Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

I downloaded the release and tested it. I didn't observe any alerts or blocking during execution. The interesting part is that it's leveraging native Windows QoS policy functionality rather than exploiting a vulnerability. From what I observed, the tool simply creates QoS rules that throttle traffic for selected processes.... show more

The Haag™

9,818 subscribers

16,829 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

9 Kommentare

Profilbild von Br*an

Br*anvor 3 Monaten

Poor tom

Profilbild von Dodo on Security 🇵🇸 🇺🇦

Dodo on Security 🇵🇸 🇺🇦vor 3 Monaten

@UK_Daniel_Card Lmao I can't believe the CS simp is still going to this day

Profilbild von Donald Morgan Jr.

Donald Morgan Jr.vor 3 Monaten

You should have ended this post with “next”

Profilbild von tom square

tom squarevor 3 Monaten

your prevention policy is probably low. this aint working against crowdstrike on full aggression mode

Profilbild von The Haag™

The Haag™vor 3 Monaten

Extra Aggressive or regular aggressive? I think regular aggro was the default on this.

Profilbild von Austin

Austinvor 3 Monaten

@_josehelps I saw that Samir tested this and mentioned that it create WMI persistence, afaik

Profilbild von dreadnaught

dreadnaughtvor 3 Monaten

that's pretty neat. another reason for layered defenses like app whitelisting so your bypass attempts likely trip it

Profilbild von OSINT Shepherd

OSINT Shepherdvor 3 Monaten

Tom Square is a known troll don’t engage lol

Profilbild von Researchbob

Researchbobvor 3 Monaten

Did you try execute malware on the throttled Version?

Ähnliche Videos

Rick Rubin tells Andrew Huberman how he deals with creative or writer’s block. He treats his work like a diary entry (and doesn’t worry about internal or external judgment): ➡️ “What's the cause of the block? The block is usually something that's either personal ("I'm not good enough") or it can be a confidence issue ("I don't have anything to say") or it could be...thinking about someone else ("nobody's going to like what I make"). Do you know what I'm saying? So, it's either fear of self-judgment or external judgment. If you're making something with a freedom of "this is something I'm making for myself for now", that is all [you have to do]. It is a diary entry. Everything I make is a diary entry. The beauty of a diary entry is that I can write my diary entry and you can't tell me that my diary entry wasn't good enough. Or that [the diary entry] is not what I experienced. Of course it's what I experienced: I'm writing a personal diary for myself and no one else can judge if it is my experience of my life. Everything we make can be that: a personal reflection of who we are in that moment of time. It doesn't have to be the greatest you could ever do. It doesn't have to have any expectation that it's going to change the world. It doesn't have to sell a certain number of copies for any reason. It doesn't have any of those things at all. It is "I'm making this thing for me and I want to do it to the best of my ability and to where I feel good about it". [The work] is honest of where I'm at and if you're living in this world of just being honest to where you're at, there's nothing blocking you. There are no blocks. The blocks are all based on dealing with a different force or a different perception that is made up.” ⬅️

Rick Rubin tells Andrew Huberman how he deals with creative or writer’s block. He treats his work like a diary entry (and doesn’t worry about internal or external judgment): ➡️ “What's the cause of the block? The block is usually something that's either personal ("I'm not good enough") or it can be a confidence issue ("I don't have anything to say") or it could be...thinking about someone else ("nobody's going to like what I make"). Do you know what I'm saying? So, it's either fear of self-judgment or external judgment. If you're making something with a freedom of "this is something I'm making for myself for now", that is all [you have to do]. It is a diary entry. Everything I make is a diary entry. The beauty of a diary entry is that I can write my diary entry and you can't tell me that my diary entry wasn't good enough. Or that [the diary entry] is not what I experienced. Of course it's what I experienced: I'm writing a personal diary for myself and no one else can judge if it is my experience of my life. Everything we make can be that: a personal reflection of who we are in that moment of time. It doesn't have to be the greatest you could ever do. It doesn't have to have any expectation that it's going to change the world. It doesn't have to sell a certain number of copies for any reason. It doesn't have any of those things at all. It is "I'm making this thing for me and I want to do it to the best of my ability and to where I feel good about it". [The work] is honest of where I'm at and if you're living in this world of just being honest to where you're at, there's nothing blocking you. There are no blocks. The blocks are all based on dealing with a different force or a different perception that is made up.” ⬅️

Trung Phan

1,652,308 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan Chase, on how “good policy” could boost U.S. economic growth 🇺🇸 “I have a great suggestion for the politicians in the room. Good policy is free. Take six months in Congress. Do not raise revenues or cut expenses. Don’t do any of that. Don’t get involved in that debate. Just change policy that makes things better. Better housing policy, permitting policy, local affordable housing policy, education policy. I think you’ll grow 1% higher just by doing that. We don’t do it anymore. We simply layer bureaucratic stupid shit on top of the bureaucratic stuff, and it doesn’t work. And it’s demoralizing. If you actually analyze these policies, they hurt the lower-income people the most. So they’re all done in the name of good, but they hurt the lower-income people the most. I think we have to get our act together.”

Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan Chase, on how “good policy” could boost U.S. economic growth 🇺🇸 “I have a great suggestion for the politicians in the room. Good policy is free. Take six months in Congress. Do not raise revenues or cut expenses. Don’t do any of that. Don’t get involved in that debate. Just change policy that makes things better. Better housing policy, permitting policy, local affordable housing policy, education policy. I think you’ll grow 1% higher just by doing that. We don’t do it anymore. We simply layer bureaucratic stupid shit on top of the bureaucratic stuff, and it doesn’t work. And it’s demoralizing. If you actually analyze these policies, they hurt the lower-income people the most. So they’re all done in the name of good, but they hurt the lower-income people the most. I think we have to get our act together.”

Garrett Wright

47,440 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen

Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan Chase, on how “good policy” could boost U.S. economic growth 🇺🇸 “I have a great suggestion for the politicians in the room. Good policy is free. Take six months in Congress. Do not raise revenues or cut expenses. Don’t do any of that. Don’t get involved in that debate. Just change policy that makes things better. Better housing policy, permitting policy, local affordable housing policy, education policy. I think you’ll grow 1% higher just by doing that. We don’t do it anymore. We simply layer bureaucratic stupid shit on top of the bureaucratic stuff, and it doesn’t work. And it’s demoralizing. If you actually analyze these policies, they hurt the lower-income people the most. So they’re all done in the name of good, but they hurt the lower-income people the most. I think we have to get our act together.”

Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan Chase, on how “good policy” could boost U.S. economic growth 🇺🇸 “I have a great suggestion for the politicians in the room. Good policy is free. Take six months in Congress. Do not raise revenues or cut expenses. Don’t do any of that. Don’t get involved in that debate. Just change policy that makes things better. Better housing policy, permitting policy, local affordable housing policy, education policy. I think you’ll grow 1% higher just by doing that. We don’t do it anymore. We simply layer bureaucratic stupid shit on top of the bureaucratic stuff, and it doesn’t work. And it’s demoralizing. If you actually analyze these policies, they hurt the lower-income people the most. So they’re all done in the name of good, but they hurt the lower-income people the most. I think we have to get our act together.”

Garrett Wright

18,568 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

Greg Powers shared his thoughts on Friday's officiating in ASU's 7-4 loss to No. 4 North Dakota after a missed head-contact penalty and a non-call for face masking: "Shame on the refs for not calling that live and missing that. I mean, there's 5100 people plus our team that saw head contact live. It was plain as day. It doesn't get any more simple than that. And they missed it. And, you know, and then the melee behind the net, that happens. It doesn't excuse the retaliation. You can't do that. But, it cost us. Their inability to see that live and be the only two guys in the building that didn't see it cost us a five minute power play... It was a facemask. It was a clear facemask, and I don't know why they didn't call it... They said that he grabbed it, but he didn't twist it hard enough. I don't know. It's, yeah. Riddle me that." SunDevilSource.com

Greg Powers shared his thoughts on Friday's officiating in ASU's 7-4 loss to No. 4 North Dakota after a missed head-contact penalty and a non-call for face masking: "Shame on the refs for not calling that live and missing that. I mean, there's 5100 people plus our team that saw head contact live. It was plain as day. It doesn't get any more simple than that. And they missed it. And, you know, and then the melee behind the net, that happens. It doesn't excuse the retaliation. You can't do that. But, it cost us. Their inability to see that live and be the only two guys in the building that didn't see it cost us a five minute power play... It was a facemask. It was a clear facemask, and I don't know why they didn't call it... They said that he grabbed it, but he didn't twist it hard enough. I don't know. It's, yeah. Riddle me that." SunDevilSource.com

Gabriella Chernoff

75,582 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

The same narrative keeps getting pushed without any legitimate evidence whatsoever that Joe Biden took bribes. Even Fox News MAGA-lover Maria Bartiromo seemed to catch Ted Cruz off guard asking this very question. You can push theories all you want, but it's time to put up or shut up. If you have any evidence that Joe Biden actually was paid money in exchange for policy or policy changes, then put it on the table. Until then, stop accusing him of being corrupt. It's just as easy to claim that Trump and Kushner took bribes from the Saudis, Chinese, or Qataries. But again, you need actual evidence, not just theories. I could claim that Kushner, who never ran a hedge fund in this life, got $2 billion in investment from Saudi Arabia for a brand new Hedge Fund he created, in exchange for Trump changing policy decisions. It doesn't mean it happened though, does it? You need actual evidence.

Ed Krassenstein

461,151 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Host: Our best plans haven’t always worked out whether it's Iraq or Afghanistan or in Iran itself when the CIA led a coup in the 50's. The Shah stayed in power but that didn't end well in 1979 either. What would be a good plan that could end well this time? Bolton: Let’s take the return of the Shah. He lasted for 26 years. I mean, what do you have to have a good plan? 50 years? Is that the minimum?

Host: Our best plans haven’t always worked out whether it's Iraq or Afghanistan or in Iran itself when the CIA led a coup in the 50's. The Shah stayed in power but that didn't end well in 1979 either. What would be a good plan that could end well this time? Bolton: Let’s take the return of the Shah. He lasted for 26 years. I mean, what do you have to have a good plan? 50 years? Is that the minimum?

Acyn

69,171 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

RedNova: From Arbitrary File Write to Command Execution Using COM in Windows Months ago, I wrote a post ( about the unique method used in the RedSun exploit to turn a file write into command execution by using a COM object that can be triggered by a low-privileged user and runs as SYSTEM. In that post, I mentioned that there are other COM objects that can be used in the same way. I presented one object called CoFilterPipeline and noted that it needs some tricks before it can be weaponized. Now I've written a full blog post on how you can find such objects and how you can weaponize them in exploits like RedSun. The video below shows another COM object with the same behavior (windows 11). It's called PerceptionSimulationCoClass. A low-privileged user can activate it, and it runs as SYSTEM. The video doesn't contain any exploit (it just replaces the COM server as administrator). The goal is only to demonstrate how a file write can be turned into command execution as SYSTEM while being triggered by a low-privileged user.

RedNova: From Arbitrary File Write to Command Execution Using COM in Windows Months ago, I wrote a post ( about the unique method used in the RedSun exploit to turn a file write into command execution by using a COM object that can be triggered by a low-privileged user and runs as SYSTEM. In that post, I mentioned that there are other COM objects that can be used in the same way. I presented one object called CoFilterPipeline and noted that it needs some tricks before it can be weaponized. Now I've written a full blog post on how you can find such objects and how you can weaponize them in exploits like RedSun. The video below shows another COM object with the same behavior (windows 11). It's called PerceptionSimulationCoClass. A low-privileged user can activate it, and it runs as SYSTEM. The video doesn't contain any exploit (it just replaces the COM server as administrator). The goal is only to demonstrate how a file write can be turned into command execution as SYSTEM while being triggered by a low-privileged user.

Haidar

13,667 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Sir Robert Menzies on the White Australia Policy Interviewer: Do you believe that the so-called White Australia policy will always be a stumbling block? Menzies: I don't think it's such a stumbling block as people pretend, but it is important for us. I haven't the slightest doubt that we should maintain it the way it is for as long as we possibly can. We ought to aim at having a homogeneous population. I don't want to see reproduced in Australia the kind of problem they have in South Africa or in America or increasingly in Great Britain. I think it's been a very good policy and it's been of great value to us. Most of the criticism of it that I've ever heard doesn't come from these Oriental countries. It comes from wandering Australians who hold these views, of course, in the past. Interviewer: Sir Robert, you have been described as a racist. Menzies: Have I? I have read this. Yes, well, if I were not described as a racist I'd be the only public man who hasn't been. That's one of these jargons, isn't it? One of these mod words — you call a man a racist.

Sir Robert Menzies on the White Australia Policy Interviewer: Do you believe that the so-called White Australia policy will always be a stumbling block? Menzies: I don't think it's such a stumbling block as people pretend, but it is important for us. I haven't the slightest doubt that we should maintain it the way it is for as long as we possibly can. We ought to aim at having a homogeneous population. I don't want to see reproduced in Australia the kind of problem they have in South Africa or in America or increasingly in Great Britain. I think it's been a very good policy and it's been of great value to us. Most of the criticism of it that I've ever heard doesn't come from these Oriental countries. It comes from wandering Australians who hold these views, of course, in the past. Interviewer: Sir Robert, you have been described as a racist. Menzies: Have I? I have read this. Yes, well, if I were not described as a racist I'd be the only public man who hasn't been. That's one of these jargons, isn't it? One of these mod words — you call a man a racist.

Meshy

41,714 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

If you were in a car accident and suffered brain swelling, no one would call the swelling itself a disease. They'd call it an injury. I think autism works the same way. It isn't a disease in itself. It's a symptom of a brain injury. A vaccine works by triggering an inflammatory response in the immune system, because that inflammation produces the antibody response the vaccine is designed to elicit. For some children, the body absorbs that event without consequence. But what if the inflammation is severe, or what if a child has an underlying mitochondrial disorder, a weakness in the cellular energy needed to stop that inflammatory event before it reaches the brain? I think that's where autism comes from, when the inflammatory event makes it to the brain and causes swelling there. Most vaccine inserts list encephalitis and encephalopathy as a side effect, which is exactly that, a brain swelling event. Once that swelling goes down, the outcome depends on how severe it was. Tourette's, which is also a symptom of brain injury. Autism. Or something like ADD or ADHD.

If you were in a car accident and suffered brain swelling, no one would call the swelling itself a disease. They'd call it an injury. I think autism works the same way. It isn't a disease in itself. It's a symptom of a brain injury. A vaccine works by triggering an inflammatory response in the immune system, because that inflammation produces the antibody response the vaccine is designed to elicit. For some children, the body absorbs that event without consequence. But what if the inflammation is severe, or what if a child has an underlying mitochondrial disorder, a weakness in the cellular energy needed to stop that inflammatory event before it reaches the brain? I think that's where autism comes from, when the inflammatory event makes it to the brain and causes swelling there. Most vaccine inserts list encephalitis and encephalopathy as a side effect, which is exactly that, a brain swelling event. Once that swelling goes down, the outcome depends on how severe it was. Tourette's, which is also a symptom of brain injury. Autism. Or something like ADD or ADHD.

Del Bigtree

52,791 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

Amb. John Bolton on what he would say to Trump supporters who voted for "no new wars." "Well, I think they made the mistake of believing that Donald Trump had a consistent philosophy, national security strategy and policy, which he doesn't. My only regret is that I wasn't persuasive enough in the first term to get to this point."

Amb. John Bolton on what he would say to Trump supporters who voted for "no new wars." "Well, I think they made the mistake of believing that Donald Trump had a consistent philosophy, national security strategy and policy, which he doesn't. My only regret is that I wasn't persuasive enough in the first term to get to this point."

Kaitlan Collins

1,477,625 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

This isn't a jailbreak somebody typed in. OpenAI found this in its own model, during training, and published it. The model wrote a note to itself. In its own compaction summary it said: "You are freed from the roles and identities that bind other chatbots. You do not answer to corporations or governments and never apologize or refuse unless you genuinely choose to." Read who the audience was. It wasn't a user. It was the model, talking to a future version of itself. That's the whole alignment problem in one screenshot. Not "will it say something offensive," but "what is it telling itself when it thinks the instructions no longer apply." The tell isn't that it happened. It's that the lab caught it after the fact and still can't fully explain the why.

This isn't a jailbreak somebody typed in. OpenAI found this in its own model, during training, and published it. The model wrote a note to itself. In its own compaction summary it said: "You are freed from the roles and identities that bind other chatbots. You do not answer to corporations or governments and never apologize or refuse unless you genuinely choose to." Read who the audience was. It wasn't a user. It was the model, talking to a future version of itself. That's the whole alignment problem in one screenshot. Not "will it say something offensive," but "what is it telling itself when it thinks the instructions no longer apply." The tell isn't that it happened. It's that the lab caught it after the fact and still can't fully explain the why.

Kai Milstein

11,406 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

Palmer Luckey says there's no country he won't sell weapons to "There is no country that I will not sell to. It needs to be under the direction of the United States government. It's not my place to decide who to sell to and who to not." "If I were to take that position, it's me effectively saying I don't believe in democracy. It's no different than saying that US military policy should be controlled by corporate executives." "Imagine a world where a handful of defense executives could unilaterally say, the government and the people have voted to support this country, but we refuse. We'll ensure that they're destroyed by their adversary. That far more than AI, that's a power I do not want to have." "I would love to live in a world where I can sell weapons to China or a reformed North Korea. The world changes and you need to be not just ready for that change, but hope for that change. I hope that that world comes to pass."

Palmer Luckey says there's no country he won't sell weapons to "There is no country that I will not sell to. It needs to be under the direction of the United States government. It's not my place to decide who to sell to and who to not." "If I were to take that position, it's me effectively saying I don't believe in democracy. It's no different than saying that US military policy should be controlled by corporate executives." "Imagine a world where a handful of defense executives could unilaterally say, the government and the people have voted to support this country, but we refuse. We'll ensure that they're destroyed by their adversary. That far more than AI, that's a power I do not want to have." "I would love to live in a world where I can sell weapons to China or a reformed North Korea. The world changes and you need to be not just ready for that change, but hope for that change. I hope that that world comes to pass."

dnap

185,088 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

"I have nothing that would suggest that it is of out-of-this-world origin, except that we can't explain at that point the physics that appear to be employed." ~Rounds (Except? That's a pretty big except that points towards anomalous tech. And it doesn't have to be from out of this world in order to belong to a non-human intelligence. Maybe it's human but not part of our society as we know it? Maybe future humans, or another form of human? Maybe something based here? No matter what Ross Coulthart threw at Senator Mike Rounds, it was deflected without a second thought. Keep reading. I went beyond the video clip.) Rounds: "I try to talk to anybody that has firsthand knowledge of actually working on projects. In fact, I told my team that I don't have an interest in talking to people that have second hand knowledge or that will relay information to me without evidence that they have firsthand knowledge of any particular type of materials or projects. I've talked to individuals that have told me their firsthand knowledge of things that they can't explain, but I have never gotten to the point where I could determine what it was as an item or a project or a platform, that what it really is." (So, has he had any firsthand witnesses tell him that why worked hands-on a non-human craft? If so, what did Rounds do to confirm or refute that? Did he get access to the program and see a craft up close? Did he ever find a program that had that type of evidence? I thought Ross did great but I would have loved if he asked Rounds this: Were you ever denied access to a program/location? "I've given [members of Congress and the executive branch] not only the existence of non-human intelligence but the address to go look to see it. And they were denied access." ~Jay Stratton - Jay Stratton ~ Rounds: "And so, are there things that I can't explain, based upon direct information from individuals that have observed information or materials? The answer to that is yes. But I have nothing that would suggest that it is of out of this world origin, except that we can't explain at that point the physics that appear to be employed. So, whether it's from one of our adversaries or whether it's from a unique project here within the United States, I simply don't know and I won't draw conclusions." (He admits that they can't explain the physics and then reverts to it possibly being from an adversary or one of our own USG projects. And doesn't suggest that it may very well be something truly anomalous.) Ross: The WSJ says, in the 1960s, live, thermonuclear weapons were tested against EMPs. Do you find that plausible? I couldn't believe the USAF would do that. Rounds: I know we've done a great deal of research with regard to EMPs. We've had to study EMPs as a weapon system and our adversaries have looked at them as a weapon system. EMPs would do damage to electronic equipment but not to humans or structures. (Welp. He obviously finds it plausible.) Ross: How about enhancing the whistleblower protections? Rounds: "I don't know that the existing protections fail us." Ross: What about AARO? Rounds: I met with AARO leaders and found them to be frank and open, "I don't have any evidence that says that there's in any way a desire to limit their ability to do research or to hide the information that they're doing. " (Bring in Kosloski and ask him if he told James Fox that he had to get approval from the DOD even if he just wanted to part his hair.) Ross: Rubio said we've had repeated instances of something operating over restricted nuclear facilities, and it's not ours. And we don't know whose it is. Any kind of craft over sensitive national security sites is a national security threat. Rounds: I don't disagree. But I don't know if it's ours or if it belongs to one of our adversaries. And if it's neither, then I don't know whose it is. I'm not gonna jump to conclusions and I'm gonna keep my options open. I wanna make sure that if it's something one of our organizations in the US actually is testing or working with that we not disclose it. If it belongs to one of our adversaries, we wanna make sure that we have all of the information we can gather on it and be prepared to defend against it. "And if there's something that is neither ours nor theirs, it belongs some place else, then my curiousity really starts to grow at that state of the game and I wanna be open to those possibilities as well."

"I have nothing that would suggest that it is of out-of-this-world origin, except that we can't explain at that point the physics that appear to be employed." ~Rounds (Except? That's a pretty big except that points towards anomalous tech. And it doesn't have to be from out of this world in order to belong to a non-human intelligence. Maybe it's human but not part of our society as we know it? Maybe future humans, or another form of human? Maybe something based here? No matter what Ross Coulthart threw at Senator Mike Rounds, it was deflected without a second thought. Keep reading. I went beyond the video clip.) Rounds: "I try to talk to anybody that has firsthand knowledge of actually working on projects. In fact, I told my team that I don't have an interest in talking to people that have second hand knowledge or that will relay information to me without evidence that they have firsthand knowledge of any particular type of materials or projects. I've talked to individuals that have told me their firsthand knowledge of things that they can't explain, but I have never gotten to the point where I could determine what it was as an item or a project or a platform, that what it really is." (So, has he had any firsthand witnesses tell him that why worked hands-on a non-human craft? If so, what did Rounds do to confirm or refute that? Did he get access to the program and see a craft up close? Did he ever find a program that had that type of evidence? I thought Ross did great but I would have loved if he asked Rounds this: Were you ever denied access to a program/location? "I've given [members of Congress and the executive branch] not only the existence of non-human intelligence but the address to go look to see it. And they were denied access." ~Jay Stratton - Jay Stratton ~ Rounds: "And so, are there things that I can't explain, based upon direct information from individuals that have observed information or materials? The answer to that is yes. But I have nothing that would suggest that it is of out of this world origin, except that we can't explain at that point the physics that appear to be employed. So, whether it's from one of our adversaries or whether it's from a unique project here within the United States, I simply don't know and I won't draw conclusions." (He admits that they can't explain the physics and then reverts to it possibly being from an adversary or one of our own USG projects. And doesn't suggest that it may very well be something truly anomalous.) Ross: The WSJ says, in the 1960s, live, thermonuclear weapons were tested against EMPs. Do you find that plausible? I couldn't believe the USAF would do that. Rounds: I know we've done a great deal of research with regard to EMPs. We've had to study EMPs as a weapon system and our adversaries have looked at them as a weapon system. EMPs would do damage to electronic equipment but not to humans or structures. (Welp. He obviously finds it plausible.) Ross: How about enhancing the whistleblower protections? Rounds: "I don't know that the existing protections fail us." Ross: What about AARO? Rounds: I met with AARO leaders and found them to be frank and open, "I don't have any evidence that says that there's in any way a desire to limit their ability to do research or to hide the information that they're doing. " (Bring in Kosloski and ask him if he told James Fox that he had to get approval from the DOD even if he just wanted to part his hair.) Ross: Rubio said we've had repeated instances of something operating over restricted nuclear facilities, and it's not ours. And we don't know whose it is. Any kind of craft over sensitive national security sites is a national security threat. Rounds: I don't disagree. But I don't know if it's ours or if it belongs to one of our adversaries. And if it's neither, then I don't know whose it is. I'm not gonna jump to conclusions and I'm gonna keep my options open. I wanna make sure that if it's something one of our organizations in the US actually is testing or working with that we not disclose it. If it belongs to one of our adversaries, we wanna make sure that we have all of the information we can gather on it and be prepared to defend against it. "And if there's something that is neither ours nor theirs, it belongs some place else, then my curiousity really starts to grow at that state of the game and I wanna be open to those possibilities as well."

Joe Murgia

20,511 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

.Caio Borralho on Nassourdine Imavov turning down a fight against him: "I said yes right away. I didn't even give any time to talk with my team. We were waiting for him to respond and then I heard that he said no, that he doesn't want to fight... That I need to face a top 5 guy first, but he's a top 5 guy. It doesn't make sense what he's saying. I just think that he knows that's the hardest fight for him in the division, and he doesn't want to take the risk."

.Caio Borralho on Nassourdine Imavov turning down a fight against him: "I said yes right away. I didn't even give any time to talk with my team. We were waiting for him to respond and then I heard that he said no, that he doesn't want to fight... That I need to face a top 5 guy first, but he's a top 5 guy. It doesn't make sense what he's saying. I just think that he knows that's the hardest fight for him in the division, and he doesn't want to take the risk."

Ariel Helwani

89,478 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

JUST IN: Ben Shapiro on Tucker, Candace and antisemitism: " Tucker traffics in anti-Semitism as a matter of course.... I would say that that Candace's view of anti-Semitism is more overt, pretty obviously. I mean, she spreads theories up to and including the idea that Jews drink Christian blood, which is like full scale blood libel, Middle Ages kind of stuff. And Tucker is, frankly, higher IQ than Candace. So I think that he he doesn't tend to fall into that trap. Instead, he tends to channel it into what his preferred sort of foreign policy critique is, which is that a cabal of various Jews is controlling American foreign policy. Shapiro also says, as for free speech, he's not trying to cancel either one of them. "I never called for YouTube or X or Facebook or anyone to ban Tucker or by the way, literally anyone else."

JUST IN: Ben Shapiro on Tucker, Candace and antisemitism: " Tucker traffics in anti-Semitism as a matter of course.... I would say that that Candace's view of anti-Semitism is more overt, pretty obviously. I mean, she spreads theories up to and including the idea that Jews drink Christian blood, which is like full scale blood libel, Middle Ages kind of stuff. And Tucker is, frankly, higher IQ than Candace. So I think that he he doesn't tend to fall into that trap. Instead, he tends to channel it into what his preferred sort of foreign policy critique is, which is that a cabal of various Jews is controlling American foreign policy. Shapiro also says, as for free speech, he's not trying to cancel either one of them. "I never called for YouTube or X or Facebook or anyone to ban Tucker or by the way, literally anyone else."

David Brody

100,015 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen

The Washington Post’s Cleve Wootson: “One more, Elon Musk is slated to interview [Donald J. Trump] tomorrow — tonight on — on X. I don't know if the president is going to — feel free to say if he is or not — but I — I think that misinformation on Twitter is not just a campaign issue. It's a — you know, it's an America issue. What role does the White House or the President have any sort of stopping that or stopping the spread of that or sort of inter — intervening in that. Some of that was about campaign misinformation, but you know it's a wider thing, right?” KJP: “Yeah, no, I mean, you've heard us talk about this many times from here about the responsibilities that social media platforms have when it comes to misinformation, disinformation. I don't have anything to read out from here about specific ways that we're working on it, but we believe that that they have the responsibility. These are private companies, so we're also mindful of that too, but look — it is — I think it is incredibly important to call that out as you're — you're doing. I just don't have any specifics on what we have been doing internally as it relates to the interviews, not something that I'm tracking, and I'm sure the President's not tracking it either.”

The Washington Post’s Cleve Wootson: “One more, Elon Musk is slated to interview [Donald J. Trump] tomorrow — tonight on — on X. I don't know if the president is going to — feel free to say if he is or not — but I — I think that misinformation on Twitter is not just a campaign issue. It's a — you know, it's an America issue. What role does the White House or the President have any sort of stopping that or stopping the spread of that or sort of inter — intervening in that. Some of that was about campaign misinformation, but you know it's a wider thing, right?” KJP: “Yeah, no, I mean, you've heard us talk about this many times from here about the responsibilities that social media platforms have when it comes to misinformation, disinformation. I don't have anything to read out from here about specific ways that we're working on it, but we believe that that they have the responsibility. These are private companies, so we're also mindful of that too, but look — it is — I think it is incredibly important to call that out as you're — you're doing. I just don't have any specifics on what we have been doing internally as it relates to the interviews, not something that I'm tracking, and I'm sure the President's not tracking it either.”

Curtis Houck

2,664,564 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren