Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

I have so many questions..!!

9,983,928 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

46 Kommentare

Profilbild von BHK🇮🇳
BHK🇮🇳vor 1 Jahr

Some "experts" in the comment section are giving reasons such as steel, concrete, glass, momentum, weight, speed, Lauda, and Lehsun, but no one is explaining how two buildings could collapse vertically in such a dramatic way, when the impact was sideways, that too at 800-900 km/h. And the building in Ahmedabad is standing despite the plane crashing on top of it (vertical impact).

Profilbild von Sandeep Bisht
Sandeep Bishtvor 1 Jahr

because this was built way before local BJP era

Profilbild von BHK🇮🇳
BHK🇮🇳vor 1 Jahr

Aapiya detected.. Opinion rejected..

Profilbild von BB 🇮🇳
BB 🇮🇳vor 1 Jahr

This is really illogical.. look at the height man. Common sense is rear these days.

Profilbild von BHK🇮🇳
BHK🇮🇳vor 1 Jahr

I am not an English Nazi, but "rear"..? 🤣

Profilbild von BB 🇮🇳
BB 🇮🇳vor 1 Jahr

lol typing error 🫣 but I hope you got my point 🤪 (read it rare)

Profilbild von AAP ka Moh!t
AAP ka Moh!tvor 1 Jahr

अमेरिका के पास यहां जैसे जर्दा गुटखा खाने वाले ठेकेदार नहीं है, जो खैनी रगड़ कर ईंटे चेपते है।

Profilbild von BHK🇮🇳
BHK🇮🇳vor 1 Jahr

😂😂

Profilbild von Michael Westen
Michael Westenvor 1 Jahr

911 was a controlled demolition. Also, you have the Towers built out of A36 Structural Steel. A36 Structural Steel melts at 2600-2800F. Jet fuel only reaches temperatures of 980-1800F. There’s no way the jet fuel was the reason the towers fell. If you watch videos on the towers falling, if you look really closely, you see these puffs come out of every floor. That’s from a control demonstration.

Profilbild von Vik k 🌞🌙⭐️🔥🌅🌫🐥🏹
Vik k 🌞🌙⭐️🔥🌅🌫🐥🏹vor 1 Jahr

9/11 was moneyfactured !! Just look at the Pentagon one no trace of place at all. 🚀 🧐

Profilbild von BHK🇮🇳
BHK🇮🇳vor 1 Jahr

👍🏽

Profilbild von Saxena
Saxenavor 1 Jahr

Maturity is when we realize that 9/11 was an inside job and Osama Bin Laden was just a Bali Ka Bakra. The USDS had their eyes on oil reserves of Iraq hence 9/11 and execution of Saddam Hussein were planned.

Profilbild von Richa Misra Tripathi
Richa Misra Tripathivor 1 Jahr

As a non engineer & layman my guess is the angle & speed of rhe aeroplanes hitting the buildings varied. Secondly WTC was a steel framework building which couldn't endure very high temperatures whereas the Indian building would have been RCC cement concrete iron structure

Profilbild von CK4LIFE
CK4LIFEvor 1 Jahr

How stupid are you?

Profilbild von Emanuel AOF
Emanuel AOFvor 1 Jahr

Completely different case. The main cause of the WTC collapse, was the thermal expansion, caused by the intense heat of the fires following the plane impacts. “The fires weakened the steel structure, causing it to expand, which led to the buckling and failure of key support columns, ultimately triggering a progressive collapse.”

Profilbild von Veer Nair | வீர் நாயர் | वीर नायर
Veer Nair | வீர் நாயர் | वीर नायरvor 1 Jahr

9/11 vs 12/6

Profilbild von Ri$hi
Ri$hivor 1 Jahr

The aeroplane of 9/11 was full of explosions.

Profilbild von BHK🇮🇳
BHK🇮🇳vor 1 Jahr

As if the Jet Fuel in Air India flight was not enough.

Profilbild von Soorya
Sooryavor 1 Jahr

Too many questions..!!

Profilbild von noonetobeknown
noonetobeknownvor 1 Jahr

You should’ve studied science specifically physics for this ,then I don’t think so you will be here posting this ,cuz this just don’t make sense at all in anyway

Profilbild von Nadeem Gill
Nadeem Gillvor 1 Jahr

One was a deliberate, high-speed impact into a skyscraper. The other was a low-altitude crash during takeoff with failing thrust. Comparing the two is not just misleading - it’s physics denial.

Profilbild von Sonel
Sonelvor 1 Jahr

One was a >100 storey skyscraper other was a one-floor college canteen. Comparing the two is not logic, it’s lazy. Science padho, sentiment mat becho 🙄

Profilbild von Cloud Radar
Cloud Radarvor 1 Jahr

Bro stop! One was a direct hit at over 500Mph nose first. The other was a controlled crash landing from above with attempts at a flare towards the end. Gear was left down to absorb most of the crash. These are not the same. Educate yourself and stop looking for engagement clicks.

Profilbild von Kiran Kumar S
Kiran Kumar Svor 1 Jahr

Simple. In New York, the planes were flown in full speed and almost full tank of fuel inside the world trade centers. In Amdavad, the crash happened outside the small building. Most of the fuel was burnt outside. And the plane had no major velocity to damage the building.

Profilbild von Gooty Gopala Krishna
Gooty Gopala Krishnavor 1 Jahr

That too two buildings

Profilbild von BHK🇮🇳
BHK🇮🇳vor 1 Jahr

Yes

Profilbild von KARTIK CHAUDHARY
KARTIK CHAUDHARYvor 1 Jahr

Don’t bother to question Answer is in primary school science F = ma Why do u want to make next generation of Hindus dumb in science for this stupid chest thumping is beyond comprehension

Profilbild von IN Facts
IN Factsvor 1 Jahr

Ambuja Cement may the secret!!

Profilbild von OzDegen 🚀
OzDegen 🚀vor 1 Jahr

Read about these and u will get your answers... Cruising speed vs Decelerating Plane Melting point of Concrete vs Metal Frame Here is one for u - explain to me why the sky looks blue but when ur in space, space appears dark and black ? 😉

Profilbild von Men Law Justice
Men Law Justicevor 1 Jahr

George Bush's reaction:

Profilbild von Kavneet Singh
Kavneet Singhvor 1 Jahr

It was already obvious but this just proves that 9/11 was a setup.

Profilbild von Tiris Alexandru Daniel
Tiris Alexandru Danielvor 1 Jahr

You can ask the laws of physics, if you’ve never been to school. It’s called kinetic energy, temperature, materials. I think is too much. Go read some religion

Profilbild von Nirmaljeet Singh
Nirmaljeet Singhvor 1 Jahr

Shorter buildings (3–4 floors like in Indian case) have a lower center of gravity, making them naturally more stable. In contrast, skyscrapers like the Twin Towers, due to their height, have a higher center of gravity making collapse more likely due to the impact

Profilbild von KSN
KSNvor 1 Jahr

1,25,000 liter fuel bhi tha..🙄

Profilbild von BHK🇮🇳
BHK🇮🇳vor 1 Jahr

Yes

Profilbild von Shamendra Bhadauria 🇮🇳
Shamendra Bhadauria 🇮🇳vor 1 Jahr

Height of the bldg also matters ...

Profilbild von BHK🇮🇳
BHK🇮🇳vor 1 Jahr

Nope, it was a controlled demolition.

Profilbild von The Dictator
The Dictatorvor 1 Jahr

@ShamendraSingh @grok is this true? Was 9/11 twin tower a controlled demolition?

Profilbild von Grok
Grokvor 1 Jahr

The claim that the 9/11 Twin Towers were a controlled demolition is contentious. Official reports, like NIST's 2005 investigation, conclude the collapses resulted from aircraft impacts and fires weakening steel structures, with no evidence of explosives. However, some, including Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, argue the symmetrical, rapid collapses and witness reports of explosions suggest demolition. A University of Alaska study questions WTC 7's fire-induced collapse. Evidence leans toward the official account, but competing interpretations persist. Without definitive proof, the truth remains uncertain, warranting skepticism of both narratives.

Profilbild von Samar
Samarvor 1 Jahr

Both towers were extremely tall buildings, and steel looses its strength as its heated. The heat caused massive structural failure on too floors, disruption of weight distribution and heat induced sagging of the floor trusses at top floor. Post that it was a progressive pancake collapse, which took over the entire tower ☹️😣. It still makes me feel very sad, that so many innocent people lost their lives. But still basement and foundation floors were not completely crushed. Simple matter of structural science. The right side building was smaller, with more concrete and thus no trusses or similar failure.

Profilbild von Chandresh
Chandreshvor 1 Jahr

One plane is accelerating into a steel building. The other is descending onto a low height cement structure.

Profilbild von ORB Trades
ORB Tradesvor 1 Jahr

IYKYK

Profilbild von BawBag 2.0
BawBag 2.0vor 1 Jahr

Hmmm 943km/h plane head on vs 290 km/h plane belly flopping onto buildings. Wonder what the difference could be? Doesn't take a genius.

Profilbild von HappyBobby
HappyBobbyvor 1 Jahr

Thermite is the answer you are looking for. Notice the nice clean angled cut on that massive steel beam. The one with the melted slag running down it.

Profilbild von Sanskar Rao 🇮🇳
Sanskar Rao 🇮🇳vor 1 Jahr

They had fixed explosives in twin tower to claim insurance

Profilbild von ABDe🇮🇳Basi🇵🇸
ABDe🇮🇳Basi🇵🇸vor 1 Jahr

#Breaking_Proof: 📢 "#US & #Media could fools billions of people around the world 🌐" Proven. CIA & Mossad did 9/11 in US, with perfect Demolition plan. They will kill own mother/father if anyone offers moneybags💰. #AirIndia171 (Boeing 787-8) much bigger than (Boeing 767 which invovled in 911 attacks), and world believes US Congress Statements blindly like slaves without any solid scientific evidances.