Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

I just started watching Ken Burns’s documentary The American Revolution. Knowing his political leanings, I paid close attention to the details. One moment immediately stood out in episode 1. In discussing the First Continental Congress and the delegates from the thirteen colonies, historian Stacy Schiff described them as people... essentially from “different countries” and “different religions.” That framing is factually wrong. Distinct Christian denominations are not different religions, and the thirteen colonies were not foreign nations to one another. Presenting them this way subtly reframes the American founding as a product of multiculturalism. This is a soft Marxist reinterpretation of history—one that distorts the reality of the founding era.show more

Xi Van Fleet

204,520 subscribers

1,300,258 views • 8 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Arts News & Politics Education

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

another video In #Bangladesh Muslim men are going from house to house assuring the safety of the minorities there and also providing them their contact numbers, so that in case of any emergency, they can contact them! This is how #Bangladeshis are! They respect the religious places of others and do not consider people of other religions as different from themselves!

another video In #Bangladesh Muslim men are going from house to house assuring the safety of the minorities there and also providing them their contact numbers, so that in case of any emergency, they can contact them! This is how #Bangladeshis are! They respect the religious places of others and do not consider people of other religions as different from themselves!

Nirab

29,192 views • 2 years ago

Americans have had enough of Democrats lying to their faces Abdul El-Sayed said “Abdul is as American as any other name in this country. It's one of the strongest American names that you can have” Jeff Mead “he's just out here lying. Just lying through his teeth. Just lying. This is why I do not like, like the Democratic Party. They look you dead in the face and just lie as if you're too stupid to know any better. Abdul is not one of the strongest American names you can have. Abdul is not an American name. Abdul is one of the strongest Arabic names you can have, not one of the strongest American names. But again, it's just crazy to me that he says this with a straight face. By the way, his name means servant of the most merciful, talking about Allah. His middle name is Muhammad, who is a central prophet in the religion of Islam. When the United States was founded, essentially close to zero amount of people here were Muslims. The vast, vast, vast majority were Christians. America was not founded on Islamic values. It wasn't founded by Muslims. He's trying to get people to believe that his culture, his beliefs, his religion is just as American as everybody else's. No, it's not.” “That's what Democrats do. They will look at you dead in the face and just lie, just lie, just lie” “If you're in Michigan, register to vote, prepare to vote, get ready to vote. Ensure that this man does not become a senator in Michigan” We all learned about the Mayflower in school and the founding of America. Does anybody remember the name Abdul mentioned? No? Because it wasn’t There is no historic figure in American history during the founding named Abdul, I show proof All democrats do is lie

Americans have had enough of Democrats lying to their faces Abdul El-Sayed said “Abdul is as American as any other name in this country. It's one of the strongest American names that you can have” Jeff Mead “he's just out here lying. Just lying through his teeth. Just lying. This is why I do not like, like the Democratic Party. They look you dead in the face and just lie as if you're too stupid to know any better. Abdul is not one of the strongest American names you can have. Abdul is not an American name. Abdul is one of the strongest Arabic names you can have, not one of the strongest American names. But again, it's just crazy to me that he says this with a straight face. By the way, his name means servant of the most merciful, talking about Allah. His middle name is Muhammad, who is a central prophet in the religion of Islam. When the United States was founded, essentially close to zero amount of people here were Muslims. The vast, vast, vast majority were Christians. America was not founded on Islamic values. It wasn't founded by Muslims. He's trying to get people to believe that his culture, his beliefs, his religion is just as American as everybody else's. No, it's not.” “That's what Democrats do. They will look at you dead in the face and just lie, just lie, just lie” “If you're in Michigan, register to vote, prepare to vote, get ready to vote. Ensure that this man does not become a senator in Michigan” We all learned about the Mayflower in school and the founding of America. Does anybody remember the name Abdul mentioned? No? Because it wasn’t There is no historic figure in American history during the founding named Abdul, I show proof All democrats do is lie

Wall Street Apes

89,271 views • 17 days ago

In this Liberty’s Voice segment, I break down the critical turning points that pushed the American colonies from protest to revolution—from the Boston Massacre and Tea Party to the Coercive Acts and the First Continental Congress. I walk through how the fight over taxation, representation, and self-governance escalated into open conflict with Britain. Then I connect it to today—why understanding these moments matters, how narratives shape our view of history, and what’s at stake when we lose sight of our founding principles. To watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:

In this Liberty’s Voice segment, I break down the critical turning points that pushed the American colonies from protest to revolution—from the Boston Massacre and Tea Party to the Coercive Acts and the First Continental Congress. I walk through how the fight over taxation, representation, and self-governance escalated into open conflict with Britain. Then I connect it to today—why understanding these moments matters, how narratives shape our view of history, and what’s at stake when we lose sight of our founding principles. To watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

35,449 views • 4 months ago

Gold from J.I. Packer: "Christianity supremely is about transformation. Persons bearing the image of Satan being transformed into persons bearing the image of the One who created them and the One who redeemed them, the image, in other words, of Christ. Holiness is about learning the way of becoming Christlike with a transformation that begins in the heart...and then expresses itself outwardly in the life. Here, of course, you have a pitfall which has a long history in the church, a pitfall, I mean, of supposing that the way to teach Christian holiness, Christian behavior, is to drill people Pharisaic style in doing this and not doing that, and the expectation is that by drilling people that way, we shall change their hearts. Well, the biblical perspective is entirely the reverse. God in His mercy changes the heart when we come as sinners to Jesus, and out of the reality of that changed heart, sustained as it now is by the indwelling Holy Spirit in our heart, comes the life of holiness in which the image of God is expressed, the likeness of our Lord is reflected, and Christians establish their identity as persons changed and different from those around them."

Gold from J.I. Packer: "Christianity supremely is about transformation. Persons bearing the image of Satan being transformed into persons bearing the image of the One who created them and the One who redeemed them, the image, in other words, of Christ. Holiness is about learning the way of becoming Christlike with a transformation that begins in the heart...and then expresses itself outwardly in the life. Here, of course, you have a pitfall which has a long history in the church, a pitfall, I mean, of supposing that the way to teach Christian holiness, Christian behavior, is to drill people Pharisaic style in doing this and not doing that, and the expectation is that by drilling people that way, we shall change their hearts. Well, the biblical perspective is entirely the reverse. God in His mercy changes the heart when we come as sinners to Jesus, and out of the reality of that changed heart, sustained as it now is by the indwelling Holy Spirit in our heart, comes the life of holiness in which the image of God is expressed, the likeness of our Lord is reflected, and Christians establish their identity as persons changed and different from those around them."

Melissa the Hopeful🏠Homemaker

30,851 views • 8 months ago

Kaja Kallas “is aware that different histories and geographies drive different countries’ views. She … is a voracious reader of history, counting the professors Timothy Snyder and Timothy Garton Ash as friends” (The Guardian, June 24, 2024). History books are very different these days, and apparently it is not enough to just read some of them. As a top EU diplomat, one needs to do their homework to be on the same page with the rest of the world - if one doesn’t want their professional competence discussed at the UN.

Kaja Kallas “is aware that different histories and geographies drive different countries’ views. She … is a voracious reader of history, counting the professors Timothy Snyder and Timothy Garton Ash as friends” (The Guardian, June 24, 2024). History books are very different these days, and apparently it is not enough to just read some of them. As a top EU diplomat, one needs to do their homework to be on the same page with the rest of the world - if one doesn’t want their professional competence discussed at the UN.

Rina Lu🇷🇺

11,222 views • 4 months ago

Frederick Douglass is a quintessential American hero. We are talking about a man with a profound and unshakeable faith in America’s founding. His life story from the fields of slavery to the world stage is one of the greatest narratives of perseverance in American history.

Frederick Douglass is a quintessential American hero. We are talking about a man with a profound and unshakeable faith in America’s founding. His life story from the fields of slavery to the world stage is one of the greatest narratives of perseverance in American history.

Congressman Byron Donalds

77,848 views • 6 months ago

Blanche: it's absolutely false to suggest that this DOJ is not executing as we should in doing the right thing every single day. Whitehouse: I will tell you that you are wrong, that in the history of the department, this kind of criticism by federal judges is unprecedented. And it comes from judges of every different political persuasion.

Blanche: it's absolutely false to suggest that this DOJ is not executing as we should in doing the right thing every single day. Whitehouse: I will tell you that you are wrong, that in the history of the department, this kind of criticism by federal judges is unprecedented. And it comes from judges of every different political persuasion.

Acyn

53,465 views • 1 month ago

“One of the most evil demonic brands in American is Crumbl Cookie” “The owner is making millions of dollars of this product and is really poisoning the American people” “This is not a dessert - this is a chemical disguised as a cookie”

“One of the most evil demonic brands in American is Crumbl Cookie” “The owner is making millions of dollars of this product and is really poisoning the American people” “This is not a dessert - this is a chemical disguised as a cookie”

Concerned Citizen

3,361,818 views • 11 months ago

The Smithsonian does not belong to the President or a political party. It BELONGS TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE! As one of the greatest historical and cultural institutions in the world—it is the keeper of our story in all its complexity, triumph, and tradition. We will not let them rewrite our history! We will fight back in Congress, the Courts, and in our Communities because this is OUR story!

The Smithsonian does not belong to the President or a political party. It BELONGS TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE! As one of the greatest historical and cultural institutions in the world—it is the keeper of our story in all its complexity, triumph, and tradition. We will not let them rewrite our history! We will fight back in Congress, the Courts, and in our Communities because this is OUR story!

Rep. Melanie Stansbury

73,027 views • 1 month ago

Here’s How 1 McDonald’s Hamburger Contains 1300 Strands Of Different DNA. This Is The Result Of Going From Small Farms To Mega Corporations “We're pooling the bacteria from a thousand different animals” “Thousands of animals” contribute “to a single hamburger.” “This is a combo bin of meat. The meat in these boxes comes from many different animals and many different places. Some is even from overseas. All of it is ground together to make the juicy hamburger Americans love. Hamburger used to be the scraps left over from butchering just one cow.” But a significant change has occurred. Now parts of many cows are blended together by the ton. ‌ If we take the meat from one animal, grind it up and make ground beef from just one animal, we're including only the bacteria from one animal. But if we take the meat from a thousand different animals and grind that together, we're pooling the bacteria from a thousand different animals as well. So explain this to me, how many different cows would be in one burger? Well, I suspect that there are hundreds or even thousands of animals that have contributed to a single hamburger.”

Here’s How 1 McDonald’s Hamburger Contains 1300 Strands Of Different DNA. This Is The Result Of Going From Small Farms To Mega Corporations “We're pooling the bacteria from a thousand different animals” “Thousands of animals” contribute “to a single hamburger.” “This is a combo bin of meat. The meat in these boxes comes from many different animals and many different places. Some is even from overseas. All of it is ground together to make the juicy hamburger Americans love. Hamburger used to be the scraps left over from butchering just one cow.” But a significant change has occurred. Now parts of many cows are blended together by the ton. ‌ If we take the meat from one animal, grind it up and make ground beef from just one animal, we're including only the bacteria from one animal. But if we take the meat from a thousand different animals and grind that together, we're pooling the bacteria from a thousand different animals as well. So explain this to me, how many different cows would be in one burger? Well, I suspect that there are hundreds or even thousands of animals that have contributed to a single hamburger.”

Wall Street Apes

3,114,142 views • 2 years ago

Dawn Butler, "The comments were Islamophobic, and banning prayer in public places is not Christian" "Attacking Muslims is not Christian" BBC Politics London, "Is the separation of men and women not an issue?" Dawn Butler, "It's the same in Hinduism, (some forms of) Christianity, Judaism - religions practice it differently" "That's not the point, the point is when you talk about values, British values, what are they?" "My British values is not tolerance, is acceptance"" "I'm accepting of other religions, other people's way of life, of who other people love, of different colours and religions" "Not tolerate, because i don't need to tolerate other people and their religions" "And for a member of parliament, Nick Timothy, to say what he said publicly. And for the leader of the opposition Kemi Badenoch to double down on that, I think brings our politics into disrepute"

Dawn Butler, "The comments were Islamophobic, and banning prayer in public places is not Christian" "Attacking Muslims is not Christian" BBC Politics London, "Is the separation of men and women not an issue?" Dawn Butler, "It's the same in Hinduism, (some forms of) Christianity, Judaism - religions practice it differently" "That's not the point, the point is when you talk about values, British values, what are they?" "My British values is not tolerance, is acceptance"" "I'm accepting of other religions, other people's way of life, of who other people love, of different colours and religions" "Not tolerate, because i don't need to tolerate other people and their religions" "And for a member of parliament, Nick Timothy, to say what he said publicly. And for the leader of the opposition Kemi Badenoch to double down on that, I think brings our politics into disrepute"

Farrukh

90,599 views • 5 months ago

Stephen Miller: When the Founding Fathers built this country, they were keenly aware of the fact that their history as Englishmen in the colonies, and their history and experience with Enlightenment principles and values, formed the foundation of our system of government. It is not the case, and has never been the case—to take the Haiti example—to take three million people from a failed island, put them into America, and overnight have them become fully successful, assimilated American citizens. It defies everything we know about how nations and assimilation work. These are hard conversations, but if we don’t have these conversations, we will continue blindly down the path that we have been on in this country for a long time.

Stephen Miller: When the Founding Fathers built this country, they were keenly aware of the fact that their history as Englishmen in the colonies, and their history and experience with Enlightenment principles and values, formed the foundation of our system of government. It is not the case, and has never been the case—to take the Haiti example—to take three million people from a failed island, put them into America, and overnight have them become fully successful, assimilated American citizens. It defies everything we know about how nations and assimilation work. These are hard conversations, but if we don’t have these conversations, we will continue blindly down the path that we have been on in this country for a long time.

Acyn

38,830 views • 1 month ago

The Weaponisation of Identity. It is remarkable how individuals from different nations can arrive into Western countries and claim to be one of the same with the people from there. This is a touchy subject in public discourse still.

The Weaponisation of Identity. It is remarkable how individuals from different nations can arrive into Western countries and claim to be one of the same with the people from there. This is a touchy subject in public discourse still.

Michael McCarthy

90,432 views • 1 year ago

Americans and Europeans alike sometimes forget how unique is the United States of America. No other nation has been built upon an idea—the idea of liberty. No other nation has so successfully combined people of different races and nations within a single culture. Whether in flight from persecution or from poverty, the huddled masses, with few exceptions, welcomed American values, the American way of life and American opportunities. And America herself has bound them to her with powerful bonds of patriotism and pride. The European nations are not and can never be like this. They are the product of history and not of philosophy. You can construct a nation on an idea; but you cannot reconstruct a nation on the basis of one. Political institutions cannot be imposed if they are to endure. They have to evolve and they have to command the affection, loyalty and respect of populations living under them, and they have to be accountable to the people.

Americans and Europeans alike sometimes forget how unique is the United States of America. No other nation has been built upon an idea—the idea of liberty. No other nation has so successfully combined people of different races and nations within a single culture. Whether in flight from persecution or from poverty, the huddled masses, with few exceptions, welcomed American values, the American way of life and American opportunities. And America herself has bound them to her with powerful bonds of patriotism and pride. The European nations are not and can never be like this. They are the product of history and not of philosophy. You can construct a nation on an idea; but you cannot reconstruct a nation on the basis of one. Political institutions cannot be imposed if they are to endure. They have to evolve and they have to command the affection, loyalty and respect of populations living under them, and they have to be accountable to the people.

Margaret Thatcher

14,208 views • 1 year ago

I break down a pivotal moment in the lead-up to the American Revolution—when General Gage was given sweeping authority by the British to use force against the colonies. This wasn’t just policy—it was a turning point that pushed America closer to war. I also take on how our founding is often misunderstood or oversimplified, and why knowing the full history matters—especially when it comes to identity, education, and what it means to be an American. To watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:

I break down a pivotal moment in the lead-up to the American Revolution—when General Gage was given sweeping authority by the British to use force against the colonies. This wasn’t just policy—it was a turning point that pushed America closer to war. I also take on how our founding is often misunderstood or oversimplified, and why knowing the full history matters—especially when it comes to identity, education, and what it means to be an American. To watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

23,612 views • 4 months ago

A previous post of ours centered around imported product being labeled as “product of the USA” sparked some really great conversation. In that, there were a few comments about how corrupt the American food production system was, and that some consumers might actually prefer product produced in another country. We are not here to discuss the quality standards or integrity of imported product. We are here to tell you that you must know your farmer, because reading a product label is simply not enough. Buying beef from other countries is not the issue- it’s companies importing product and leading consumers to believe it’s a “product of the USA” when it’s clearly not. The animals were raised, slaughtered and butchered in a foreign country. Imported product being sold as “product of the USA” is one of the, if not the, biggest reasons there are not more American, regenerative farmers. We believe that if there were clear country of origin labeling laws, there would be MORE regenerative, American farmers. And, until this becomes a reality, we will continue to have an incredibly fragile food supply systems. Know your farmer. Know where your food comes from.

A previous post of ours centered around imported product being labeled as “product of the USA” sparked some really great conversation. In that, there were a few comments about how corrupt the American food production system was, and that some consumers might actually prefer product produced in another country. We are not here to discuss the quality standards or integrity of imported product. We are here to tell you that you must know your farmer, because reading a product label is simply not enough. Buying beef from other countries is not the issue- it’s companies importing product and leading consumers to believe it’s a “product of the USA” when it’s clearly not. The animals were raised, slaughtered and butchered in a foreign country. Imported product being sold as “product of the USA” is one of the, if not the, biggest reasons there are not more American, regenerative farmers. We believe that if there were clear country of origin labeling laws, there would be MORE regenerative, American farmers. And, until this becomes a reality, we will continue to have an incredibly fragile food supply systems. Know your farmer. Know where your food comes from.

White Oak Pastures

15,115 views • 2 years ago

James Talarico: "I believe Christianity points to the truth. I also think other religions of love point to the same truth. I think of different religious traditions as different languages, but we are all talking about the same reality. I believe Jesus Christ reveals that reality to us, but I also think that other traditions reveal that reality in their own ways with their own symbol structures. And I've learned more about my tradition by learning more about Buddhism and Hinduism and Islam and Judaism. And so I see these beautiful faith traditions as circling the same truth about the universe, about the cosmos." You can believe those things, but you can't be a Christian and believe that all religions point to the same truth. In John 14:6, the Jesus that James Talarico claims to follow says, "I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the father except through me." Talarico is still a member of his childhood congregation, St. Andrew Presbyterian Church, which is a very progressive church in Austin. It shouldn't be surprising at all that in the church’s About Us page it says, "We are Christ centered, yet we respect and learn from all religions of love." That's not a Christian position. If God is love and we believe in the trinity: God, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, which no other religion believes in, then He is actually the only source of love. There aren't other religions of love in addition to Christianity. It doesn't come as a surprise that Talarico is essentially a universalist who claims to be a Christian and uses some Christian tenets, but actually doesn't believe in the exclusivity of Christ.

James Talarico: "I believe Christianity points to the truth. I also think other religions of love point to the same truth. I think of different religious traditions as different languages, but we are all talking about the same reality. I believe Jesus Christ reveals that reality to us, but I also think that other traditions reveal that reality in their own ways with their own symbol structures. And I've learned more about my tradition by learning more about Buddhism and Hinduism and Islam and Judaism. And so I see these beautiful faith traditions as circling the same truth about the universe, about the cosmos." You can believe those things, but you can't be a Christian and believe that all religions point to the same truth. In John 14:6, the Jesus that James Talarico claims to follow says, "I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the father except through me." Talarico is still a member of his childhood congregation, St. Andrew Presbyterian Church, which is a very progressive church in Austin. It shouldn't be surprising at all that in the church’s About Us page it says, "We are Christ centered, yet we respect and learn from all religions of love." That's not a Christian position. If God is love and we believe in the trinity: God, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, which no other religion believes in, then He is actually the only source of love. There aren't other religions of love in addition to Christianity. It doesn't come as a surprise that Talarico is essentially a universalist who claims to be a Christian and uses some Christian tenets, but actually doesn't believe in the exclusivity of Christ.

Relatable with Allie Beth Stuckey

11,548 views • 5 months ago

What motivated the founding fathers to build America? Fame. They wanted fame. "The love of fame" declares Hamilton in the Federalist Papers is "the ruling passion of the noblest minds." He likely had Washington in mind writing that. Similarly, Franklin confesses in the beginning of his autobiography that it may look like he's writing it out of vanity… and he is! Because vanity "is often productive of good to the possessor, and to others that are within his sphere of action… it would not be altogether absurd if a man were to thank God for his vanity." Of course, the type of fame that the founding fathers were after is different in kind from the fame most of our contemporaries are chasing. It is not just to be known, but to be respected by those whom you respect for accomplishing noble deeds. And I think we need to re-legitimize the desire for this kind of "fame" as a spur to attempt great deeds today. Our society advises us to "stop caring what others think" — while this is a good antidote for the clout-chasers of today, our blanket rejection of "vanity" veers too far in the other extreme. The task should be to discern what types of fame is worth and not worth pursuing. In this interview, you will learn about the psychology, history, and blindspots of the American founding from one of its most respected commentators, the legendary UT Philosopher Thomas Pangle.

What motivated the founding fathers to build America? Fame. They wanted fame. "The love of fame" declares Hamilton in the Federalist Papers is "the ruling passion of the noblest minds." He likely had Washington in mind writing that. Similarly, Franklin confesses in the beginning of his autobiography that it may look like he's writing it out of vanity… and he is! Because vanity "is often productive of good to the possessor, and to others that are within his sphere of action… it would not be altogether absurd if a man were to thank God for his vanity." Of course, the type of fame that the founding fathers were after is different in kind from the fame most of our contemporaries are chasing. It is not just to be known, but to be respected by those whom you respect for accomplishing noble deeds. And I think we need to re-legitimize the desire for this kind of "fame" as a spur to attempt great deeds today. Our society advises us to "stop caring what others think" — while this is a good antidote for the clout-chasers of today, our blanket rejection of "vanity" veers too far in the other extreme. The task should be to discern what types of fame is worth and not worth pursuing. In this interview, you will learn about the psychology, history, and blindspots of the American founding from one of its most respected commentators, the legendary UT Philosopher Thomas Pangle.

Johnathan Bi

17,078 views • 3 months ago

Did you know there might be a second language on the Book of Mormon gold plates? Most Latter-day Saints have heard that the plates were written in Reformed Egyptian, but not as many people realize that the Book of Mormon started as essentially a different language first. And the relationship between these two languages, I believe, supports the authenticity of the Book of Mormon. What the Nephite language started as, is described in the first chapter of the book of Mormon as "the learning of the Jews and the language of the Egyptians." Scholars have theorized that this first language could contain a mix of Hebrew and Egyptian features. So the Book of Mormon writing may have started out looking something like this, a Judahite variety of Egyptian known as Palestinian Hieratic that is attested in Lehi and Nephi’s day. But languages don’t stay static. After hundreds of years, it seems this earlier Egyptian language evolved into a modified, or Reformed Egyptian, as Moroni calls it at the end of the book. So maybe something like this. Since the writings of Nephi and Mormon both appear to be included on plates that became the Book of Mormon, one would expect their languages to look different. And Martin Harris’s visit to Professor Charles Anthon may show evidence of this shift. New research reveals Anthon may have seen two different transcripts: one that resembled Egyptian—like at the beginning of the Book of Mormon— and another that was harder to identify, just like we’d expect from an evolving, reformed language. Language changing over time is totally natural—just look at how different English was a few hundred years ago! So this shift in the Book of Mormon’s language is exactly what we’d expect from an authentic, ancient record. If you want to learn more, read KnoWhy 774 at Scripture Central.

Did you know there might be a second language on the Book of Mormon gold plates? Most Latter-day Saints have heard that the plates were written in Reformed Egyptian, but not as many people realize that the Book of Mormon started as essentially a different language first. And the relationship between these two languages, I believe, supports the authenticity of the Book of Mormon. What the Nephite language started as, is described in the first chapter of the book of Mormon as "the learning of the Jews and the language of the Egyptians." Scholars have theorized that this first language could contain a mix of Hebrew and Egyptian features. So the Book of Mormon writing may have started out looking something like this, a Judahite variety of Egyptian known as Palestinian Hieratic that is attested in Lehi and Nephi’s day. But languages don’t stay static. After hundreds of years, it seems this earlier Egyptian language evolved into a modified, or Reformed Egyptian, as Moroni calls it at the end of the book. So maybe something like this. Since the writings of Nephi and Mormon both appear to be included on plates that became the Book of Mormon, one would expect their languages to look different. And Martin Harris’s visit to Professor Charles Anthon may show evidence of this shift. New research reveals Anthon may have seen two different transcripts: one that resembled Egyptian—like at the beginning of the Book of Mormon— and another that was harder to identify, just like we’d expect from an evolving, reformed language. Language changing over time is totally natural—just look at how different English was a few hundred years ago! So this shift in the Book of Mormon’s language is exactly what we’d expect from an authentic, ancient record. If you want to learn more, read KnoWhy 774 at Scripture Central.

ScripturePlus

11,129 views • 1 year ago

Pennsylvania is one of the greatest agricultural states in America—and as one of our original 13 colonies, it deserves to be represented at the Great American State Fair as we celebrate 250 years of American agriculture and our nation's founding. I'm grateful to Senator Dave McCormick and U.S. Senator John Fetterman for stepping up to help ensure the Keystone State has a place on the National Mall. From dairy and mushrooms to apples, poultry, and so much more, Pennsylvania's farmers, ranchers, and producers have helped feed America for generations. This celebration is about honoring the people and places that built our country. Pennsylvania belongs at the heart of it, and I look forward to welcoming the Commonwealth to the Great American State Fair. 🇺🇸🌾

Pennsylvania is one of the greatest agricultural states in America—and as one of our original 13 colonies, it deserves to be represented at the Great American State Fair as we celebrate 250 years of American agriculture and our nation's founding. I'm grateful to Senator Dave McCormick and U.S. Senator John Fetterman for stepping up to help ensure the Keystone State has a place on the National Mall. From dairy and mushrooms to apples, poultry, and so much more, Pennsylvania's farmers, ranchers, and producers have helped feed America for generations. This celebration is about honoring the people and places that built our country. Pennsylvania belongs at the heart of it, and I look forward to welcoming the Commonwealth to the Great American State Fair. 🇺🇸🌾

Secretary Brooke Rollins

109,375 views • 1 month ago