I have always warned the #Kaspa community to refrain from using the Digital Silver label, because then clowns make videos like this, taking advantage of ambiguous and uneffective definitions. Better to call $Kas for what it is: a #BTC competitor, and the strongest ever invented !

Maybe he should read Yonatans article on how kaspa is a zero-sum game with Litecoin. The digital silver name for kaspa is simply because the supply is so much bigger than bitcoin or even litecoin. This is because actual silver was used. The point that bitcoin can be infinitely divided as a way to say there is no need for "digital silver" doesn't make sense when you preach that Bitcoin is a type of digital gold and you should not use it.

With the same logic, if I launch a 21.000 only coins PoW, am I authorized to called it a better Gold or Gold squared vs Bitcoin, due to less computable units ? In general I disagree on the very meaning of these supplies. A pizza is still the same pizza, no matter the # of slices

Ironically this is an argument against BTC not Kaspa

Even the word "Kaspa" is the ancient Aramaic word for silver. The logo isn't a perfect circle because is an used coin. Everything is carefully planned. The copy-pasters will do their thing, whatever you say or do, the most important thing is to have an identity and we have it 😉

It means money.

Silver was used because of the scarcity of gold. That is where the silver comparison comes in. Kaspa is less scarce than Bitcoin and can actually be used to pay for inexpensive purchases, which was bitcoin’s original goal

I disagree on the concept of scarsity, the way you are presenting it here. If you divide your pizza (Bitcoin) in 4 slices, and I divide mine (Kaspa) in 8 slices, we still eat the same.

ima need to make a video about this

Agree, the silver narrative implies inferiority. $Kas > #BTC

Dudes a clown