正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

I had a conversation today with a fellow breast surgeon who shared that the large company she works for has decided they will no longer bill for preoperative counseling visits. I want you to sit with that for a moment. They’re no longer billing for the visit where a...

30,306 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

Joseph Marine 的头像
Joseph Marine1 年前

Agree. These visits are so important. The most important question patients ask is silent: "Do I trust this person with my health or not."

Elizabeth Hornsey 的头像
Elizabeth Hornsey1 年前

Thank you for continuing to speak out for patients. As a uterine cancer survivor I know how important these pre op appointments are because it was very important to me. I was able to get all of my questions answered before my hysterectomy including discussing keeping my ovaries. It is an essential part of the preparation and ensuring informed consent. That is just outrageous.

Fired Patients Union 的头像
Fired Patients Union1 年前

Some offices fire patients over these denials. One office manager told me recently, "We just don't have the time or staff for this now." Thank you for fighting and speaking out.

Readerrabbit 的头像
Readerrabbit1 年前

When is one supposed to go over all the risks and benefits and informed consent, etc.? That is just supposed to be done for free? Let’s tell lawyers that every millisecond of their time cannot be billed anymore, and that it should be done for free.

Disa Sacks 的头像
Disa Sacks1 年前

Doctors who work for these big corporations- hospital systems no longer have any leverage or say in these matters. What happens with them sets the standards for private practitioners. This is by design It forces the patients to go to the doctors on their lists and that’s usually the hospital owned doctors . It’s an ugly business It has nothing to do with what’s right for patient care What leverage do independent practioners have?

Pat Jack 的头像
Pat Jack1 年前

It is a blow to informed consent.

DontknowwhatImdoing 的头像
DontknowwhatImdoing1 年前

It’s valuable because it is how you create informed consent. Shame on the healthcare company for not allowing that time to be billed.

Mark Storey 的头像
Mark Storey1 年前

Probably an rvu based MD comp model and the system loses money on that part. So they write contract with MD to only pay work for billable items or expect most mds won't catch the dropped rvus. Nearly guaranteed to be something along those lines.

Steelman Medical Group 的头像
Steelman Medical Group1 年前

Heard once from someone in training: “Physicians are Eagles gaslit that they are Chickens” I’ve never been so happy to have made the jump to Direct Primary Care and eject from the madness of arguing with health insurance corporations that patient premium money should go towards paying for actual medical care that would benefit them. It’s like screaming at a charging Polar Bear….you don’t even stand of chance, just run.

Plasticolicious, MD💈 的头像
Plasticolicious, MD💈1 年前

So basically they want her to work for free? “Slave consults” Yea, I wouldn’t accept that at all. If the company doesn’t want to bill, fine. But you should still get paid for it.

相关视频

INSANE 🚨 This surgeon has a patient who needs a “deep flap” surgery. Insurance denied it To appeal she had to speak to her patients insurance. “I actually asked, do you know what a deep flap is? THE DOCTOR SAID NO.” The insurance companies deciding if Americans get their procedures DONT EVEN KNOW what the procedures are. How is this okay?! THIS is the state of American healthcare… “You may remember I had a patient who needs a deep flap, and the insurance company denied an inpatient stay for her. So I had to schedule a peer to peer call and schedule time out of my day to ask for a conversation directly with someone who is my peer to discuss deep flap surgery and why that patient needed to be overnight. That call was scheduled for 11AM, and eleven came around 11: 30, 11: 45 and no call still. And then we emailed the insurance company because, of course, they don't give me the call number. They only let me receive the call. So finally at 12: 15, I received the call that was initially scheduled for 11. And the doctor who called me was not a surgeon. And I actually asked the doctor, do you know what a deep flap is? And the doctor said no. So that's where we are. My patient has insurance. She's seeing someone who's fellowship trained in microsurgery, me, to do her breast reconstruction, and I'm having to teach another doctor what a deep flap is in order to justify her overnight stay to navigate her insurance. This is completely ridiculous.”

Wall Street Apes

1,292,441 次观看 • 1 年前

Insurance companies do not want you to fully understand this story. Because if you do, you will understand exactly how American healthcare needs to change. When my patient Rachel needed breast reconstruction, her insurance company required that I operate at a hospital that was not equipped to provide the safest care for her recovery. Rachel has spent over 20 years in healthcare as a nurse and nurse practitioner. She understands hospitals. And despite that, she was deeply traumatized by what she experienced. On Monday morning in Austin, she showed up for surgery and was turned away because the operating rooms were not safe to use. We pleaded with her insurance company to allow her surgery to be performed at @redbudsurgerycenter, a center designed specifically for breast reconstruction. They refused. On Tuesday, we went to a different hospital. The nurses were skilled, compassionate, and doing their best. But they did not have the tools or systems to support this kind of recovery. Rachel spent the night advocating for herself because she could tell things were not right. IV access issues. Monitoring gaps. Basic safety checks missed. Things patients should never have to catch on their own. Rachel asked me to share her story because when doctors and patients are forced into unsafe situations with no ability to choose better care, something is very wrong. After more than a decade of caring for people affected by breast cancer, I built a surgery center specifically for this work. It is CMS certified. It exists for patient safety. And yet, like so many Americans, Rachel’s insurance company decided where she was allowed to receive care. Insurance companies are no longer just making payment decisions. They are making medical decisions. We cannot change what happened to Rachel. But we can listen, learn, and do better for the next patient. Because the next person may not know how to advocate the way she did. And that is how people get hurt.

Elisabeth Potter MD

44,697 次观看 • 7 个月前

American Surgeon shows the actual letter from UnitedHealthcare DENYING a patient in emergency condition from receiving care “This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms” “I think we all knew this would happen. I had another patient come in and share with me that UnitedHealthcare denied her inpatient's day. So this is a patient who had shortness of breath and some chest pain, and she just knew that something wasn't right in her body. She had a family history of blood clots and she'd had a deep flap surgery a couple of weeks ago. She went to the hospital and they saw her and they found that she had a life threatening condition known as pulmonary embolisms. So she was admitted to the hospital and taken care of really well by the doctors there. And they ordered all the right things. After a couple of days, she was discharged. She got a letter from UnitedHealthcare explaining that they didn't agree with the level of her care and that they would not cover it. So I'm gonna share some of the language of that letter with you, and I want you to know that my patient that we talked about previously who had her surgery denied had almost exactly the same letter shared. So there's some troubling things in this letter. I think this term is really interesting. United is saying they reviewed the request for inpatient admission. So let's all just pause and consider that. This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms, and the doctor wasn't really requesting anything. They were saying this patient needs to be in the hospital. But an insurance company sees this as a request, and that's part of this prior auth environment that we're living in. So I think it's important as patients and as physicians to just acknowledge that this is our reality now. Someone can think that there's a good medical decision for you and can write orders and wanna do the right thing for you, but your insurance company is seeing that as a request and deciding whether or not they wanna do it. One of the criteria that this insurance company used to decide whether or not to accept or deny this request was whether it's medically necessary. And it's so interesting that we're letting insurance companies and the doctors who work for insurance companies determine what's medically necessary and not just the doctor in front of the patient in the emergency room. So this is a really bold statement from UnitedHealthcare for my patient. They say you did not have to be admitted as an inpatient to the hospital for this care. I think we all need to just reflect on that. An insurance company is telling a patient and her doctor that they disagree with the plan of care to keep that patient safe. I know that this is boiling down to whether it's an inpatient admission or an observation admission, and that's really about money. But what I wanna point out to you is they're making medical decisions. This insurance company is actually weighing in and disagreeing with a doctor who made a medical decision to admit this patient for her safety. So this specific sentence, when a doctor or facility treats a patient above the recommended level of care, we cannot cover it. What the heck? That's what we do. We go above and beyond as physicians. It's clear that insurance companies don't, and they're actually saying it here.”

Wall Street Apes

115,712 次观看 • 1 年前

INSANE 🚨 American Surgeon says a Health Insurance Company stopped her from doing surgery on a cancer patient AGAIN After a year of denials and appeals they finally got the insurance company to say yes. Only for them call and say she can’t do the surgery until the timeframe the insurance company decides on “I have a patient who had breast cancer that was aggressive, positive lymph nodes and all the things. And she wanted to have a mastectomy, and she wanted her other breast removed to reduce her risk because she's 35 with an aggressive cancer. She has a family history of cancers. We did her mastectomy last year, and the night before surgery, her insurance denied the prophylactic side, so they wouldn't let us do both breasts, just the one with cancer. So that's what we did. She's completed radiation and chemotherapy, and it's time for her to have her deep lab surgery. And she wants the other breast removed because she's worried, and it's reasonable to have it removed. And we asked her insurance again, would you please cover the prophylactic mastectomy on the other side? And they said no. So we appealed and appealed again. And then finally this week, I was able to talk to a doctor at an insurance company, and I explained to him again why she wants a mastectomy. She wants a deep flap reconstruction. I can only do that once in her life, and if she's gonna have the other mastectomy, now's the time to do it. And, he considered, and he actually overturned the decision and said that we could do the mastectomy. So it's been a year, and now the insurance company decided to let us do the thing that we'd been asking for a year to do. And then today, they called to say that they didn't agree with my timing, that they want me to wait 2 more months before I do her DFLOP because their standard is that microsurgeon. I'm the one who chooses when to operate, and they're telling me when to operate. I've done this for a long time, and I'm really successful at doing this. And I can do it 4 months after the end of radiation, but they want me to wait for 6 months. They're (insurance companies) are practicing medicine.” I’ve shared this surgeons videos before and this is at least the 3rd time health insurance companies have stopped her from doing surgeries

Wall Street Apes

357,743 次观看 • 1 年前

My last case of 2025 and my first case of 2026 tell you everything you need to know about our healthcare system. Last week, I was scheduled to do a DIEP flap for a patient who had been waiting a long time. We had asked her insurance company if we could do the surgery in network at @Redbudsurgerycenter, where we have everything needed to safely and efficiently take care of her. They hadn’t approved that, so the surgery had to be scheduled at an older hospital in town. When we arrived, the hospital was having HVAC issues. The humidity levels were not safe for surgery. We waited for hours, and ultimately the case had to be canceled. It wasn’t just her surgery. Multiple surgeries were canceled that day because operating under those conditions would have been a fire risk. We weren’t able to reschedule her surgery before the end of the year, which means her deductible resets. I could have safely done her surgery at Redbud that day but insurance rules wouldn’t allow it. This is what closed networks and rigid systems look like in real life. Now here’s the contrast. The first case I’m doing in 2026 is also a woman who needs breast reconstruction with DIEP flaps. This time, instead of traditional insurance, her employer uses a third party administrator. They came to me directly and asked what I would charge if they paid fairly and transparently. On Monday, we’re doing her bilateral DIEP flap at @Redbudsurgerycenter. I can control the environment, the costs, and the care. It’s better for the patient and significantly less expensive for the employer. This is called Direct Specialty Care. It’s not direct primary care. It’s specialty care delivered without unnecessary barriers. It’s happening. We’re starting the year this way. And I’m going to keep pushing the boundaries and keeping you informed.

Elisabeth Potter MD

136,464 次观看 • 7 个月前

This woman is a Board Certified Emergency Medicine Physician in America She says she’s seeing more and more doctors leave practicing medicine because what US Health Insurance companies are doing to healthcare She explains why, this is important information: “I believe what we are seeing with healthcare professionals is not just burnout, it's something far more insidious and painful. This is moral injury. — Moral injury. The pain of knowing what the right thing is for the patient, but being unable to do that because of systemic barriers. And over time, this wears you down. I have seen so many people leave the profession because it has eroded their sense of purpose, their love for the job. And we take a Hippocratic oath to do no harm. But in a system that doesn't place human health at the center, that becomes harder and harder to uphold. And that disconnect from what we are trained to do, from what we can actually do, creates a very painful wound. And when the healers themselves are wounded, when their hands are tied, when their clinical judgment is overruled, they don't just feel that defeat themselves, they that trickles down to the patient. — So when we see our providers juggling insurance company protocols, productivity metrics, hospital bureaucracy, the relentless pull of the electronic medical record, all of these things take the doctor away, the patient. If we really want to understand why the United States spends more on health care than any other nation, while delivering some of the worst outcomes, we need to start being honest. The system just isn't inefficient. It is deeply misaligned with care and having it be patient first” US Health Insurance companies are absolutely destroying American Healthcare and we all must keep sharing these important stories because something has to change

Wall Street Apes

223,295 次观看 • 1 年前

EVERYONE NEEDS TO SEE THIS 🚨 American doctor exposes new internal change to Blue Cross prior authorization process to deny coverage for Americans - They’ll only speak to the doctor who put in request - They WONT SAY WHAT NUMBER THEY’RE CALLING FROM - They’ll ONLY CALL ONCE - If they miss the call, the patient will be denied coverage for treatment “Now Blue Cross is saying that they will only do their peer to peer reviews by calling the doctor who is asking for the treatment to be authorized. And they will only call once, and they won't tell you when they're calling, and they won't tell you what number they're calling from.” “So if you're a doctor seeing patients and you have your phone on do not disturb because you're seeing patients or you just don't answer numbers that you don't recognize, and you're seeing patients and you don't wanna interrupt a a patient visit, you're gonna miss the call. And guess what? The treatment will not be authorized” “They're getting more creative about how to deny your claims or just not authorize your treatment at all. I'm going on information given to me by Blue Cross. I am a physician. When we physicians ask for a treatment to be authorized by an insurance company and they deny authorization, what happens at that point is that we are asked to do a peer to peer review, meaning that we, the doctor asking for the treatment, have to speak with the doctor who is employed by the insurance company, who is there only to say no.” THIS IS INSANE

Wall Street Apes

1,465,641 次观看 • 1 年前