Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

I have long suspected that Disclosure was far more complex than the public has been privy to, and Ross Coulthart has reinforced that idea with his recent remarks regarding Lue Elizondo, and his potential role within the legacy UAP crash retrieval program. Here is the bottom line on Coulthart's...

23,562 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

🚨 Ross Coulthart BOMBSHELL: "Lue Elizondo was part of the Legacy UFO Crash Retrieval Program" 👽🛸🇺🇸 Lue Elizondo had a role within the legacy UFO crash retrieval program and led James Clapper effort to conceal it and control the UAP Disclosure narrative. He states that Lue needs to be more forthcoming about his past roles. There are people that bitterly resent that Lue be appointed to a position of power in UAP transparency because they think that he was part of a previous agenda that was to try to control the narrative to restrict what the public is entitled to know about UAP Disclosure. Coulthart believes a lot of this was an intention by James Clapper to try and impose a narrative on the public domain using Lue as a highly urbane articulate and likable frontman to try to restrict what the public was told about crash retrievals. Speaking directly to Elizondo he says he has spoken to people in the legacy program who knew Lue. Lue I know a lot of people and they know you. I know you cannot speak about the role that you have held within the legacy program but you did. We have got to stop this nonsense because it is becoming distractive. There are factions and bitternesses beginning to develop within the UAP world and it is in danger of blowing the whole thing apart. The remarks point to real tensions inside the disclosure community that could slow progress. How can those seeking truth come together to focus on facts rather than division?

Interstellar

46,814 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨Ross Coulthart Says a Pentagon Faction Is Trying to Put UFO Disclosure Back in the Box Ross Coulthart has made one of his most direct claims yet about the battle taking place behind the scenes over UFO disclosure. He says he believes a that a control group inside the Pentagon is attempting to restrict the narrative, slow the momentum toward disclosure and prevent the public conversation from reaching the issue of alleged crash retrieval and reverse engineering programs. Coulthart argues that the creation of new governance and scientific advisory structures may be part of that struggle. He stressed that many of the people appointed to those bodies could have entirely good intentions, but warned that others may be attempting to place institutional roadblocks in the path of further transparency. He also described the original 2016 / 2017 launch of To The Stars Academy as a form of controlled disclosure driven by a faction within the national security establishment that believed it was time to reveal something to the public. In Coulthart's view though that process may have been designed to limit the discussion to military encounters and unexplained objects while keeping the alleged retrieval programs outside the accepted narrative. That all changed when David Grusch publicly alleged the existence of a long running crash retrieval and reverse engineering program. Coulthart believes that Grusch's testimony disrupted the planned disclosure process by forcing the central allegation into the open. The debate could no longer remain confined to whether unusual objects were being observed. It had moved directly into claims that material and potentially non human technology had in fact already been recovered. Coulthart then turned his attention toward Lue Elizondo, confirming that Elizondo was the person he had previously suggested could be considered for a major UAP transparency position. He said he respects Elizondo and believes he is in a difficult situation because of the ongoing restrictions imposed by his security obligations. At the same time, Coulthart said Elizondo needs to be more forthcoming about his previous roles, while making the extraordinary allegation that Elizondo had held a role within the legacy program. That assertion has not been publicly established through documentary evidence, but Coulthart presented it as something that is well known among people familiar with the program. He also claimed that some figures oppose Elizondo being placed in a position of authority because they believe he was previously involved in an effort to control how much the public was told. Coulthart suggested that former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper may have supported a carefully managed narrative, with Elizondo acting as a credible and publicly acceptable spokesman. Coulthart didn't actually accuse Elizondo or others involved in that effort of acting maliciously. He described them as patriots who believed they were serving their country, even if the intended disclosure was narrower than what the public was entitled to know. His larger warning was aimed at the bitter factionalism now spreading through the UFO community. Coulthart believes internal feuds, private attacks and disputes over personalities are creating exactly the division that opponents of disclosure need. Divide the movement, discredit its leading voices and the entire issue can be placed back inside the classified system for another generation. Coulthart also said there is no doubt in his mind that a non human intelligence is engaging with this planet, adding that people on Capitol Hill and inside the Pentagon had privately confirmed that conclusion to him during the same week. #RossCoulthart #UAPDisclosure #LueElizondo #DavidGrusch #Pentagon #UAP #UFO #CrashRetrievals #DisclosureNow Source:

Skywatch Signal

17,528 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Ross Coulthart says Lue Elizondo should come clean about his true role in the UAP Legacy Program to clear up some of the bad blood in the UAP community for the good of disclosure “There is a bigger story here and I think it has a lot to do with Lue Elizondo's true role as a counter intelligence official in the Defense Department. That's as far as I'm prepared to go. At some stage, Lue is going to have to give a clearer accounting of what his precise role was, both in the alleged AATIP program and possibly also in his knowledge of and involvement with the legacy program. I do think that for the UAP commentary community, this is very unhealthy. I think it's time the air was cleared. I think as disclosure rolls out hopefully in the next few months, I do think it's going to become clearer about what the prescribed roles were of certain individuals and whether the um UAP community has been given the full story about people's roles. At some stage there is going to have to be a clearer accounting because it's clear there is bad blood between James Lacatski and Lue Elizondo, and there is towards Lue from other people in the social media UAP commentary community, people who have served within government who obviously feel I think some resentment that things are not being properly represented. I can kind of sympathize with Lue to some degree. I know exactly what Lue's role was and I know he hasn't been allowed to talk about it because for him to talk about it would be a breach of his national security oath.”

Red Panda Koala

206,331 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

🚨 Lue Elizondo: "I have signed NDA's which prevent me talking about UFO Crash Retrievals" 👽🛸 "I was told several years ago that I could never talk about crash retrievals or material ever and I signed paperwork for it. I just don't want to go to jail." Earlier today Ross Coulthart revealed that Lue Elizondo was part of the Legacy UFO Crash Retrieval Program The former head of the Pentagon's Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) directly addressed whether he had seen or handled recovered UFO material. When asked if he had stood in front of a recovered UFO, Elizondo stated he has had in his possession material that was allegedly recovered from a UFO. He declined to say who provided it. He explained that he was warned very clearly years ago and signed paperwork prohibiting discussion of crash retrievals or such material. Only recently has he been cleared to speak about one specific piece because it appears in his book, which went through the Pentagon's prepublication review process. Elizondo described the material as clearly engineered. Analysis showed it could not be replicated by top aerospace contractors despite significant time and expense. He noted the technology involved appears beyond what was available at the time of recovery, creating a temporal mismatch with known human capabilities. He stressed he is not being evasive and must honor the legal boundaries to avoid serious consequences. The former intelligence official has maintained that greater transparency on UAP is important while operating within approved limits. This exchange highlights the ongoing tension between classified programs, legal restrictions on former officials, and public interest in potential non-human technology.

Interstellar

106,325 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨David Grusch vs. James Clapper: The Disclosure Line Just Broke Why Grusch's Megyn Kelly Interview May Be the Most Explosive Admission in Modern UAP History Grusch crossed a line that hadn't been crossed before. Ross Coulthart reacted to David Grusch's interview with Megyn Kelly, where Grusch, a former intelligence officer directly named a former Director of National Intelligence as someone who managed a UAP crash retrieval program. As Ross points out, in "The Age of Disclosure", James Clapper appeared to acknowledge awareness of a program that tracked UAPs. At the time, that felt significant but vague. What Grusch has now done is remove the ambiguity. According to him, Clapper wasn't just aware of crash retrievals, he actually managed them. While serving as DNI, he placed people into critical roles to control how the issue was handled, both publicly and through channels that were not public at all. If Clapper managed a crash retrieval program, then the idea that senior intelligence figures "didn’t really know" falls apart. Silence all of s sudden looks less like uncertainty and more like policy. It also forces a harder question about just how many other officials who now speak publicly about UAPs once had operational roles inside the same legacy program? Grusch didn't stop with Clapper. He also referenced Stephanie O'Sullivan and others who were present in rooms where this issue was discussed and managed. This reveals a structured program, overseen, and staffed at the highest levels. Personally I think at this point, the debate has changed. We are no longer arguing about whether programs existed or parsing blurry footage. We're dealing with named individuals and specific roles. That's a different phase of disclosure entirely. For the first time ever, accountability has been placed squarely in view. This wasn't a slip of the tongue or careless phrasing by Grusch. It was deliberate, measured, and put on the public record for a reason. Now its up to us to put the pressure on. Source:

Skywatch Signal

49,542 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce