Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

I have a code: stand by your friends when shit gets real, not when everything is good. The Tate brothers have been held for several weeks in inhumane incarceration despite not committing any crime in the US. That ends now. On August 13 at 11 AM in Miami, FL,...

176,409 views • 24 days ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 Andrew Tate's bumbling lawyer, Joseph McBride, speaks outside a courthouse in Miami after a hearing about the Tate's potential extradition to the UK. To address a few main talking points: 1. "Tate is not a flight risk because he cooperated with judiciary control in Romania." Tate had to check in at Bucharest periodically as part of his judiciary control requirements. If he did not, he would risk becoming an international fugitive and going back to jail. Tate had an unbelievably good deal in Romania. He was able to travel the world freely while charged with crimes as serious as allegedly raping a 15-year-old and trafficking a 17-year-old. If the Tate's were ever going to face trial in Romania, it was years and years away. They were never going to risk giving up the cushy deal they had been given. And this is important to consider when people (moronically) use the Tates complying with Romania as proof that they are not a flight risk for the UK. You are comparing: Being able to travel the world freely and live as normal for years and years while awaiting trial in Romania Vs Being likely incarcerated until trial in the UK (and the UK charges are trial ready) where they face up to life sentences if convicted of what they are charged with. So in my opinion, the Tate's behaviour in Romania does not mean they are not a flight risk to the UK. 2. "We haven't been given evidence like victim names, witness statements. We demand the evidence and police records from the UK." It's not unusual for the UK not to produce its full evidence at this stage. Extradition hearings aren't trials - they determine whether someone should be extradited, not whether they're guilty.

Gadget

77,345 views • 1 month ago

BREAKING: Andrew and Tristan Tate Charged After a 15-month-long investigation. The charges against them include: - Rape - Human trafficking - Formation of an organized crime group The allegations claim the Tates formed an organized criminal group in Romania, the US, the UK and other countries to recruit girls by promising them love/marriage, then placing them under constant surveillance/control & forcing them into the porn industry. The trial will not start immediately and is expected to take several years MY THOUGHTS: Tate was arrested days before a scheduled interview we had in Dubai. We did a space as soon as he was arrested and the consensus by most panelists was that they are 'most likely guilty' We came to this conclusion based on a narrative built around Tate, mainly from things he said, generally taken out of context. However, over the past few months, while the Tates were being held without bail, we started seeing all the evidence getting 'leaked'. I will make a thread on this one day, but to say the evidence is 'underwhelming' is an understatement. This doesn't mean there isn't evidence I haven't seen, but suffice to say, I don't trust the Romanian legal system. On June 29th, Tristan announced that he would be allowed to discuss the "evidence" against him, something that both brothers were not allowed to do. My position is simple: If the allegations are true, they should be jailed. If the allegations are false, they should be freed. But, will they get a fair trial? Do you think the Tates are guilty, or the victims of corruption?

Mario Nawfal

9,857,561 views • 3 years ago