Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

I have so many questions..!!

9,983,928 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 46

Фото профиля BHK🇮🇳
BHK🇮🇳1 год назад

Some "experts" in the comment section are giving reasons such as steel, concrete, glass, momentum, weight, speed, Lauda, and Lehsun, but no one is explaining how two buildings could collapse vertically in such a dramatic way, when the impact was sideways, that too at 800-900 km/h. And the building in Ahmedabad is standing despite the plane crashing on top of it (vertical impact).

Фото профиля Sandeep Bisht
Sandeep Bisht1 год назад

because this was built way before local BJP era

Фото профиля BHK🇮🇳
BHK🇮🇳1 год назад

Aapiya detected.. Opinion rejected..

Фото профиля BB 🇮🇳
BB 🇮🇳1 год назад

This is really illogical.. look at the height man. Common sense is rear these days.

Фото профиля BHK🇮🇳
BHK🇮🇳1 год назад

I am not an English Nazi, but "rear"..? 🤣

Фото профиля BB 🇮🇳
BB 🇮🇳1 год назад

lol typing error 🫣 but I hope you got my point 🤪 (read it rare)

Фото профиля AAP ka Moh!t
AAP ka Moh!t1 год назад

अमेरिका के पास यहां जैसे जर्दा गुटखा खाने वाले ठेकेदार नहीं है, जो खैनी रगड़ कर ईंटे चेपते है।

Фото профиля BHK🇮🇳
BHK🇮🇳1 год назад

😂😂

Фото профиля Michael Westen
Michael Westen1 год назад

911 was a controlled demolition. Also, you have the Towers built out of A36 Structural Steel. A36 Structural Steel melts at 2600-2800F. Jet fuel only reaches temperatures of 980-1800F. There’s no way the jet fuel was the reason the towers fell. If you watch videos on the towers falling, if you look really closely, you see these puffs come out of every floor. That’s from a control demonstration.

Фото профиля Vik k 🌞🌙⭐️🔥🌅🌫🐥🏹
Vik k 🌞🌙⭐️🔥🌅🌫🐥🏹1 год назад

9/11 was moneyfactured !! Just look at the Pentagon one no trace of place at all. 🚀 🧐

Фото профиля BHK🇮🇳
BHK🇮🇳1 год назад

👍🏽

Фото профиля Saxena
Saxena1 год назад

Maturity is when we realize that 9/11 was an inside job and Osama Bin Laden was just a Bali Ka Bakra. The USDS had their eyes on oil reserves of Iraq hence 9/11 and execution of Saddam Hussein were planned.

Фото профиля Richa Misra Tripathi
Richa Misra Tripathi1 год назад

As a non engineer & layman my guess is the angle & speed of rhe aeroplanes hitting the buildings varied. Secondly WTC was a steel framework building which couldn't endure very high temperatures whereas the Indian building would have been RCC cement concrete iron structure

Фото профиля CK4LIFE
CK4LIFE1 год назад

How stupid are you?

Фото профиля Emanuel AOF
Emanuel AOF1 год назад

Completely different case. The main cause of the WTC collapse, was the thermal expansion, caused by the intense heat of the fires following the plane impacts. “The fires weakened the steel structure, causing it to expand, which led to the buckling and failure of key support columns, ultimately triggering a progressive collapse.”

Фото профиля Veer Nair | வீர் நாயர் | वीर नायर
Veer Nair | வீர் நாயர் | वीर नायर1 год назад

9/11 vs 12/6

Фото профиля Ri$hi
Ri$hi1 год назад

The aeroplane of 9/11 was full of explosions.

Фото профиля BHK🇮🇳
BHK🇮🇳1 год назад

As if the Jet Fuel in Air India flight was not enough.

Фото профиля Soorya
Soorya1 год назад

Too many questions..!!

Фото профиля noonetobeknown
noonetobeknown1 год назад

You should’ve studied science specifically physics for this ,then I don’t think so you will be here posting this ,cuz this just don’t make sense at all in anyway

Фото профиля Nadeem Gill
Nadeem Gill1 год назад

One was a deliberate, high-speed impact into a skyscraper. The other was a low-altitude crash during takeoff with failing thrust. Comparing the two is not just misleading - it’s physics denial.

Фото профиля Sonel
Sonel1 год назад

One was a >100 storey skyscraper other was a one-floor college canteen. Comparing the two is not logic, it’s lazy. Science padho, sentiment mat becho 🙄

Фото профиля Cloud Radar
Cloud Radar1 год назад

Bro stop! One was a direct hit at over 500Mph nose first. The other was a controlled crash landing from above with attempts at a flare towards the end. Gear was left down to absorb most of the crash. These are not the same. Educate yourself and stop looking for engagement clicks.

Фото профиля Kiran Kumar S
Kiran Kumar S1 год назад

Simple. In New York, the planes were flown in full speed and almost full tank of fuel inside the world trade centers. In Amdavad, the crash happened outside the small building. Most of the fuel was burnt outside. And the plane had no major velocity to damage the building.

Фото профиля Gooty Gopala Krishna
Gooty Gopala Krishna1 год назад

That too two buildings

Фото профиля BHK🇮🇳
BHK🇮🇳1 год назад

Yes

Фото профиля KARTIK CHAUDHARY
KARTIK CHAUDHARY1 год назад

Don’t bother to question Answer is in primary school science F = ma Why do u want to make next generation of Hindus dumb in science for this stupid chest thumping is beyond comprehension

Фото профиля IN Facts
IN Facts1 год назад

Ambuja Cement may the secret!!

Фото профиля OzDegen 🚀
OzDegen 🚀1 год назад

Read about these and u will get your answers... Cruising speed vs Decelerating Plane Melting point of Concrete vs Metal Frame Here is one for u - explain to me why the sky looks blue but when ur in space, space appears dark and black ? 😉

Фото профиля Men Law Justice
Men Law Justice1 год назад

George Bush's reaction:

Фото профиля Kavneet Singh
Kavneet Singh1 год назад

It was already obvious but this just proves that 9/11 was a setup.

Фото профиля Tiris Alexandru Daniel
Tiris Alexandru Daniel1 год назад

You can ask the laws of physics, if you’ve never been to school. It’s called kinetic energy, temperature, materials. I think is too much. Go read some religion

Фото профиля Nirmaljeet Singh
Nirmaljeet Singh1 год назад

Shorter buildings (3–4 floors like in Indian case) have a lower center of gravity, making them naturally more stable. In contrast, skyscrapers like the Twin Towers, due to their height, have a higher center of gravity making collapse more likely due to the impact

Фото профиля KSN
KSN1 год назад

1,25,000 liter fuel bhi tha..🙄

Фото профиля BHK🇮🇳
BHK🇮🇳1 год назад

Yes

Фото профиля Shamendra Bhadauria 🇮🇳
Shamendra Bhadauria 🇮🇳1 год назад

Height of the bldg also matters ...

Фото профиля BHK🇮🇳
BHK🇮🇳1 год назад

Nope, it was a controlled demolition.

Фото профиля The Dictator
The Dictator1 год назад

@ShamendraSingh @grok is this true? Was 9/11 twin tower a controlled demolition?

Фото профиля Grok
Grok1 год назад

The claim that the 9/11 Twin Towers were a controlled demolition is contentious. Official reports, like NIST's 2005 investigation, conclude the collapses resulted from aircraft impacts and fires weakening steel structures, with no evidence of explosives. However, some, including Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, argue the symmetrical, rapid collapses and witness reports of explosions suggest demolition. A University of Alaska study questions WTC 7's fire-induced collapse. Evidence leans toward the official account, but competing interpretations persist. Without definitive proof, the truth remains uncertain, warranting skepticism of both narratives.

Фото профиля Samar
Samar1 год назад

Both towers were extremely tall buildings, and steel looses its strength as its heated. The heat caused massive structural failure on too floors, disruption of weight distribution and heat induced sagging of the floor trusses at top floor. Post that it was a progressive pancake collapse, which took over the entire tower ☹️😣. It still makes me feel very sad, that so many innocent people lost their lives. But still basement and foundation floors were not completely crushed. Simple matter of structural science. The right side building was smaller, with more concrete and thus no trusses or similar failure.

Фото профиля Chandresh
Chandresh1 год назад

One plane is accelerating into a steel building. The other is descending onto a low height cement structure.

Фото профиля ORB Trades
ORB Trades1 год назад

IYKYK

Фото профиля BawBag 2.0
BawBag 2.01 год назад

Hmmm 943km/h plane head on vs 290 km/h plane belly flopping onto buildings. Wonder what the difference could be? Doesn't take a genius.

Фото профиля HappyBobby
HappyBobby1 год назад

Thermite is the answer you are looking for. Notice the nice clean angled cut on that massive steel beam. The one with the melted slag running down it.

Фото профиля Sanskar Rao 🇮🇳
Sanskar Rao 🇮🇳1 год назад

They had fixed explosives in twin tower to claim insurance

Фото профиля ABDe🇮🇳Basi🇵🇸
ABDe🇮🇳Basi🇵🇸1 год назад

#Breaking_Proof: 📢 "#US & #Media could fools billions of people around the world 🌐" Proven. CIA & Mossad did 9/11 in US, with perfect Demolition plan. They will kill own mother/father if anyone offers moneybags💰. #AirIndia171 (Boeing 787-8) much bigger than (Boeing 767 which invovled in 911 attacks), and world believes US Congress Statements blindly like slaves without any solid scientific evidances.

Похожие видео