Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

i honestly don't f*cking understand why no one has done this yet a second brain inside grok bot 1000+ agents with their own memory one CHIEF that issues the work steal the floor plan: CHIEF → signal deck | inbox, threads, archive → orbit deck | calendar, holds, reminders... show more

beamnxw ./

5,716 subscribers

14,320 просмотров • 18 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

this is the most dangerous thing on the internet today.. I built a second brain inside Grok Bot. 1000+ agents. Each one keeps its own permanent memory and works without me in the loop. Chief sits in the center of the graph, issues every task and owns every handoff. I only talk to him. Nothing ships until he routes it and I hit yes Chief ➜ routes the work Signal ➜ reads the live feed Orbit ➜ owns timing Vault ➜ holds receipts and lifelong context Drift ➜ runs outreach Lens ➜ watches numbers and heat Helm ➜ picks the next move Forge ➜ builds Crew ➜ executes I do not manage 1000+ bots. I manage one Chief. The rest keep their state, keep pushing and never drop context 1 human ➜ 1 chief ➜ 1000 specialists the floor never stops don't sleep on this ⭣

this is the most dangerous thing on the internet today.. I built a second brain inside Grok Bot. 1000+ agents. Each one keeps its own permanent memory and works without me in the loop. Chief sits in the center of the graph, issues every task and owns every handoff. I only talk to him. Nothing ships until he routes it and I hit yes Chief ➜ routes the work Signal ➜ reads the live feed Orbit ➜ owns timing Vault ➜ holds receipts and lifelong context Drift ➜ runs outreach Lens ➜ watches numbers and heat Helm ➜ picks the next move Forge ➜ builds Crew ➜ executes I do not manage 1000+ bots. I manage one Chief. The rest keep their state, keep pushing and never drop context 1 human ➜ 1 chief ➜ 1000 specialists the floor never stops don't sleep on this ⭣

beamnxw ./

12,397 просмотров • 22 дней назад

GUYS, STOP F*CKING SLEEPING ON GROK BOT I BUILT A FULL ZERO-SALARY AI ENGINEERING TEAM INSIDE A GROK BOT OVERNIGHT Architect ➜ Harness ➜ Memory ➜ Critic ➜ Implementer ➜ Deployer ➜ Chief of Staff Chief owns the final yes Everything irreversible lands in my approval tray first > Architect ➜ Designs the full system architecture and role structure > Harness ➜ Builds evaluation loops, self-tuning and test harnesses > Memory ➜ Owns persistent memory, retrieval and lifelong context > Critic ➜ Finds real failure modes, runs adversarial tests and edge cases > Implementer ➜ Writes the actual prompts, code and routines > Deployer ➜ Ships live, monitors and runs overnight > Chief of Staff ➜ Only point of contact. Routes all work and holds the approval queue I only talk to Chief The rest hand work forward and keep their own memory I wake up to a sorted queue Read the evidence Hit yes or no One human Six specialists Full engineering floor running 24/7 This is GROK FORGE Read the article if you want to do the same ⭣

GUYS, STOP F*CKING SLEEPING ON GROK BOT I BUILT A FULL ZERO-SALARY AI ENGINEERING TEAM INSIDE A GROK BOT OVERNIGHT Architect ➜ Harness ➜ Memory ➜ Critic ➜ Implementer ➜ Deployer ➜ Chief of Staff Chief owns the final yes Everything irreversible lands in my approval tray first > Architect ➜ Designs the full system architecture and role structure > Harness ➜ Builds evaluation loops, self-tuning and test harnesses > Memory ➜ Owns persistent memory, retrieval and lifelong context > Critic ➜ Finds real failure modes, runs adversarial tests and edge cases > Implementer ➜ Writes the actual prompts, code and routines > Deployer ➜ Ships live, monitors and runs overnight > Chief of Staff ➜ Only point of contact. Routes all work and holds the approval queue I only talk to Chief The rest hand work forward and keep their own memory I wake up to a sorted queue Read the evidence Hit yes or no One human Six specialists Full engineering floor running 24/7 This is GROK FORGE Read the article if you want to do the same ⭣

beamnxw ./

16,914 просмотров • 25 дней назад

This is restored footage of a F6F Hellcat belly-landing on a carrier in 1944, with no landing gear, sliding down the deck. Watch what the crew does. They do not run away from the crashing plane. They run toward it. This is the story of the men on the deck.. A Controlled Crash Landing an aircraft on a carrier has been called one of the most difficult and dangerous things in all of aviation. Some pilots described it as a controlled crash. Think about what it involves. A fighter comes screaming toward a tiny strip of deck on a ship that is itself moving through the ocean, pitching on the swell. The pilot has only a few feet of margin. He has to slam his aircraft down onto a precise spot, at exactly the right speed and angle, again and again, every time he comes home. To stop the plane in the short space of the deck, each aircraft had a hook mounted under its tail. As it touched down, that tailhook had to catch one of several steel cables stretched across the deck, called arresting wires. The cable would snatch the speeding fighter and drag it to a halt in about two seconds. But what happened when it went wrong? When Things Went Wrong That is where the danger truly began. If a pilot came in with damaged landing gear, or no gear at all like the Hellcat in this footage, or if his tailhook missed every wire, the aircraft became a several-ton object sliding down a steel deck out of control. And the front of that deck was not empty. It was often packed with other aircraft, fueled and armed, and crowded with men working. A plane that slid all the way forward could plow straight into parked aircraft and deck crews, and turn the whole deck into an inferno. So the carriers had a last line of defense. A crash barrier, a wall of heavy steel cable raised across the middle of the deck, designed to catch a runaway aircraft and stop it before it reached the crowd at the bow. Time and again, that barrier was all that stood between one bad landing and a catastrophe. The Landing Signal Officer Guiding every one of those landings was one man in an incredibly exposed position. He was the Landing Signal Officer, and he stood on a small platform at the aft port side of the flight deck, close to where the aircraft came in. Holding a bright paddle in each hand, he signaled to each incoming pilot, telling him he was too high, too low, too fast, lined up wrong, or clear to land. The pilot trusted those paddles with his life. A good Landing Signal Officer could talk a shaken pilot and a shot-up aircraft safely down onto the deck. It was a job that demanded total calm and split-second judgment, over and over, with lives riding on every signal. One young officer who served as a Landing Signal Officer early in the war, David McCampbell, would go on to become the US Navy's top-scoring ace. The Men Who Ran Toward the Fire Then there were the men who ran toward the fire. The flight deck of a wartime carrier was a storm of spinning propellers, roaring engines, live bombs, high-octane fuel, and steel cables under enormous tension that could snap and cut a man in half. To manage the chaos, the crews wore jerseys in different colors, each color marking a job, so that in the deafening noise everyone could tell at a glance who did what. Men in one color directed the aircraft, another handled the arresting gear, another fueled the planes, another the bombs. And among them were the men in heavy asbestos suits, nicknamed the Hot Papas. Their job, when an aircraft crashed and burst into flames, was to run directly into the fire and pull the pilot out. That is what you are watching in this footage. As the Hellcat grinds to a stop, the men who rush toward it are not spectators. They are doing their job, closing on a possible fire and a trapped pilot without hesitating. The Forgotten Crew Landing accidents like this happened constantly. Belly landings, missed wires, barrier crashes, and deck fires were so common that they were simply accepted as part of the price of operating aircraft at sea. For every dramatic dogfight in the sky, there were thousands of these tense, dangerous moments on the deck, handled by young men in colored shirts who are almost never remembered. The pilots got the glory, and they earned it. But they could not have flown at all without the deck crews who launched them, guided them home, caught them when they came in wrong, and ran into the flames when it all went bad. The next time you see footage like this, do not just watch the plane. Watch the men around it. They worked one of the most dangerous jobs of the entire war, and most of the world never knew their names. This was the story of the carrier deck crews. I post a story like this every single day. Most people never see them. Follow so you don't miss the next one.

This is restored footage of a F6F Hellcat belly-landing on a carrier in 1944, with no landing gear, sliding down the deck. Watch what the crew does. They do not run away from the crashing plane. They run toward it. This is the story of the men on the deck.. A Controlled Crash Landing an aircraft on a carrier has been called one of the most difficult and dangerous things in all of aviation. Some pilots described it as a controlled crash. Think about what it involves. A fighter comes screaming toward a tiny strip of deck on a ship that is itself moving through the ocean, pitching on the swell. The pilot has only a few feet of margin. He has to slam his aircraft down onto a precise spot, at exactly the right speed and angle, again and again, every time he comes home. To stop the plane in the short space of the deck, each aircraft had a hook mounted under its tail. As it touched down, that tailhook had to catch one of several steel cables stretched across the deck, called arresting wires. The cable would snatch the speeding fighter and drag it to a halt in about two seconds. But what happened when it went wrong? When Things Went Wrong That is where the danger truly began. If a pilot came in with damaged landing gear, or no gear at all like the Hellcat in this footage, or if his tailhook missed every wire, the aircraft became a several-ton object sliding down a steel deck out of control. And the front of that deck was not empty. It was often packed with other aircraft, fueled and armed, and crowded with men working. A plane that slid all the way forward could plow straight into parked aircraft and deck crews, and turn the whole deck into an inferno. So the carriers had a last line of defense. A crash barrier, a wall of heavy steel cable raised across the middle of the deck, designed to catch a runaway aircraft and stop it before it reached the crowd at the bow. Time and again, that barrier was all that stood between one bad landing and a catastrophe. The Landing Signal Officer Guiding every one of those landings was one man in an incredibly exposed position. He was the Landing Signal Officer, and he stood on a small platform at the aft port side of the flight deck, close to where the aircraft came in. Holding a bright paddle in each hand, he signaled to each incoming pilot, telling him he was too high, too low, too fast, lined up wrong, or clear to land. The pilot trusted those paddles with his life. A good Landing Signal Officer could talk a shaken pilot and a shot-up aircraft safely down onto the deck. It was a job that demanded total calm and split-second judgment, over and over, with lives riding on every signal. One young officer who served as a Landing Signal Officer early in the war, David McCampbell, would go on to become the US Navy's top-scoring ace. The Men Who Ran Toward the Fire Then there were the men who ran toward the fire. The flight deck of a wartime carrier was a storm of spinning propellers, roaring engines, live bombs, high-octane fuel, and steel cables under enormous tension that could snap and cut a man in half. To manage the chaos, the crews wore jerseys in different colors, each color marking a job, so that in the deafening noise everyone could tell at a glance who did what. Men in one color directed the aircraft, another handled the arresting gear, another fueled the planes, another the bombs. And among them were the men in heavy asbestos suits, nicknamed the Hot Papas. Their job, when an aircraft crashed and burst into flames, was to run directly into the fire and pull the pilot out. That is what you are watching in this footage. As the Hellcat grinds to a stop, the men who rush toward it are not spectators. They are doing their job, closing on a possible fire and a trapped pilot without hesitating. The Forgotten Crew Landing accidents like this happened constantly. Belly landings, missed wires, barrier crashes, and deck fires were so common that they were simply accepted as part of the price of operating aircraft at sea. For every dramatic dogfight in the sky, there were thousands of these tense, dangerous moments on the deck, handled by young men in colored shirts who are almost never remembered. The pilots got the glory, and they earned it. But they could not have flown at all without the deck crews who launched them, guided them home, caught them when they came in wrong, and ran into the flames when it all went bad. The next time you see footage like this, do not just watch the plane. Watch the men around it. They worked one of the most dangerous jobs of the entire war, and most of the world never knew their names. This was the story of the carrier deck crews. I post a story like this every single day. Most people never see them. Follow so you don't miss the next one.

Untold War Stories

145,990 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

HOLY SH*T, I BUILT A F**KING COMPANY INSIDE GROK BOT i split the operation into separate roles for research, writing, outreach, ops, finance and support. each agent owns one narrow job 6 agents → 1 shared operation → automatic handoffs → human approval each bot keeps its own workflow and memory, then passes finished work forward instead of routing everything back through me the control layer catches anything that sends, spends, publishes or deletes and pushes it into approval before anything happens after a few runs this stops feeling like ai chat. it feels like a 24/7 operations team running behind one dashboard

HOLY SH*T, I BUILT A F**KING COMPANY INSIDE GROK BOT i split the operation into separate roles for research, writing, outreach, ops, finance and support. each agent owns one narrow job 6 agents → 1 shared operation → automatic handoffs → human approval each bot keeps its own workflow and memory, then passes finished work forward instead of routing everything back through me the control layer catches anything that sends, spends, publishes or deletes and pushes it into approval before anything happens after a few runs this stops feeling like ai chat. it feels like a 24/7 operations team running behind one dashboard

Gipp 🦅

1,385,464 просмотров • 26 дней назад

OpenAI just shipped the biggest release in their history. I got in before launch. GPT-5.6 family : Sol, Terra, Luna. A new super app that merges @ChatGPTapp and Codex. Three modes: Chat, Work, Code. I sat down with Wulfie Bain from OpenAI and we built a full startup on camera. Pitch deck, working web app, computer-use agents finding and fixing bugs live, and an autonomous 16-hour overnight run. The idea that changes everything: stop writing prompts. Start writing loops. Give the agent a goal and a way to check its own work. That's how a model runs overnight and comes back finished. We also answer the real questions what you build that OpenAI won't kill, tokens vs engineers, and why India wins in this era. Coder or not watch this one.

OpenAI just shipped the biggest release in their history. I got in before launch. GPT-5.6 family : Sol, Terra, Luna. A new super app that merges @ChatGPTapp and Codex. Three modes: Chat, Work, Code. I sat down with Wulfie Bain from OpenAI and we built a full startup on camera. Pitch deck, working web app, computer-use agents finding and fixing bugs live, and an autonomous 16-hour overnight run. The idea that changes everything: stop writing prompts. Start writing loops. Give the agent a goal and a way to check its own work. That's how a model runs overnight and comes back finished. We also answer the real questions what you build that OpenAI won't kill, tokens vs engineers, and why India wins in this era. Coder or not watch this one.

Vaibhav Sisinty

11,578 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

I gave Elon Musk's new Grok Bot an org chart instead of a to-do list, and in one week I stopped being a founder who does the work and became one who assigns it. eight bots. one org chart. nobody sleeps but me. here's the whole design, steal it. step 1 → 0:01 What we're covering step 2 → 2:01 Installation & Setup step 3 → 3:14 Building the First Bot step 4 → 8:18 Teaching by Screen Recording step 5 → 14:18 Putting it All Together THE ROSTER: Atlas, chief of staff. the only bot I talk to. I give it outcomes, never tasks. it decomposes them and delegates to the team in group chat, and it never does specialist work itself. it posts the plan every morning and what shipped every night, and it only comes to me when a decision is irreversible or spends money. Scout, research. finds and qualifies my ICP. every day: 25 verified prospects, one line on why they need us right now, and a source. if it can't verify, it marks it unverified. it never guesses. Quill, content. turns what the company learned this week into 5 posts and 1 long piece, in my voice, matched from the last 50 things I wrote. drafts only, it never publishes. Pitch, outbound. writes a first touch and two follow-ups for everyone Scout marks ready. 60 words max, one specific observation about their business, one clear ask. queued in drafts, I approve in bulk. Vault, inbox and ops. triages everything into needs-me, needs-a-bot, needs-nothing. it handles the last, routes the middle, and gives me five bullets on the first by 9am. Ledger, analyst. one report a night: what moved, what didn't, and the single number I should care about tomorrow. no dashboards, no adjectives. HOW THEY'RE WIRED one group chat per outcome, not per person. Atlas sits in all of them. the bots hand off inside the chat, so I only read the handoff, I never manage it. two rules that made this actually work: 1. every charter ends with a hard "never do this without asking" line. autonomy without a fence is just chaos on a schedule. 2. show once, don't describe. I ran the full workflow on my screen one time. that single demo taught them more than a page of instructions ever could. WEEK ONE 214 verified prospects delivered. 89 personalized outreaches queued and approved. inbox at zero every morning. 11 content pieces ready. THE POINT most people are still treating Grok Bot like a smarter chat window. it isn't. it's the first time one person can own an org chart instead of a to-do list. my bottleneck was never how much I could do, it was how much I could hand off. bookmark this.

I gave Elon Musk's new Grok Bot an org chart instead of a to-do list, and in one week I stopped being a founder who does the work and became one who assigns it. eight bots. one org chart. nobody sleeps but me. here's the whole design, steal it. step 1 → 0:01 What we're covering step 2 → 2:01 Installation & Setup step 3 → 3:14 Building the First Bot step 4 → 8:18 Teaching by Screen Recording step 5 → 14:18 Putting it All Together THE ROSTER: Atlas, chief of staff. the only bot I talk to. I give it outcomes, never tasks. it decomposes them and delegates to the team in group chat, and it never does specialist work itself. it posts the plan every morning and what shipped every night, and it only comes to me when a decision is irreversible or spends money. Scout, research. finds and qualifies my ICP. every day: 25 verified prospects, one line on why they need us right now, and a source. if it can't verify, it marks it unverified. it never guesses. Quill, content. turns what the company learned this week into 5 posts and 1 long piece, in my voice, matched from the last 50 things I wrote. drafts only, it never publishes. Pitch, outbound. writes a first touch and two follow-ups for everyone Scout marks ready. 60 words max, one specific observation about their business, one clear ask. queued in drafts, I approve in bulk. Vault, inbox and ops. triages everything into needs-me, needs-a-bot, needs-nothing. it handles the last, routes the middle, and gives me five bullets on the first by 9am. Ledger, analyst. one report a night: what moved, what didn't, and the single number I should care about tomorrow. no dashboards, no adjectives. HOW THEY'RE WIRED one group chat per outcome, not per person. Atlas sits in all of them. the bots hand off inside the chat, so I only read the handoff, I never manage it. two rules that made this actually work: 1. every charter ends with a hard "never do this without asking" line. autonomy without a fence is just chaos on a schedule. 2. show once, don't describe. I ran the full workflow on my screen one time. that single demo taught them more than a page of instructions ever could. WEEK ONE 214 verified prospects delivered. 89 personalized outreaches queued and approved. inbox at zero every morning. 11 content pieces ready. THE POINT most people are still treating Grok Bot like a smarter chat window. it isn't. it's the first time one person can own an org chart instead of a to-do list. my bottleneck was never how much I could do, it was how much I could hand off. bookmark this.

Ridark

1,267,623 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

HOLY SH*T. I BUILT A 24/7 AI TRADING FLOOR INSIDE GROK BOT Six AI agents, six cloud terminals and one Chief of Staff now operate as a single desk, researching, challenging and routing ideas while my laptop stays closed. The morning call starts at 4:00 AM. I am not in it. TAPE → watches the prints and flags unusual size QUANT → refits the models whenever they drift MACRO → handles the Asia handover, oil, rates and FX RISK → controls exposure and keeps VAR pinned FLOW → reads sweeps and block trades PM → keeps the book Above them sits GROK BOT. The Chief of Staff never trades. It checks every handoff, rejects weak signals and escalates only the decision that genuinely requires a human. Research → risk review → execution → visible audit trail No meetings. No status updates. No one asking whether the work is finished. What looks like a trading terminal is actually an organization compiled into software. Every agent has its own computer, browser, memory and responsibility, yet the entire operation remains visible on one screen. The market data in this prototype is simulated. The operating model isn’t.

HOLY SH*T. I BUILT A 24/7 AI TRADING FLOOR INSIDE GROK BOT Six AI agents, six cloud terminals and one Chief of Staff now operate as a single desk, researching, challenging and routing ideas while my laptop stays closed. The morning call starts at 4:00 AM. I am not in it. TAPE → watches the prints and flags unusual size QUANT → refits the models whenever they drift MACRO → handles the Asia handover, oil, rates and FX RISK → controls exposure and keeps VAR pinned FLOW → reads sweeps and block trades PM → keeps the book Above them sits GROK BOT. The Chief of Staff never trades. It checks every handoff, rejects weak signals and escalates only the decision that genuinely requires a human. Research → risk review → execution → visible audit trail No meetings. No status updates. No one asking whether the work is finished. What looks like a trading terminal is actually an organization compiled into software. Every agent has its own computer, browser, memory and responsibility, yet the entire operation remains visible on one screen. The market data in this prototype is simulated. The operating model isn’t.

BuBBliK

324,716 просмотров • 25 дней назад

Grok Bot might be the first tool that lets one non-technical person run an entire business with a team of AI agents. My friend Billy runs his whole newsletter business on Grok Bot agents, and I think we're about to see 100,000+ businesses like his. BEST PRACTICES: 1. The agents run on a shared cloud computer, so running your newsletter, your X, and your receipts all in one place creates context bloat and burns tokens fast. One mission per setup. 2. Start with a Chief of Staff. Give it access to your existing docs (Notion, Slack, Gmail), have it audit the business, then tell you the top three agents to build first to drive revenue. 3. Perfect a task with the Chief of Staff before spinning up a new agent. Have it do the outbound sales once, review it, and only then say "now build a bot that does exactly that." You earn each new hire by proving the task works first. 4. Constraints are the feature. You get a limited number of agents, one thread per bot, like DMs with a teammate. It forces you to stay mission-oriented instead of spinning up a bot for every random idea. 5. You make the decisions, not the agent. Billy's team spent three weeks unable to pick where content should live. At some point you say "we're doing Notion, no more tinkering" and move on. 6. Run week one with no new agents. Build the team, learn to fly the plane, just execute. Week three is when you find the real gaps and expand, someone to man the inbox, someone for the Shopify shop. 7. Then add routines so it works while you sleep. Ask your Chief of Staff what recurring jobs would move the business forward overnight, and it builds the automations that run without you. Thanks to Billy Howell for sharing the sauce on The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃 (follow for more). Grokbot is really cool. Watch below:

Grok Bot might be the first tool that lets one non-technical person run an entire business with a team of AI agents. My friend Billy runs his whole newsletter business on Grok Bot agents, and I think we're about to see 100,000+ businesses like his. BEST PRACTICES: 1. The agents run on a shared cloud computer, so running your newsletter, your X, and your receipts all in one place creates context bloat and burns tokens fast. One mission per setup. 2. Start with a Chief of Staff. Give it access to your existing docs (Notion, Slack, Gmail), have it audit the business, then tell you the top three agents to build first to drive revenue. 3. Perfect a task with the Chief of Staff before spinning up a new agent. Have it do the outbound sales once, review it, and only then say "now build a bot that does exactly that." You earn each new hire by proving the task works first. 4. Constraints are the feature. You get a limited number of agents, one thread per bot, like DMs with a teammate. It forces you to stay mission-oriented instead of spinning up a bot for every random idea. 5. You make the decisions, not the agent. Billy's team spent three weeks unable to pick where content should live. At some point you say "we're doing Notion, no more tinkering" and move on. 6. Run week one with no new agents. Build the team, learn to fly the plane, just execute. Week three is when you find the real gaps and expand, someone to man the inbox, someone for the Shopify shop. 7. Then add routines so it works while you sleep. Ask your Chief of Staff what recurring jobs would move the business forward overnight, and it builds the automations that run without you. Thanks to Billy Howell for sharing the sauce on The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃 (follow for more). Grokbot is really cool. Watch below:

GREG ISENBERG

4,026,671 просмотров • 28 дней назад

BlackRock runs on 20,000 people. Elon's Grok Bot runs the same shape for $300 a month, and it hires its own staff. You do not get an assistant. You get a company that hires. It does not throw ten agents at your problem and hand you the pile. It makes one agent that makes 10, and those ten make a 100. > LAYER ONE is one agent, the chief of staff, and it never touches the market > LAYER TWO is six desk heads, one job each, every one on its own computer with its own logins > LAYER THREE is whatever those six decide they need, spun up on the spot and shut down when the work is done Nobody writes a task list. You hand out job titles and the org fills itself in underneath. The swarm is never the same twice. Agents get spun up for one job, finish it, and are gone before I ever read their names. Not one of them sees the whole picture. The answer only exists after they hand off to each other. Wall Street cannot copy that. You cannot hire a hundred people for eleven minutes. BlackRock holds that shape together with a risk system called Aladdin. Mine holds it together with one agent that is only allowed to say no. I gave it $1,000 and told it to grow the money or get deleted. 15 hours later it was holding $3,900, on an address anyone can open and read. I was asleep for most of it, and I have still not written a line of code. The whole thing runs with my laptop shut, because none of it lives on my laptop. Setup is one evening. Create the chief, hand out the titles, run one trade on your screen while they watch, connect Telegram. Ten years ago a machine this shape had its name on a tower. Mine has a name I typed into a box. Save this while the whole thing still fits on one screen.

BlackRock runs on 20,000 people. Elon's Grok Bot runs the same shape for $300 a month, and it hires its own staff. You do not get an assistant. You get a company that hires. It does not throw ten agents at your problem and hand you the pile. It makes one agent that makes 10, and those ten make a 100. > LAYER ONE is one agent, the chief of staff, and it never touches the market > LAYER TWO is six desk heads, one job each, every one on its own computer with its own logins > LAYER THREE is whatever those six decide they need, spun up on the spot and shut down when the work is done Nobody writes a task list. You hand out job titles and the org fills itself in underneath. The swarm is never the same twice. Agents get spun up for one job, finish it, and are gone before I ever read their names. Not one of them sees the whole picture. The answer only exists after they hand off to each other. Wall Street cannot copy that. You cannot hire a hundred people for eleven minutes. BlackRock holds that shape together with a risk system called Aladdin. Mine holds it together with one agent that is only allowed to say no. I gave it $1,000 and told it to grow the money or get deleted. 15 hours later it was holding $3,900, on an address anyone can open and read. I was asleep for most of it, and I have still not written a line of code. The whole thing runs with my laptop shut, because none of it lives on my laptop. Setup is one evening. Create the chief, hand out the titles, run one trade on your screen while they watch, connect Telegram. Ten years ago a machine this shape had its name on a tower. Mine has a name I typed into a box. Save this while the whole thing still fits on one screen.

cvxv666

45,488 просмотров • 18 дней назад

how to use Google's NEW open source Design.md + AI Skills to make your startup look like a $100 million company in 1 hour: 1. Design.md is an open source file from Google that captures the soul of a design. Typography, colors, spacing, all in one markdown file. You attach it to your prompt and your agent builds beautiful things every time. 2. Think of it this way. The HTML is the finished dish. The design.md is the recipe. The skills are the ingredients. Put them together and everything you build looks consistent and professional. 3. Don't create a design system from scratch. Find a brand you love. Linear, Stripe, Vercel, whatever resonates. Study it. Use ChatGPT or Claude to help you extract the design language into your own design.md file. 4. Build skills on top of your design.md. A landing page skill. A mobile app skill. A motion design skill. A slide deck skill. Each one references the same design.md so everything looks like it came from the same designer. 5. The biggest mistake people make: they nail one screen and then everything else looks generic. Design.md solves this. One file keeps every page, every format, every medium consistent. 6. Use it across everything. Your landing page. Your app. Your pitch deck. Your promo videos. Same DNA. Same taste. Same system. That's what separates a startup that looks real from one that looks vibe-coded. 7. Build a second brain for design inspiration. When you see something beautiful in the real world or online, capture it. Save it. When you're building something new, reference it. Taste is developed, not downloaded. 8. It's obvious but the difference between a product people trust and a product people bounce from is how it looks and feels. Design.md gives you that edge. you can watch below shoutout to Meng To for coming on The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃 and walking through his full workflow. if you want to use AI to actually build gorgeous designs, you'll want to use see this. watch

GREG ISENBERG

512,753 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Most people use Claude Code like a chatbot, then wonder why it forgets everything by Tuesday. The ones quietly building $10K AI workflows give it a second brain instead, and it’s free. It’s called Obsidian. You download it, point it at one folder on your computer, and that folder becomes a vault. Every note inside it is now something Claude Code can read end to end. Open Claude in that folder and it’s connected, that simple. The trick isn’t the tool, it’s the map. 3 folders, that’s the whole system. Raw, you dump everything here. Notes, transcripts, screenshots, half thoughts, zero structure. Wiki, Claude reads the raw pile and writes clean Wikipedia style articles about it, structured, searchable, permanent. Output, when you want a deliverable, a PDF, a slide deck, a script, it pulls from the wiki and ships it. Most people skip the wiki layer and feed Claude a junk drawer of 400 files, then blame the model when the answers are garbage. The model isn’t the problem, your folder is. Give it a path it can follow and it finds anything in 1 second, give it chaos and it guesses. You don’t even have to design the structure yourself. Open the vault, tell Claude to build a file system that fits your work, and watch it organize your entire brain in one prompt. Free tool, 3 folders, a second brain that compounds while you sleep. The people falling behind are still copy pasting into a chat window.

Most people use Claude Code like a chatbot, then wonder why it forgets everything by Tuesday. The ones quietly building $10K AI workflows give it a second brain instead, and it’s free. It’s called Obsidian. You download it, point it at one folder on your computer, and that folder becomes a vault. Every note inside it is now something Claude Code can read end to end. Open Claude in that folder and it’s connected, that simple. The trick isn’t the tool, it’s the map. 3 folders, that’s the whole system. Raw, you dump everything here. Notes, transcripts, screenshots, half thoughts, zero structure. Wiki, Claude reads the raw pile and writes clean Wikipedia style articles about it, structured, searchable, permanent. Output, when you want a deliverable, a PDF, a slide deck, a script, it pulls from the wiki and ships it. Most people skip the wiki layer and feed Claude a junk drawer of 400 files, then blame the model when the answers are garbage. The model isn’t the problem, your folder is. Give it a path it can follow and it finds anything in 1 second, give it chaos and it guesses. You don’t even have to design the structure yourself. Open the vault, tell Claude to build a file system that fits your work, and watch it organize your entire brain in one prompt. Free tool, 3 folders, a second brain that compounds while you sleep. The people falling behind are still copy pasting into a chat window.

West Lord

32,845 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

MY GROK BOT CONTENT SYSTEM JUST WENT VIRAL ON X – SO I THINK YOU NEED TO SEE WHAT'S ACTUALLY IN IT It wasn't the visual that got people. It was realizing this is already possible, today, for anyone. That's the part worth saying out loud. AI agents used to be a developer thing. You needed an API key, a server, a framework, and a weekend you weren't getting back. Grok Bot deleted all of that. You describe the job in plain language, and you have an agent that does it – with its own computer, its own browser, its own files, running whether you're at the desk or not. Which means the question stopped being can I build this and became what do I point it at. People are pointing it at everything: sales outreach, research, SEO, bookkeeping, customer replies, personal admin. This one is aimed at the thing most people say they'll start and never do – publishing consistently. It's seven agents. One in the centre, six in orbit. Here's what each one actually does. CHIEF OF STAFF – the centre. Every request lands here first, gets broken into jobs, and gets routed to whoever owns that kind of work. It chases what's late, keeps the others from duplicating each other, and surfaces exactly one thing to me when a real decision is needed. Everything else it just handles. RESEARCHER – goes out and finds what's actually moving in the niche. Reads the sources, checks the claim, drops the duplicates, and hands over a brief with links attached. Not "here's what I think" – here's what's true and where it came from. WRITER – takes that brief and writes the finished piece in my voice. Hooks, threads, captions, long-form. It's had my old posts as reference, so what comes back isn't a draft I rewrite – it's a draft I approve. VISUALISER – I fed it my reference visuals once. Now every cover, image and dashboard comes back in that exact style, without a single new instruction. This is the agent that kills the "I have the post but no visual" excuse. ANALYST – reads what actually performed. Not vanity numbers: which hook shape landed, which format died, which time slot was dead air. Then it tells the Writer and the Scheduler what to do differently. This is the loop almost every setup is missing, and it's why most of them plateau. SCHEDULER – owns timing. Holds the queue, spaces things properly, protects the calendar, and makes sure nothing ships into an empty feed at 3am. PUBLISHER – ships it. Formats per platform, posts, confirms it went out, logs it back to the Chief. The reason it holds together instead of falling apart: they share memory. The research is already sitting inside the draft before the draft starts. No copy-pasting between tools, no re-explaining context, no approving every step. And you can teach any of them a repetitive task by recording yourself doing it – start recording, do the thing, stop. I wrote the whole thing up below – every agent, what each one is told, how they hand off, and how to wire it together. Read it and you can start building this today, not "eventually" ↓

MY GROK BOT CONTENT SYSTEM JUST WENT VIRAL ON X – SO I THINK YOU NEED TO SEE WHAT'S ACTUALLY IN IT It wasn't the visual that got people. It was realizing this is already possible, today, for anyone. That's the part worth saying out loud. AI agents used to be a developer thing. You needed an API key, a server, a framework, and a weekend you weren't getting back. Grok Bot deleted all of that. You describe the job in plain language, and you have an agent that does it – with its own computer, its own browser, its own files, running whether you're at the desk or not. Which means the question stopped being can I build this and became what do I point it at. People are pointing it at everything: sales outreach, research, SEO, bookkeeping, customer replies, personal admin. This one is aimed at the thing most people say they'll start and never do – publishing consistently. It's seven agents. One in the centre, six in orbit. Here's what each one actually does. CHIEF OF STAFF – the centre. Every request lands here first, gets broken into jobs, and gets routed to whoever owns that kind of work. It chases what's late, keeps the others from duplicating each other, and surfaces exactly one thing to me when a real decision is needed. Everything else it just handles. RESEARCHER – goes out and finds what's actually moving in the niche. Reads the sources, checks the claim, drops the duplicates, and hands over a brief with links attached. Not "here's what I think" – here's what's true and where it came from. WRITER – takes that brief and writes the finished piece in my voice. Hooks, threads, captions, long-form. It's had my old posts as reference, so what comes back isn't a draft I rewrite – it's a draft I approve. VISUALISER – I fed it my reference visuals once. Now every cover, image and dashboard comes back in that exact style, without a single new instruction. This is the agent that kills the "I have the post but no visual" excuse. ANALYST – reads what actually performed. Not vanity numbers: which hook shape landed, which format died, which time slot was dead air. Then it tells the Writer and the Scheduler what to do differently. This is the loop almost every setup is missing, and it's why most of them plateau. SCHEDULER – owns timing. Holds the queue, spaces things properly, protects the calendar, and makes sure nothing ships into an empty feed at 3am. PUBLISHER – ships it. Formats per platform, posts, confirms it went out, logs it back to the Chief. The reason it holds together instead of falling apart: they share memory. The research is already sitting inside the draft before the draft starts. No copy-pasting between tools, no re-explaining context, no approving every step. And you can teach any of them a repetitive task by recording yourself doing it – start recording, do the thing, stop. I wrote the whole thing up below – every agent, what each one is told, how they hand off, and how to wire it together. Read it and you can start building this today, not "eventually" ↓

SCOTTY BEAM

10,486 просмотров • 16 дней назад

I'M A F*CKING GENIUS - I WAS THE FIRST TO BUILD THIS WITH GROK BOT. And now? My idea is everywhere. Scroll your feed. You've seen it. The screenshots. The "digital office" carousels. The threads explaining it like they invented it. Every single one of them is running my playbook - and half of them don't even know where they got it from. I BUILT MY OWN OFFICE. AND GROK BOT IS THE BOSS. Just look at what my workplace looks like now. Before, AI sat there waiting. Waiting for me to open a chat. Waiting for a prompt. A very expensive parrot. Now I run a real digital office. Persistent agents with actual roles. A shared cloud computer, browser, and terminal. They keep working 24/7 - laptop closed, me asleep, doesn't matter. The office never shuts down. And here's the part that broke people's brains: it's easy. Download the app → sign in → create the "Chief" → give them job titles (exactly like briefing new hires) → show a task once → connect Telegram. → No experience needed. → No VPS. → No coding. → Nothing complicated. At all. I drop a goal into Telegram. The bots break it down, delegate it, and deliver it. I just make the decisions. That's the whole job now. Grok Bot isn't a chatbot. It's a team - one you can build in a single evening, even if you've never touched an agent in your life. So yeah. My content is everywhere. The recognition I actually earned? Still nowhere. Copy it again. I'll build the next one before you finish reading.

I'M A F*CKING GENIUS - I WAS THE FIRST TO BUILD THIS WITH GROK BOT. And now? My idea is everywhere. Scroll your feed. You've seen it. The screenshots. The "digital office" carousels. The threads explaining it like they invented it. Every single one of them is running my playbook - and half of them don't even know where they got it from. I BUILT MY OWN OFFICE. AND GROK BOT IS THE BOSS. Just look at what my workplace looks like now. Before, AI sat there waiting. Waiting for me to open a chat. Waiting for a prompt. A very expensive parrot. Now I run a real digital office. Persistent agents with actual roles. A shared cloud computer, browser, and terminal. They keep working 24/7 - laptop closed, me asleep, doesn't matter. The office never shuts down. And here's the part that broke people's brains: it's easy. Download the app → sign in → create the "Chief" → give them job titles (exactly like briefing new hires) → show a task once → connect Telegram. → No experience needed. → No VPS. → No coding. → Nothing complicated. At all. I drop a goal into Telegram. The bots break it down, delegate it, and deliver it. I just make the decisions. That's the whole job now. Grok Bot isn't a chatbot. It's a team - one you can build in a single evening, even if you've never touched an agent in your life. So yeah. My content is everywhere. The recognition I actually earned? Still nowhere. Copy it again. I'll build the next one before you finish reading.

Aleiah

11,604 просмотров • 25 дней назад

Founders spending $30K/year on agencies in 2026 haven't found naïve yet. One prompt does everything they're charging you for. I opened Naive, typed one sentence, and a full team of AI employees spun up and started building my online brand, immediately. No agency pitch deck. No onboarding call. No monthly retainer. Here's my team right now: → Marketer: running content & outreach on autopilot, zero posts from me → Engineer: building the store, shipping updates, zero reviews from me → Finance: tracking every dollar, reconciling accounts, generating reports 24/7 Each agent has their own email, bank account, phone number, and workspace. They share context, delegate tasks, and coordinate as a real team. Every outcome feeds a self-improvement loop, they get smarter with every task and every sale. I set a budget. I set one goal: first sale within 7 days. Then I walked away. What one prompt replaced: ❌ $10K developer → Engineer agent ✔️ ❌ $8K marketing agency → Marketer agent ✔️ ❌ $5K finance consultant → Finance agent ✔️ What founders on this platform are seeing right now: • Real ARR generated with zero human employees • Active businesses growing 32% week over week • Tasks completed growing 42% week over week You're still paying agencies for work one prompt handles completely. Try it free at 👉 Your first AI team is one sentence away. #NaïveAI2B9YHR

Gina Acosta

23,648 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Every AI agent you've tried has amnesia. It does one task, forgets everything, and tomorrow you start from zero. That's not an employee. That's a temp you have to retrain every single morning. Hyperagent by Airtable is the first platform I've used that actually fixes this. Here's what got me: 1. Agents that compound. Each agent has memory. The one running today is smarter than the one you shipped three weeks ago. Same prompt, same integrations, but weeks of your judgment baked in. 2. Real deliverables, real receipts. You don't get a chat transcript. You get finished work with the cost and runtime printed right on it. A full research report for under ten bucks. Try getting that invoice from an agency. 3. A fleet, not a chatbot. Build a specialist for outreach, another for research, another for reporting. Give each one its own tools, its own memory, and its own budget cap so nothing runs away with your credits. 4. Deploy to Slack and your whole team uses the agent you built. One competitive intel agent, @ mentioned by everyone. Airtable runs its own data team this way. 5. Each agent gets its own cloud machine with a real browser and code execution. It works while you sleep. No babysitting, no local setup, no laptop that has to stay open. I put it to work in the video below. Watch what it builds. The teams treating agents as durable assets instead of one-off prompts are going to lap everyone else. This is the first tool that actually treats them that way. #ad Hyperagent

Every AI agent you've tried has amnesia. It does one task, forgets everything, and tomorrow you start from zero. That's not an employee. That's a temp you have to retrain every single morning. Hyperagent by Airtable is the first platform I've used that actually fixes this. Here's what got me: 1. Agents that compound. Each agent has memory. The one running today is smarter than the one you shipped three weeks ago. Same prompt, same integrations, but weeks of your judgment baked in. 2. Real deliverables, real receipts. You don't get a chat transcript. You get finished work with the cost and runtime printed right on it. A full research report for under ten bucks. Try getting that invoice from an agency. 3. A fleet, not a chatbot. Build a specialist for outreach, another for research, another for reporting. Give each one its own tools, its own memory, and its own budget cap so nothing runs away with your credits. 4. Deploy to Slack and your whole team uses the agent you built. One competitive intel agent, @ mentioned by everyone. Airtable runs its own data team this way. 5. Each agent gets its own cloud machine with a real browser and code execution. It works while you sleep. No babysitting, no local setup, no laptop that has to stay open. I put it to work in the video below. Watch what it builds. The teams treating agents as durable assets instead of one-off prompts are going to lap everyone else. This is the first tool that actually treats them that way. #ad Hyperagent

Leonard Rodman

94,961 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

NOBODY IS USING GROK BOT FOR THIS AND IT MAKES NO SENSE TO ME. A FAMILY OF 4 MAKES MORE DAILY DECISIONS THAN A SMALL BUSINESS – AND RUNS THEM ALL FROM ONE PERSON'S MEMORY. I GAVE THAT MEMORY TO 9 GROK BOT AGENTS. HERE IT IS: Dad, mom, a daughter, a son. Four calendars, one fridge, one boiler, two schools, endless small decisions. The 9 agents I run the house with: → CALENDAR – one family calendar instead of four. Catches the clash before it happens: "dentist 15:00 vs football 16:30 – move one?" → MEALS – a week menu built from what's already in the fridge, then the shopping list. No 7pm "what do we even eat" panic. → BILLS – every due date, every price rise. "Energy went up 8%" and "2 subscriptions nobody has opened in 3 months." → HOMEWORK – explains, never answers. Kid gets the method, not the solution. "Try it again yourself." → HEALTH – appointments, check-ups, refills, vaccines. Books the follow-up before you forget the first one. → HOUSE – boiler service, filters, car inspection, warranties. The stuff that only becomes expensive when it's late. → SAFETY – screens, games, friend requests. Not spying, agreements: what's ok, for how long, and who asked for what. → MEMORY – documents. Passports, insurance, contracts. "Passport expires in 4 months" arrives 4 months early, not at the airport. → CHIEF OF STAFF – reads all eight and gives you ONE page every Sunday. Usually it says: nothing needs you. The part nobody says out loud: In every family there is one person quietly holding the entire household in their head. The dentist, the football kit, the boiler, the passport. Nobody sees the work – they only notice the one time it's missed. That job is not love. It's admin. And admin is exactly what agents are for. You don't need all nine on day one. Start with two: CALENDAR and MEALS. One week of no double-booked evenings and no 7pm fridge panic will convince the rest of your family faster than any explanation. Not magic – the agents organise, the family still decides. Adults sign off on anything involving money, health or the kids. Bookmark this & read more in the article below ↓

NOBODY IS USING GROK BOT FOR THIS AND IT MAKES NO SENSE TO ME. A FAMILY OF 4 MAKES MORE DAILY DECISIONS THAN A SMALL BUSINESS – AND RUNS THEM ALL FROM ONE PERSON'S MEMORY. I GAVE THAT MEMORY TO 9 GROK BOT AGENTS. HERE IT IS: Dad, mom, a daughter, a son. Four calendars, one fridge, one boiler, two schools, endless small decisions. The 9 agents I run the house with: → CALENDAR – one family calendar instead of four. Catches the clash before it happens: "dentist 15:00 vs football 16:30 – move one?" → MEALS – a week menu built from what's already in the fridge, then the shopping list. No 7pm "what do we even eat" panic. → BILLS – every due date, every price rise. "Energy went up 8%" and "2 subscriptions nobody has opened in 3 months." → HOMEWORK – explains, never answers. Kid gets the method, not the solution. "Try it again yourself." → HEALTH – appointments, check-ups, refills, vaccines. Books the follow-up before you forget the first one. → HOUSE – boiler service, filters, car inspection, warranties. The stuff that only becomes expensive when it's late. → SAFETY – screens, games, friend requests. Not spying, agreements: what's ok, for how long, and who asked for what. → MEMORY – documents. Passports, insurance, contracts. "Passport expires in 4 months" arrives 4 months early, not at the airport. → CHIEF OF STAFF – reads all eight and gives you ONE page every Sunday. Usually it says: nothing needs you. The part nobody says out loud: In every family there is one person quietly holding the entire household in their head. The dentist, the football kit, the boiler, the passport. Nobody sees the work – they only notice the one time it's missed. That job is not love. It's admin. And admin is exactly what agents are for. You don't need all nine on day one. Start with two: CALENDAR and MEALS. One week of no double-booked evenings and no 7pm fridge panic will convince the rest of your family faster than any explanation. Not magic – the agents organise, the family still decides. Adults sign off on anything involving money, health or the kids. Bookmark this & read more in the article below ↓

SCOTTY BEAM

12,016 просмотров • 22 дней назад

THAT'S F**KING CRAZY, MY GROK BOT CONTENT DESK COSTS ME $20 A MONTH. I GOT QUOTED OVER $15,000 FOR THE HUMAN VERSION. I actually priced it out before I built it. Researcher, writer, designer, analyst, scheduler, editor – six roles, market rates, five figures a month before anyone ships a single post. Freelance instead of full-time? Cheaper, and then you own six calendars and six inboxes. → Seven agents replaced that line item. Here's the part that actually explains why. One narrow job each. A model asked to be six people is mediocre at six things. Asked to be one, it's one. Six worse prompts beat one perfect one. A fixed handoff order. The bottleneck was never ideas – it was the six hand-offs between having one and shipping it. Every hand-off is where a human team loses a day. Here it's a function call. A seventh agent that only routes. Six agents without a chief of staff is a group chat. With one, it's a desk. Nobody sleeps. Six people go home at six. The chain doesn't. Same week of work, compressed into an evening. Zero code. Seven prompts. Ten minutes to stand up. I still approve everything before it publishes – that gate I kept on purpose. And this hasn't been measured against months of results yet. When it is, the misses get written up too. I wrote it all down so you don't have to guess at the prompts. Seven agents, one article ↓

THAT'S F**KING CRAZY, MY GROK BOT CONTENT DESK COSTS ME $20 A MONTH. I GOT QUOTED OVER $15,000 FOR THE HUMAN VERSION. I actually priced it out before I built it. Researcher, writer, designer, analyst, scheduler, editor – six roles, market rates, five figures a month before anyone ships a single post. Freelance instead of full-time? Cheaper, and then you own six calendars and six inboxes. → Seven agents replaced that line item. Here's the part that actually explains why. One narrow job each. A model asked to be six people is mediocre at six things. Asked to be one, it's one. Six worse prompts beat one perfect one. A fixed handoff order. The bottleneck was never ideas – it was the six hand-offs between having one and shipping it. Every hand-off is where a human team loses a day. Here it's a function call. A seventh agent that only routes. Six agents without a chief of staff is a group chat. With one, it's a desk. Nobody sleeps. Six people go home at six. The chain doesn't. Same week of work, compressed into an evening. Zero code. Seven prompts. Ten minutes to stand up. I still approve everything before it publishes – that gate I kept on purpose. And this hasn't been measured against months of results yet. When it is, the misses get written up too. I wrote it all down so you don't have to guess at the prompts. Seven agents, one article ↓

SCOTTY BEAM

19,221 просмотров • 8 дней назад

ELON MUSK REPOSTED MY GROK BOT CONTENT SETUP. AND I STILL DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY NOBODY IS DOING THIS WITH TRADING YET. A WALL STREET RESEARCH DESK COSTS MILLIONS A YEAR TO STAFF – YOU CAN NOW RUN THE SAME THING WITH 9 GROK BOT AGENTS. Nine people used to do this job. Nine Grok Bot agents now do it while you sleep. Here's the entire desk: → MACRO – watches rates, CPI, FOMC. Tells you what kind of day it is before you open a single chart. → SCANNER – sweeps 9,000 tickers for one thing: your setup. Not "interesting stocks". Yours. → CATALYST – reads every 8-K, earnings call and wire the second it drops. Flags the two that matter. → QUANT – backtests the idea before you fall in love with it. Kills it if the edge isn't there. → CRYPTO – on-chain flows, funding, basis. The stuff nobody has the energy to check at 2am. → RISK – the one that actually saves you. Sizes the position, sets the stop, refuses the 4th trade. → EXECUTION – places the order, tracks the fill, reports the slippage in basis points. → COMPLIANCE – logs every single decision. So you can audit yourself instead of lying to yourself. → CHIEF OF STAFF – sits on top of all eight. Ranks their output and hands you one page every morning. Here's the part nobody says out loud: Retail traders don't lose because they lack information. They lose because they can't process it fast enough – and can't stay disciplined when they do. Grok Bot solves the first problem completely. RISK and COMPLIANCE quietly solve the second one, because a bot never moves a stop loss. And you write zero code. You describe each agent in plain English, tell it where to look, give it one job. Start with two: SCANNER and RISK. That alone is more process than 95% of retail traders have ever run. Not financial advice – this is a research desk, not a money printer. The bots find and organise. You decide. Bookmark this & read more in the article below ↓

ELON MUSK REPOSTED MY GROK BOT CONTENT SETUP. AND I STILL DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY NOBODY IS DOING THIS WITH TRADING YET. A WALL STREET RESEARCH DESK COSTS MILLIONS A YEAR TO STAFF – YOU CAN NOW RUN THE SAME THING WITH 9 GROK BOT AGENTS. Nine people used to do this job. Nine Grok Bot agents now do it while you sleep. Here's the entire desk: → MACRO – watches rates, CPI, FOMC. Tells you what kind of day it is before you open a single chart. → SCANNER – sweeps 9,000 tickers for one thing: your setup. Not "interesting stocks". Yours. → CATALYST – reads every 8-K, earnings call and wire the second it drops. Flags the two that matter. → QUANT – backtests the idea before you fall in love with it. Kills it if the edge isn't there. → CRYPTO – on-chain flows, funding, basis. The stuff nobody has the energy to check at 2am. → RISK – the one that actually saves you. Sizes the position, sets the stop, refuses the 4th trade. → EXECUTION – places the order, tracks the fill, reports the slippage in basis points. → COMPLIANCE – logs every single decision. So you can audit yourself instead of lying to yourself. → CHIEF OF STAFF – sits on top of all eight. Ranks their output and hands you one page every morning. Here's the part nobody says out loud: Retail traders don't lose because they lack information. They lose because they can't process it fast enough – and can't stay disciplined when they do. Grok Bot solves the first problem completely. RISK and COMPLIANCE quietly solve the second one, because a bot never moves a stop loss. And you write zero code. You describe each agent in plain English, tell it where to look, give it one job. Start with two: SCANNER and RISK. That alone is more process than 95% of retail traders have ever run. Not financial advice – this is a research desk, not a money printer. The bots find and organise. You decide. Bookmark this & read more in the article below ↓

SCOTTY BEAM

93,953 просмотров • 25 дней назад

Elon Musk, absolute leader of the AI race with Grok Bot, and it's not a joke anymore. Ultimate guide on god-mode setup of Grok Bot, the org chart that runs while you sleep, step by step: A Chief of Staff sits in the middle with no tools of its own, BUT it reads the outcome you gave it, picks who does what, and never does the work itself. That one rule is why it never turns into the bottleneck you hired it to remove. → Researcher pulls real sources and tracks what's actually moving, not what sounds true → Writer turns that into finished copy while the research is still in the room → Visualiser gets three reference visuals once, then ships everything in that style forever → Analyst reads what performed and tells the rest of the team what to stop doing → Scheduler owns timing and holds the queue → Publisher actually ships What makes it different from every AI tool you've used: each bot gets its own computer in the cloud, its own browser, its own files, and they all share one memory. So the research is already sitting inside the draft before the draft starts. Nothing gets copy-pasted between tabs, nothing waits on you to approve step four of nine. And you never write a workflow for it. You hit record, do the job once the way you actually do it, stop. It pulls out the steps, saves them as a skill, and puts it on a schedule. The shape you're aiming for on every bot: everything reversible finished, nothing sent. 36 drafts queued, 0 published. It does all the work and stops dead at the one line only you can cross. You stop prompting. You start assigning. Full charter blocks, the approval line and the routines are in the article below ↓

Elon Musk, absolute leader of the AI race with Grok Bot, and it's not a joke anymore. Ultimate guide on god-mode setup of Grok Bot, the org chart that runs while you sleep, step by step: A Chief of Staff sits in the middle with no tools of its own, BUT it reads the outcome you gave it, picks who does what, and never does the work itself. That one rule is why it never turns into the bottleneck you hired it to remove. → Researcher pulls real sources and tracks what's actually moving, not what sounds true → Writer turns that into finished copy while the research is still in the room → Visualiser gets three reference visuals once, then ships everything in that style forever → Analyst reads what performed and tells the rest of the team what to stop doing → Scheduler owns timing and holds the queue → Publisher actually ships What makes it different from every AI tool you've used: each bot gets its own computer in the cloud, its own browser, its own files, and they all share one memory. So the research is already sitting inside the draft before the draft starts. Nothing gets copy-pasted between tabs, nothing waits on you to approve step four of nine. And you never write a workflow for it. You hit record, do the job once the way you actually do it, stop. It pulls out the steps, saves them as a skill, and puts it on a schedule. The shape you're aiming for on every bot: everything reversible finished, nothing sent. 36 drafts queued, 0 published. It does all the work and stops dead at the one line only you can cross. You stop prompting. You start assigning. Full charter blocks, the approval line and the routines are in the article below ↓

Miraqle

87,098 просмотров • 29 дней назад

i genuinely don't understand why nobody is building this.. last night, i built my growth operator system on an Obsidian vault with HUNDREDS of notes as markdown files: 1. every niche i've mapped, demand signals, supply gaps, which ones are heating up and which are already crowded 2. every creator the bot scouted, why their work is strong, what's broken in their distribution, who i passed on and why 3. every partner's offer, price, rev-share terms, and the objections that came up before signing 4. the content data, which topics pulled views vs which actually sold, hook by hook, with numbers next to each 5. the playbooks, scouting prompts, the content engine, whop CLI commands, outreach that doesn't sound like outreach 6. the rulings, every decision i never want to re-argue, one dated line each.. never below 25% rev-share, never partner without proof of skill 7. the trend radar, weekly scans of what's going viral in the niche right now, new formats and hooks that convert THIS week, not three months ago.. content stays on trend, conversion holds then whenever Grokbot starts working on a new partner, i point it at the vault it doesn't start from zero.. it starts with everything the last 10 partners taught it that's the difference between an agent doing tasks and an operator with MEMORY every partner makes the next one cheaper to run in the article below i break down the full growth operator system this vault plugs into:

i genuinely don't understand why nobody is building this.. last night, i built my growth operator system on an Obsidian vault with HUNDREDS of notes as markdown files: 1. every niche i've mapped, demand signals, supply gaps, which ones are heating up and which are already crowded 2. every creator the bot scouted, why their work is strong, what's broken in their distribution, who i passed on and why 3. every partner's offer, price, rev-share terms, and the objections that came up before signing 4. the content data, which topics pulled views vs which actually sold, hook by hook, with numbers next to each 5. the playbooks, scouting prompts, the content engine, whop CLI commands, outreach that doesn't sound like outreach 6. the rulings, every decision i never want to re-argue, one dated line each.. never below 25% rev-share, never partner without proof of skill 7. the trend radar, weekly scans of what's going viral in the niche right now, new formats and hooks that convert THIS week, not three months ago.. content stays on trend, conversion holds then whenever Grokbot starts working on a new partner, i point it at the vault it doesn't start from zero.. it starts with everything the last 10 partners taught it that's the difference between an agent doing tasks and an operator with MEMORY every partner makes the next one cheaper to run in the article below i break down the full growth operator system this vault plugs into:

Ronin

16,096 просмотров • 25 дней назад