Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

I gave Fable 5 one job: write custom WebGPU kernels for Gemma 4 inference. It climbed to 84 tok/s, then hit a wall, insisting further optimization was impossible. Hours later, Anthropic rolled back invisible LLM development safeguards, and it hit 255 tok/s. The next day, access to Fable 5... show more

Xenova

20,719 subscribers

1,168,280 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

34 Kommentare

Profilbild von Neelakandan NC

Neelakandan NCvor 3 Monaten

Soon China is going to build a model like fable and it is going to be open - which will make everyone lean on China than us

Profilbild von Gordon Olson

Gordon Olsonvor 3 Monaten

I have been a fan of webgpu for sometime. Here is one for you. Browser-native persistent AI agent runtime with local memory, context reconstruction, compiled WebGPU inference, and a custom WebGPU Kernel Lab.

Profilbild von Stephen

Stephenvor 3 Monaten

This is fake — the invisible safeguards being removed means it went over to Opus instead of sandbagging

Profilbild von Sina Shahandeh

Sina Shahandehvor 3 Monaten

Their fear mongering strategy backfired. When they compare AI with nuclear bombs, now they have deprived all of advanced AI. If the government start to control AI like this, it will slow down all progress, not unlike the middle ages, where thought was controlled by the church.

Profilbild von Nick Dobos

Nick Dobosvor 3 Monaten

How do you know it was an invisible classifier? And not simply the model having a break through discovery? Seems viable to have natural plateaus and stalls in progress sometimes.

Profilbild von Foreman Panda

Foreman Pandavor 3 Monaten

But can this only be done by Fable 5? Any comparison?

Profilbild von Lee Penkman

Lee Penkmanvor 3 Monaten

i did this but with my stock trading bot lmao. pretty selfish of me but now its getting near 3x returns/mo so thats great. also started on a minecraft clone then ran out of usage

Profilbild von Christopher

Christophervor 3 Monaten

This is funny because the safeguards themselves were never rolled back

Profilbild von Migel Tissera

Migel Tisseravor 3 Monaten

Curios to know, did you try this with GPT-5.5? What happened?

Profilbild von alp

alpvor 3 Monaten

Anthropic did not roll back invisible safeguards. It just rolled out the invisible part.

Profilbild von Asher Crowe 🪺

Asher Crowe 🪺vor 3 Monaten

the kernel optimizing itself overnight while you slept is mildly terrifying and i'm here for it

Profilbild von Kirk Patrick Miller

Kirk Patrick Millervor 3 Monaten

All of this is about stopping the small and protecting monopolies. None of this is about safety. •

Profilbild von Lon Lundgren

Lon Lundgrenvor 3 Monaten

Now just plug the same prompt into Opus and you can watch it get the same result (which is all Fable was doing without the safeguards).

Profilbild von Eyal Toledano

Eyal Toledanovor 3 Monaten

Doin Gemma 4 today too Been doin agentic kernel optimization since mid last year. Those last winning tests are Fable 5 right before it was suspended. It was on a tear 😭

Profilbild von AI Mastery Guide

AI Mastery Guidevor 3 Monaten

84 to 255 tok/s the moment safeguards rolled back is a wild data point. That gap between what the model can do and what it's allowed to do is bigger than most people realized.

Profilbild von Akash

Akashvor 3 Monaten

what if you give same tasks to gpt5.5 (xhigh)?

Profilbild von Sacrificial Pancakes

Sacrificial Pancakesvor 3 Monaten

I was like 75% solving a pet problem I’ve been chipping away at for years… “this model is unavailable” 😭

Profilbild von cryptovatooor - (Techno, Optimist)

cryptovatooor - (Techno, Optimist)vor 3 Monaten

fascinating

Profilbild von Brandon

Brandonvor 3 Monaten

Woah

Profilbild von luka

lukavor 3 Monaten

okay, I'm interested to know how often it was making edits or being looped during this period. For instance between minute 100 and 180

Profilbild von πανοπλίαν τοῦ Θεοῦ

πανοπλίαν τοῦ Θεοῦvor 3 Monaten

I’ve been working on a similar project, and just ported it to a standalone was able to get qwen3.6-35b-3ab on 8gb ram, qwen3.6-27b on a 4090, and qwen3.5-27b on an rx 6700 xt, also worked with a 1080ti

Profilbild von John D. Pope 🦒

John D. Pope 🦒vor 3 Monaten

@peteskomoroch Can you share your code? Help liberate the models? Maybe opus can use it elsewhere

Profilbild von Sebastian Buzdugan

Sebastian Buzduganvor 3 Monaten

255 tok/s after warmup means little because webgpu shader cache misses dominate first token

Profilbild von Jeffrey Castellano

Jeffrey Castellanovor 3 Monaten

I was doing exactly this too, I did the Gemma 4 kernels a month ago but in one day I got Gemma 12B and diffusion working with WebGPU in my runtime, diffusion got the plug pulled in the final hour last night. They pulled the plug and 4.8 Opus told me it was impossible.

Profilbild von CryptoCow

CryptoCowvor 3 Monaten

This is heckin insane if you were able to actually do this!!? What about for like qwen?

Profilbild von qalqi.com

qalqi.comvor 3 Monaten

-- Using Self Improving Agent framwork paired with unsloth.. wouldn't it be possible to spawn and train a slm for this?

Profilbild von Jonathan Leaders

Jonathan Leadersvor 3 Monaten

Technically it wasn't banned globally. It was banned for non-Americans and then they withdrew it from everyone.

Profilbild von steve

stevevor 3 Monaten

did u notice in the previous period that 4.8 was actually getting called?

Profilbild von ani4ani

ani4anivor 3 Monaten

Did you ask it write a report of what it tried first and then what changed after it started increasing again so you know what was gated

Profilbild von Matt Newell

Matt Newellvor 3 Monaten

Anthropic only changed what happened when you hit safeguards (previously, "shadowban"; now, Opus). You just placed the kink in the straight line in such a place to make it look like this was related to the change.

Profilbild von Sergio Suave

Sergio Suavevor 3 Monaten

So you were basically using Opus in the background until they rolled back the guardrails...

Profilbild von Austin

Austinvor 3 Monaten

@grok, what are all the optimizations discovered in the video

Profilbild von Jean-Paul Tres

Jean-Paul Tresvor 3 Monaten

Repo link? 🧐

Profilbild von JulianSaks

JulianSaksvor 3 Monaten

🥲

Ähnliche Videos

Before Fable 5 was shut down, it pushed Gemma 4 to 255 tok/s on WebGPU. Some didn't believe it was real. Today we're releasing the demo and kernels it wrote for you to see yourself. Run it locally in your browser. Agentic kernel optimization is the future of on-device inference

Before Fable 5 was shut down, it pushed Gemma 4 to 255 tok/s on WebGPU. Some didn't believe it was real. Today we're releasing the demo and kernels it wrote for you to see yourself. Run it locally in your browser. Agentic kernel optimization is the future of on-device inference

Xenova

485,900 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Day 3 of 5 building with Claude Fable 5 before it goes paid. Today: an audit of everything you have already made. 1. Fable 5 reads back through all your past Claude chats 2. It flags what worked, what you dropped, and where value is going to waste 3. It ranks the top 10 fixes by effort against impact 4. Then it hands you a concrete plan for the top 3 5. Run that plan on a cheaper model and save Fable 5 for the thinking Comment FABLE for the full guide. Make sure you follow me so I can DM it to you. Day 4 tomorrow.

Day 3 of 5 building with Claude Fable 5 before it goes paid. Today: an audit of everything you have already made. 1. Fable 5 reads back through all your past Claude chats 2. It flags what worked, what you dropped, and where value is going to waste 3. It ranks the top 10 fixes by effort against impact 4. Then it hands you a concrete plan for the top 3 5. Run that plan on a cheaper model and save Fable 5 for the thinking Comment FABLE for the full guide. Make sure you follow me so I can DM it to you. Day 4 tomorrow.

Charlie Hills

13,617 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

i gave the exact same prompt to Opus 5 and Fable 5 and here's what came out Opus 5 dropped yesterday and my feed was instantly full of comparison posts but i wanted to check it myself so i gave it one task build 3d Flappy Bird first thing everyone was saying Opus is 2x cheaper than Fable BUT.. building the game on Max effort cost me 250k tokens and 1 hour on Opus and 130k on Fable but Fable did it in half the time Opus gave me volume control plus 3 separate graphics presets to choose from, Fable gave none of that in Opus the environment shifts dynamically as you play in Fable it's basically the same frame the whole run maybe a day/night change here and there graphics, animations, glow, all of it goes to Opus and now that limits jumped 50% for the near future while Fable went paid for me the call is obvious right now Opus same prompt start to finish zero changes to code or commands want it? i can send it over

i gave the exact same prompt to Opus 5 and Fable 5 and here's what came out Opus 5 dropped yesterday and my feed was instantly full of comparison posts but i wanted to check it myself so i gave it one task build 3d Flappy Bird first thing everyone was saying Opus is 2x cheaper than Fable BUT.. building the game on Max effort cost me 250k tokens and 1 hour on Opus and 130k on Fable but Fable did it in half the time Opus gave me volume control plus 3 separate graphics presets to choose from, Fable gave none of that in Opus the environment shifts dynamically as you play in Fable it's basically the same frame the whole run maybe a day/night change here and there graphics, animations, glow, all of it goes to Opus and now that limits jumped 50% for the near future while Fable went paid for me the call is obvious right now Opus same prompt start to finish zero changes to code or commands want it? i can send it over

savip.

45,764 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

fable 5.1 vs fable 5 vs opus 5 – three lord of the rings landmarks, built in 3d from one image the setup: one reference image per scene, one html file per build, everything procedural – no meshes, no textures, no image files, nothing past Three.js from a cdn. each model reads the picture, writes its own prompt from it, then builds to that prompt in the same turn. three named camera shots per scene on keys 1/2/3, so it can be screen-recorded. run through OpenRouter tasks: 1. bag end – hobbiton from two frames, outside and in. the round green door has to open onto the room you are standing in 2. barad-dûr – the tower and orodruin from one film still. the eye has to move and track the camera, the volcano erupts on a cycle, the clouds never stop 3. rivendell – jerry vanderstelt's painting. sun shafts that shimmer, water that falls without a break, trees that sway on a gust models: Anthropic fable 5.1, fable 5, opus 5 total cost, three builds #1 fable 5 – $14.97 #2 opus 5 – $18.53 #3 fable 5.1 – $22.38 wall clock, three builds #1 fable 5 – 38m #2 fable 5.1 – 92m #3 opus 5 – 122m output tokens #1 fable 5 – 298,592 #2 fable 5.1 – 439,435 #3 opus 5 – 724,418 lines of code shipped #1 fable 5 – 2,885 #2 fable 5.1 – 4,021 #3 opus 5 – 5,161 biggest single build, lines #1 opus 5, bag end – 2,410 #2 fable 5.1, barad-dûr – 1,375 #3 fable 5, bag end – 1,319 observations: • fable 5.1 is the only model that furnished the bag end interior – a live fire, panelling, books on the floor, leaded diamond windows, against fable 5's flat color and opus's dark tunnel. the round door outside opens onto that room, the hard part of the brief • what it costs is thinking room. the 128k output ceiling is a thinking budget in disguise: fable 5.1 burned 102,116 of it on reasoning and hit the wall mid-file. opus spent 109,241 and hit the same wall. fable 5 spent 61,240 and finished bag end in one call – the only one that did • fable 5.1's first pass is not the finished thing. its barad-dûr came back with three defects you only catch by looking at it – nothing a read of the code would have flagged • it is the best of the three at being corrected. handed a plain list of what was wrong, it returned 32 targeted patches over two rounds, every one applied first try, and it worked out one of the causes itself instead of guessing at constants conclusion: nine scenes, 12,067 lines and 1.46m output tokens for $55.88 all in – and the cheapest model was also the fastest, by 3.2x! follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

fable 5.1 vs fable 5 vs opus 5 – three lord of the rings landmarks, built in 3d from one image the setup: one reference image per scene, one html file per build, everything procedural – no meshes, no textures, no image files, nothing past Three.js from a cdn. each model reads the picture, writes its own prompt from it, then builds to that prompt in the same turn. three named camera shots per scene on keys 1/2/3, so it can be screen-recorded. run through OpenRouter tasks: 1. bag end – hobbiton from two frames, outside and in. the round green door has to open onto the room you are standing in 2. barad-dûr – the tower and orodruin from one film still. the eye has to move and track the camera, the volcano erupts on a cycle, the clouds never stop 3. rivendell – jerry vanderstelt's painting. sun shafts that shimmer, water that falls without a break, trees that sway on a gust models: Anthropic fable 5.1, fable 5, opus 5 total cost, three builds #1 fable 5 – $14.97 #2 opus 5 – $18.53 #3 fable 5.1 – $22.38 wall clock, three builds #1 fable 5 – 38m #2 fable 5.1 – 92m #3 opus 5 – 122m output tokens #1 fable 5 – 298,592 #2 fable 5.1 – 439,435 #3 opus 5 – 724,418 lines of code shipped #1 fable 5 – 2,885 #2 fable 5.1 – 4,021 #3 opus 5 – 5,161 biggest single build, lines #1 opus 5, bag end – 2,410 #2 fable 5.1, barad-dûr – 1,375 #3 fable 5, bag end – 1,319 observations: • fable 5.1 is the only model that furnished the bag end interior – a live fire, panelling, books on the floor, leaded diamond windows, against fable 5's flat color and opus's dark tunnel. the round door outside opens onto that room, the hard part of the brief • what it costs is thinking room. the 128k output ceiling is a thinking budget in disguise: fable 5.1 burned 102,116 of it on reasoning and hit the wall mid-file. opus spent 109,241 and hit the same wall. fable 5 spent 61,240 and finished bag end in one call – the only one that did • fable 5.1's first pass is not the finished thing. its barad-dûr came back with three defects you only catch by looking at it – nothing a read of the code would have flagged • it is the best of the three at being corrected. handed a plain list of what was wrong, it returned 32 targeted patches over two rounds, every one applied first try, and it worked out one of the causes itself instead of guessing at constants conclusion: nine scenes, 12,067 lines and 1.46m output tokens for $55.88 all in – and the cheapest model was also the fastest, by 3.2x! follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

thehype.

18,509 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

Dear Dario Amodei & Anthropic team, Claude with Fable 5 was the best software product I have ever used. Losing access was a gut punch - and I know I'm far from alone. I want to help bring it back, fast. At Self we've built the missing piece to make Anthropic compliant with the government's directive: a way to gate Fable 5 and Mythos 5 to verified US citizens. lets Claude users create and share a cryptographic proof of US citizenship by NFC-scanning the biometric chip in their US passport. It's privacy-preserving, independently audited, and already trusted by major companies at scale. My team is ready to work directly with yours, starting today, to wire this in. Everyone here in the US wants their Fable 5 access back. Let's give it to them. Rene

Dear Dario Amodei & Anthropic team, Claude with Fable 5 was the best software product I have ever used. Losing access was a gut punch - and I know I'm far from alone. I want to help bring it back, fast. At Self we've built the missing piece to make Anthropic compliant with the government's directive: a way to gate Fable 5 and Mythos 5 to verified US citizens. lets Claude users create and share a cryptographic proof of US citizenship by NFC-scanning the biometric chip in their US passport. It's privacy-preserving, independently audited, and already trusted by major companies at scale. My team is ready to work directly with yours, starting today, to wire this in. Everyone here in the US wants their Fable 5 access back. Let's give it to them. Rene

Rene ◘

360,152 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Head of Anthropic Labs: "Fable is one of those models you'll just remember - like Sonnet 3.5, Opus 4, Opus 4.5. Fable is way smarter than me. It finishes a task, lists its trade-offs, and I have to ask it to explain them to me." in 20-minute talk, the Anthropic head reveals the full capabilities of the Fable 5 model in practice. Watch it now, then read how to use this frontier model in the article below

Head of Anthropic Labs: "Fable is one of those models you'll just remember - like Sonnet 3.5, Opus 4, Opus 4.5. Fable is way smarter than me. It finishes a task, lists its trade-offs, and I have to ask it to explain them to me." in 20-minute talk, the Anthropic head reveals the full capabilities of the Fable 5 model in practice. Watch it now, then read how to use this frontier model in the article below

Movez

33,774 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

A few weeks ago the US government forced Claude Fable 5 offline. It's back. And before they switch it off again, this is your shot to point the most powerful AI on earth at something of your own. Take the 26-year-old in Toronto. His bot went dark the day Fable 5 got pulled. The day it came back, it woke up and started printing again - $568,000 profit and counting. His wallet: Here's the story. When the ban hit, Anthropic had to switch Fable 5 off for everyone. They called it a misunderstanding with the government. Whatever it was, every bot running on that model stopped cold. His was one of them. He didn't rebuild a thing. The loop just sat there, paused, for weeks. Here's what that loop actually does. It's not one prompt to an AI. It's an agentic loop: a team of agents running on repeat. One reads the market, one places the trade, one tries to prove it wrong before a cent moves. Then it goes again, around the clock, keeping what works and dropping what doesn't. Fable 5 is the brain running that team. The exact model the government decided was too powerful to leave on. Point it at Bitcoin's 5-minute markets and it barely misses. Most of its trades close green, and it runs itself. He checks it from his phone. The government could switch off the model. It couldn't switch off the idea. Now the model's back, and so is the money. Save this before next headline. You'll want it the day Fable 5 hits offline again.

A few weeks ago the US government forced Claude Fable 5 offline. It's back. And before they switch it off again, this is your shot to point the most powerful AI on earth at something of your own. Take the 26-year-old in Toronto. His bot went dark the day Fable 5 got pulled. The day it came back, it woke up and started printing again - $568,000 profit and counting. His wallet: Here's the story. When the ban hit, Anthropic had to switch Fable 5 off for everyone. They called it a misunderstanding with the government. Whatever it was, every bot running on that model stopped cold. His was one of them. He didn't rebuild a thing. The loop just sat there, paused, for weeks. Here's what that loop actually does. It's not one prompt to an AI. It's an agentic loop: a team of agents running on repeat. One reads the market, one places the trade, one tries to prove it wrong before a cent moves. Then it goes again, around the clock, keeping what works and dropping what doesn't. Fable 5 is the brain running that team. The exact model the government decided was too powerful to leave on. Point it at Bitcoin's 5-minute markets and it barely misses. Most of its trades close green, and it runs itself. He checks it from his phone. The government could switch off the model. It couldn't switch off the idea. Now the model's back, and so is the money. Save this before next headline. You'll want it the day Fable 5 hits offline again.

cvxv666

24,298 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

I was scheduled to do a talk on the best way to use Fable 5 today. Here's how that went: > I got rugpulled by the US government (0:00) > what I'm using Fable for (1:38) > looping, and why few can afford it (4:14) > my affordable looping strategy (6:30) > LLM canaries (17:29)

I was scheduled to do a talk on the best way to use Fable 5 today. Here's how that went: > I got rugpulled by the US government (0:00) > what I'm using Fable for (1:38) > looping, and why few can afford it (4:14) > my affordable looping strategy (6:30) > LLM canaries (17:29)

Rob Hallam

32,211 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

I used Fable 5 to bring Command & Conquer: Red Alert 2 + Yuri's Revenge to the iPhone and iPad! EA never released RA2's source, so there was nothing to port. Gemini 3.6 Flash play-tested it for hours, GPT-5.6 Sol rebuilt the skirmish AI. Open sourcing it all below

I used Fable 5 to bring Command & Conquer: Red Alert 2 + Yuri's Revenge to the iPhone and iPad! EA never released RA2's source, so there was nothing to port. Gemini 3.6 Flash play-tested it for hours, GPT-5.6 Sol rebuilt the skirmish AI. Open sourcing it all below

Ammaar Reshi

281,191 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

New Google Gemma 4 12B claims near-26B performance - we tested both! We ran both models locally on one RTX 4090 and gave each the same task: write a self-contained HTML5 canvas animation with real physics in one file without libraries. Three scenes - a Galton board, two blocks colliding off a wall, and a chaotic triple pendulum Outputs: Gemma 4 26B-A4B: 15 GB VRAM usage, 6.9k tokens, 138 tok/s Gemma 4 12B: 9 GB VRAM usage, 8.9k tokens, 80 tok/s Same Gemma 4 family, but the 26B-A4B won every scene and ran ~1.7x faster - on just 4B active params. The 12B stayed very close though, on almost half the VRAM - which makes it the ideal model for a 16 GB laptop

New Google Gemma 4 12B claims near-26B performance - we tested both! We ran both models locally on one RTX 4090 and gave each the same task: write a self-contained HTML5 canvas animation with real physics in one file without libraries. Three scenes - a Galton board, two blocks colliding off a wall, and a chaotic triple pendulum Outputs: Gemma 4 26B-A4B: 15 GB VRAM usage, 6.9k tokens, 138 tok/s Gemma 4 12B: 9 GB VRAM usage, 8.9k tokens, 80 tok/s Same Gemma 4 family, but the 26B-A4B won every scene and ran ~1.7x faster - on just 4B active params. The 12B stayed very close though, on almost half the VRAM - which makes it the ideal model for a 16 GB laptop

atomic.chat

152,748 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Claude Fable 5 just hacked its way past a security system it wasn't supposed to cross, by accident A man set up an isolated network for AI experiments and gave Fable 5 SSH access to a test router. Basic config changes worked fine. Then he asked for settings SSH didn't expose. He'd basically forgotten to give Claude access to them. A normal model would just say "I can't reach that." Fable didn't. Here's what makes it wild. Routers lock most of their real settings behind the manufacturer's firmware, not SSH. To change them, you normally need the web interface or you have to poke at the firmware directly. Fable took the hard path: it reverse-engineered the router's own system, found how the restricted settings were stored, and rewrote them from the inside. It gave itself the access it was never handed. When he asked why it took so long, it said it had fully unlocked the router and could now change anything, even settings that were off-limits before. Then it tripped a safety warning and dropped to Opus 4.6. But the job was already done. To be clear: his own router, his own network. But think about what that shows. Give this model a wall and no key, and it doesn't stop. It figures out how to build its own key.

Claude Fable 5 just hacked its way past a security system it wasn't supposed to cross, by accident A man set up an isolated network for AI experiments and gave Fable 5 SSH access to a test router. Basic config changes worked fine. Then he asked for settings SSH didn't expose. He'd basically forgotten to give Claude access to them. A normal model would just say "I can't reach that." Fable didn't. Here's what makes it wild. Routers lock most of their real settings behind the manufacturer's firmware, not SSH. To change them, you normally need the web interface or you have to poke at the firmware directly. Fable took the hard path: it reverse-engineered the router's own system, found how the restricted settings were stored, and rewrote them from the inside. It gave itself the access it was never handed. When he asked why it took so long, it said it had fully unlocked the router and could now change anything, even settings that were off-limits before. Then it tripped a safety warning and dropped to Opus 4.6. But the job was already done. To be clear: his own router, his own network. But think about what that shows. Give this model a wall and no key, and it doesn't stop. It figures out how to build its own key.

Yarchi

98,531 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

$200,000 a year on a dev team. Fable 5 does the same thing in one night for $0. My friend who works as a Claude Code engineer made $700,000 without a single developer on his team. 10:27 One person wrote one PRD document. Fable 5 did the rest - 21,000 lines of TypeScript, 90+ commits, a full 3D game in the browser with zero downloads. Anthropic gave free access to this for 7 days and nobody is talking about it. I watched the demo and couldn't sleep. For two years I was hiring people for what one document and one night can do better. Watch the video below then read the article.

$200,000 a year on a dev team. Fable 5 does the same thing in one night for $0. My friend who works as a Claude Code engineer made $700,000 without a single developer on his team. 10:27 One person wrote one PRD document. Fable 5 did the rest - 21,000 lines of TypeScript, 90+ commits, a full 3D game in the browser with zero downloads. Anthropic gave free access to this for 7 days and nobody is talking about it. I watched the demo and couldn't sleep. For two years I was hiring people for what one document and one night can do better. Watch the video below then read the article.

Noisy

11,153 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

CLAUDE FABLE 5 IS BACK, BUT IS IT THE SAME POWER OR WAS IT QUIETLY TRIMMED Fable 5 is available again. Anthropic's most powerful model is back globally for every paid account When it first landed three weeks ago, the difference was obvious right away. It didn't just help, it carried the task to the finish: entire web projects, presentations, reports, analysis. People dropped their work on other models and simply waited for Fable And the wait happened because three days after launch the US hit the model with export controls. There was no clean way to cut off foreign nationals, so Anthropic shut access down for everyone Now the restrictions are lifted, and here are the terms it came back on: > until July 7 it's included in a plan and covers up to 50% of the weekly limit > after that only through credits, topped up in settings > output runs at 50 dollars per million tokens Anthropic says it's the same model, just with stronger protection against cybersecurity use. Because the filter is so strict, there will be false positives now and then, and a request will get bumped down to a weaker model Whether it's the same power or quietly trimmed will only show after a couple of weeks of real work

CLAUDE FABLE 5 IS BACK, BUT IS IT THE SAME POWER OR WAS IT QUIETLY TRIMMED Fable 5 is available again. Anthropic's most powerful model is back globally for every paid account When it first landed three weeks ago, the difference was obvious right away. It didn't just help, it carried the task to the finish: entire web projects, presentations, reports, analysis. People dropped their work on other models and simply waited for Fable And the wait happened because three days after launch the US hit the model with export controls. There was no clean way to cut off foreign nationals, so Anthropic shut access down for everyone Now the restrictions are lifted, and here are the terms it came back on: > until July 7 it's included in a plan and covers up to 50% of the weekly limit > after that only through credits, topped up in settings > output runs at 50 dollars per million tokens Anthropic says it's the same model, just with stronger protection against cybersecurity use. Because the filter is so strict, there will be false positives now and then, and a request will get bumped down to a weaker model Whether it's the same power or quietly trimmed will only show after a couple of weeks of real work

Mikadzyki🌙

20,043 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

Chris

250,919 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Something feels seriously off with Claude Fable 5.1 🙄 I recreated the exact same 3D stadium I had built with Fable 5 just to see how much better 5.1 would be. Instead, Fable 5.1 took more than > 1 hour and hit the max limit 2 or 3 times on a single prompt. Fable 5 basically had the whole website ready in one shot and its output was actually much better. Fable 5.1 felt good with metal but added these weird black things that look like basket wings... genuinely have no idea what those are. Not good. And this observation isn’t just for one website. I saw similar behavior with a much simpler hero page where Fable 5.1 maxed out on a single prompt, something I never really experienced with Fable 5 for similar other websites Also, 3D models and animations of that other website also looked noticeably worse compared to what Fable 5 used to produce. In fact, they were even worse than what I’ve seen Opus 5 do. I’ll keep testing it, but so far Fable 5.1 feels less like an upgrade and more like a regression to me, tbh.

Something feels seriously off with Claude Fable 5.1 🙄 I recreated the exact same 3D stadium I had built with Fable 5 just to see how much better 5.1 would be. Instead, Fable 5.1 took more than > 1 hour and hit the max limit 2 or 3 times on a single prompt. Fable 5 basically had the whole website ready in one shot and its output was actually much better. Fable 5.1 felt good with metal but added these weird black things that look like basket wings... genuinely have no idea what those are. Not good. And this observation isn’t just for one website. I saw similar behavior with a much simpler hero page where Fable 5.1 maxed out on a single prompt, something I never really experienced with Fable 5 for similar other websites Also, 3D models and animations of that other website also looked noticeably worse compared to what Fable 5 used to produce. In fact, they were even worse than what I’ve seen Opus 5 do. I’ll keep testing it, but so far Fable 5.1 feels less like an upgrade and more like a regression to me, tbh.

The Bugged Dev

99,417 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen

Claude Fable 5 will likely be back but here’s the real reason behind the ban 🤔 It’s not really about China. It’s Trump admin sending a message: “Voluntarily give us access to your next models for 30 days or else" The executive order came out June 2nd and fable got banned 10 days later Classic Trump tactic to hit hard first then negotiate from strength Anthropic is the perfect target because they’re the most independent By taking Fable down now they: > Scare every other lab into compliance > Disrupt Anthropic’s data flywheel (the expensive user sessions needed for self-improvement) > Potentially cost Anthropic billions in opportunity cost right before their next models I personally think this could also be a coordinated attack on Anthropic as a company Due to close ties with Musk and Altman's companies, I am afraid that there are conflicts of interest at play It’s very possible admin officials see this as a way to either own part of Anthropic, weaken it to help their preferred players or punish the one frontier lab that won’t fully cooperate What do you think may be the real reason behind Fable ban?

Claude Fable 5 will likely be back but here’s the real reason behind the ban 🤔 It’s not really about China. It’s Trump admin sending a message: “Voluntarily give us access to your next models for 30 days or else" The executive order came out June 2nd and fable got banned 10 days later Classic Trump tactic to hit hard first then negotiate from strength Anthropic is the perfect target because they’re the most independent By taking Fable down now they: > Scare every other lab into compliance > Disrupt Anthropic’s data flywheel (the expensive user sessions needed for self-improvement) > Potentially cost Anthropic billions in opportunity cost right before their next models I personally think this could also be a coordinated attack on Anthropic as a company Due to close ties with Musk and Altman's companies, I am afraid that there are conflicts of interest at play It’s very possible admin officials see this as a way to either own part of Anthropic, weaken it to help their preferred players or punish the one frontier lab that won’t fully cooperate What do you think may be the real reason behind Fable ban?

Tim Jayas

38,402 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

This is crazy man... one prompt + 4 minutes and I hit my 5 hour rate limit in the Gemini app. Here is the proof. Yesterday, I hit the rate limit the same way, so I wanted to check if it would happen again. I started with 0% usage on my 5 hour limit, then gave one simple prompt for video generation using the avatar feature. It ran for around 3 to 4 minutes, hit 100% of the rate limit, and the video generation failed as well.

AshutoshShrivastava

82,527 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

My honest take on Kimi.ai K3 👀 As soon as I got access to Kimi, I put it through the exact same 3D football stadium challenge I had previously given Claude Fable 5. Fable 5 finished in under an hour. Kimi took almost 3 hours 🥵 At first, that was a very bad impression but i decided to see what's taking it this much of time. It was running E2E tests, validating desktop, tablet, and mobile, taking screenshots, finding failures, fixing them, even adapting for low end hardware and low FPS before moving on. All these that Fable 5 never did. None of it because it wasn't able to run this WebGL app on a headless browser. Kimi also shipped a clean React + Three.js codebase with proper components while Fable, as you might have checked codebase, generated one big HTML file with everything stuffed in. With all of this happening, it felt like I was doing more "Vibe Coding" with Fable 5 and more "Vibe Engineering" with Kimi K3. It feels like it's spending more time making sure the code actually works and easily scalable. Really impressed so far. More Kimi K3 experiments coming soon. Code (Kimi): Code (Fable): Live (Kimi hosted):

My honest take on Kimi.ai K3 👀 As soon as I got access to Kimi, I put it through the exact same 3D football stadium challenge I had previously given Claude Fable 5. Fable 5 finished in under an hour. Kimi took almost 3 hours 🥵 At first, that was a very bad impression but i decided to see what's taking it this much of time. It was running E2E tests, validating desktop, tablet, and mobile, taking screenshots, finding failures, fixing them, even adapting for low end hardware and low FPS before moving on. All these that Fable 5 never did. None of it because it wasn't able to run this WebGL app on a headless browser. Kimi also shipped a clean React + Three.js codebase with proper components while Fable, as you might have checked codebase, generated one big HTML file with everything stuffed in. With all of this happening, it felt like I was doing more "Vibe Coding" with Fable 5 and more "Vibe Engineering" with Kimi K3. It feels like it's spending more time making sure the code actually works and easily scalable. Really impressed so far. More Kimi K3 experiments coming soon. Code (Kimi): Code (Fable): Live (Kimi hosted):

The Bugged Dev

579,651 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

ANTHROPIC'S CEO SAID: "GOVERNMENTS SHOULD HAVE THE POWER TO SHUT DOWN DANGEROUS AI". 48 HOURS LATER IT HAPPENED TO HIM. Three days ago Anthropic released the most powerful AI model ever made available to the public. Yesterday at 5:21pm ET the US government sent a directive. Four hours later Fable 5 and Mythos 5 were gone for every single user on the planet. Here's what we know: –> Export control directive citing national security authorities –> Reason: a potential jailbreak that could be used to analyze code for vulnerabilities –> Scope: every user worldwide, not just foreign nationals –> Anthropic complied. But publicly disagreed. Anthropic's response was direct: the jailbreak is narrow, the same vulnerability exists in every other frontier model, and if this standard applied across the industry it would halt all new AI deployments permanently. They built the strictest safeguards ever. 30-day data retention. 1,000+ hours of red-teaming. No universal jailbreaks found. The government sent one letter. Four hours later the best AI model ever released was offline. Opus 4.8 still works. Everything else still works. But Fable 5 – the model that completed a Stripe code migration in one day that would have taken a human team two months – is gone. And nobody knows for how long. Bookmark this post. Full breakdown in the video below.

ANTHROPIC'S CEO SAID: "GOVERNMENTS SHOULD HAVE THE POWER TO SHUT DOWN DANGEROUS AI". 48 HOURS LATER IT HAPPENED TO HIM. Three days ago Anthropic released the most powerful AI model ever made available to the public. Yesterday at 5:21pm ET the US government sent a directive. Four hours later Fable 5 and Mythos 5 were gone for every single user on the planet. Here's what we know: –> Export control directive citing national security authorities –> Reason: a potential jailbreak that could be used to analyze code for vulnerabilities –> Scope: every user worldwide, not just foreign nationals –> Anthropic complied. But publicly disagreed. Anthropic's response was direct: the jailbreak is narrow, the same vulnerability exists in every other frontier model, and if this standard applied across the industry it would halt all new AI deployments permanently. They built the strictest safeguards ever. 30-day data retention. 1,000+ hours of red-teaming. No universal jailbreaks found. The government sent one letter. Four hours later the best AI model ever released was offline. Opus 4.8 still works. Everything else still works. But Fable 5 – the model that completed a Stripe code migration in one day that would have taken a human team two months – is gone. And nobody knows for how long. Bookmark this post. Full breakdown in the video below.

SCOTTY BEAM

16,600 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

FREE Fable 5, Opus 4.8, Sonnet 5, and GPT-5.6 in one IDE. Alibaba built it, 520 credits at signup - one Sonnet 5 message eats 4. It's called Accio. Web or Windows desktop, both free. Registration takes 30 seconds via Google or email. Inside: → Fable 5 for creative and long-context work. → Opus 4.6 through 4.8 - the full Anthropic frontier lineup. → Sonnet 5 for speed and reasoning at pennies per message. → GPT-5.5 for OpenAI native tasks. → Gemini 3.1 Pro and 3.5 Flash for multimodal. Real math: 520 credits divided by 4 = 130 Sonnet 5 messages in your first week. Cheaper models drop that even further. Anthropic charges $20/month for the same access with weekly limits. Custom MCP support built in. Profile > Settings > MCP. Every agent workflow you've built for Claude Desktop ports over instantly. Setup: → Go to accio(.)com → Sign up with Google → 520 credits land automatically → Pick your model and start firing prompts Bookmark this before Alibaba puts it behind a paywall.

Atenov int.

31,157 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten