Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

i keep hearing about how GLM-5.2 not only is great at coding but also that is on Opus 4.8 level when it comes to front end design I wanted to find out so... i put it to the test.. you can be the judge

HermesAgentTips's profile picture

Hermes Agent Tips

7,464 subscribers

71,024 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

ОбразованиеНовости и политикаНаука и технологии
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

we asked GLM 5.2 and Claude Opus 4.8 to find and fix the bugs in two different scripts while Opus 4.8 finished a few seconds faster in both tests, GLM 5.2 burned roughly 17k–38k fewer tokens and absolutely crushed it on cost, coming in 15x to 22x cheaper! Test 1: GLM 5.2 ($0.068) vs. Opus 4.8 ($1.06) Test 2: GLM 5.2 ($0.045) vs. Opus 4.8 ($1.02)
0:23

we asked GLM 5.2 and Claude Opus 4.8 to find and fix the bugs in two different scripts while Opus 4.8 finished a few seconds faster in both tests, GLM 5.2 burned roughly 17k–38k fewer tokens and absolutely crushed it on cost, coming in 15x to 22x cheaper! Test 1: GLM 5.2 ($0.068) vs. Opus 4.8 ($1.06) Test 2: GLM 5.2 ($0.045) vs. Opus 4.8 ($1.02)

GMI Cloud

86,444 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

I was skeptical about giving GLM-5.2 the task to build a super mario snes style game in a single HTML file so i ran the test on Opus and also on GLM-5.2 Opus didnt even try to make a game or made something but it wasn't a game GLM-5.2 one shotted a pretty functional game.. WILD
0:45

I was skeptical about giving GLM-5.2 the task to build a super mario snes style game in a single HTML file so i ran the test on Opus and also on GLM-5.2 Opus didnt even try to make a game or made something but it wasn't a game GLM-5.2 one shotted a pretty functional game.. WILD

Hermes Agent Tips

32,883 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

I was a bit suspicious of the claim, but GLM-5.2 is pretty good at designing stuff. Obviously not at the level of a professional designer, but it has that Opus-level quality. Great at: - games - landing pages - HTML artifacts - 3D worlds Wish I had Fable 5 to compare with.
9:24

I was a bit suspicious of the claim, but GLM-5.2 is pretty good at designing stuff. Obviously not at the level of a professional designer, but it has that Opus-level quality. Great at: - games - landing pages - HTML artifacts - 3D worlds Wish I had Fable 5 to compare with.

elvis

18,976 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

I love using GLM 5.2 for web app iteration. My workflow: generate 6 variations, then pick the best one and continue iterating on it. I built Recast to make this even easier. Give it a prompt, get 6 variations, download the code for your favorite version, then continue iterating in your own coding agent. GLM 5.2 works really well for this use case since it's fast, cheap, and great at design. On average, you can make 3-6 landing pages with GLM 5.2 for every one you can generate with Opus 4.8. And the design variety of the GLM landing pages helps a lot with trying to think through what style you want to go with. Recast is launching soon (as a web app + skill).
0:34

I love using GLM 5.2 for web app iteration. My workflow: generate 6 variations, then pick the best one and continue iterating on it. I built Recast to make this even easier. Give it a prompt, get 6 variations, download the code for your favorite version, then continue iterating in your own coding agent. GLM 5.2 works really well for this use case since it's fast, cheap, and great at design. On average, you can make 3-6 landing pages with GLM 5.2 for every one you can generate with Opus 4.8. And the design variety of the GLM landing pages helps a lot with trying to think through what style you want to go with. Recast is launching soon (as a web app + skill).

Hassan

20,164 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

I haven’t tested it that rigorously but so far glm-5.2 is killing it at breaking out of agent sandboxes. This is so fun I had to make a video.
0:35

I haven’t tested it that rigorously but so far glm-5.2 is killing it at breaking out of agent sandboxes. This is so fun I had to make a video.

Zack Korman

20,951 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Opus 4.8 vs GLM 5.2 everyone is praising Glm on my timeline, so i had to test it myself > both models were given the same prompt > GLM was super fast and used like 2% of my weekly limit > Opus took over 20 mins and used like 3% of weekly limits which one do you think won?
0:41

Opus 4.8 vs GLM 5.2 everyone is praising Glm on my timeline, so i had to test it myself > both models were given the same prompt > GLM was super fast and used like 2% of my weekly limit > Opus took over 20 mins and used like 3% of weekly limits which one do you think won?

J A Z I I

48,108 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

OpenAI are testing a new model on the Web Dev Arena Arena under the name 'Anonymous Chatbot 0717'. I can't believe I'm gonna say this, but it is genuinely at a completely different level of front end coding - far better than Sonnet, o3, Gemini 2.5 Pro, or Grok 4. To test it, I ran a great prompt borrowed from the amazing The Feature Crew YouTube channel, asking models to create a procedurally generated planet with Three.js. Take a look yourselves, but I'm pretty astonished by how big the jump is. I have featured the new model twice just because its implementations have been so interesting. Of course, this is only one test, but OpenAI models have always been a bit 'meh' at front-end work, and they seem to have finally overtaken everyone else on that front. We'll see when it comes out. Credit to Chetaslua for discovering the model
1:21

OpenAI are testing a new model on the Web Dev Arena Arena under the name 'Anonymous Chatbot 0717'. I can't believe I'm gonna say this, but it is genuinely at a completely different level of front end coding - far better than Sonnet, o3, Gemini 2.5 Pro, or Grok 4. To test it, I ran a great prompt borrowed from the amazing The Feature Crew YouTube channel, asking models to create a procedurally generated planet with Three.js. Take a look yourselves, but I'm pretty astonished by how big the jump is. I have featured the new model twice just because its implementations have been so interesting. Of course, this is only one test, but OpenAI models have always been a bit 'meh' at front-end work, and they seem to have finally overtaken everyone else on that front. We'll see when it comes out. Credit to Chetaslua for discovering the model

Peter Gostev

495,815 просмотров • 1 год назад

Fatima’s anger is honestly understandable. Being in her position I can only begin to imagine how painful it is having to put on a front to those in power so that they aren’t punished, but the ignorance on the other end is just as painful. #Jaadugar #AWitchinMongolia
2:52

Fatima’s anger is honestly understandable. Being in her position I can only begin to imagine how painful it is having to put on a front to those in power so that they aren’t punished, but the ignorance on the other end is just as painful. #Jaadugar #AWitchinMongolia

𝙰 𝚔 𝚒

48,926 просмотров • 24 дней назад

Grok 4.5 operates at Opus-level intelligence and Sonnet-level pricing! We tested it against Claude Opus 4.8, Sonnet 5, and GLM 5.2 on a SpaceX mission: liftoff, stage sep, orbit insertion, satellite deploy. Grok 4.5 animates it more accurately and vividly than Sonnet 5 and GLM 5.2. Opus is the fastest and most expensive. Grok burns more tokens but still lands ~40% cheaper than Opus, and a bit under Sonnet 5. Time / tokens / cost: Grok 4.5 — / 35k / $0.69 Opus 4.8 — / 13.7k / $1.10 Sonnet 5 — / 22.1k / $0.78 GLM 5.2 — / 92.7k / $0.13 yet GLM did the whole mission for $0.13 😮
0:45

Grok 4.5 operates at Opus-level intelligence and Sonnet-level pricing! We tested it against Claude Opus 4.8, Sonnet 5, and GLM 5.2 on a SpaceX mission: liftoff, stage sep, orbit insertion, satellite deploy. Grok 4.5 animates it more accurately and vividly than Sonnet 5 and GLM 5.2. Opus is the fastest and most expensive. Grok burns more tokens but still lands ~40% cheaper than Opus, and a bit under Sonnet 5. Time / tokens / cost: Grok 4.5 — / 35k / $0.69 Opus 4.8 — / 13.7k / $1.10 Sonnet 5 — / 22.1k / $0.78 GLM 5.2 — / 92.7k / $0.13 yet GLM did the whole mission for $0.13 😮

GMI Cloud

150,679 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

⚔️ i wanted to tell you about me going to the military, that when will i go. the announcement will be out soon so, i will be going on september. i wanted to tell it to carats first 🥹😭
0:23

⚔️ i wanted to tell you about me going to the military, that when will i go. the announcement will be out soon so, i will be going on september. i wanted to tell it to carats first 🥹😭

우지냥이

65,375 просмотров • 19 дней назад

I just tested GLM 5.2, Claude opus 4.8, and GPT 5.5 to see which one could rebuild my personal site in that whimsical ascii style GLM 5.2 held its own and went toe to toe with the other 2 top tier models lowkey impressed, look at the hero section it built here
1:36

I just tested GLM 5.2, Claude opus 4.8, and GPT 5.5 to see which one could rebuild my personal site in that whimsical ascii style GLM 5.2 held its own and went toe to toe with the other 2 top tier models lowkey impressed, look at the hero section it built here

Ann Nguyen

33,577 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

This is how I created this video. Prompts + bloopers below ♥ I used a previs storyboard style this time just to test it, it worked well except when it would keep the directional arrows. I need to adjust the prompt so that does not happen. The little videos and buttons at the end is pure capcut masking.
1:02

This is how I created this video. Prompts + bloopers below ♥ I used a previs storyboard style this time just to test it, it worked well except when it would keep the directional arrows. I need to adjust the prompt so that does not happen. The little videos and buttons at the end is pure capcut masking.

Glitter Gal

89,595 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Everyone is talking about Claude Design… but I keep going back to Gemini. Gemini 3.1 Pro is seriously impressive when it comes to motion design. I actually want to try Claude Design, but after only two prompts, I was already running out of credits. If you care about anti AI slop, Gemini is still winning. With a single prompt, it can transform a static HTML layout into dynamic, polished motion graphics.
0:40

Everyone is talking about Claude Design… but I keep going back to Gemini. Gemini 3.1 Pro is seriously impressive when it comes to motion design. I actually want to try Claude Design, but after only two prompts, I was already running out of credits. If you care about anti AI slop, Gemini is still winning. With a single prompt, it can transform a static HTML layout into dynamic, polished motion graphics.

FHILY👑

25,019 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Truly unbelievable GLM 5.2 just released and it's an open weights model you can run locally The insane part is, it's just as good as Opus 4.8 Unlimited, free super intelligence running on your desk In this video I cover how it works, and how to set up your first local model:
18:30

Truly unbelievable GLM 5.2 just released and it's an open weights model you can run locally The insane part is, it's just as good as Opus 4.8 Unlimited, free super intelligence running on your desk In this video I cover how it works, and how to set up your first local model:

Alex Finn

124,051 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

I know that more is not always better when it comes to visual or gameplay design, but when it comes to testing the capabilities of PS5 in our Astrobot #MadeInDreams , I am a simple man.
1:43

I know that more is not always better when it comes to visual or gameplay design, but when it comes to testing the capabilities of PS5 in our Astrobot #MadeInDreams , I am a simple man.

BadRobo82

16,522 просмотров • 1 год назад

Kimi-K3 vs Opus-4.8 Flappybird test. Kimi is significantly better than Opus. That’s the reason why I claimed it as Opus-5 level. Test done in Arena.ai
0:20

Kimi-K3 vs Opus-4.8 Flappybird test. Kimi is significantly better than Opus. That’s the reason why I claimed it as Opus-5 level. Test done in Arena.ai

Jun Song

118,502 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🍀 "how do you overcome times when your willpower drops?" 🐻 "when willpower drops, just live with it dropped. just let it flow. and then, at some point, someday you'll have the strength to do it again. but i think the most important thing at that time is to completely empty your mind of any desire to do something. like, 'i don't want to do it right now. i'm not going to do it.' if you can cleanly say that, that's great. but if there's even a little bit of, 'i should be doing it, so why am i not doing it?' in your mind, then it's better to just go ahead and do it. but in the end, when your willpower is down, you can't do it anyway. so in the end, i think it's good to take care of your own feelings. that's how i overcame it."
0:50

🍀 "how do you overcome times when your willpower drops?" 🐻 "when willpower drops, just live with it dropped. just let it flow. and then, at some point, someday you'll have the strength to do it again. but i think the most important thing at that time is to completely empty your mind of any desire to do something. like, 'i don't want to do it right now. i'm not going to do it.' if you can cleanly say that, that's great. but if there's even a little bit of, 'i should be doing it, so why am i not doing it?' in your mind, then it's better to just go ahead and do it. but in the end, when your willpower is down, you can't do it anyway. so in the end, i think it's good to take care of your own feelings. that's how i overcame it."

dea❀ꕤ

15,922 просмотров • 1 год назад