002, when we went to present them with an economic package the President and even the Vice President thought would be persuasive in getting them to back off their nuclear programme. Kye-Gwan looked right at us and said…we already have nuclear weapons. So I know how we were fooled by North Korea. I know North Korea in 2002 was working with Iran, not just on underground fortifications but also on nuclear weapons, how to match warhead to missile. So Ted, I think, is right. If the Iranians want a nuclear weapon, they'll make one.’ — Former Chief of Staff at the State Department, Col. Lawrence Wilkerson on the latest episode of New Order Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

New Order with Afshin Rattansi

48,243 次观看 • 3 个月前

When I am at the gym and I see somebody’s water bottle there or a towel or something. I know they just stepped away for a moment and that the machine is occupied. Out of respect I won’t move it out of the way only for them to come back and have to explain themselves anyways. This young lady on the machine left her water bottle on it because she stepped away for a moment to use the restroom only for somebody else to come by and try to use it in her place. Would you have understood the etiquette or is it just a free for all? When I first started working out I was unfamiliar with the gym etiquette. Some people just got done with a hard set and need to stand up and walk for a few moneys or get a drink of water and they use it as their rest period so that they can go back at it. Interrupting that process is the same thing as booting them off the machine mid workout. It’s rude and uncalled for but why does it keep happening? I think what it is, is that some people are very judgmental, they see others and think that they are more serious about working out than the other person so that to them it means they are entitled to use it first because their workouts are more important. I used to let them do that to me but no more. I treat it as first come first serve, if they don’t want to wait then maybe they need to avoid the gym during peak hours. This is the very reason I work out in the middle of the night most of the time. I rather not be bothered and if I need to take my time I can, most of the time nobody else is even there anyways when I go.
0:58

When I am at the gym and I see somebody’s water bottle there or a towel or something. I know they just stepped away for a moment and that the machine is occupied. Out of respect I won’t move it out of the way only for them to come back and have to explain themselves anyways. This young lady on the machine left her water bottle on it because she stepped away for a moment to use the restroom only for somebody else to come by and try to use it in her place. Would you have understood the etiquette or is it just a free for all? When I first started working out I was unfamiliar with the gym etiquette. Some people just got done with a hard set and need to stand up and walk for a few moneys or get a drink of water and they use it as their rest period so that they can go back at it. Interrupting that process is the same thing as booting them off the machine mid workout. It’s rude and uncalled for but why does it keep happening? I think what it is, is that some people are very judgmental, they see others and think that they are more serious about working out than the other person so that to them it means they are entitled to use it first because their workouts are more important. I used to let them do that to me but no more. I treat it as first come first serve, if they don’t want to wait then maybe they need to avoid the gym during peak hours. This is the very reason I work out in the middle of the night most of the time. I rather not be bothered and if I need to take my time I can, most of the time nobody else is even there anyways when I go.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

176,262 次观看 • 13 天前

Stephen A. Smith comes right out and says it: The Democrats now have to OWN Anthony Fauci and all of his scandals because they USED him “to enforce so much on the American people.” He said that “direct connection” to the Democratic Party may come back to bite them in the midterms. SMITH: “I don’t think it amounts to nothing. Here’s why.” “Because he’s Anthony Fauci, and because there’s such a direct connection to the Democratic Party, remember the Democratic Party rode that wave to get Trump out of office…” “Because again, Trump and the economy…according to them, everything was looking a little bit decent and then the virus, the pandemic arrived.” “And all of a sudden everything went haywire and everything went downhill, and they rode that momentum…” “But the point is, is that Democrats rode that wave. And so when you look at Anthony Fauci now, the bottom line is they don’t get to separate themselves from him now.” “They don’t get to pull that off.” “If there’s any suspicion that can be elevated in his direction, that gets attached to the Democratic Party because you utilized him, basically, to enforce so much upon the American people at that particular moment in time.” “And folks are not going to forget that come midterm!” “They’re not going to forget it.”
1:19

Stephen A. Smith comes right out and says it: The Democrats now have to OWN Anthony Fauci and all of his scandals because they USED him “to enforce so much on the American people.” He said that “direct connection” to the Democratic Party may come back to bite them in the midterms. SMITH: “I don’t think it amounts to nothing. Here’s why.” “Because he’s Anthony Fauci, and because there’s such a direct connection to the Democratic Party, remember the Democratic Party rode that wave to get Trump out of office…” “Because again, Trump and the economy…according to them, everything was looking a little bit decent and then the virus, the pandemic arrived.” “And all of a sudden everything went haywire and everything went downhill, and they rode that momentum…” “But the point is, is that Democrats rode that wave. And so when you look at Anthony Fauci now, the bottom line is they don’t get to separate themselves from him now.” “They don’t get to pull that off.” “If there’s any suspicion that can be elevated in his direction, that gets attached to the Democratic Party because you utilized him, basically, to enforce so much upon the American people at that particular moment in time.” “And folks are not going to forget that come midterm!” “They’re not going to forget it.”

Overton

209,554 次观看 • 2 天前

🚨 JUST IN: Speaker Johnson says Iran better WATCH how many troops President Trump floods to the region and make a deal "The buildup of troops is very different than boots on the ground. We don't have boots on the ground. I don't think that's the intention, but I think Iran should WATCH that buildup, and they need to take note of that!" "They have to reopen the strait. They have to be good neighbors to their Middle East neighbors over there in the region." "They cannot have a nuclear warhead. They cannot have that capability. And they cannot declare war on the United States and Israel, which is what they did decades ago." "Our mission will be accomplished. I think that will wrap up in a short time period, and I know that's the intention of the administration and the Department of War." "We have the greatest, most powerful military fighting force ever conceived in the history of planet Earth." "It's an amazing, an amazing power that we have, and we willed it for good. We've done it here. That job is almost done, and I think it will wrap up soon."
0:54

🚨 JUST IN: Speaker Johnson says Iran better WATCH how many troops President Trump floods to the region and make a deal "The buildup of troops is very different than boots on the ground. We don't have boots on the ground. I don't think that's the intention, but I think Iran should WATCH that buildup, and they need to take note of that!" "They have to reopen the strait. They have to be good neighbors to their Middle East neighbors over there in the region." "They cannot have a nuclear warhead. They cannot have that capability. And they cannot declare war on the United States and Israel, which is what they did decades ago." "Our mission will be accomplished. I think that will wrap up in a short time period, and I know that's the intention of the administration and the Department of War." "We have the greatest, most powerful military fighting force ever conceived in the history of planet Earth." "It's an amazing, an amazing power that we have, and we willed it for good. We've done it here. That job is almost done, and I think it will wrap up soon."

Eric Daugherty

695,524 次观看 • 4 个月前